It says so much about how conservatives think about the media that to them, a news organization reporting on a study equates with the news organization promoting and espousing the results of the study. They literally can't imagine media that does not serve a propaganda purpose.

@1 - Spot. fucking. on.

They no doubt can imagine it; they just haven't ever experienced it.

So, you admit that Dan savage is a puppet master leading our youth astray?! I'm going to go tell the crack investigative journalists at InfoWars.

Well, not really. I'd probably become physically ill if I ever looked at that site.

BTW, has anyone ever noticed that InfoWars is a surprisingly accurate name for an organization dedicated to swaying the gullible through propagandizing allegations known to be false?

And now all these "oh so outraged" GOPers and Nazis will watch CNN day and night, hoping for more stories about cuckolding!

and a how-to primer!

@1, So, by their reasoning, if Trump reports that murder rates are up in Chicago, he's actually endorsing murder? Interesting.

If the media you know and love only tells you the things that you want to be true without regard to whether they're true, maybe that somehow leads to a weird twisted mindset where it makes sense to attack other media for saying things that you don't want to be true.

I respect and look up to some religious people, but I can't help wondering if the willing suspension of critical reasoning in favor of choosing to "believe" in an imaginary friend in the sky helps some people down the slippery slope to ignoring evidence on all subjects and just choosing to believe whatever the hell they want, which usually seems to be something about brown people, women, and people of minority sexual orientations being treated too well.

I'm really glad I'm an atheist.

How is it any different than liberals believing polls that Hillary Clinton was going to be president.

you snowflakes sure got triggered by @1.

@10 CNN IS MY THINKER! - CNN LOVES #METOO -CNN IS MY THINKER! #METOO = VICTIMIZATION - CNN IS MY THINKER - BEING SLUTTY IS REPORTEDLY OK- CNN IS MY THINKER- I’VE BEEN SEXUALLY HARASSED AND OR ASSULTED BY A MAN I CHEATED WITH- CNN IS MY THINKER - #METOO: I’M A VICTIM - CNN IS MY THINKER - CNN POLLS HAVE HILLARY CLINTON AS BEING NEXT PRESIDENT- CNN IS MY THINKER...

Fact is, a woman would have been shared with friends / tribe members in early history. Men secretly love this idea (see the absolute preponderance and multitude of gangbang porns.) Then you've got the cum-scoop shaped head of the actual penis to remove the seed of the men who would have preceded you when it was your turn. Cuckolding, sharing, gangbanging, turn-taking... it seems repulsive and heartbreaking now, but it is written in our history whether we acknowledge it or not

Shared, like a thing.
Swell.

@14

No welfare check. #11 should get a job like the rest of us.

I'm 99% certain the Daily Caller writer doesn't have a clue what "deconstructionist" means, and thinks it means "a person who wants to destroy society" or something.

@15 Pretty sure blip @14 meant sending someone in to check on @11's wellbeing. See if maybe he needs to be carted off to a home. Not as in presenting the resident kookaburra with free money.

I sure wouldn't want to be Katie after Dan sees his name in the same sentence with the non-word, "sexpert." Whether it's referring to him or not.

I do wish people would give up as the default insult the occasionally-true taunt that revulsion = fascination. It's degrading and LMB-making.

@8,
The difference is that liberals understand the poll-takers weren't endorsing or promoting Clinton, they were merely reporting data.

Liberals also believed what the polls said about Trump's numbers, also understanding the poll takers weren't endorsing or promoting Trump either.

There's a difference between advertising and reporting.

@1 - probably the best non-Savage-Love-related comment I've read on here in 5 years.