I don't know if you linked to the wrong article, or just read the text wrong, but the two girls who were charged regarding the Steubenville rape case are accused of threatening the rape victim's life, not the rapist's. The attorney general is saying that it's not okay to threaten a victim. Not a tool move. A much needed move in what seems to be an endlessly fucked up case.
@2 for the reading comprehension win! I hope this prosecutor keeps going.
On the upcoming SCOTUS ruling. On the surface the GOP might feel it could adopt the Roe-vs.-Wade approach: demagogue on the issue while trusting all the time that the adults have made any real policy change impossible. Of course, that golem, like so many others the Right Wing have conjured, has gotten away from them and will shortly bite them on the ass (one of these days the SCOTUS is going to uphold one of the bans-in-all-but-name pieces of legislation like the one we just saw out of ND).
But, very fortunately, it turns out the way these lawsuits are crafted only invalidates DOMA and Prop. 8; it does not make marriage equality automatic in all states. That means the GOP will still have to stand up and make a political choice (and LOSE).
Isn't that what years of BS rhetoric about 'not legislating from the bench' and 'allowing the political process to go forward' is all about? No, I'm not advocating making basic individual rights subject to majority rule, but it never hurts when those rights are upheld not just in the courts but by a majority at the ballot box - it removes the incentive for sleazeballs to exploit hatred, bigotry and discrimination as a tool for organizing and mobilizing the population.
If we didn't have the talibangelicals out there fear mongering and whipping up a froth over teh gays and abortion, these issues would have vanished much, much faster.
I came to the comments to point out that the girls were arrested for threatening the *victim*, not the rapist, but i see that's been noted. While i'm here though, elizabeth warren didn't seem to be speaking to state voters as a whole--she seemed to be speaking to voters in the republican primary. More of an attempt to short circuit a candidate who might be more viable in the general against a dem, i would venture.
@4 Are you sure it wasn't due to Anakin Skywalker tampering with your memories of the destruction of the World Trade Center? That's just the sort of collateral damage I've seen in other such cases of control by the New World Order
um I would support more height for bigger setbacks, and I would support massive investment in train lines, while I support efforts to stop the ugly buildings being built today, so we would have more beautiful buildings built today. instead of the blank 20 foot wall say on the vitamilk building, I would require varied storefronts, differnet kinds of doors, not the ubiquitous identical smoky glass sing;le door that seems perfect for appointment based business and hostile to street level greengrocers or other true commercial that lends vibrancy. I'd also support ending most rules about sidewalk cafes, I think businesses can be trusted to figure out where to put the table and chairs without a $20K permit process. also: apodments.
I think many at the federal level see Washington and Colorado's pot laws as a path out of a legal nightmare that's too expensive in many ways. That a Republican is running on legalization is encouraging. But, yeah, I think Warren was being funny.
I hope Equality House has infra-red CCTV and the local prosecutor on speed-dial. There be some vandalizin' comin'. Oh, and don't forget civil suits! That'd be some nice turnabout. I hear Westboro Baptist makes a living suing people that fight back. It's about time someone reverses that.
Suppose some guy got drunk at a party, and two female athletes picked him up and took him to bed and had sex with him all night and videoed it and put it on YouTube.
@15: I'd be pissed if that happened to me. One, I'm already taken. Two, I'd really rather not experience that burning sensation during urination (or worse).
We make a few promises to our veterans, and despite our dismal record of honoring our word, we should make an exception in this case.
Further, your portion of those benefits is so infinitesimal that it boggles the mind. Even at Unpaid Intern's pay rate, the amount of time it took you to write that dickish sentence would have covered your contribution.
Shit, why don't you advocate kicking some "undeserving" families off of WIC next.
You're usually better than this and I am disappointed.
The relevant passages from the article:
There are 10 living recipients of benefits tied to the 1898 Spanish-American War at a total cost of about $50,000 per year. The Civil War payments are going to two children of veterans — one in North Carolina and one in Tennessee— each for $876 per year.
Surviving spouses can qualify for lifetime benefits when troops from current wars have a service-linked death. Children under the age of 18 can also qualify, and those benefits are extended for a lifetime if the person is permanently incapable of self-support due to a disability before the age of 18.
17, oh, that is rich. this is coming from the same person who defended Sarah Palin, the woman who resigned her Governorship mid-term so she can give speeches and appear on Fox more often.
seriously, Phoebe, you will not believe how much brighter the world looks once you pull your head out of your ass.
@27: There you go again. Typically you extrapolate from the specific to the general in contorted ways to build your rant, this time it's the same thing but from the general to the specific.
@27, seeing as "Phoebe in Wallingford" is using a photo of the character "Phoebe Tyler Wallingford" from "All My Children" as her profile pic, I think she's a fake-o. To what end, I can't imagine, since "she" plays it so close to the vest that the satire, if any, is undetectable.
@31: And why shouldn't I use Ruth Warrick's pic? We look alike in a way, but my first name is Phoebe (I used to be 'Phoebe on NE 79th' when I joined Slog years ago. I moved to Wallingford to be closer to my daughter and the play on 'Phoebe in Wallingford' was irresistible. In all these years, you're the second to notice.
BTW - 'All My Children' and 'One Life to Live' did finally get that Internet broadcasting deal going with Prospect Park - airing this spring I believe.
This is way below the fold at this point but it is interesting to note that out of nearly every online left-leaning community blog out there today SLOG is the only one that doesn't mention the 10 year anniversary of the invasion of Iraq.
And of all those left-leaning community blogs SLOG is the only one with a sitting editor that was FOR the invasion of Iraq. Huh.
@24 Not a coincidence, Savage & Frizzele both have gone back to what they know, sex advice and name dropping literary celebs, thankfully leaving political commentary to people who actually give a shit what's going on in the world.
Perhaps it is you who is a tool.
On the upcoming SCOTUS ruling. On the surface the GOP might feel it could adopt the Roe-vs.-Wade approach: demagogue on the issue while trusting all the time that the adults have made any real policy change impossible. Of course, that golem, like so many others the Right Wing have conjured, has gotten away from them and will shortly bite them on the ass (one of these days the SCOTUS is going to uphold one of the bans-in-all-but-name pieces of legislation like the one we just saw out of ND).
But, very fortunately, it turns out the way these lawsuits are crafted only invalidates DOMA and Prop. 8; it does not make marriage equality automatic in all states. That means the GOP will still have to stand up and make a political choice (and LOSE).
Isn't that what years of BS rhetoric about 'not legislating from the bench' and 'allowing the political process to go forward' is all about? No, I'm not advocating making basic individual rights subject to majority rule, but it never hurts when those rights are upheld not just in the courts but by a majority at the ballot box - it removes the incentive for sleazeballs to exploit hatred, bigotry and discrimination as a tool for organizing and mobilizing the population.
If we didn't have the talibangelicals out there fear mongering and whipping up a froth over teh gays and abortion, these issues would have vanished much, much faster.
[/sgtdoom]
satisfied?
For Republicans, who prefer campaigning to governing, a supreme court ruling won't slow them down at all.
We make a few promises to our veterans, and despite our dismal record of honoring our word, we should make an exception in this case.
Further, your portion of those benefits is so infinitesimal that it boggles the mind. Even at Unpaid Intern's pay rate, the amount of time it took you to write that dickish sentence would have covered your contribution.
Shit, why don't you advocate kicking some "undeserving" families off of WIC next.
You're usually better than this and I am disappointed.
The relevant passages from the article:
There are 10 living recipients of benefits tied to the 1898 Spanish-American War at a total cost of about $50,000 per year. The Civil War payments are going to two children of veterans — one in North Carolina and one in Tennessee— each for $876 per year.
Surviving spouses can qualify for lifetime benefits when troops from current wars have a service-linked death. Children under the age of 18 can also qualify, and those benefits are extended for a lifetime if the person is permanently incapable of self-support due to a disability before the age of 18.
seriously, Phoebe, you will not believe how much brighter the world looks once you pull your head out of your ass.
BTW - 'All My Children' and 'One Life to Live' did finally get that Internet broadcasting deal going with Prospect Park - airing this spring I believe.
And of all those left-leaning community blogs SLOG is the only one with a sitting editor that was FOR the invasion of Iraq. Huh.
Interesting coincidence.