Aaah, the crystal clear tranquility of an empty comment thread. Who would trade this for the dopey tracker-infested Disqus thread dominated by one fan?

Re: WATCHER. The whole "not open for discussion" argument is power politics rather than a healthy relationship. How is WATCHER supposed to know what qualifies as porn? Xhamster? Sports Illustrated (swimsuit edition or maybe even the NFL draft results)? Any woman walking down the street not wearing a burqa? It sounds like the porn ban is just a club to be brought out any time the subservient member is in need of a good whack.

It's almost as bad as the "toilet seat down, lid up, no discussion" ultimatums.