Utah discovered it's cheaper to give homeless people homes than to lock them up. It costs less than what we currently do. You don't need to get more money, raise taxes, or anything else. You just need to spend the money we already spend differently. You just need to give homeless people homes, no strings attached, here's a home, and it costs less than what we do right now. Here's an article on it: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86560…
Can the council show that *any* progress has been made, for the millions of wasted dollars?
I just want a story of one capable person, who was down on luck ( job loss, illness ) who was able to get services ( cause the backlog is years ) and rise back to where they were before.
Otherwise we might as well just make being homeless illegal and arrest them all, at least then we know they are getting food and shelter.
@3: i'm very tired of seeing Utah's program trotted out as the cure-all for homelessness. just give them homes! Utah's internet-legend success is not easily replicable.
the question in Seattle is, WHERE? we're not swimming in low-rent vacancies, homeless and low-income housing providers can barely finance new housing. more homeless are emigrating to Seattle, attracted by our comparatively-generous services. the waiting list at the SHA and Housing Authorities in surrounding areas is a mile long. did you know the waiting list at the Peninsula Housing Authority in Port Fucking Angeles is a 1000 applicants long?
Seattle needs a plan, and homes first makes sense and is being replicated. NYC couldn't have more available housing and less homeless. The key point is people need homes to climb out of poverty, and it is a good investment. I'm sick of these empty slogans "end homelessness" "end hunger".
@8: Yeah, I can't picture what it would look like in unincorporated King County with that picture of a tent city in Seattle in the way! OUTRAGE! #GAMERGATE
72 percent decrease in the number of the chronic homeless, from almost 1,800 to less than 500.
I just want a story of one capable person, who was down on luck ( job loss, illness ) who was able to get services ( cause the backlog is years ) and rise back to where they were before.
Otherwise we might as well just make being homeless illegal and arrest them all, at least then we know they are getting food and shelter.
the question in Seattle is, WHERE? we're not swimming in low-rent vacancies, homeless and low-income housing providers can barely finance new housing. more homeless are emigrating to Seattle, attracted by our comparatively-generous services. the waiting list at the SHA and Housing Authorities in surrounding areas is a mile long. did you know the waiting list at the Peninsula Housing Authority in Port Fucking Angeles is a 1000 applicants long?
Also, Utah's program targets chronically homeless people. There are many people who wind up homeless in a given year who don't meet that definition.
There, I WIN THE INTERNET!!!!