News Jul 22, 2010 at 4:00 am

An Abridged Guide to Everything You're Missing on Slog, The Stranger's 24-Hour Tunneling Blog

Comments

1
Where are the West Seattle and Ballard lawyers and those in the know who can help stop this tunnel? My own (back of envelop) calculation is that for $3 billion less, the current viaduct could be retrofited to last 25 years more withou causing massive traffic problems a tunnel project would cause.
2
Yes 'HONESTLY', and then how much MORE expensive will a replacement, of whatever type, cost in 25 years? At least double or triple or sextuple times what it will cost now.... So if you want to have your cake and eat it too, realize that no matter what year/decade/century a project of this magnitude falls into, it will always be considered too expensive.

So, I ask you, why spend 1-2 billion to upgrade a structure to get, maybe (and your "25 years" is a HUGE maybe), a few more years out of it when we could spend $4-6 Billion and, if properly enginieered & constructed, get a brand NEW STRUCTURE built to last 100 years? The latter would be the better investment.

On top of this....retro-fitting would still require replacement (not just re-surfacing) of all the roadway's concrete (which has crumbled, in spots, to almost see-through!), which WOULD disrupt traffic and therefore cause delays and potentially more accidents.

If we wanted to "save" money, we tear down the out-dating viaduct and stick with the once-recommended surface street idea. No viaduct and no tunnel. It opens the waterfront up, but also has just as much traffic noise as the viaduct, but without the cost a new one or a tunnel. Simple as that.
3
The tunnel would open up the priceless waterfront down there. The potential for revenue from that alone easily eclipses the cost of the tunnel. Stop being so fickle people.

If it goes over budget so what the city will not collapse. I believe it's over a 10 year period anyway.
4
Hmmm....in 25 or 100! years - did anyone mention how much automotive traffic will still be around then? Maybe there's another angle too? Maybe we should consider (gasp) investing this magnitude of money in something more future-relevant, like say, education, or fortune portend rapid (and I *do NOT mean Bus-Rapid) transit. In the odd case that cars are sill huffing along poisoning the shit out of us and continuing their reign of dysfunctional urban blight, there will be so many of them that the 100 year old once- brandy-new "structure" will be vastly too small anyway. But hey if we get rid of public education I bet there would be more than enough money to drill an oil-tanker wide tunnel at that point. A pitiful state of affairs. Those tunnel people should go suck a tailpipe somewhere and let the good mayor and the reasonable folks take care of things.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.