News
Jun 25, 2015 at 4:09 pm
Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
More In News
Editors' Picks
Popular Articles
is a proud member of the
network
network
All contents © Noisy Creek, Inc.
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
That's funny, doesn't she go around and lecture other women?
I don't know if his church was ONA, but I do know he has addressed our General Synod, and was supportive at that time. This was before he ran for President. After he announced his candidacy, the GOP tried to strip the tax exempt status of the UCC because they thought his speech was political. Clearly they didn't even bother to actually listen to his speech. And considering how many conservative churches push politics from behind the pulpit, that is pretty ironic.
What a fucking surprise.
The Wasilla Hillbilly Hypocrites ride again!
I honestly think this snow-billy idiot doesn't know how babies are made.
I like how she preaches but can’t practice what so ever she is doing a word salad about..
I don't know, there must be something punchier out there [any ideas?], but this young woman is working hard to make the points that need making. She just doesn't mean to.
Since the wedding is not on, it follows ex-fiance #2 is not the father. Which makes Bristol a CPOS in addition to a hypocrite.
So he was more than happy to throw any gay friends, coworkers and staff under the bus under the guide of political expediency. I don't see how that's better than opposing gay marriage on principle.
You forgot to mention how she does "not want any give lectures," so there is that--she's tired of being a hypocrite....Oh wait--She actually said "I do not want any lectures."
My bad. Never mind.
She is the poster child for the failure of abstinence only "education". She and her son, plus her future child are living, breathing, walking proof that abstinence only is an utter failure. Had her school or her family taught her to use birth control if she was going to do the deed, yeah, it's possible she would get pregnant, in which case, I would be empathetic. But she and her family are a pack of hypocrites, so she gets no compassion from me.
Next time, Bristol, use a condom, as that Situation dude suggested.
No she didn't? Having a baby doesn't teach everyone to use birth control.
It's crass politics, but his support is present now that he's been elected. And it's absolutely better than hate.
(As she gets older, does Sarah become a palincrone?)
Maybe some porn company will do a Nailin' Palin 2.
But I am shocked, shocked I tell you that Bristol is pregnant out of wedlock again!
I feel a little joy myself, that surely she will have to shut up about abstinence after this, or become a walking, talking sketch comedy.
Ever the optimist. This is literally her only job in life, to be a life coach. Her ability to talk out of both sides of the mouth was instilled side birth.
Except use birth control.
The existence of this article rests on the idea that because the Dumb, Hateful, Stupid, No-Good people might have said rude things if one of Obama's daughters were pregnant, that it is therefore OK to do so here.
If your goal was to as reputable as Fox News, congratulations
It is not at all analogous, and she can easily step out of the spotlight and stop getting reported on.
Whether we should post on it or not is a separate argument. But you're being highly disingenuous if you think the two are at all comparable.
Her livelihood is based on repression and an inability to live up to her own goals. Perhaps one day she can find the love she needs, but until then, she and all others deserve birth control readily and morally available as needed.
The frequency of sex doesn't make her a bad person, harming others does.
You slutshamed her.
McCain would have lost to anyone. The economy was in freefall thanks to the GOP and while the American public might have the memory of a gnat they were actually aware of that at that time.
What is this babble even supposed to mean?
Why try to argue for the sake of arguing?
Point is, this isn't cool no matter whether she's a staunch Republican, whether she's a hypocrite, and even if she does harm people with her sham career. That she's had sex with enough guys to breed twice is really not why her and her grifterfamily are shitty.
But folks, let's stop slut-shaming her. It doesn't matter who she screws as long as he's a consenting adult. We can shame her for her hypocrisy without shaming her for having sex.
But with all these homophobic, abstinence-preaching, degenerates; 'hypocrisy' is not an adequate term. Bristol really doesn't 'get' the dissonance. The Duggars really think they did the morally responsible think enabling the abuse of at least 4 more girls.
The only term I can dig up for this is 'Moral Insanity.' A bit Victorian and horse-and-buggy in tone. But does anything else really cover how destructive and willfully ignorant these bozos are?