First time ever?

http://www.sgn.org/sgnnews35_37/mobile/p…

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news…

@1

It's not like higher wages has anything to do with whether a woman needs access to abortion, is it?

First time ever?

http://old.seattletimes.com/html/politic…

@2 @3 @5

Nice finds.

Stenography of Barnettian self-aggrandizement or just two people who didn't check their facts?

Corrections made. Appreciate keeping our snide comments to this post up.

An additional clarification: NARAL Pro-Choice Washington has endorsed in council races when we have identified a candidate as anti-choice. This is the first time we've made endorsement decisions in all council races regardless of whether an anti-choice candidate is running. The endorsements are made by our board and PAC board, and neither I nor any other staff member gets a vote.

@8: OK, got it. Every major candidate is pro-choice, but you just wanted to give your board members a chance to plug their friends. Next!

I'm not sure why Tim Burgess is deemed pro-choice since he's donated money to an anti-choice organization in the past.

Looks like Barnett's lack of fact checking has followed her to her new career.

If 100% of the candidates agree with Erica's new special interest podium 100% of the time, endorsements of a few seems to benefit Erica's special interests more than her employer.