Galleycat has posted the work of Project Gutenberg and claimed they "rounded up" free melville for us all, giving no credit to Project Gutenberg while doing so.
Remember how in school you would read something that some ancient guy said way in the past in the 1800s and you'd think about how stupid everyone must have been to believe it. Well, we say that stuff all the time now!
I'm with #2 and #5. Paul Constant is a huge failure in this recommendation of Melville. But if he's like me, when it comes to failure on the web, it's actually preferable. So all of you convincing winners, "I would prefer not to."
Is it OK to see a movie based on a Melville book instead? I haven't seen "Billy Budd", which looks dire, but I can recommend "Moby DIck", with its script by Ray Bradbury, or "Bartleby" with Crispin Glover, which is like an offbrand "Office Space".
@7 "Paul Constant is a huge failure in this recommendation of Melville. But if he's like me, when it comes to failure on the web, it's actually preferable."
As an undergrad in the 1970's, I had a professor who was ABD. His dissertatin was supposed to be on the theme of failure in Melville. The fact that he never finished was ironically appropriate.
Fixed That For You. . .
Remember how in school you would read something that some ancient guy said way in the past in the 1800s and you'd think about how stupid everyone must have been to believe it. Well, we say that stuff all the time now!
You beat me to it.
As an undergrad in the 1970's, I had a professor who was ABD. His dissertatin was supposed to be on the theme of failure in Melville. The fact that he never finished was ironically appropriate.