Columns Aug 10, 2011 at 4:00 am

Legalize Prostitution

Comments

1
Amen Sister! Excellent argument. I hadn't thought of the comparison to marriage before but it makes perfect sense.
2
I agree with your argument. The unfortunate thing is, that you really don't own your body, at least not in this country. You can't sell your body fluids (except sperm maybe, but I think that's still labeled as a "donation" like plasma) or body parts. There are things that you can't put in your body... and so, so much more...

But, I'm rambling. Everyone knows there is a lot of wrongness in this country. This column was excellent though. Thank you!
3
Most women are prostitutes and have been for time immemorial. Women provide their bodies for sex and procreation, men provide everything else.
4
Once you legalize prostitution the quality of the providers health and service would become the most important aspect of the marketing. The $5 would be a thing of the past. If a woman wanted to quit she would be fully supported by programs instead of given a scarlet letter
5
Well Said MM. Well Said. This nation was built on a rational foundation that has grown over with the mold, mildew, and brambles of fundimentalist beliefs in the name of returning to a "tradition" that never existed. For all the steps forward we have made since the constitution was radified there are those who would throw us back to the Magna Carta in the name of this tradition. This last thing will go the way of all the others. It probably should have decades ago. The fact that it has not says a great deal about the power of the puritanical thought that we have such difficulty shaking off.
6
@3 What's up with reducing women down to nothing except our naughty bits, which are fundamentally for the pleasure of men (to you)? Men, I see, get to do a ton more shit in your "cute" little summary of all human interactions in history ever.

You are either a conservative, stupid, or 15.
8
@3, fuck off.
9
Laws aren't moral codes handed down from on high. They're tools to help make the world a better and safer place.

If you look at the results in countries that legalized prostitution versus the results in countries that continue to prosecute johns but decriminalized prostitution and offer women resources to leave the profession (if they so choose) the choice is clear.
10
Male prostitution is ignored to the point of being decriminalized right now.

Eliminate the double standard, whichever way it goes.

http://www.rentboy.com/Browse/Results.as…

http://www.men4rentnow.com/ds/index.asp?…
11
"Women provide their bodies for sex and procreation, men provide everything else."

Yes, like child-rearing and cooking and cleaning and tending the chickens and the garden and making the clothes and nursing the sick. Men have provided those things since time immemorial.
12
Thank you. As a former sex-worker, I often wondered why what I was doing was illegal. I never came up with an answer.
13
@3 sorry, you're incorrect. We've been people for 82 years!! (in Canada, anyway).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._…

"to those who ask why the word ["person"] should include females, the obvious answer is why should it not." - Lord Sankey
14
My experience working with underage prostitutes in NYC demonstrated to me that there is too much overlap between the legal sex services industry and human trafficking/child prostitution. The case that needs to be made is that legalizing adult prostitution would reduce this overlap, but the author's reference to laws that already exist don't accomplish this. If anything, the "let those laws do that" argument just underscores how the existing laws are NOT sufficient to protect children. I'm open to the idea that creating a market of consensual, adult prostitutes will help reduce the demand for young exploited women-- but the author needs to make that argument effectively to convince me. "My body, my choice" sidesteps the trafficking/exploitation problem completely and most unsatisfactorily.
15
haven't you written this same article a number of times before? publishing this in the stranger is preaching to the choir. NEXT..
17
@14 If sex was legal to sell, rather than just not-quite-"real"-sexual touching or looking, as it is now, then prostitutes wouldn't have to hide among the sex workers who really are just offering looking and touching. What's more, sex workers themselves will be better able to shut out people who compel women (or men) to work as well as children who work for themselves, because they won't get arrested for existing. And finally, customers will be more empowered to ask and state their preferences - the VAST majority of clients would prefer to sleep with someone over 18.

Besides, Matisse only has a few hundred words here. This column need not present every argument in favor of legalization, but the ones it brings up should be done rigorously and well, and I think she does that.
18
I think its interesting that you didn't cover the reason why the Dutch have legalized it.

My understanding of their reasoning goes something like... since the availability of birth control removes sex purely from the realm of procreation and raises it to a leisure activity, then why not go the extra step and have people who are experts in that activity?
19
I'm surprised MM didn't mention one of the primary reasons prostitution is illegal in the first place... it is one of the only transactional realms in which women are in sole possession of the most valuable commodity. It fits squarely under the umbrella of all moral panics and social structures created to control women by controlling their sexuality.
20
yep, as the above poster said, preaching to the choir by posting this in Stranger. Now, just like me as a tradesperson, taking up grievance up with my union, for example, MM, as a worker in this shadow industry, would be advised to do something about it, or at least try. Organize and try to make some changes....
21
MM is correct, it should be legal between adults if the activity itself is legal. Sex can be the most positive therapies to grow and heal individuals if truly intimate.

Our thought police want to enforce the morals of the Government Church upon us. Morals should be in the province of the Church and what we believe. I understand why the right wants to control others, but I do not understand the left wanting us to have the liberty to choose how we live, provided it does not hurt others.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.