No endorsement in District 3? Hmmm. Probably has nothing to do with Barnett's strong dislike of Sawant, right?

It's not like higher wages has anything to do with whether a woman needs access to abortion, is it?
@2 @3 @5

Nice finds.

Stenography of Barnettian self-aggrandizement or just two people who didn't check their facts?
Corrections made. Appreciate keeping our snide comments to this post up.
An additional clarification: NARAL Pro-Choice Washington has endorsed in council races when we have identified a candidate as anti-choice. This is the first time we've made endorsement decisions in all council races regardless of whether an anti-choice candidate is running. The endorsements are made by our board and PAC board, and neither I nor any other staff member gets a vote.
@8: OK, got it. Every major candidate is pro-choice, but you just wanted to give your board members a chance to plug their friends. Next!
I'm not sure why Tim Burgess is deemed pro-choice since he's donated money to an anti-choice organization in the past.
Looks like Barnett's lack of fact checking has followed her to her new career.
If 100% of the candidates agree with Erica's new special interest podium 100% of the time, endorsements of a few seems to benefit Erica's special interests more than her employer.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.

Add a comment

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.