Features May 11, 2011 at 4:00 am

Is the Woodland Park Zoo Mistreating Its Elephants?

kelly o

Comments

1
the zoo exploits all the animals for pockets full of cash
2
I've looked into keeping cattle, and found that I'd need about an acre per cow. To think that they keep three ELEPHANTS on less space than I could humanely keep three COWS on just hurts my heart. I see where the zoo is coming from, I really do. They want to stay open, and they feel this is the only way to do that. But this is not the way, guys...

I'm certain most zoo employees got into this business because they truly love animals. I hope they don't let business concerns make them lose sight of what's truly important. They could set up a high-tech, interactive elephant exhibit in that space, maybe including a webcam to the elephants that they've sent to live somewhere they can be happy. If they made that their goal, I bet they could raise some money to see it happen, perhaps even from the activists that they're fighting now.

Three elephants on one acre is simply unacceptable. Anyone who knows the slightest thing about animals knows that.
3
Cienna, thank you for writing this article. The treatment of elephants in captivity is absolutely shameful. I was so incredibly saddened reading about Chai's 57 forced impregnations and subsequent miscarriages and Sri having to carry her dead fetus around inside of her for years. I hope this article opens some eyes and hearts to the plight of what are some of the most amazing, sensitive and intelligent creatures on earth. Obviously, Woodland Park Zoo is not going to do anything about this problem until the public demands it. I'm hoping you've inspired a few more to speak out on the elephant's behalf.
4
Science, death statistics and common sense tells us elephants don't belong in tiny urban zoos. The 2,700 acre Elephant Sanctuary is the best we can do for them
5
Science, death statistics and common sense tells us elephants don't belong in tiny urban zoos. Allowing Bamboo, Chai and Watoto to live out their lives at the 2,700 acre Elephant Sanctuary is the best we can do - ASAP!
6
As a former employee of the Woodland Park Zoo, I can tell you that the elephants are treated with the utmost respect. They are well maintained and cared for 24 hours a day.
7
Thank you for this very enlightening article. Elephant experts and scientists and - increasingly, the public - know that elephants cannot have healthy and satisfying lives in small urban zoos. WPZ is NOT doing what is best for the elephants! Do they really think that 3 incompatible enormous social creatures are better off in a barren, less-than-one-acre yard or at the 2,700-acre paradise for elephants at The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee (elephants.com)? There they are free to roam, swim, dig, dust-bathe, knock down trees and play with elephant companions of their own choosing.
8
The former employee of WPZ must not know that the elephants are locked up alone in the barn - with no keepers present for 16-17 hours a day for 7 months of the year. And her claim that the elephants are "cared for 24 hours a day" causes me to ask: where was this care when Hansa spent the last 14 hours of her life ALONE (except for her poor mother, Chai, watching helplessly) dying a horrible excruciating death.
9
Thank you for this article & getting the word out.
If people want to see elephants go see Born to be Wild http://www.imax.com/borntobewild/ or look up conservation groups such as Elephant Voices http://www.elephantvoices.org/ to learn about elephants & see them in their habitats. This is way more accurate than any behavior exhibited at a zoo & will garner appreciation of the actual animal!
Elephants ARE born to be wild - not kept enclosed, isolated from larger family groups & certainly not artificially inseminated.
Thanks Stranger!
10
The zoo should put the elephants' welfare above all other considerations. The current conditions in which the elephants are kept are inhumane, and the elephants are showing their distress. The compassionate thing to do is to release them toan elephant sanctuarywhere they can live out their years in peace in .
11
What an amazing and fascinating article. It reminds me of a movie that just came out titled "The Elephant in the Living Room" addressing a similar issue of individuals wanting to possess animals that belong in the wild. (http://www.theelephantinthelivingroom.co…) I highly recommend you check it out if you get the chance. It's quite the eye opener.

13
What an amazing and fascinating article. It reminds me of a movie that just came out titled "The Elephant in the Living Room" addressing a similar issue of individuals wanting to possess animals that belong in the wild. (http://www.theelephantinthelivingroom.co…) I highly recommend you check it out if you get the chance. It's quite the eye opener.
14
required reading on this topic:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/08/magazi…
16
Oh my goodness! Is there finally a possibility that Chai, Watoto and Bamboo (and Sri at the other elephants at the St. Louis Zoo) will be released to the 2700 Elephant Sanctuary in Hohenwald, Tennessee, to live out the rest of their lives in dignity with room to roam freely and socialize with other elephants instead of in captivity suffering physically, psychologically and emotionally for the pleasure of gawkers and greedy humans. Prayers going up on their behalf
17
Cienna, thank you for your important article. WPZ must do the right thing now and let these three poor elephants go to their freedom. I am surprised that the board is not taking a compassionate approach and vote to let them go. Why delaying? Bamboo,Chai and Watoto are poor innocent prisoners...
18
Thanks for printing this article.
My so-called liberal, green, eco-conscious, humanity-fostering city, Seattle, is far behind Detroit when it comes to walking its talk. It doesn't take genius to realize large animals require large spaces. Money and egos again cause suffering to other helpless beings. Shame on Woodland Park Zoo - they have a chance to do the right thing, and they refuse to do it.
19
Disgusting and shameful. Thank you for covering this. Can we say, "PUPPY MILL"?
21
Thank you. These captive elephants are overdue being sent to an sanctuary. It is amazing that the zoo continues to hang on to the idea that they are being well cared for. How can they be so blind to the true needs of these majestic animals.?
22
The misery of the elephants at the zoo is palpable - and an embarrassment to the city. At one time, WPZ was a world-class facility and a leader in the zoo community. Unfortunately, it has failed to keep pace with the increased understanding and knowledge of animal behavior and welfare - not the mention the changing attitudes of the public - and is now on a par with a shabby roadside zoo.
23
Thanks Cienna - once Seattle's taxpayers separate the nostalgia they feel for zoos they will appreciate that the veil of "conservation" falls flat with regard to what has been happening for years at the WPZ.

All the zoo is nurturing is their own pockets until they have to shuffle another elephant to another zoo or explain another elephant death to the public.

Send the elephants to the sanctuary - let us watch them via TV monitors or online.

Wouldn't it be something to see them run?

24
@6, it's not enough that the WPZ "respects" its elephants. When they're dying of herpes, or suffering from osteoarthritis and absesses, or living in isolation, it's simply a lie that they're being well cared for. It's also irrelevant, since it is not in their (the elephants'!) interests to keep them at the zoo. There is no reason at all to have these elephants at the zoo, expect to make the zoo some moolah.
I don't care if every zookeeper in the park gave every elephant a big smooch on the nose and a belly rub. Caring well for elephants in captivity is oxymoronic.
25
Sometimes when I am sad or just want to think in the company of quiet, intelligent creatures, I sit at the Woodland Park Zoo's elephant exhibit. It's my mental comfort place. I do honestly believe that the WPZ may be doing everything it can to treat the animals in the best, most humane possible way, while still doing the elephants an injustice. You can dine like a king in prison, but still yearn only to be starving and free.

The sanctuary sounds like an ideal solution, and though I would miss my three elephant friends, I would feel immeasurably better knowing their quality of life has greatly improved. I'd imagine the Seattle community here would be happy to band together and sponsor their transition and tenure. That in itself is even more comforting to my mind than sitting near them with rough fence between us.
26
Re: Yearning to be free, watch this seal!
http://youtu.be/RtxTW394L_4
27
Thank you Cienna!! These girls have suffered enough. Get them to The Elephant Sanctuary!
28
Simply stated, these animals do not belong in captivity, no matter what measures are taken for their physical well being. Think about this for a minute. What if you were claustrophobic, temperamental, or even perhaps suffered from anxiety attacks, do you think being shoveled into a small space would help the situation? No matter how clean, how well fed, or vetted the animal is,we as humans do not have a full understanding of their need to be free to roam. That is why we found them in open spaces, their need for their natural surrounding is obvious. Woodland Park Zoo is an amazing zoo, however the need to provide elephants on display is not necessary, so why continue to victimize these
beautiful creatures.
29
I recently visited the zoo and saw Chai rocking and swaying horribly. It was nonstop. The keeper told another zoo visitor that she was just anticipating her next meal. He fed her and as soon as Chai finished eating, she went right back to rocking back and forth. Obviously this behavior was not "anticipatory" behavior, but the severe sign of distress that Dr. Gay Bradshaw and other experts have described. What bothers me is that the zoo claims to be all about elephant education while they deliberately misinform the public about their poor elephants. How completely hypocritical.
31
I recently visited the zoo and saw Chai rocking and swaying horribly. It was nonstop. The keeper told another zoo visitor that she was just anticipating her next meal. He fed her and as soon as Chai finished eating, she went right back to rocking back and forth. Obviously this behavior was not "anticipatory" behavior, but the severe sign of distress that Dr. Gay Bradshaw and other experts have described. What bothers me is that the zoo claims to be all about elephant education while they deliberately misinform the public about their poor elephants. How completely hypocritical. Let these poor, long-suffering elephants go where they can finally be elephants.
32
My father and I belong to different generations and therefore have differeing veiws on the issue of elephants in zoos. Some animals seem thrilled to have the safety and good care of a zoo. Other, more intelligent, usally larger, social animals with specialized needs such as elephants and gorillas just can't be properly provided for in zoos, no matter how much we respect and adore them and do everything we can. Unfortunately, these very animals are indeed the cash cows of the zoos, but the zoos need to find better ways to support their mission. Your article will be a helpful aide to the ongoing respectful and good-willed debate my father (now in his 70's) and I have been having over this very issue. Thank you.
33
So wait...everyone agrees these elephants are being treated in a far-from-ideal way...the 1-acre thing at the very least has to be acknowledged by even the most craven zoo advocate to be grossly inadequate.

And yet the argument for keeping them here in these conditions is to, as Cienna paraphrases, "help educate the public and spur conservation efforts."

So basically, they're saying "we're mistreating these animals, so you can see how badly these animals are being mistreated"? Is that the logic here?

Bullshit. Humanity fail.

34
so everyone who wants them to be happy at the reservation is cool with using Seattle tax dollars to pay for it?

And we all also know that elephants get shot and killed in the wild all the time right?

An acre is tiny, but a lawsuit demanding they be retired at expense, while citing the expense of abusing them as a reason is a little hypocritical.
35
Is it just me or does this thread read like some person (or group of people) is comment bombing this article? I mean, not that I neccesarily disagree with the position, but why?
36
Heartbreaking......
37
I love how people are saying: "I totally don't agree with it, we just went and they look so sad."

First, that's completely hypocritical to not agree with yet fork over your cash to a zoo.

Second, I love how human beings think they know everything about everything. "The elephants looked sad" "An expert said" it's all bullshit.

Experts are, at best, making educated guesses regarding wild animal behavior. Sure they're educated, but they're hypothesis after studying the animal. Typically, these hypothesis will also have some human element to them which just astounds me with stupidity.
38
But what do they think of the Fleet Foxes?!
39
@35 I'm sensing the same thing about the comment bombing.

I take issue, a little bit, with the assertion that zoos are incapable of promoting conservation and public education. I like zoos.

That being said, last time I was at WPZ I got the distinct sense that those particular elephants were in a bad place. They are big, complex creatures and I don't think the average zoo (which WPZ is), is an appropriate place to house them. Seriously, the Ringling Bros. elephants seem better off.
40
Thank you so much for this article! The plight of Bamboo, Watoto and Chai (and the death of poor little Hansa) needs to be brought to the attention of the public. The part of this article I DIDN'T know about was the story of Sri. The idea of a rotting fetus left inside her because it was not in the zoos financial interest to remove it just sickens me. How can they possibly claim to have the best interests of the elephants in mind and then do something like this?? Disgusting! If they REALLY cared about the lives of these animals, they would move the elephants to the Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee... NOW!!!
42
This is a great article. Thanks for researching and writing.

I learned a lot - for instance, I knew elephants walked, but twenty miles per day? This fact alone makes the educational argument that the zoo advances silly, silly, silly.

We should focus on conserving and restoring natural places - not wasting money on unsafe urban enclosures.
43
Extremely well presented piece, Cienna. As a former director of Woodland Park Zoo I would like to thank you for highlighting these awful problems. The elephants at the zoo have always had a wretched time, and things have only gone rapidly downhill in recent decades.
There is no evidence that zoos have any beneficial impact on visitor attitudes, compassion or knowledge. And zoo elephant breeding programs make no contribution to conservation: they are nothing but attempts to keep elephants in zoos.
44
Such intelligent animals & as sentient beings they should be treated with respect. It is OUR responsibility to be sure they are treated well.
45
First, regarding the idea that a group is "bombarding" this article is ridiculous. Could the reason that almost everyone who has responded so far has been against keeping the elephants here be that we all see the same thing and it sickens us that they are kept in a tiny enclosure and they are not in a habitat anywhere NEAR what their natural surroundings should be?? I have 2 draft horses in a pasture that is FIVE times larger than what the WPZ elephants have, I am aware how much area a large animal needs to thrive, not just survive. I appreciate that the WPZ says they are treated with respect, although I disagree, they need more than that to thrive. DO the right thing and send them to the sanctuary. This kind of incarceration is barbaric.
46
I attended the last Zoo board meeting, they were visibly disinterested in constructive comments made by myself and 4 others for up to three minutes.
They only clapped when a commenter praised the zoo.
Yet I am still a Seattle taxpayer that contributes to their 6.5 million received by the city. So are you.

Retiring Bamboo, Chai, and Watoto to TN's Elephant Sanctuary (at no cost to the Seattle taxpayer) *is* the right thing.

To do the right thing, watch: http://bit.ly/WPZElephantsSpacelessinSea…

Then go to Woodland Park zoo Contact Us website and respectfully request the retirement of our elephants. Now.

Thank you,
Veronica Cannady
47
the zoo is great enough besides the elephant exhibit that if they get rid of them it wont hurt there attendance. there is no opinion here, it is a scientific fact that these elephants are in hell
48
If you think the elephant enclosure is bad, go check out the tigers- their pen was basically a cement box with stairs, sans one wall for viewers. It was the most depressing thing I saw all day.
49
time for some action
50
it may not be "comment bombing", but posting the same comment multiple times is "commenter error".

simply, zoos are animal jails - not only the elephants are miserable, but the wolves look like they're about to have a nervous breakdown. the only thing that makes them look decent by comparison are research vivariums. which are ALL AROUND YOU.
51
@35 Maybe it's because the hypocrisy of the zoo is so palpable that no-one can ignore it?
52
I was director of Woodland park Zoo from 1976 to 1984, when we were trying to set new standards for zoos. I sincerely believed that we could make a difference; improving people's attitudes through education and compassionate exhibits, and contributing to conservation by captive breeding and research.
Sadly, no evidence has emerged to support my hopes. Indeed, in situations such as the elephants at WPZ, who have always had to endure miserable conditions, and whose quality of life has even declined significantly in recent decades, the Zoo is merely generating negative outcomes. The only right and good thing to do is to send the elephants to a Sanctuary.
53
please consider moving the elephants to the Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee. The climate will be perfect for the elephants.
54
also, the 2700 acres in tennessee is too small. we should introduce them back into the N American wild so they evolve into mastodons, because that would be sweet.
55
Thank you for writing this article!

The City Council and the Mayor's office should immediately demand that the zoo re-locate these elephants to a sanctuary. We don't have enough room. No other zoo has enough room.

I'd be happy to elect out of office anyone who doesn't take decisive and responsbile action on re-locating these elephants now!

I'd still support the zoo, and even more so, without the elephants there...at least I would know that MY ZOO MEMBERSHIP isn't funding animal abuse!!!
57
Thank you so much for your article! I've been following the plight of these elephants for some time now.

My conclusion is, after the protests and all the evidence given, the only reason I can think of that WPZ would NOT send these poor elephants to the sanctuary is that they are just pissed off and don't want to be told what to do. Pure and simple spite.
58
I like the Zoo. I like elephants. the larger the animal, the more difficult it is to keep it sane in a zoo. Its a quandry. I do think that the elephants at the WPZ seem less mentally challenged or stimulated than at other zoos.
59
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN COMMENT BOMBED.

Nearly all of the above commenters have never commented on a Slog piece and joined the site in the past day.

This is par for the course for this elephant-rights group. It kinda sucks, too -- I'm sure they have a worthwhile cause, but their idea of marketing/"getting the word out" is ridiculous. Check out a few of the more popular blogs for examples.

Thanks for turning this comments thread into lame propaganda, folks. Really, the elephants deserve better advocates than you.

Certainly, the zookeepers deserve better, too, but that's a different story.

61
Dear Elephants,

I am sorry for what we have done to you. Last time I visited you I cried for your suffering. I hope the Zoo Keepers will do the right thing and send you to TN where you can have a better life.
62
@45: So how is it ridiculous when nearly all commenters here have never commented on another Stranger/Slog piece before? Seems more than a little fishy to my eyes.
63
BTW: Yikes -- sorry for my own comment appearing twice! Where are you, "edit function?"
64
@meanie - yes but at least in the wild they have the chance to enjoy life, whether or not they get shot. Having seen elephants in the wild in both Africa & Asia, I can say that there are few things so wonderful to witness and they are entirely different creatures than those you see in any zoo. Also, despite the amount of tourism in these areas, they are the places where true conservation, true co-habitation with wildlife is happening, not in zoos. Further, lawsuits serve a few purposes and one of these is to set judicial precedent. If the plaintiff's win, then an amazing victory for captive animals is on the books.
65
Elephants, or any animal for that matter, do not belong behind bars for human enjoyment. They are animals and should be allowed to be themselves in their natural habitat.
66
Thank you for writing this insightful article!
67
Put them in a bigger space. Man, this makes me sad.
68
#34, you said, "so everyone who wants them to be happy at the reservation is cool with using Seattle tax dollars to pay for it?" Seattle tax payers wouldn't pay for it. The Sanctuary will pay all costs for transport of the elephants. Everyone should check out www.elephants.com to see what a wonderful place it is, and to see what healthy, happy elephants are like.
69
#34, you said, "so everyone who wants them to be happy at the reservation is cool with using Seattle tax dollars to pay for it?" Seattle taxpayers would not pay for it. The Elephant Sanctuary has offered to pay all the expenses to transport the elephants. Everyone should go to www.elephants.com to see what happy, healthy elephants are really like.
70
How does it happen that comments get posted twice? Sorry about that.
71
Great article that nails the horrific conditions the Woodland Park elephants face every day. The Zoo always maintains that they are well cared for and that the keepers love them. No amount of caring and love can fulfill their emotional and physical needs. If only the Zoo cared about what's best for the elephants instead of their financial bottom line. If they were transfered to a sanctuary, Watato and Bamboo would never have to see each other again, and poor Chai would never be put through another invasive artificial insemination ever again. They could walk for miles and miles and be friends with whomever they choose. Their painful foot problems would disappear. Seattle is such a progressive city but we are WAY behind the times when it comes to our elephants. May justice prevail in the courts!
72
The Elephant Sanctuary has offered to pay all the expenses: transport and care for life at no cost to the city or the zoo. It's a win all the way around. The Zoo's PR dept. could teach our children such an incredible lesson in compassion and selflessness.
73
Here's a link to an article about the Pony Rides at WPZ. Perhaps this is an ongoing trend.

http://www.flyingchanges.com/htmls/2004/…
74
Set them free in Tennessee. It will also free up a lot of land in the zoo for other exhibits for animals in need of attention that are better suited for life in a zoo environment.
75
Wow! Up until today I have really enjoyed reading the Stranger. While sometimes you guys go over the top and come up with outrageous stories I've never considered the possibility you were completely full of shit..until now.

I've been a volunteer photographer at the Woodland Park Zoo for about 6 years now. I have actually been in the room while Chai was artificially inseminated and was privileged to witness first hand the passionate and caring Zoo Keepers treating her with dignity, respect and compassion. I witnessed it then and have witnessed the same care during many other encounters with the devoted team of zookeepers. They had a tangible bond with each of the elephants that could never be described in a newspaper article. To imply the elephants or any other animal at the Zoo for that matter are treated with anything less than absolute love and first rate care is nothing short of an ignorant lie.

"Cash Cows?" Can you for even one second imagine how much money is required to maintain that zoo? I certainly can't but I'm willing to bet it's more than any one animal or species will bring in.

I have been to East Africa and seen first hand enormous herds of Wild Elephants (www.MHWildlife.com) walking the vast savanna. Without question, it is a magnificent, breathtaking site that everyone on Planet Earth should take in. It truly changed my life. Unfortunately, not everyone can make that trip. Luckily there are incredible Zoos in America like Woodland Park where families can go and see them close up and personal. "If you want to learn about elephant behavior, go read a book." That is really the slant the Stranger wants to take? How can reading a book replace the sounds and sites (and yep, even smells) of witnessing these awe inspiring animals first hand?

I hope that you guys retract your comments about the zoos comments. You did not ask her about revenue generated by elephants so she did not decline to comment. You did not ask any general questions about the zoo or the zoo's elephants. You lied. You did ask about the lawsuit and I've been led to believe the answer seemed to satisfy her. It appears to me you had no intent to actually do any reporting. Just wanted to push your personal agenda. Boo.

P.S. The guy on the cover with the Hump girl...the unicorn tattoo is stupid :) He should have it removed.

Again, I love the Stranger...hated this article. I get that sensationalistic journalism creates a buzz. I wish that all journalism was straight forward and filled with facts. Unfortunately, as a culture we like to have fluff spoon fed to us. To outright lie and not present at least some sort of facts from the side you are bashing is in my opinion irresponsible. I want my money back.
76
I disagree with most of the article. The elephants in WPZ help connect people to elephants in a way that cannot be experienced through only books, TV, or the Internet. The impact of seeing one in person is powerful. To care about them, to want to save them, one needs to learn about them. Zoos provide a venue for that. The elephants (as well as all the rest of the zoo's animals) get exceptional care. They are daily examined, bathed, get plenty of enrichment, exercise, and stimulation. Even though wild elephants can walk up to 20 miles a day, that's because they are looking for food and/or water. When it's readily available to them, they don't wander far. So the fact that the zoo's elephants don't walk a great distance is far from being abused -- they don't need to because their food, water, and shelter are close by. To take the elephants out of the zoo would be very short-sighted.
78
No wild animal should be in "prison" at any time.
79
I'm with all of you who think this site's being bombed.

Have you done any internet research on this place in Tennesee -- they've had a bunch of elephants die, and a handler die, and the leader is gone(suspicious circumstances)... doesn't look like nirvana... so what's this really all about.

Not your best investigative reporting.. we expect better from the Stranger.
81
I disagree with most of this article. The elephants in WPZ help connect people to elephants in a way that cannot be experienced through only books, TV, or the Internet. The impact of seeing one in person is powerful. To care about them, to want to save them, one needs to learn about them. Zoos provide a venue for that. The elephants (as well as all the rest of the zoo's animals) get exceptional care. They are daily examined, bathed, get plenty of enrichment, exercise, and stimulation. Even though wild elephants can walk up to 20 miles a day, that's because they are looking for food and/or water. When it's readily availabel to them, they don't wander far. So the fact that the zoo's elephants don't walk a great distance is far from being abused -- they don't need to because their food, water, and shelter are close by. To take the elephants out of the zoo would be short-sighted.
82
I have volunteered at Woodland park zoo for about 8 years. The zookeepers I have seen are incredibly dedicated and caring to all the animals at the zoo. I have my own moral problems with the idea of a zoo but I decided to do something about it, so I volunteered. I too don't think that these animals should be kept in captivity and displayed as entertainment. But zoos do exist. Whether you agree with the idea of a zoo or not, these animals are not unhappy or mistreated. Moving a large intelligent mammal across the country to what "you" think is a better situation might be very stressful to the animal. Imagine the only world you have ever known removed, a long truck ride in a cage and having to deal with new surroundings and a new social order. My point is that it not as easy as this article makes it out to be. I have seen the moving of several primates and the care and planning that goes into that is incredible.
What we are seeing in zoos across the country is a response to privatization- i.e. no more tax dollars. Revenue has to be generated through ticket sales which =entertainment. For those of you who object to the changes you see at Woodland Park Zoo please think about that the next time you vote. We caused these changes by voting and making the city cut the zoo from funding. And please,please remember that all of these creatures are being pushed to the brink of extinction in the wild from the constant pressure of Humans. That is the real crime.
84
This is about space. The elephants need 200+ acres according to experts like the World Wildlife Fund and basically any mainstream elephant conservation organziation.

Even with the best care and intention, zookeepers can't do right by elephants when all they have to give is an acre.

It is time for Seattle to SUPPORT OUR ZOO IN HELPING THE ELEPHANTS TO RE-LOCATE!
85
@55, 56

The definition of comment bombing. Again, not that I neccesarily disagree with the message, but this sort of "astro-turfing" tactic discredits whatever position any person who uses it is trying to advocate for...
86
The suit cites "exposure to beatings". Where is the evidence of that?
89
I spend a good many volunteer hours behind the scenes and I speak from first-hand experience when I say the keepers at WPZ are indefatigable in their care for these animals. They go far beyond monitoring behavior and intake of nutrition--their care comes from a deep love and devotion to what they do. I doubt that many parents know the true personality and idiosyncrasies of their own children better than these keepers know these animals. Do accidents happen at zoos--of course! Zoos are a microcosm of society just like any organization but the people who run them have a special calling and they respond to accidents appropriately with compassion and skill. Please put your efforts where they can do more good--protecting animals in the wild and educating the public about the idiocy of buying ivory or poaching wild animals or cutting down forests. Just stop and consider your motives and try to examine all the issues involved before uttering inane remarks and parroting the comments of activists.
Far from deserving condemnation the keepers at WPZ deserve our highest praise.
90
Thanks for finally doing a story on the sad existence of Bamboo, Chai and Watoto. Woodland Park cannot adequately provide for these elephants and they should be released to a sanctuary!
91
My local zoo (Toronto) is meeting today to discuss options. We have a decent amount of space, but there's controversy over whether they should have to face these temperatures.

The decision has already been made, however, not to send them to a sanctuary, since sanctuaries are unregulated and so we can't guarantee that they'll be appropriately cared for once there.

The California Sanctuary (Performing Animal Welfare Society) has a better reputation than Tennessee, if one was going to go this route.
92
I'm fascinated that Mat Hayward is 100% sure of every communication that has gone on between the Stranger and the zoo. How so sure? Listening devices? Psychic readings?
93
Woodland Park Zoo is seriously needing some new people in charge. Are they that dense that they cant see they are abusing these elephants? Anyone who supports this Zoo is letting them know its okay to confine and torture these sentient beings that belong in a santuary. If you bring your kids here you are telling your children its okay to abuse animals. Think before you buy tickets to this Zoo.
94
"I'm fascinated that Mat Hayward is 100% sure of every communication that has gone on between the Stranger and the zoo. How so sure? Listening devices? Psychic readings?"

They told me. In all the years I've known them and the woman that was "interviewed" I have never known them to lie or even stretch the truth. They are always above board on everything because they are so minutely scrutinized on everything they do.

That and the Psychic readings you referred to certainly did help. Trust me Canadian Nurse...don't believe everything you read in the papers.
95
Hello People the old Director of the Zoo thinks these elephants should go to the sanctuary.
As for the woman who is worried about tax payers paying for their release...hell YES its okay..we have made these elephants suffer for our seattle entertainment and education.
I mean come on lady...tax payers should pay! If tax payers spoke up and stop supporting the Zoo maybe they would not keep the exhibit.
97
OK, Mat. So what questions did Cienna ask the spokeswoman?
98
Canadian Nurse. Re your comment (#91) about tThe Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee,I don't know where you're getting your information but it is blatantly false. I have been an observer of that sanctuary and their elephants for years and, believe me, those elephants get the best of care and have loving caregivers. I hope and pray the elephants in the Toronto Zoo are sent there. I know the decision is being made today but so far I haven't heard what it is.
99
Those who claim that the WPZ employees love and care for these animals are almost absolutely correct.

However, I also believe that the people we see in the news or on the Animal Hoarders TV show also love and care for the mess of animals they keep in their homes.

The WPZ as well as the LA Zoo are dead wrong about keeping elephants in these little enclosures.
100
Here is some perspective on whether or not their 1 acre lot is sufficient. Assuming my math is correct, and assuming the average overfed human takes up about 6 square feet of space, we are saying that if three elephants are perfectly fine sharing 43,560 sq ft, that three adult humans would be fine sharing 3485 sq feet of space...or less than 1/6th of an acre...for life. Please let me know if you think this is 'fair' or appropriate for any living being.
102
"OK, Mat. So what questions did Cienna ask the spokeswoman?"

I don't know what questions she DID ask. I'm told it was a brief interview and I was told what she DIDN'T ask which was what I posted above and what Cienna lied about. There is sensationalist reporting and there is blatant lying. Sadly, it appears this is the latter.

I know that the Zoo has reached out to ask her about this. I'm not sure if they have heard back at this point or not. I hope it gets worked out because it'll make me sad to hate the Stranger.

Up until now it was always a great way to...well, it was always a good excuse to look at soft porn in the last couple pages. Now I have to question when the ad says "real photo" if it is in fact a real photo or simply a drawing disguised as a photo.
103
Oh wow - I don't know what to comment on first - the many inaccurate facts and/or myths in the article or the writer's obvious bias and unwillingness to consider both sides. FYI - Watoto has had joint issues/stiff legs since she arrived at the zoo AT ONE YEAR OF AGE. Elephants in the wild only walk as far as they need to in order to find enough food. The "need" to walk 20-30 miles a day is a myth - Asian elephants certainly don't as they live in a tropical rain forest with food all around. The writer's sarcastic comments about the zoo's education about elephants consisting of unread plaques ignores the daily keeper talks to the public during bath time as well as the docents (volunteers) who staff carts with elephant artifacts (an elephant tooth, a tusk, etc.) that allow the public to stop, ask questions and listen to both natural history and conservation messages. I could go on - but I suspect the writer is less interested in true facts than in inflaming their readership.
104
Suggest those interested in the fate of these elephants read the following. The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee is a beautiful haven for these elephants and, contrary to what someone said, it is accredited.

http://www.elephants.com/accreditation.p…
105
@102, I did receive a call last night from a zoo spokeswoman, Gigi--one of two women from the zoo I questioned for this article. The first woman I spoke with (or who I thought was a spokeswoman) declined to comment on a few questions, including how and if they measure zoo attendance, and how much the elephant exhibit drives zoo attendance. That person then transferred me to Gigi, who sent me the press release.

Gigi was upset because she says I didn't ask her those questions--and I didn't. That doesn't mean the questions weren't asked. When I call someone, identify myself and why I'm calling, and they agree to speak with me, I can only assume they're in a qualified position to do so.

That said, when I talked to her today, I asked Gigi the same main question--namely, does the elephant exhibit drive attendance? Here's what she said: "No zoos can break down how much each species generates." But she added that, "When Hansa was born, sure, she increased attendance. That was a record year."

Meanwhile, the zoo has currently just debuted a new baby ocelot and baby penguin chicks. Gigi says that these additions have not zoo impacted attendance, although "we're getting a lot of buzz about them online."
106
@102, one more thing--you weren't present during either/any of my phone interviews, so I'd really watch who you're calling a liar. It's pretty fucking offensive.
107
Until the elephants are moved out of WPZ into the sanctuary, I will not go there. It is cruel to keep them there, with all the evidence presented. Shame on you WPZ!
108
Until WPZ sends the elephants to the sanctuary, I will not be visiting. They have been presented with evidence citing keeping the elephants is cruel, yet they continue to do so. None of my money will go towards an establishment that cares so little of its animal inhabitants.
109
Hey Echoes @59,

I reject your assumption that this article has been comment bombed. My comment was one of the first, I've had a SLOG log-in for several years now and I am not part of any "organization".

LJH @45's got it right. And it makes me hopeful that I'm not the only one that gives a shit.
110
"you weren't present during either/any of my phone interviews, so I'd really watch who you're calling a liar. It's pretty fucking offensive."

That's pretty fucking hilarious. As a "journalist" it would seem you should have thicker skin. Especially one who writes such inflammatory, biased articles clearly designed to insight rebellion and anger rather than to educate or inform.

You said in your rebuttal that Gigi sent you the press release. You also said that she wasn't the person you spoke with and asked your questions to. However, in your article you say that "When I inquired if I could ask more general questions about the zoo, another declined and sent me a press release"

The way I am interpreting your words is that you were transferred to Gigi and asked her if you could ask general questions about the zoo. Gigi then told you that you could not ask her general questions about the zoo. Instead she insisted you could only get a generic press release from her. Does that sound about right?

I've met Gigi a number of times. She is a professional and I can't help but think that if a member of the press (or you) wanted to ask general questions about the zoo that she would be willing to answer them to the best of her ability. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Did you record these calls? If so, and Gigi refused to answer your questions I want to hear it. I will stand in Downtown Seattle wearing my underwear holding up a sign that says "Cienna Madrid is a top notch journalist! She was right, I was wrong and I'm sorry!"

If not then I stand by my earlier accusation....you are a liar.

111
Thank you for this article. Anyone with half a brain knows WPZ does not have enough room for the elephants. And yes, elephants even die in sanctuaries, especially since they are old, abused and sick when they arrive.
Glad to see you mention the Detroit zoo. Their attendance actually went UP after Ron sent the elephants to PAWS sanctuary.
112
To Mat Hayward, the question is either the zoo's treatment including its severe confinement of the elephants for long periods which the zoo itself has acknowledged is animal cruelty. Would you like to be locked up in a small closet for your whole life? Of course not, yet that is the equivalent of what the zoo is doing to the elephants. How absurd for you to claim the zoo shows them respect. By ignoring their very nature (the need for vast spaces, freedom, naturally growing vegetation and compatible other elephants) the zoo is showing total disrespect for them and for their species. If you witnessed Chai's insemination, did the zoo keepers tell you that any calf born there will be exposed to the same deadly virus that killed Hansa since its AFrican elephant is still infected with it? Of course not, that's a "minor" detail that any calf is likely to die. How respectful....
113
This comments thread is officially a zoo. ZING!
114
All the comments regarding how humane the handlers are make me laugh... it doesn't matter how nice the prison guards are when you're stuck in a small concrete box. The point isn't that the zoo is intentionally cruel, but rather that the habitat for the elephants (and I would argue, quite a few other animals as well) is far from adequate, and not going to change anytime soon.

PS- This is not a comment bomb.

    Please wait...

    Comments are closed.

    Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


    Add a comment
    Preview

    By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.