Comments

1
I see this shit happening all the time while riding. I always call it in!
Highly competent driver has "no other option but to park there" - well guess what: NOBODY HAS ANY PARKING OPTIONS IN SEATTLE. BS excuses count for nada.
2
I ride and hate this shit. But, just to play devil's advocate for a minute, those guys with the truck and the giant pallet of goods ... How exactly are they supposed to deliver anything if they can't park in front of the delivery address? In the bottom picture, it appears they could have parked in the median strip (legal?), but that's not always the case.
3
there is always a loading zone somewhere around a building. you can see part of the sign in the first photo. on the curb right next to the bike track.

your shit is not fully worked out, SDOT.
4
Bike lanes are for bicyclists* not "bikers" because "bikers" are actually cool.
5
I have been bike commuting for decades. I understand that there are many typs of cyclists on the roads and the lanes are meant to encourage new cyclists. However, the term "Share the Road" goes both ways. It is much easier for one person on a bike to manouver around a truck than it would be for the truck to manouver. Many people, cyclists inculded, probably want to shop at those stores and buy those products and such. The truckers have a job to do too.
6
Where are you supposed to park to unload stuff like that? The guys working those jobs don't get paid to circle the block and shrug.
7
@5 & @6) Those are their problems and they can drive them somewhere else; it's a big world. Excuses are all for BULL$h!+, as are those apologists for dimwitted, lazy scofflaws.
8
The truck drivers have been doing their job for years. A cycle lane goes in and now the drivers are supposed to park blocks away to make their deliveries just cause cyclists can't be bothered to take seconds and safely go around the truck?

And then you guys want to snitch on the delivery men to the police. Delivery men who's livelihood is being negatively impacted for your cycling convenience.

You know what, Fuck you cyclists! This city has bent over backward for you. And all you can do is act like you're entitled to more more more. Assholes.

9
The good news is that First World Problem #1 has finally been identified.
10
Jesus, don't call freaking 9-11 for a blocked bike lane. If you must call someone so they can hassle working class guys trying to do their crappy jobs, find the actual number and save it in your phone.

11
@8: see my post at @3. slow your roll, dori monson jr.
12
In a real city, the cars parked in the bike lane are usually police vehicles.
13
The driver of the truck in the first photo is a dick. But it's weird that the curb is still painted yellow and that there's also a Loading Zone sign.
14
@10) So "crappy jobs" have priority over all Seattle traffic flow? A panicky tool such as yourself would be the first to flip your $h!t if a truck parked in a lane and blocked your car.
15
@13, you have a point. That yellow paint is fresh, too. It's on top of the temporary bike lane paint. Maybe the guys in the truck brought it.
16
Yeah freight delivery is an issue in urban areas, but blocking the bike lane or cycle path is not ok - it forces the cyclist to make a dangerous maneuver to pass.

If there is really a problem with freight delivery in the area, hopefully SDOT will take a look.
17
I hate to tell y'all this, but even in bicycle heaven - Holland - delivery vehicles block bike lanes. I go around them every single morning on my way to work.

Somehow, everyone survives it with feelings intact. Maybe because the momentarily inconvenienced cyclists sympathize with the schleppers?
18
Trucks block car lanes for decades. Cars pull around truck rather than call 911, and life goes on. But blocking a bicycle lane? String those asshole truckers up by the balls!

It's a big city, folks. Deal with it.
19
The dirty little secret of bike lanes is that they are not there to protect the cyclists, only the drivers. Of course the bike lane is a loading zone. That makes it easier for the cars to drive uninhibited.
20
Uhh... the third picture tells a story. I see a number of pallets stacked up against what looks like a mixed use building and another crate. Is this an HVAC install? Restaurant equipment for a new business on the ground floor? Other shit that is heavy as fuck? Did you bother asking? Is there a fork lift nearby? I don't see one. Looks like these poor sops are unpacking the pallet by hand. Who knows. You don't seem interested in providing the context to your very temporary inconvenience.

Ansel, this is the business of the city. Heavy shit is moved to and fro and sometimes actual humans like yourself have install things so you and your cohort can eat, drink and be merry.

Snitch these guys out by calling 911? The recommendation of an entitled pricks, IMO.
21
@14: I never said they should block the lane or have the right to, I said that calling 9-1-1 on them is a move right out of the entitled asshole playbook, which I suppose explains why it seems to fly in Seattle.

Also, you do not think it is a bit hypocritical to call out other people hypothetically flipping shits, when you are right here, flipping your own shits because strangers dare to disagree with you?
22
@8,

I'd love to see your reaction to the truck that blocks a through lane on Fourth and Seneca at rush hour at least a few times per week.
23
@21,

So what's your suggestion for making them stop?

Delivery companies typically have parking tickets baked into their cost of doing business, by the way.
24
As I bicyclist in Seattle, I don't mind sharing the road. It's helpful when one of the drivers hangs out nearby to help wave cyclists and cars around, but it's not absolutely necessary. I'm a grown-up, and I can handle the slight inconvenience, just like other grown-ups.
25
IOKIYAR
26
@18: "Trucks block car lanes for decades. Cars pull around truck rather than call 911, and life goes on."

Typically a delivery truck will block ONE lane of car traffic. If a truck (or say two side-by-side trucks) took up all the car lanes on a street, I'll guarantee you that car drivers would not like that.

The truck above is taking up the the entire cycletrack, not just a portion of that that people can bike around.
27
I have faith in the human race that we can figure this shit out without blocking bike or auto traffic lanes. I know we have it within ourselves to set aside some legitimate delivery ONLY parking somewhere near every business throughout the entire city. It can't be that hard.

Get your shit together SDOT and city of Seattle. Every business license and large housing complex should outline delivery and large truck protocol before building construction happens. For those grandfathered-in before the new road/cycling structure there should be side-street options set aside for delivery and maintenance vehicles.

Let's stop blaming cyclists, delivery drivers and motorists for those asshats who made these issues arise in the first place.
28
@19 is the only correct comment in this thread.
29
The SPD is not going to do anything about this. They don't like bikes, don't like bike lanes, and don't consider it their job. And they don't respect the mayor, the city attorney, or the will of the people.

Instead of trying to reform the police we should de-fund them and put the money into a new agency that will do what the people want them to do.
30
Truck occasionally blocking a bike lane where a cyclist can easily merge to avoid it, technically illegal, yes, but certainly not worth making a huge fuss about. The problem in Ansel's photo is that there is no where to go, a cyclist not already in the road can't easily pass this guy due to the legally parked cars.
31
@28: So is your comment incorrect?
32
To hell with freight delivery. They're acting like self important pricks by illegally parking in the first place. Call 911, even if it is "just" freight being delivered in a passenger loading/unloading zone or someone waiting for a passenger in a freight zone. Go up to them and ask them what kind of human being pulls a stunt like this in their neighborhood. Make them uncomfortable every time they illegally park. Make them afraid of the neighborhood response every time they do this.
Clearly freight drivers don't care. They need to be made to care, using any and every legal tool the community has at its disposal.
Until freight drivers decide to behave responsibly in the city, they should be shown no mercy. It is their responsibility to act in accordance with the law, and it is our responsibility to call out bad behavior in our community until it changes. The law is not the first or last measure of safety in our community. We, the people, are that first and last measure. It is time we remembered that and started acting with that truth in the front of our minds.
If we do not take the time and effort to clean up our streets, we can guarantee that nobody with a badge will either.
33
@32) Me likes you. Hugs.
34
Oh, come the fuck on, you guys. This is what loading zones are for. These guys already have preferential parking, but they want to block a lane for a vulnerable user who gets unexpected thrown into motor vehicle traffic?

Fuck these guys. Call 911 on them before someone has to call 911 on your remains smeared on the asphalt.
35
He could park in the left turn lane in the center of the road.
36
So, when I call 911 to report a murder in progress, house on fire or actual emergency I may get preempted by a fucking call about a parking violation?
37
Ansel - I don't know where you bought your tricycle, but it should have a steering mechanism that lets you go around things. That should go a long way towards easing your frustrations.

We live in an urban center, we need the things that trucks have in them, and those trucks are going to need a temporary spot to park while those things are unloaded.

I have an office on 12th and Pike, specifically chosen so I could bike to work every day. One day, I ordered a bunch of office furniture. It arrived in a truck! There were no parking spots, so it was parked in an illegal spot for 20 minutes to do its truck job. To anyone who was mildly inconvenienced by this, sorry, and thanks for not being a total douchebag about the truck!

38
Yeesh, people. Both situational issues are easily solved.

In the 12th Ave photo, the delivery guys could easily pull 12-18 inches closer to the curb. Since their truck is wider than a normal parked car, they would still spill over into the bike lane. But they would spill 12-18 inches less, allowing a cyclist that much more width to veer around without veering into harm's way.

In the Broadway photo, there is clearly intended to be a loading zone along that stretch, but in the parking lane, which is to the left of the bikeway. In order for the cars, trucks, and enforcers to understand this, the bikeway buffer must be painted yellow. It's not enough to paint the curb but leave the buffer white, implying normal paid parking, as evidenced by the unbroken line of parked cars in what is supposed to be the zone.

Observing and thinking and problem-solving is a whole lot more productive than yelling and cop-calling.
39
Delivery trucks should just park on the sidewalks. The pedestrians can just walk around the truck.
40
@39) Or they can park in any driveway or lawn that is convenient (fuck you if you don't like it you typical property owners) - they gotta DELIVER something, amiright?? Fuck you if you can't wait.
41
@39, in some neighborhoods, parking a heavy truck on the sidewalk will get you a quick trip into the coal cellar, as the sidewalk is just a thin lid over the downstairs, which extends out from the building, or maybe a utilities vault. Probably not the case on Broadway, but delivery guys shouldn't be expected to be experts on the precise layout of the urban fabric.

I know this has happened in Pioneer Square, and I've seen it in San Francisco and New York as well.
42
We don't need the things these trucks have on them. That's the point. We need transportation infrastructure more than we need crass commercialism. We need to move more than we need to conspicuously consume. The right of the public to get from point A to point B trumps anybody's right to make a quick buck.
43
Remember - its the CYCLISTS who have a scofflaw problem. Because drivers are just doing what the road should have done for them, but didn't.
44
@32, your talents are wasted in this forum, you should be taking your rant skillz to the pro level--start attending Seattle Public Schools district meetings!
45
Anybody with a shred of common sense would realize that in-city freight deliveries should be lowered from a helicopter.
46
From the pixs, you have the sidewalk to ride on. Avoid 911 for this type of irritant.
47
@26, it's important that the truck "take the full lane" in the cycletrack rather than bait unsuspecting cyclists into a lane that would not be a full 4 ft wide door zone.

Because that's how cyclists feel about "should bike as far to the right as is safe".
48
Truck drivers aren't dicks and they need to use this space. Even if everybody rode bikes, you would still need trucks for delivery. What the fuck are the trucks supposed to do? Seriously (to everyone calling the truck drivers assholes)? What are they fucking supposed to do? Park blocks away?
49
@32: You are a psychopath.
50
In Arlington, VA, OUR brand new cycle tracks look like yours but are about half a lane wide. So, we avoid this type of problem by making the lanes too narrow for cars or trucks to squeeze into them. Of course (who could have anticipated?!) they are often filled with silt and broken glass, and in the winter, snow and ice, because the street-cleaners and snow plows can't fit down them either. lol
51
As it was said, share the road goes both ways. Be accommodating. Learn how not to ruminate over the inconveniences of life and you cyclists will be happier. You're already happier than drivers in this city.
52
@48:

Well yeah, if the city hasn't established loading-zones adjacent to these buildings (and seriously, what building in this town DOESN'T have a loading zone - several in fact - next to it?), then they're breaking the law and should be held accountable, because, to answer your (presumably rhetorical) question: finding another place to park, even if some distance from their destination (or conversely driving around the block a few times until a designated zone opens up) IS EXACTLY what they're fucking supposed to do.

If I have to drop off several boxes or bags and I can't find an open parking stall next to where I need or want to be, I don't get to double-park in the street or block access to a driveway or garage entry, hell I'm not even allowed to use most designated Yellow Zones; I have to go to where there's a place I CAN legally park, even if it's blocks away and I end up having to shuttle everything in several trips. Why should delivery vehicles be held to a lesser standard, particularly when they already enjoy the benefit of being able to park in a lot of places I CAN'T? If they're breaking the law by parking in a bicycle lane or cycletrack, then they're BREAKING THE LAW, period, just as they would be if they double-parked, or blocked a lane of vehicle traffic, or a driveway, or garage entry, or passenger loading zone, or any other location where they're legally restricted from parking.

This ain't rocket science kids, it's just basic parking enforcement.
53
@48,

They absolutely are dicks. So are construction crews and self-employed contractors/tradesmen. On that latter point, if you're on a bike, fear the white van. Those guys are out to kill you.

Those guys will always and forever do whatever is most convenient for themselves and their employers and will only ever change their behavior if given alternatives and if they're *forced* to use those alternatives.
54
@52: I hope the next time you need something delivered that you get a hefty fee for the additional time and effort required. I also hope that everything you buy becomes more expensive because you are wasting the time delivering it.
55
Bicyclist tears are delicious, what a bunch of limp dicks.
56
@52 IKR. Breaking the laws. Like doing Idaho stops and jaywalking at 2AM when no one is around or drinking hard lemonade when picnicking at Alki and letting that sneaky 3 yo (no matter how cute) come home with a shell from the beach. Starting to think after reading this uptight, sanctimonious blog (when did it get this way?), one does need rocket science just to propel oneself far, far, far away....
57
*let's all just remind ourselves that ansel refuses to wear a helmet*
58
@57, good point. Probably should call that into 911 too.... and those flashing headlamps on bikes. How many $103 fines until Ansel breaks down and gets a helmet, we shall find out.
59
BUT WHAT IF THEY WERE DELIVERING BIKES TO A BIKE SHOP?!?

"fuck freight delivery" (paraphrasing a few of you) well, how would you like to live in this city if no one could stock your bike shops or get tools and materials in here to build your super special green condos?! ...and why should the trades workers even want to build them for your elitist condescending asses?!? ("shitty jobs" etc)

and @3 there often are not adequate freight loading areas especially in the more residential margin neighborhoods where density is growing and substantial but infrastructure has not caught up. i would imagine bicyclists might understand what its like to not have all the access and resources they feel they need. so maybe try a little fucking empathy...

as for all the high and mighty following the law talk, i'm sure every one of you never goes through a red light on your bike - even when no one is around, never makes an illegal lane change, always wear a helmet, etc etc etc.... and never smoked weed before 502 was passed.
60
I don't really mind the delivery trucks so much. They're just doing a job.

What I hate are taxis and personal vehicles that park or stop in bike lanes. On Friday, some idiot disgorged his passenger into the bike lane on Dexter, directly in the path of 20 commuting cyclists.

So I yell "watch out!" at him so he doesn't get himself pummeled (at no point did he look for incoming bicycle traffic). What do I get for my effort?

A water bottle thrown at my head.
61
What does it feel like to run into a loading ramp?
62
@59: If they were delivering bikes, then it would be acceptable since the bikes would offset the effect of the truck. Vegan food would also be acceptable for the same reason. As would books on selected topics.
63
I spent 10 years on 2 wheels and came away with the conclusion that cyclists are dickheads par excellence.
64
Okay that was a little over the top...
65
@54:

Which is precisely why I have all items delivered to my office, where I have a very convenient allocation of reserved parking spaces designated for just such a purpose. Sorry about not paying the extra fees/fines/whatever. But, that's the price one doesn't pay for thinking ahead and planning accordingly.
66
These reports do give us a bit of insight into the sociology of the phrase "check your privilege," no?
67
@65 who delivered your fucking house??? I know you all live in green condos but that doesn't mean they actually grow by themselves...
68
@56:

And anyone who's been caught doing any of those things probably knows full-well they'll be cited for the infraction, because that's what happens when you get busted. So, what's your point? That people should just indiscriminately break laws whenever they feel like it and NOT expect to take their lumps because somebody else somewhere once got away with it?
69
@67:

I believe my "fucking house" (are you suggesting it was once or currently is a brothel? I'm not sure) was delivered sometime early in the last century, when my street was a rutted dirt road traversed mainly by teams of oxen (and the occasional horse-drawn cabriolet) plodding up the skid road from Yesler's Mill, although it's just as likely the timber was felled, bucked, sawed, and planked from the trees on the property, that being a fairly common practice around here back in those days.

I'm sorry, what was your point again?
70
Wow, a whole lot of straw man arguments up in this thread. "You can either let trucks park wherever they damn well, please, or you must forsake all the material goods that you hold dear!" Or how about, you know, we designate some sort of zones... where it's legal to undertake loading and unloading... and enforce them?
71
As the operations manager of a distribution company who occasionally has to make deliveries in this town, and as a Seattle voter who is a staunch supporter of grade separated bike lanes, expanded public transit, and a series pneumatic tubes to get pedestrians around faster...wow you guys. Just...fucking...wow.
72
@69: Has anyone verified that they are breaking laws?

I haven't verified for Seattle, but for Renton, they have a FAQ that states that delivery trucks can block a lane for deliveries:

http://rentonwa.gov/living/default.aspx?…

The RCW (46 something 560 or 570) relates specifically to parking in places prohibited or outside of cities. Is there a municipal code violation here? Please cite it with evidence that it has been enforced.
73
Call 911 for this? Are you kidding me? I don't care if an officer of SPD told you this themselves because they can "bounce it back to the non-emergency line", as a citizen I am telling you that the 2 minutes it takes you to look up the number (you should already have it anyway) or the 2 minutes for the call taker to determine that you need to be "bounced back" is the 2 minutes I waited on hold with a recording playing when I called 911 for a house fire on June 6th. 2 minutes doesn't seem like long, but sit there and watch a house burn while you listen to "don't hang up, your call will be answered in the order it was received" for 2 minutes. Parking complaint? Ugh!
74
The trucks in the photos are NOT the same make and model...FAKE BULLSHIT....LIES...Wow, another fraud from the malcontent bike Nazis...
75
@23: Once again, I am simply saying that calling the phone line specifically for life and death emergencies because you feel personally insulted that a truck blocked your lane of traffic is not a good idea. There are ways to get in touch with cops without calling the EMERGENCY number because of an inconvenience. People calling 9-1-1 for inconveniences like this should be fined.

Is that so hard to understand?
76
@75:

Even though it's an SPD representative ENCOURAGING citizens to call 911? Seems there's a bit of a disconnect if it's the police themselves who are advocating an action you seem to feel is worthy of punishment.

Or maybe we should fine SPD for suggesting it in the first place?
77
@72:

It's covered under SMC 11.72.100 (Double Parking): "No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle with its side next to or adjacent to another vehicle which is stopped, standing or parked on a street, or alley except while angle parking." There is no exception made for delivery vehicles occupying a lane of traffic, either here or in SMC Section 11.74 which covers loading and unloading of commercial vehicles.
78
I don't mind so much if a delivery truck blocks a bike lane to make a delivery. It doesn't take 45 minutes to get something off the back of a truck.
79
The WHOLE article is BULLSHIT.....The photos are of 3 different trucks and check out the curbs and pavement ....BULLSHIT I say !
80
@61: Same as it does when you're going too fast and collide with another vehicle. Except bikes don't have air bags.
81
Some of you here are smart and very lucky to live lives where things are so cut and dry. Sure every person can call 911 for every parking violation. Will that solve the problem? Perhaps. Will that begets new problems? Most certainly because we are talking about human nature and finite resources. And they are anything but cut and dry.

I called 911 for a car accident with injury. Same when I saw a person having a major seizure on the bus. I wouldn't call 911 in Ansel's case because I can just merge in with cars and go around or hop onto the empty sidewalk and be on my way. And while SPD may have given the green light to make such a situation -a 911 call, I do discern the difference given the demands on SPD and emergency services. I guess what I'm saying is the truck situation is irritating as heck, but I can deal with it on my own.
82
Even by Seattle standards, the pervasive idiocy and argument-from-partisan-alignment hostility here is astounding.

All the way back @38, I pointed out the solution to both problems:

- on Broadway, the yellow paint needs to be to the left of the cycle track, where the intended loading zone would be made obvious to delivery drivers and general parking-space seekers alike;

- on 12th, the truck can easily pull at least another foot closer to the curb, and is both morally and legally obligated to do so.

But it seems that not a single one of you read my comment, nor referred back to the photos to vet my conclusions. You all would rather literally argue from ignorance, employing pre-molded stock responses about who is the most "entitled" faction in town.

I would submit that willful ignoramuses of all stripes seem equally entitled around here.

83
@69 congratulations for having the money and elite status to live in an original craftsman house from the turn of the century. You must be better than everyone. I assume no toilets, boilers, heater, dishwashers, or laundry machines have ever been delivered to your house since original construction and that when you moved in the movers parked three blocks away and carried you bed and dresser down over grown sidewalks to your home. Or because of your privledged status, parking is not an issue in your exclusive neighborhood...

Either way my point was that your reasoning is asinine and very self centered. You must be proud of yourself.
84
@79, LOL.
85
@83:

I guess, if you consider a 300 ft/sq mother-in-law apartment built into the basement of a 110 year old farm house in the "exclusive neighborhood" known as The Central District indicative of "elite status". But, you go right on ahead making an ass of yourself; it suits you.

And you ARE aware that most non-arterial residential streets in Seattle DON'T have designated loading zones, nor bike lanes, sharrows, or cycle tracks, yes? Which, apparently, by your definition must mean people who live in Haller Lake or Rainier Valley or South Park are also elite, self-absorbed yuppy scum, because they don't have delivery trucks illegally blocking NON-EXISTENT designated bicycle thoroughfares.

So, again I ask: what IS your point?
86
@83 is your mother-in-law unit a legal duplex arrangement. If not, maybe someone should call 911
87
@86:

You're starting to comment to your own self. Maybe someone should call 911 for YOU.
88
Simple error. answer the question. you know who I'm talking to. But go ahead and change the subject if you cant defend your position
89
@88:

It may be a "simple error" to you, but from my perspective it may be indicative of a mild form of Multiple Personality Disorder, which, in addition to your penchant for anonymous trolling, means I do NOT in point of fact KNOW to whom I'm talking; for all I know, you could be a 12 year-old girl in Argentina.

But, if the answer to your question is so vital to maintaining your sense of personal well-being, stroking your ego, or fulfilling your need to score insignificant rhetorical points, I guess you'd have to ask my landlord.
90
@89: I heart you.
As for the rest of ya I'm with d.p. @ 82 and LEE @ 71.
I just do not understand why anything having to do with bicycles turns Sloggers into such raving maniacs.
91
@90:

Thanks. I don't think anything having to do with bicycles TURNS some Sloggers into raving maniacs - it just seems to be one of many, many subjects that can trigger the latent mania which is always inside them. If they couldn't express their outrage over this, I have no doubt they would have little difficulty finding another object upon which to direct their impotent spleen-venting.
92
@82: If I could highlight your comments, I would!
93
@92: I'll just repeat the factually objective and non-insulting parts, in bold:

- On Broadway, the yellow paint needs to be to the left of the cycle track, where the intended loading zone would thus be made obvious to delivery drivers and general parking-space seekers alike;

- On 12th, the truck can easily pull at least another foot closer to the curb, and is both morally and legally obligated to do so.


These are pretty straightforward problems to ameliorate.
94
Some truck drivers disobey traffic laws, making conditions worse for everyone else. However, the decisions of some drivers to break laws should not reflect on all truck drivers- that's as bad as the "all cyclists are horrible lawbreakers and should be banned because one time I saw..." arguments that we've all come to hate.

These individual drivers should be punished, and SDOT/SPD should look into what needs to be done to improve the situation for drivers and cyclists alike.
95
We should just make it legal to key any vehicle illegally parked in a bike lane - enforcement problem solved.
96
@92 Oh Anzel, If that was really your attitude, your journalism would have led us to that solution rather than calling 911...

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.