Yes, but having acne doesn't typically cause someone to take their father hostage and threaten his life.
And he paid the price nature charges for all living beings unsuited for their environments.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Families need to do more to take care of business instead of letting their spawn's problems escalate to the point that the cops need to be brought in, e.g., the military vet with dementia who pulled a gun on a cop. You can give cops some de-escalation training but it is not nearly as effective as the family getting the disturbed person some mental health treatment/incarceration.
The only thing surprising here is that SPD admitted this.
What's your suggestion when the writer doesn't seem to know from what illness that individual suffered? And if I see someone who appears to have an illness and I don't know what that illness is, I probably would describe that person as an "ill person" (probably not a "sick person" since that connotes something else). Does that mean that I enjoy stigmatizing ill people?
Obviously we don't know if what happened is exactly as the police described, but it doesn't seem like an impossible scenario. Given SPD's record, though, they don't deserve too much benefit of the doubt.
Congratulations, you win the prize for the stupidest, most out-of-context crazy response in the history of your whole species of stupid, out-of-context crazy people, not just in the "mah butt is foah exit only" category. How do you say "non sequitur" in Klingon? That's how far off you are. And yet, and yet, so close to the bone. Your own.
@6 obviously lives in Eymanitis, a suburb of Red Idaho.
I hope the SPD officers involved don’t lose too much sleep over it. They have an impossible job.
Anyone over the age of 18 years is an adult and free to go on or off their meds as the please. Unless they actually do something the courts won't intervene and commit them and if the court does finally intervene they typically don't do it for longer than a few days. There is no mental health care system in this country anymore. There hasn't been one since Ron Reagan decided to de-fund and dismantle it.
Beyond that -- sounds like a complete clusterfuck. I'm glad they tried to use a taser first, but putting 8-9 bullets in the guy and strays into neighboring houses is unacceptable.
I don't think we should make them follow Barney Fife's example -- one bullet, kept in the pocket -- but maybe they shouldn't have so many bullets in their guns if they are going to go shooting up the neighborhood like that.
Isn't it amazing how people will openly say things such as people with mental illnesses don't deserve to live? I somehow doubt that you would say that people with cancer don't deserve to live. At what point did you decide that the world would be better off without those who suffer from mental illness? What other people that have certain diseases or conditions would the world be better off without?
I'm as cynical about SPD as the next lefty, but you guys seem to expect the average cop to be some sort of expert non-lethal all-purpose ninjas for every scenario. I trained with cops for a dozen years. Well. They can do a lot better, sure. But these kinds of expectations where they can handle every single situation like they are PhD's. It's just not possible.
Again. Knife wielding. Violent. 370 fucking pounds!
I'm sad for this kids family for sure and I wish there were better mechanisms for families to deal with disturbed family members (believe me, I've way too personal experiences on that). But still. Not to be cold, but part of me is glad, one way or another, that guy is no longer walking the streets. I tangled with some big dudes but... well, holy shit. That's NFL linebacker size. And possible a ticking time bomb.
If you want effective mental healthcare, it has to be done in community. I know that mental hospitals are a popular topic right now, but the truth is that they were only meant for emergency conditions where people are at an immediate risk to hurting themselves. The skills learned in a mental hospital (at ~$1500/day) aren't the same skills a person needs to survive day to day in the real world. That can only be done through outpatient treatment, which nobody wants to fund. If you want to help someone, you help them deal with their life as it occurs, not take them out of it and put them in a total control environment for a couple of months and then drop them back into a hellstorm when they are released.
Wait, wait. I think I missed your point. You weren't actually talking about treatment. You just wanted to get them back in cheap asylums where you could forget about them, right? Because if you were actually talking about treatment, you would talk about funding outpatient treatment so that conditions don't progress to need hospitalization. Instead you only talked about how hard it was to lock people up, so obviously 'treatment' has a different meaning for you.
Considering that he was under court-ordered mental health care, which he ignored, what do you propose the state should have or could have done other than institutionalize him?
There is no evidence to support your conclusion. People with many conditions commit violence. But we don't causally link them except in the case of mental illness. The sad thing is that the mental illness link is fallacious. The risk of violence by someone with a mental illness isn't higher than that of the average population. But that isn't enough to satisfy your witch-hunt is it? You think the existence of a mental illness, in and by itself, is enough to explain everything about a person, including violence.
Do you know what actually does predict violence? Previous criminal behavior. So was this man a high risk for violence? Yes! But not because of a mental illness.
All that your witch-hunt and desire to clamp down on the civil liberties of people that have mental illnesses accomplishes is to scare away the majority of people that have a mental illness from seeking help. Let me repeat that: the majority of people that have a mental illness do not get help because they are afraid of discrimination and stigma. Do you think that the statements in this very thread might affect that stigma, such as talking about how a man with a mental illness deserved to die (@11 and @16), how people with mental illness don't deserve the civil liberties of 'normal' people (@2, @12, and @13), or associating mental illness with violence (the post, @7, and @21)?
And somehow explains the seemingly irrational behaviors that often lead to these kinds of tragedies,
And doesn't somehow stigmatize persons with related but not-quite-the-same illnesses (or differences),
then I'm sure the commentariate will gladly replace "mentally ill" or "psychotic" with that phrase.
Until then, understand we understand the difference between the 98% of people with mental illnesses who never physically harm anyone but themselves and the 2% who make the news when they scare the shit out of us.
Unfortunately, there are some varieties of mental illness that include paranoia, poor impulse control, and tendencies toward violence against others.
So please, suggest a phrase we can all agree on and let us get back to kvetching about the police.
How the fuck do you expect me to reply to this? Read the DSM to see how the recognized mental illnesses are diagnosed. You will not find murderous rampages listed as a symptom anywhere.
What you are doing is equating mental illness with being a criminal or a bad person. Before you post again, I would like to know how much you have studied psychology or psychiatry. My guess is that you are an ignorant asshole who doesn't know shit about mental health, but you still feel you have some right to spout off about shit you don't understand.