Comments

1
I cab't agree that Glen Beck or Sean Hannity has "little or no acting experience."

C'mon, reading those crazy lines with a straight face requires fierce acting chops.
2
Nothing against Ron Paul, but isn't he a little old to be playing the World-Carrying strongman Atlas? Was Schwarzenneger unavailable?
3
Ron Paul was in Bruno. While he was himself, I find it hard to believe that being a political figure doesn't require a lot of acting, so I don't think you can claim this is his acting "debut".
4
Any link that promises people "doing stupid things" in Ron Paul's name really has to link here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZB8lmDjx…
5
@3: That was the only possible way I've ever felt sympathy for Ron Paul.

Why don't these douchebags just do product placement? You'd think it'd be good for Lululemon, Whole Foods, and all the other corporations who are run by asshole Libertarians. Shove a McGriddle in Taggart's hands or something.
6
@1: EXACTLY what I was thinking.
7
I thought we were all waiting to do a marathon viewing when the last film comes out.
8
@7: The Director's Cut Blu-Ray Limited Edition Boxed Set. That's what we're waiting for.
9
@4,

That guy rules. His complete inability to form coherent sentences and insistence on screaming random fragmented talking points, most notably the word "constitution" over & over, leads me to believe he'd be a prime candidate for office in his district.
10
Libertarian hypocrisy.

Ask a Libertarian what he wants Government to do and he will say "almost nothing".

But not nothing. He still wants the protections of enforced private property. He still wants a 'stable' (non-inflationary) money supply.

The Libertarian wants his fun to continue in perpetuity at the expense of us all.
11
Non-actors appear in film all the time. With enough TBs on the hard drive, a talented editor, and sufficient takes, you can work miracles.
12
Perhaps Paul can leave Congress and stick to acting. Would be nice. And less damaging to the country.
13
@10
Actually, we want government to abide by the non-aggression principal. Know what that means? Probably not because most critics of libertarianism are completely ignorant about it and make up a straw-libertarianism that has nothing to do with the actual ideology.
We want government to protect people and property from aggression, be that fraud, physical violence, unsafe working conditions that are not disclosed (fraud) or damaging the environment (everyone's property)
We disagree on what else government should do. Some libertarians, like myself, are okay with public education and would actually like to see that expanded and also would like the government to spend more on things like mental health.
A libertarian is someone who simply believes in minimum government, maximized personal freedom and the non-aggression principal. Anything else is BS, but most of our critics (like Paul Constance) are full of shit anyway.
14
Hey Paul,
Your own link showed that Ron Paul didn't have anything to do with people flying a blimp to advertize for him...not that having an ad blimp is really all that crazy.
Why not report on what people do after being "inspired" by that douche-bag warmonger-in-chief Obozzo?
http://www.obeygiant.com/tattoos/obama-t…

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.