Comments

1
When has Eastwood ever had an idea about anything?
2
There was nothing actually reviewed in this film critique except the absence of animals in the afterlife. How is this useful?
3
Eastwood makes a film about something he has no idea about: Death.

So Mudede writes about something he has no idea about: Film.
4
One thing I love about Mudede's reviews is the way they are like a flyzapper, but for idiots. Sadly, they'll all be in the hereafter too.
5
Those truly familiar with the topic don't make films.
6
#2 - agreed. This just read to me like a very lazy non-analysis.

Thanks for nothing, Charles.
7
Hey, at least he didn't mention Euripides, Handel and Schopenhauer's Cat. Good job, Charles!
8
schrodinger's cat.
9
'Eastwood's Neopaganism'
Mudede you kill me, man! Do you write these up on the crapper to impress 20 year-old Baristas?

The review should have been titled:

Torino in A(ss)Minor
10
@fairy_tyler_moore:

In Search of Schopenhauer's Cat: Arthur Schopenhauer's Quantum-Mystical Theory of Justice. The Catholic University of America Press, 2006

Definition of FACETIOUS
1
: joking or jesting often inappropriately : waggish

Further information is concealed in the book, professor
12
#11 you are clearly new to the world of Mudede. He has no interest in imparting actual ideas. He wishes only to coat you in a viscous layer of his own verbal diarrhea.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.