Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
More In Film/TV
Editors' Picks
Popular Articles
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
For a review this pathetic, you should have your press pass revoked.
Also, spent two months in the fjords down there. It is a lot like the Inside Passage here, except w/ less people, fewer conifers, and more beech trees. Plus penguins. Minus bears.
You turn 180 degrees to the south - kind of like how maps show the North Pole on top, but it could easily be portrayed with the South Pole on top.
Here is obviously someone who has never experienced real adventure before with moments of true personal triumph,a pure way of travelling and seeing the world. Therefor reviewer you will never understand the feeling and life changing situations an adventure can bring. People like Jeff are not going for the big bucks but try capture that feeling of true freedom in this case on camera to share it with as many people as possible and maybe even educate us a bit in the process.
To try and show the great adventure is still out there, but for how long...so get out of that lazy chair.
Luckily there are still plenty of people out there that can appreciate this film for what it is.
A personal journey with more adventure and life lessons in the 6 months it took then most people will ever experience in a lifetime. So please read your review again because this might very well be your own personal wake up call. So go out and experience real life instead of looking for cliche's.
Conqueror of the Useless how great is that title!
A word of advise, stick to reviewing the hollywood Cr#% untill you have experienced enough to understand, Abre los ojos!
Great Documentary, great soundtrack!
Keep the adventure alive,
Tom Kooreman
The Netherlands
Chouinard was part of a group of climbers that climbed these huge rock walls at Yosemite before anyone thought it was possible. So for him to have a little bit of an ego it is understandable.
Tomkins basically took his whole fortune from Esprit and North Face and dumped it all into buying land in Chile and Argentina. He basically bought so much land that he bisected a portion of Chile at one point (his land divided Chile into North and South).
This freaked the government and big business people of Chile out, as conservation and environmental philanthropy was not really heard of there. And here was this foreigner basically dividing the country into two. Chile has many still untapped resources (hydropower, fish farms, etc) that are quickly being tapped by major corporations in a polluting manner.
So we have this sort of disjointed journey being financed by these two wealthy older guys that most of us have never heard their whole history. So I was deeply moved by the movie but I'm not sure why. I guess I am moved as I realize there are lots of wild places still out there like Patagonia which draws people to them that come their for their own reasons, with the reasons never being 100% pure.
I was also interested in their original trip as that sounded much more adventurous. In the land of GPS, cellphones, and helicopters it never seems as on the edge as a trip in a van in the 60's would have been. If only Chouinard and Tompkins would have had a video camera for that trip, that would have been a better documentary.
It was especially interesting in that Chouinard basically says we will climb this mountain and walk away and be done with it. He's a refreshing realist, he's done all he can to save the earth, it's going down the tubes anyways, so he's going to live in the moment every second and enjoy it, in a Buddhist sort of fashion. Everyone is human and we try and most of the time that is not enough but we still can gaze on the beauty of a place like patagonia.
All in all, the documentary is very loose, but opens up a whole series of questions to explore about patagonia and the people who have tried to save it and live in it. Piques the curiosity if anything. Much better than most hollywood fiction or canned documentaries
Of course to review this review may very well be folly - however some of the reader's comments have inspired me to try.
This is not a good review. It is a bad review.
That was considerably easier than I thought.
I found 180 Degrees South to be a story about searching for answers about over consumption and over spending,.....go one step backwards and look for ways to make our lives simpler !!!
Awesome Documentary, Great soundtrack.
This review is useless and lame !!!!
I found 180 Degrees South to be a story about searching for answers about over consumption and over spending,.....go one step backwards and look for ways to make our lives simpler !!!
Awesome Documentary, Great soundtrack.
This review is useless and lame !!!!
Good work buddy....you are the kind of person that this movie makes me want to get as far away from as possilbe.
Watch the movie again, and pay particular attention to the story of Easter Island. There is no opinion needed to grasp that concept. Out doing one another to the point that it becomes more important than survival? Take a look around you bro.......
What are you doing to save your soul? I bet you think about that a lot more than you would ever admit to anybody. Scary when you think about it, isnt it?
Do the right thing. There are sh***y movies all over the place for you to tear apart, if that's all your good at. This is not a sh***y movie. If people payed more attention to what was going on around them, and connected the dots a little bit, we might have a chance.....but, most people are just like you, so we really have no chance.
-Kurt
What I enjoyed most about this movie was the lack of visual presence of the narrator. Jeff Johnson obviously shows himself in the movie, but it isn't a hand-held, camera-in-the-face sort of presence. Instead he concentrates the film footage towards the environment, the places he visits and the people he comes across. That fact alone exhibits the intent behind the movie: he's not out to become a celebrity, and if anything he's attempting to magnify a problem in an effort to reach a responsible solution.
I applaude this movie, the people who made it, and the people who were moved by it. Perhaps before we offer up ignorant critiques we should research our subjects a little more closely.
I agree with the reviewer, this is not a great movie as-such, but it is a pretty spectacular thing! Ok, the dialogue and aphorisms were a bit trite, but then again, watch any movie and you will find about the same sort of language. And in the end, 180degrees thoughtfully asserts its loose set of points through a variety of pleasantly didactic settings.
But the beauty of this movie was its unassuming self assurance. Compare it to Werner Herzog's two brilliant polar documentaries. While these were decidedly more innovative works, their self-consciousness surrealism infuses the stories with an ambiguous urgency.
Not so here! The take-away is basically: have an adventure, it is good for you, exactly because you won't know why until you do it.
This is good advise for anybody interested in changing themselves along with the world. While I don't think Herzog would have loved this film, I am positive that he, himself, ascribes to the above adage.
I agree with the reviewer, this is not a great movie as-such, but it is a pretty spectacular thing! Ok, the dialogue and aphorisms were a bit trite, but then again, watch any movie and you will find about the same sort of language. And in the end, 180degrees thoughtfully asserts its loose set of points through a variety of pleasantly didactic settings.
But the beauty of this movie was its unassuming self assurance. Compare it to Werner Herzog's two brilliant polar documentaries. While these were decidedly more innovative works, their self-consciousness surrealism infuses the stories with an ambiguous urgency.
Not so here! The take-away is basically: have an adventure, it is good for you, exactly because you won't know why until you do it.
This is good advise for anybody interested in changing themselves along with the world. While I don't think Herzog would have loved this film, I am positive that he, himself, ascribes to the above adage.
I agree with the reviewer, this is not a great movie as-such, but it is a pretty spectacular thing! Ok, the dialogue and aphorisms were a bit trite, but then again, watch any movie and you will find about the same sort of language. And in the end, 180degrees thoughtfully asserts its loose set of points through a variety of pleasantly didactic settings.
But the beauty of this movie was its unassuming self assurance. Compare it to Werner Herzog's two brilliant polar documentaries. While these were decidedly more innovative works, their self-consciousness surrealism infuses the stories with an ambiguous urgency.
Not so here! The take-away is basically: have an adventure, it is good for you, exactly because you won't know why until you do it.
This is good advise for anybody interested in changing themselves along with the world. While I don't think Herzog would have loved this film, I am positive that he, himself, ascribes to the above adage.
By the way, that "dangerous ocean crossing" that you commented on actually is very dangerous, and that part with the mast breaking is serious business. A lot more serious then your chain breaking off your single speed bike you fucking pansy.
p.s. That wasn't modest mouse
p.s.s. go fuck yourself and get cancer in your dick.
Great photography. Weird frat boy music (though pretty), and unlikely comparisons between adventurers and planet-saving. I'll take a science documentary any day!
For instance, my favorite quote was actual from the conversation that happens about 180 degrees south and I got a whole different story than the author did. I read it as you can walk north and step forward on your path. Then you can turn 180 degrees and walk forward and take a step forward. Which step is progress? Now you could use this in mountaineering or adventure traveling. Several times in the journey they had to turn around. Sometimes you have to go backwards and reevaluate the path before you can proceed. But you can also take it as a metaphor for progress of people. In Chile they used examples of pulp factories and hydroelectric dams. Sure, development of the nation requires use of resources and exports. However, where is the line drawn between what is progress and what is destruction of the resources that sustain the development. Like the example of Easter Island. It did not spell it out and tell you that, but it did assume you can read between the lines.
So go into it knowing it is meant for you to make up your own mind and really expand your perspective without preaching.
The morality of a dams and conservation is complex. As a rule an indie rock backtrack with summarizing voiceover is a ideologically and emotionally simplistic understanding of this world. The film was beautiful and I think Johnson's heart is in the right place but he has alot to learn. He should start with history-his Huxley quote contains more wisdom than he knows.