Comments

1
You mentioned District 9. I think last year's Monsters would qualify for that catagory.
3
Why can't fucking Hollywood make a decent Hi-Fi Sci-fi picture anymore. I'm staying home and watching George Pal's "War of the Worlds".
4
@1: That one was decent, but not great. The local businessmen extorting from desperate passers-through and former neighbors, the simplistic and ineffectual government response to the threat, even the monsters: all pretty good. What kinda made that movie suck is that despite some efforts to make you like the main characters, I kept rooting for them to die because there's really not enough personality or likability in either one to identify with them.
5
Proof that nationalism and knee jerk patriotism make the best movies.
6
Michael Bay's fault
7
I thought the movie was great. A real popcorn film. Yes, it was full of cliches, but I didn't expect any less. I laughed at the cheesy lines, and enjoyed the theatrical action. It was a great ride. Too many reviewers are so self-important. Don't they ever just have fun at the movies? I would totally see this movie again.
8
You're wondering why Hollywood can't make a decent sci-fi movie? I wonder why Hollywood can't make anything that doesn't suck donkey cock. And the higher the budget the worse the movie becomes.
9
I like the use of enemies who are both pure evil and can be blown to itty bits. In a WWII war movie, they'd be Nazis. In a horror movie, they'd be zombies. When your foe is inhuman, the CGI-sky's the limit! It's perfect for sci-fi.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.