So, the Stranger publishes yet another fawning article about a repeated no-hope candidate who will, of course, attempt to defeat a liberal Democrat. (Because not a single one of Washington state's many Republican elected office-holders has yet become the tiniest bit complicit in the Trump administration's cruel policies?) Last time, demanding cease-fire in GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA was all of the motivation; here, Gaza has shrunk into the background a bit, but of course there's absolutely no mention of the once all-important cease-fire there, and certainly not of Hamas' imperiling said cease-fire by refusing to disarm.
And just because he's a repeat candidate, doesn't mean we can ever learn anything useful about him. "His platform is still fuzzy." Given the Stranger hasn't mentioned it either time, can we assume that, like many members of his faith, he opposes a woman's right to choose?
“I'm going to push all these people, whether it's the attorney general, whether it's the governor, [to] act on the behalf of these people who are impacted by this fascist administration,”
Maybe if last time, you'd spent less time slagging the Democrats on GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA, we might not now have a Republican administration at all?
@1 his platform isn’t fuzzy he just doesn’t want to talk about it because it’s deeply unpopular. He wants to pass an all out income tax, he wants the government to confiscate wealth like CA is proposing and he wants to control housing ala Zamdani and Cea Weaver in the name of affordability. What could go wrong?
@6 even if you don't believe people will leave, as most progressives don't, you should take into account Jamie Peterson's own words when asked about the fact they passed a ban on income taxes last year. He said "It's a pie crust promise, easily made, easily broken". Anyone who thinks this will stop at $1M once passed is hopelessly naive.
“We cannot endorse Vice President Kamala Harris’ candidacy because of her refusal to even consider imposing the arms embargo on the Israeli government required by U.S. laws and her failure to promise any other changes whatsoever to President Biden’s failed policy of steadfast financial, diplomatic and military support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza.”
The Stranger doesn’t want you to remember folks like CAIR helped enable the election if the orange piece of shit - aka, “this fascist administration”
“American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force, a coalition of national 501(c)4 political organizations, today calls on all American Muslim voters to turn out in the 2024 election and vote for candidates up-and-down the ballot who support just policies here and abroad, including a presidential candidate who endorses a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo on the Israeli government, such as Green Party nominee Dr. Jill Stein, Justice for All nominee Dr. Cornel West or Libertarian Party nominee Chase Oliver.”
Remember, Harris bad - Putin toadie and libertarians good.
@12-@14: Thank you for your persistence. Now that Hamas has undeniably become the major threat to both the cease-fire they demanded in Gaza, and to the lives of Palestinian civilians there, our local "Genocide!" crowd no longer even pretends to care about cease-fire, Gaza, or Palestinian civilians. As that pretense was their sole basis for demanding the arms embargo they also won't talk about now, all they can do now is hope we forget all of their machinations during the election -- machinations which, we told them plainly at that time -- could only have benefited Trump. Denial and censorship will result when that hope fails them, as they have demonstrated with you here.
Again, thank you for your vigilance and persistence.
"In 2024, he tried to unseat Rep. Kim Schrier (WA-08), who he felt hadn’t stood against Israel’s war on Gaza."
Ok, let's follow that link and see what he said: "'You know, as somebody who's voted Democrat their entire life, I ask: How are Democrats differentiating themselves from Republicans at this point?' Siddiqi said in a phone interview with The Stranger."
Uh-huh. So, translation, he doesn't actually care about the well-being of America or the rest of the world, and was happy to enable Trump burning everything down, in order to Make a Statement about Gaza. Even though he knew this wouldn't actually help Gaza, it would hurt everyone else, and that was enough for him. Yeah, it'll be a cold day in hell before I support this both-siding backstabber.
Oh, but now he'll be "protecting people against ICE." Really. Because apparently protecting people against ICE didn't matter in 2024, and he was happy to help Trump turn ICE into his private gestapo, because hey, ICE didn't harm Gaza, so what's the difference?
But, no, guys! Davis totally sucks! She cares about stupid things like [checks] the health and safety of people who live in Seattle! Gross! Such a hand-wringer! Hasn't she gotten the memo? Caring about the well-being of your constituents is for "corporate democrats." Real progressives understand the goal is making pointless political gestures that harm your constituents, because the glow of having made that stunningly dramatic point will be all that you need.
"I feel that there is a shortfall in terms of leaders who have failed to meet this moment, to stand up as our communities are being ravaged by ICE.”
I'm sorry, what? Mr. Didn't-See-The-Difference between this and ICE under Biden? The guy who knew this would happen but didn't think it mattered enough to motivate him to support Kamala? HE wants to talk about who's been falling short, here? HE HELPED THIS HAPPEN! Now after shooting holes in the lifeboat he wants to criticize how everyone else is bailing out the water? Fack all the way off, buddy.
Few events delight here as much as a puff-piece political profile garnering exactly zero supportive comments. In my favorite prior edition, the comments began with "[The subject] sounds perfectly awful," and ended with, "Take your bizarre and destructive ideas somewhere else." (https://www.thestranger.com/elections-2023/2023/05/19/78997570/mutual-aid-organizer-tye-reed-enters-city-council-race-in-north-seattle/comments)
The subject of that piece finished fifth in the primary, barely edging that famously fearsome North End political powerhouse, Boegart Bibby. We can only hope Mr. Siddiqi's performance in the election follows a similar pattern.
So, the Stranger publishes yet another fawning article about a repeated no-hope candidate who will, of course, attempt to defeat a liberal Democrat. (Because not a single one of Washington state's many Republican elected office-holders has yet become the tiniest bit complicit in the Trump administration's cruel policies?) Last time, demanding cease-fire in GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA was all of the motivation; here, Gaza has shrunk into the background a bit, but of course there's absolutely no mention of the once all-important cease-fire there, and certainly not of Hamas' imperiling said cease-fire by refusing to disarm.
And just because he's a repeat candidate, doesn't mean we can ever learn anything useful about him. "His platform is still fuzzy." Given the Stranger hasn't mentioned it either time, can we assume that, like many members of his faith, he opposes a woman's right to choose?
“I'm going to push all these people, whether it's the attorney general, whether it's the governor, [to] act on the behalf of these people who are impacted by this fascist administration,”
Maybe if last time, you'd spent less time slagging the Democrats on GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA, we might not now have a Republican administration at all?
"I'm very passionate about holding billionaires accountable"
For what? Does that include Oprah?
@1 his platform isn’t fuzzy he just doesn’t want to talk about it because it’s deeply unpopular. He wants to pass an all out income tax, he wants the government to confiscate wealth like CA is proposing and he wants to control housing ala Zamdani and Cea Weaver in the name of affordability. What could go wrong?
why wouldn’t it include oprah
@4: Because his hate is against tech bros, e.g. Elon, Tiel, etc
Anyone in favor of a 9.9 percent tax on income over $1 million is hopelessly misguided. That will ruin our state and drive out jobs.
@6 even if you don't believe people will leave, as most progressives don't, you should take into account Jamie Peterson's own words when asked about the fact they passed a ban on income taxes last year. He said "It's a pie crust promise, easily made, easily broken". Anyone who thinks this will stop at $1M once passed is hopelessly naive.
https://m.kuow.org/stories/gov-ferguson-wants-to-see-a-millionaires-tax-in-washington-state
@7: Next up: assets!
@5 he just says billionaires in the passage you quoted though
@10: never mind about it
Too funny, my comment @8 calling out the hypocrisy of CAIR Action was pulled - how sad.
Posting again…
https://cairaction.org/press-release/american-muslim-2024-election-task-force-calls-on-muslim-voters-to-turn-out-support-candidates-who-back-permanent-ceasefire-arms-embargo-and-other-just-policies
“We cannot endorse Vice President Kamala Harris’ candidacy because of her refusal to even consider imposing the arms embargo on the Israeli government required by U.S. laws and her failure to promise any other changes whatsoever to President Biden’s failed policy of steadfast financial, diplomatic and military support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza.”
The Stranger doesn’t want you to remember folks like CAIR helped enable the election if the orange piece of shit - aka, “this fascist administration”
Pathetic
“American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force, a coalition of national 501(c)4 political organizations, today calls on all American Muslim voters to turn out in the 2024 election and vote for candidates up-and-down the ballot who support just policies here and abroad, including a presidential candidate who endorses a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo on the Israeli government, such as Green Party nominee Dr. Jill Stein, Justice for All nominee Dr. Cornel West or Libertarian Party nominee Chase Oliver.”
Remember, Harris bad - Putin toadie and libertarians good.
@12-@14: Thank you for your persistence. Now that Hamas has undeniably become the major threat to both the cease-fire they demanded in Gaza, and to the lives of Palestinian civilians there, our local "Genocide!" crowd no longer even pretends to care about cease-fire, Gaza, or Palestinian civilians. As that pretense was their sole basis for demanding the arms embargo they also won't talk about now, all they can do now is hope we forget all of their machinations during the election -- machinations which, we told them plainly at that time -- could only have benefited Trump. Denial and censorship will result when that hope fails them, as they have demonstrated with you here.
Again, thank you for your vigilance and persistence.
"In 2024, he tried to unseat Rep. Kim Schrier (WA-08), who he felt hadn’t stood against Israel’s war on Gaza."
Ok, let's follow that link and see what he said: "'You know, as somebody who's voted Democrat their entire life, I ask: How are Democrats differentiating themselves from Republicans at this point?' Siddiqi said in a phone interview with The Stranger."
Uh-huh. So, translation, he doesn't actually care about the well-being of America or the rest of the world, and was happy to enable Trump burning everything down, in order to Make a Statement about Gaza. Even though he knew this wouldn't actually help Gaza, it would hurt everyone else, and that was enough for him. Yeah, it'll be a cold day in hell before I support this both-siding backstabber.
Oh, but now he'll be "protecting people against ICE." Really. Because apparently protecting people against ICE didn't matter in 2024, and he was happy to help Trump turn ICE into his private gestapo, because hey, ICE didn't harm Gaza, so what's the difference?
But, no, guys! Davis totally sucks! She cares about stupid things like [checks] the health and safety of people who live in Seattle! Gross! Such a hand-wringer! Hasn't she gotten the memo? Caring about the well-being of your constituents is for "corporate democrats." Real progressives understand the goal is making pointless political gestures that harm your constituents, because the glow of having made that stunningly dramatic point will be all that you need.
"I feel that there is a shortfall in terms of leaders who have failed to meet this moment, to stand up as our communities are being ravaged by ICE.”
I'm sorry, what? Mr. Didn't-See-The-Difference between this and ICE under Biden? The guy who knew this would happen but didn't think it mattered enough to motivate him to support Kamala? HE wants to talk about who's been falling short, here? HE HELPED THIS HAPPEN! Now after shooting holes in the lifeboat he wants to criticize how everyone else is bailing out the water? Fack all the way off, buddy.
Few events delight here as much as a puff-piece political profile garnering exactly zero supportive comments. In my favorite prior edition, the comments began with "[The subject] sounds perfectly awful," and ended with, "Take your bizarre and destructive ideas somewhere else." (https://www.thestranger.com/elections-2023/2023/05/19/78997570/mutual-aid-organizer-tye-reed-enters-city-council-race-in-north-seattle/comments)
The subject of that piece finished fifth in the primary, barely edging that famously fearsome North End political powerhouse, Boegart Bibby. We can only hope Mr. Siddiqi's performance in the election follows a similar pattern.