Comments

1
Another thing to remember when signing on the student loan dotted line is that the amount you borrow in relation to what your income is is used in calculating your FICA score. So, say you are making $35,000 a year an owe $100K in student debt. Even if you are re-paying on time and in accordance with all the rules and regulations, even if you are staying out of default using the new IBR or ICR repayment plans, lenders still see that you owe almost three times your salary. If you can get a mortgage (not likely!) or a credit card or auto loan, because of the lower FICA score, you'll pay way more in interest than someone in the same salary range who doesn't carry that debt. Lenders and the credit scoring agencies see debt as debt. As far as they're concerned, you could have a $100K Mastercard bill - except the $100K credit card debt can be discharged in bankruptcy.

My counselors told me that "student debt was good debt." That, of course, is bullshit in this economy. If you do borrow, stay away from private lenders like Sallie Mae and stay with the government's Direct Student Loan program.

When you vote this November, find out how your candidates feel about changing student loan laws (i.e., discharging in bankruptcy, etc.). The student loan lobby is HUGE and very powerful and there are several members of Congress who benefit financially by keeping the status quo. They pretty much have made low and middle class borrowers slaves for a lifetime. Only death or permanent disability (not a bad back but losing one's eyesight and both arms and legs) discharges student debt.
2
Wow, this last section is unhinged. And massively irresponsible, considering your audience. Seattle is one of the most intellectually vibrant cities in the country and you're telling its new student cohort that there's nothing in higher education that they can't teach themselves? That "learning things" (in scare quotes) and experience are mutually exclusive alternatives? Way to play right in to the corporatizing rhetoric of business schools and finance degrees ("fields that pay"), not to mention the stereotype of west coast vacuousness and entitlement.

This from a public school kid who grew up in the 80s and 90s in the second poorest state in the country, barely got into college, majored in English Lit, amassed debt, went to grad school (in English Lit), amassed more debt, and now is perfectly fulfilled in a creative career in Seattle with no loans left to speak of. So fuck you guys.
3
In my ideal world, 18 year olds would leave high school, work for 5-15 years and THEN go to college. When I was at Evergreen in a business/management (yes, they have those at Evergreen) program, half the students were 20-21 years old and the other half were in their 30s-40s and it was like two populations from separate planets coming together. I was one of the 20 yr olds and was in awe of what I saw the older students getting out of the schooling. Went back at 27 myself for some polishing and aced that course - 3.98 GPA - with ease, just due to the real world polish I'd acquired.
4
Brendan Kiley misses an opportunity to bring some helpful direction to the issue of student loan debt. His article assumes that the readers are unable to figure out how loans work and simply makes warnings of assured financial ruin if loans are taken. It would be very helpful if the Stranger could have a larger piece on this issue and give the assignment to a writer with an understanding of debt and how borrowing to invest in your education and future can work. The potential pitfalls must be explained for sure, but in the context of the whole.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.