This is the dumbest thing The Stranger has ever done (and you've hired kathleen wilson!). Apparently, all you need to do to become a music editor is just be a worthless, hipster alcoholic like Bissey. No wonder The Stranger is a laughing stock around the country. God, get Maerz back, Bissey is a fat little bitch who knows nothing about music. Get thee to rehab already, fat bitch!!!
Your music section is lame and out of touch. Luckily, we have a lot of interesting music blogs, written by people who actually enjoy music to fill the void.
Another precious hipster-ironic piece by the Stranger. The Stranger's music coverage hasn't been culturally relevant in at least 10 years and arguably 15.
Please, just give me something I can use! How fucking hard is that?
I find this to be an insightful and relevant review, but I admit that I may be biased in that my personal reaction to Fleet Foxes is very much like most of these animals'.
Seriously, I never thought anything could make me yearn for Eric Grandy's weekly pieces on Vampire Weekend or Of Montreal, but this article did it. Not that I would read them, of course, but it would be comforting just to know they were there.
I'd usually classify Pitchfork and The Stranger as the ilk of hipster 'journalism' but what I'd give for the quality of Mark Richardson when I read stuff like this. ..Not so much a defense for Fleet Foxes as much as a plea for good music writing.
I'm betting Diego Garcia is one of those dudes who can get laid pretty much whenever he wants. He just pulls his acoustic guitar out of nowhere and serenades the lady with his melancholy Latin-flavored pop gems, and it's game over. Laura—the first solo effort from the Elefant frontman—is evidence to support this assertion
I love reading how worked up people get about Stranger articles. It is seriously entertaining. Funny how people fall into the trap every time. What idiots. They are that worked up over this?? How lame their lives must be. Thank you for making me laugh, over and over.
Robin Pecknold on Twitter: "Both weeklies in Seattle have joke-y, belittling articles about us this week. Being a local press punching bag is one reason I moved. Happy?"
Being funny is fine, but treating really nice, really talented dudes with a little respect would also be nice. Especially since they just made a tremendous album.
So...did you guys decide that you were doing articles that were too good (tunnel coverage, cocaine, etc) and you were in danger of becoming reputable or something? I would have preferred a bunch of naked pictures if that was your thought process. For future reference.
I never thought I'd see so many aggro anonymous commenters and mellow brah Fleet Foxes fans join sides in such a touching display of whiny little bitch.
oh at @8, wtf does that even mean? you're the kind of dude who just sits around saying "well, not necessarily" in a squeaky voice all day aren't you?
I'm pretty sure the point of this "article" is to get revenge on everyone who complained about that useless Cave Singers feature. It is pretty neat that Kelly O was able to get a picture of one of the wolves, though.
@14 what? You want more articles that you wouldn't read? That is so stupid. Even for a comment section, that is stupid. I hope you are a fake account made by Eric Grandy.
This is the greatest thing I've ever read. It would be pretty bullshit though, without all the butt-hurt Fleet Foxes fans. Don't make music if you don't want people to comment on it. DOY
How "strange." When you can't provide heartfelt criticism good or bad, just put words in animal's mouths and blame it on animal mentality. Or make it religious with bad photoshop Jesus mash-ups. That'll make a point.
@49, When did they put words into the animal's mouth? In the article I read they only recorded the animals reactions without anthropomorphizing them. Please read it again, comprehend what is going on, and then comment.
I actually find this article to be more entertaining than the Fleet Foxes themselves. Not that I'm trying to knock their fans - different strokes and all that.
Kinda thought we were living in a post-snarky world. Feel like this is the same sort of article Sarah Palin would do if she ever did an article on Katie Couric. Sad 4 Stranger they chose to make this their front-page story. Kinda Worried abt future of the Stranger when reading this...
This kind of thing would be pretty funny if it happened every once in a while, tucked in between some solid music writing. But this seems to be the direction the music section is headed in permanently. That's a bummer.
@55, Why did you "kinda" think we were in a post-snarky world? Who gave you this idea? The same idiots who said irony died on 9/11 or racism was gone after Obama was elected? Don't listen to them. Grow up, open your eyes, and don't take things seriously if they are obviously a joke.
Damnit The Stranger, I pay good no-money to read your stuff, and I expect it to be exactly what I personally want, all the time! Get you act together, or I swear I'll take my non-business elsewhere!
@54 Absolutely ZERO of the anonymous comments came from me. I use my own name when I comment, and it's usually on something I like. Kelly O took some great photos. I still have never been to the zoo.
This is a truly awful piece of music "journalism". You should have just printed the pictures of cute animals, at least that would have had some redeeming value.
Jesus, Fleet Foxes fans, calm down! The fact that your favorite, BFF band has become huge and iconic enough to warrant a light-hearted, satirical piece is a boon for them.
Also, "support local music" only goes so far dudes (I LOVE EVERYTHING BECAUSE IT IS LOCAL AND I LOVE IT BECAUSE IT IS LOCAL). Y'all are the new "Seattle doesn't dance."
I'll I'm hearing in these comments is "Man, I wish I got paid to go to the zoo and 'interview' animals".
Seriously, if you want to find out about new bands, go look for new bands, you're perfectly capable. The Stranger prints some pretty stupid shit, but it prints what it wants, and that's awesome. Would you rather a newspaper where the reviews are paid for by the bands being reviewed?
Yeah this is a fantastic review! What the hell do you want a review to be? A bunch of terrible comparisons to other bands? Some bullshit about how some asshole who writes for a paper REALLY likes/hates it?
No, you can't review music because it's too subjective, so to effectively review it you should do so in abstract.
This review is vapid and pointless but it is published in a reputable paper and apparently widely read by people who claim not to give a shit. JUST LIKE THE MOTHERFUCKING FLEET FOXES.
It is the perfect review for the worlds most meaningless band.
The icing on top is Robin's butt-hurtness over it. Classic.
A fleet of foxes fell asleep and fawned for Fleet of Foxes. But did the foxes feign their fawning of our Fleet of Foxes. Fortunately I, like them, fell asleep and don't give a flying fuck.
A fleet of foxes fell asleep and fawned for Fleet of Foxes. But did the foxes feign their fawning of our Fleet of Foxes. Fortunately I, like them, fell asleep and don't give a flying fuck.
They're constantly bombarded by noise and movement and crazy children, and it wouldn't surprise me if most of them have just learned to factor out most stimuli and just focus on the hay bale/pooping/ignoring the humans.
Totally harshed ma mellow buddy.
You'll prob die from an ulcer though, so it's cool.
Please, just give me something I can use! How fucking hard is that?
Though apparently Def Dee is "sharking" very hard according to my NY friend who knows things.
You got a little SLOG left on your chin.
Are they always left out for some reason? Do they not count? Are you going to ask them next month? etc...
Being funny is fine, but treating really nice, really talented dudes with a little respect would also be nice. Especially since they just made a tremendous album.
nice photos though!
oh at @8, wtf does that even mean? you're the kind of dude who just sits around saying "well, not necessarily" in a squeaky voice all day aren't you?
I'm sending my copy back to you because it is too trashy to recycle.
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/9464…
I actually find this article to be more entertaining than the Fleet Foxes themselves. Not that I'm trying to knock their fans - different strokes and all that.
Then again, Fleet Foxes is also a pile of pointless hipster bullshit. So it's rather fitting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh0OGko3T…
Also, "support local music" only goes so far dudes (I LOVE EVERYTHING BECAUSE IT IS LOCAL AND I LOVE IT BECAUSE IT IS LOCAL). Y'all are the new "Seattle doesn't dance."
Seriously, if you want to find out about new bands, go look for new bands, you're perfectly capable. The Stranger prints some pretty stupid shit, but it prints what it wants, and that's awesome. Would you rather a newspaper where the reviews are paid for by the bands being reviewed?
Firing Grandy, Zwickel and Segal were smart moves.
Kudos Stranger editorial. Keep up the good work Grant.
No, you can't review music because it's too subjective, so to effectively review it you should do so in abstract.
It is the perfect review for the worlds most meaningless band.
The icing on top is Robin's butt-hurtness over it. Classic.
I can't tell you how many times I had to keep children from climbing on the rocks and disrupting the penguins.
One man even reached over the enclosure and started hitting one on the head.
They're constantly bombarded by noise and movement and crazy children, and it wouldn't surprise me if most of them have just learned to factor out most stimuli and just focus on the hay bale/pooping/ignoring the humans.