Comments

1
You know, common sense tells me that somewhere, somewhere there must be some Republicans who are NOT ignorant, vicious, and ugly on the inside.

I wish that I had some empirical evidence for that idea, though.

:/
2
@1 I knew at least one, but he since defected and registered Democrat.
3
Were Wisconsin and Minnesota always this crazy? Was I blinded by 'Prairie Home Companion' and 'Lavern & Shirley'?
4
@3 - Remember Joe McCarthy?
5
I don't blame the author for showing up to speak but I think the library was going overboard to spend the cash. The money comes from the general fund and the library felt that if they did not spend the money that it was going away. It simply would not be spent for the specific purchase.

There are tons of other funds in government that are like this. You have x amount to spend and any less than that is returned to the general fund.

Libraries of all organizations should understand that there are plenty of needy organizations that draw from public funds. It was greedy of them to insist it be spent in some way on them instead of simply returned to the general funds to be spent on roads or healthcare.
6
that's not fair to the other pencil-necked little weasels.
7
I'm with @5. I don't think the issue is whether Gaiman charges "too much" or not. The issue is whether the library system, and the state, should be spending a whopping $45k to bring in some author to speak instead of buying books or keeping the doors open. It's a poor use of resources. The party at fault here isn't Gaiman, it's the administrators.
8
@5: What do you expect. It was the suburbs.
9
The people of Minnesota don't get near enough blame for the kind of creeps they voted for.
10
Phew, I was worried for a moment Gaiman gave it to Scientology, as he's known for donating money to them.
11
@5 “The money comes from a grant for programs like this. It can't be used to buy books or pay salaries. The money was only allocated in October, 2009 and had to be spent by June, 2010 or it would be taken back. This was a big-ticket, inaugural event to generate interest in the program.”

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/05/10/nei…
12
Kudos to the author for having so much class about the whole thing. Though I'd like to think I wouldn't be, I'm pretty sure I'd be seething if I were in his place; Gaiman clearly is a sane and tempered individual. That politician sounds like a complete and utter tool.

I'm so glad I live in the relatively normal state o' Washington.
13
At least it was spent in-state.

Most of the money given to "fellow travelers" of the RNC is shipped overseas to Red China, as part of their communist dues structure.

And then used to prevent iPad workers from committing suicide when they find out they have no Freedom in that Dictatorship of the Republitariat.
14
@11, Yes, I saw that. I was wrong; they couldn't buy books with it. But it could have stayed in the general fund, as Packeteer wrote. That's where it would have been "taken back" too. I think the Boing Boing guys are a little too quick to conflate the best and highest use of one of their sci-fi compatriots with that of the State of Minnesota.
15
@5 The idea behind the program was to generate interest and discussion in libraries, books, and reading. It seems to have worked. It not only gave the people in a small-town the sort of event that usually only people in larger cities would have access to, but they recorded it so thousands more could have a bit of the same experience. Now they want to spend the money on a stadium, which would go to a very different goal and type of tax-payer.

I think it's useful to fund the arts, and this sort of program does help to spread appreciation for the arts. The real problem is, as Gaiman mentioned, that the program involved no roll-over provision. If it had allowed for the money to roll-over to the next year if not spent, then it could have been used to provide many cheaper library-related events.

However, this was still a fairly successful program, even if not done nearly as well as it should have been.
16
@10 Gaiman was married to a scientologist - now that he's married to Amanda Palmer, I imagine that the money will be more likely to go to a fund for orphans and windows of carnival stuntmen or something
17
@3: Don't be fooled; Garrison Keillor is a complete asshole. A very folksy asshole, but an asshole just the same.
18
@5 Packeteer got it.

The problem was not the author, but the way the funding was granted and managed. When the grant was given with that kind of restriction, this was inevitable.

Of course, the people at the library *should* have thought of the greater good and tried to not spend all the money, but that's easier said than done.
19
@13: I feel like I should be playing Buzzword Bingo with your comments.
20
@16: "10 Gaiman was married to a scientologist - now that he's married to Amanda Palmer, I imagine that the money will be more likely to go to a fund for orphans and windows of carnival stuntmen or something"

He was born into it, his money still goes to COS causes post-marriage, though I'm sure it's to keep from him being disconnected from his children, which still live with the ex-wfie.
21
@16 I love the idea of a trust fund for windows of carnival stuntmen. I'm thinking of painted ones, or at least stained glass.

Anyone else looking forward to the film about the Russian Youth Circus at SIFF?
22
@19 try Shanghai Sudoku instead.
23
Word to Fnarf @7 and @14.

Restricted-use budgets like this are one driver of ever-increasing spending. Whoever is responsible for administring the money wants to use it so they don't loose it, so programs only grow, never shrink. They should introduce savings incentives, e.g. the person who administers the budgets gets 5% of whatever he returns to the general fund. That would not only encourage reduced spending, it would also help to introduce into the public sector the execs-get-rich-and-little-people-get-fired cost-cutting dynamic that exists in the private sector.

Oh, and its "whom I hate", not "who I hate".
24
This pissed me off a year ago, and it pisses me off now. I love Neil Gaiman, I would happily bear little illegitimate half English babies for him. (really, Neil, call me) The man has a set fee, it was paid, he donated it to charity. Let it go already. Fucking pin headed Minnesota republicans.
25
omigod -- "embiggened"? what a fucking great word! I LOVE that word? Did he make it up? I have to go look in a dictionary. What a great word!!!!
26
@25 It's a Simpson's reference. It's a perfectly cromulent word though.
27
Republicans: against class warfare directed at rich people, except when they are engaging in it.
28
My friend is a professional jazz musician. He once had a person at a show come up to him and chide him for having a cover charge because it should be "about the music". To be sure Joey chewed the guy out immediately, performance is a job, and people get paid for it! Next this guy will be suggesting that authors should donate their books to libraries, seriously it makes about as much sense.
29
Matt Dean is right! Gaiman is taking money from Minnesota to fund Scientology which is being investigated for Human Trafficking. Gaiman is worse than a pencil necked weasel, he's a cult member and the only charity Gaiman donates to is SCIENTOLOGY!

Neil Gaiman in the Cornerstone Newsletter along with Mary Gaiman, as
contributing $35,000.00 in 2009. Being listed in the Cornerstone Newsletter
means you are in good-standing with the cult. In 2010, Mary Gaiman was awarded the "Gold Humanitarian Award" for her contribution of $500,000.00 to Scientology. This is
significant because Mary Gaiman continues to be Neil Gaiman’s business partner
in The Blank Corporation, which is now Neil Gaiman's Scientology front and how
he pays the cult. Gaiman is also the "Vitamin Heir" of Scientology.

The Gaiman family owns G&G Vitamins which reaps 6 million a year from selling
The Purification Rundown Vitamins.Gaiman's two sisters, Claire Edwards and Lizzie Calciole are not just high-ranking Scientologists, they are the head of RECRUITING and the head of Wealden House, the Scientology stronghold in East Grinstead. These two
cannot associate with Neil unless he is in good standing.
30

Matt Dean is right! Gaiman is taking money from Minnesota to fund Scientology which is being investigated for Human Trafficking. Gaiman is worse than a pencil necked weasel, he's a cult member and the only charity Gaiman donates to is SCIENTOLOGY!

Neil Gaiman in the Cornerstone Newsletter along with Mary Gaiman, as
contributing $35,000.00 in 2009. Being listed in the Cornerstone Newsletter
means you are in good-standing with the cult. In 2010, Mary Gaiman was awarded the "Gold Humanitarian Award" for her contribution of $500,000.00 to Scientology. This is
significant because Mary Gaiman continues to be Neil Gaiman’s business partner
in The Blank Corporation, which is now Neil Gaiman's Scientology front and how
he pays the cult. Gaiman is also the "Vitamin Heir" of Scientology.

The Gaiman family owns G&G Vitamins which reaps 6 million a year from selling
The Purification Rundown Vitamins.Gaiman's two sisters, Claire Edwards and Lizzie Calciole are not just high-ranking Scientologists, they are the head of RECRUITING and the head of Wealden House, the Scientology stronghold in East Grinstead. These two
cannot associate with Neil unless he is in good standing.

Amanda Palmer is Scientology approved and clearly a woman who would do anything to get ahead, even join a cult.
31
Gaiman is a Scientologist in good standing and funnels money into the cult. Scientology is a horrific cult that terrorizes people, drives them to suicide, imprisons members, destroys lives such as Lisa McPherson who they murdered, and forces family members to disconnect from one another. Gaiman FUNDS these bastards to the tune of millions and yes, it does matter.
32
Neil Gaiman is the one who is bonkers. Gaiman paid Scientology $35,000.00 in 2009 and half a million in 2010. The library fee was funneled into the cult. He is a typical arrogant Scientologist who thinks he can pay the cult off and not talk about it.


Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.