Comments

1
That $16 mil should be spent on roads and infrastructure, not on nice-to-have warning systems for theoretical possibilities. I'd rather have secure bridges if the big one comes than a few minutes to pour myself a cocktail to enjoy the ride.
2

This should be funded by Property Tax.

If Sven Seattle and Wally Washington are too tight-fisted not to protect their own homes from a tsunami, then let them get washed away.

5
It does nothing to make up for her vote to fast-track TPP.
6
Do y'all even require residential seismic retrofitting? Might be a good first step.

@2 - There's already a tsunami warning center in place for the West Coast from Alaska to San Diego. I think what they want the money for is to monitor the Cascadia fault the way California monitors its on-shore faults, which has proven to work.
7
You people who are saying that you want this to fail because of "hype" are fucking idiots. God damn, just fucking idiots.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.