News Mar 19, 2009 at 4:00 am

How Peter Can Win

Comments

1
Run or don't run, Peter. I like Peter, but this middle school crush thing is getting old. There are other candidates out there who are more quietly deciding if they will run as well, so it won't be the end of the world if he doesn't run.

2
No incumbent of any elective office deserves a free ride, and political discourse and the public interest are not well-served when incumbents go unchalleged. The decision to run for office- time-honored and noble- is guaranteed to turn your life upsidedown. One should be sober-headed going into it, have a purpose beyond ego and ambition, and know something about what you're in for!
3
Peter is a petulant pecksniff, a sanctimonious hypocrite. "True environmentalist," my ass. Peter lives in single-family home in the north end, just like a suburbanite. As a councilmember, he drove more miles than any other.

Peter is not executive material. He loves Seattle process. He much prefers to dither and vacillate (your word). In other words, nothing will get done. Imagine Peter attempting to manage the snowstorms, which were a challenge for Nickels.

ECB, you need to give up pushing his candidacy. While you covet a role like Robert Mak's in a Steinbruek administration, Peter would not consider you now, given what happened yesterday.
4
Peter is a petulant pecksniff, a sanctimonious hypocrite. "True environmentalist," my ass. Peter lives in a single-family home with a yard in the north end, just like a suburbanite. As a councilmember he drove more miles than any other.

Peter is not executive material. Peter loves "Seattle process." Seattle much prefers to dither and vacillate (your word). In other words, nothing will get done. The requirement of an executive is decisiveness and action. The last thing Seattle needs is a "visionary." Let the council be the visionaries.

ECB, you need to give up pushing his candidacy. While you covet a role like Robert Mak's in a Steinbrueck administration, he'd be foolish to consider you, given what happened yesterday.
5
Peter was on the Council for 10 years, not 8 years. He ran 3x not 2x. First elected in 1997 to fill a 2 year term. Ran for reelection in 1999 and 2003.
6
Peter was elected in 1997 and re-elected in 1999 and 2003. He was in office for 10 years, not 8 and he ran 3x not 2x.
7
You're a thief.
8
Erica,

Please be more specific when you use the term "affordable housing advocates". While John Fox has been at odds recently with the environmental camp (and increasingly isolated as you brilliantly pointed out), local non-profit housing providers and the statewide housing advocacy group have worked toward common environmental goals through building green and supporting transit oriented communities, one of the top 2009 enviro legislative goals.

The Housing Development Consortium has partnered with Futurewise,the Cascade Land Conservancy, Transportation Choices Coalition and looks forward to working with more allies in the environmental community.
9
Erica,

Nice article on Steinbrueck. Thanks.

Quick question: On your recent story about the Times violating the law, by converting over PI subscribers. You said about the Times spokeswoman:

"Mackie says she's looking into the contract issue"

Did she ever get back to you? (I know the Attorney General's office was contacted today.)

If you call the Times to cancel the wait was 15 minutes this morning. I had to hang-up because my break was over.

Erica, don't let up on them until they obey the law!

10
Regardless of where he lives, he did fight to make sure developers set aside money for low income housing when Nickles was raising the height limit. Nickels did too, but Steinbrueck asked for a whole lot more, and he got it. Nickles asked for ten dollars per square foot but, since Steinbruek and company haggled, that ended up being something around eighteen dollars. Am I remembering that correctly? Did he, or did he not, fight for affordable housing? That seems far more important to me than where he happens to live. Plus, he fought against giving money to the Sonics AND he wasn't trying to shove a tunnel down our throats the way Nickles does. So, yeah, for his pro- mass-transit stance I think he does deserve to be considered an environmentalist. Besides,the person who criticized Steinbrueck never mentioned what kind of car he drives.
11
Mike McGinn for Mayor

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.