What the fuck Charles???? If a woman is drugged and then had sex with and she did not consent to it then the WOMAN WAS RAPED!! How could you say she wasn't raped since she was already in a relationship with Him?? How the fuck could a statement like that make it on slog???
". Bill had drugged her. She was not angry. She was baffled, stunned, even shaken by the experience. Plus, she felt betrayed."
@4 "...her friend was not actually raped. She was already in a relationship with the icon and happy to fuck him at any time." That's what he wrote. That's fucked up. Time for some employee training at Slog. Rape 101.
Yep Charles was saying the woman who was drugged wasn't raped.
Charles wrote:"In fact, and this is where the link to Proust exists, her friend was not actually raped. She was already in a relationship with the icon and happy to fuck him at any time. "
Did Charles even read the whole article? The writer says:
". Of course, now that I am older, I look back and realize that when a woman is unconscious, she cannot ever consent."
I like the spin in trying to defend Bill Cosby.
However, Proust wrote fiction. Bill Cosby sexually assaulted and raped countless women.
Cosby didn't want to "fuck" these women, he wanted to satisfied his paraphilia, which was to sexually assault and raped unconscious women. His paraphilia was rampant and unchecked for years, and he knew it. Even when the basketball coach from Temple fought back, Cosby went all out to discredit her until he was probably told to settle, because all the other women were fighting back.
Don't try to sully Proust's name with Cosby. What Cosby was doing was more in line with what Jimmy Saville got away with in the UK, because of his PR aura that withstood any criminal action against him.
"In fact, and this is where the link to Proust exists, her friend was not actually raped. She was already in a relationship with the icon and happy to fuck him at any time."
@2, you are totally right. i changed the wording to make that clear and to better express my point. all in all, if the allegations are true, Cosby is certainly an evil human being.
". Bill had drugged her. She was not angry. She was baffled, stunned, even shaken by the experience. Plus, she felt betrayed."
Charles wrote:"In fact, and this is where the link to Proust exists, her friend was not actually raped. She was already in a relationship with the icon and happy to fuck him at any time. "
Did Charles even read the whole article? The writer says:
". Of course, now that I am older, I look back and realize that when a woman is unconscious, she cannot ever consent."
However, Proust wrote fiction. Bill Cosby sexually assaulted and raped countless women.
Cosby didn't want to "fuck" these women, he wanted to satisfied his paraphilia, which was to sexually assault and raped unconscious women. His paraphilia was rampant and unchecked for years, and he knew it. Even when the basketball coach from Temple fought back, Cosby went all out to discredit her until he was probably told to settle, because all the other women were fighting back.
Don't try to sully Proust's name with Cosby. What Cosby was doing was more in line with what Jimmy Saville got away with in the UK, because of his PR aura that withstood any criminal action against him.
Charles, you are a horse's ass.
http://www.psdisasters.com/