News Dec 20, 2022 at 1:17 pm

Current System Is So Confusing Judges and Prisons Screw Up 10% of Sentences

We should probably have some consistency about how long we make people spend behind bars. ANTHONY KEO

Comments

2

It was judicial mistrust that led to the tough on crime bills of the 90s and mandatory sentencing standards. Now we’re going the opposite direction and again implying judges can not be trusted to do what’s best for the communinity. It’s nonsense and the only outcome will to turn the state into a version of Seattle where you have 20% of the criminals occupying 60% of the resources. Let judges do their job. Thank God for the squishy moderates who will hopefully shoot this legislative overreach down

3

“Under the current guidelines, a person with no prior criminal history who commits some Class A offenses could receive a lighter sentence than if they had committed certain Class C offenses, for example.”

As Will the attorney here utterly fails to explain, this could be a consequence of how the laws are written by legislators, rather than sentencing decisions by judges. For example, “domestic violence” is not itself a felony in Washington state, but it can be a consideration in sentencing. So, conviction for the Class A felony, “assault with a deadly weapon” between two strangers could indeed receive a shorter sentence than would a conviction for the Class C felony, “assault with battery,” when it was against a family member.

As I personally have no problem with longer sentences for perpetrators of domestic violence, the situation as Will here describes it does not warrant legislative urgency. Perhaps he could instead advocate for the legislature to make domestic violence crimes explicit felonies?


Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.