Comments

1
In order to stick it to the Man we should sneak in to see it , right Luby?! HO.
2
Lord ... I cringed when I saw the trailer to this film.

I thought: Well, yet another thousand feet of celluloid catering to the male, 19-25 year old demographic population and their damn erect penises, not to mention the idiots' propensity to laugh at inanities.
Oy vey, shoot me if you dare.

But, I kinda digress ...

I grew up watching Hoffman and DeNiro act in ground-breaking films. They WERE the ones to emulate and imitate, if such a thing were possible.
They gave acting a new name and prestige. They WERE the best of their generation.
Now? It seems as though they've fallen from grace and mightily. They have been reduced to taking secondary roles in films that do not befit their considerable talents.

WHAT are THESE guys, taking prat falls, anyway?
WHAT are they doing making fools of themselves onscreen?
WHY are we being duped into watching this Shit?
3


I FEEL VERY SORRY for DeNiro.
Times must really be hard for The Fella.
Why would he accept parts such as the comedic buffoon were it not for dire economic adversity?
Same for Hoffman.
I hate to think that the Greats are falling all too speedily, from Grace (with out Will of course ...)
4
aaww come on guys. you got to know going in that the Fockers franchise is like whipped cream. Its quick, non-substanial, but totally yummy. i laughed at the review talking about how non-art the movie is. that is whole point. its a thumbs up against pretensions. now don't get all your hipster boy panties knotted up and pull them out your ass once in awhile. its okay to be corny once in awhile. to just say focker is funny....
5
Also, the name Luby would be great comedic counterpoint to Focker..

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.