First, the praise: There is nothing wrong with Scott Sanders's Black Dynamite. You will enjoy the kung-fu fighting; you will laugh at the many references to the main themes of the blaxploitation tradition; you will not be disappointed by its crazy ending. The editor, Shawn Maurer, knows the logic of funky sequencing. The director, Scott Sanders, has a great sense of comic timing. Michael Jai White, the star of the film and also one of the script's authors, has complete control of his macho (or "mac ho") character.

Next, the criticism: What is right with Black Dynamite also happens to be what is wrong with it. Meaning, all you can give this movie is praise—praise for the editing of its action sequences, for its competent acting, for the director's knowledge of the blaxploitation tradition, and for its groovy score. The film begins with a quest for praise and ends by finding lots of it. But what one wants from a movie of this kind, a movie about a type or period of cinema, is for it to cross the border of being merely entertaining (order) to being a work of genius (disorder). This I think is the hidden or even silent failure of Black Dynamite—it is a comedy that never reaches the strange regions of the cosmic.

A final thought: Think of Pootie Tang. That film, which has much in common with Black Dynamite (both deconstruct popular images of black masculinity), can hardly be called a comedy. It is a work that defeats any effort to name or classify it. Pootie Tang is pure genius. Because Black Dynamite is easily (indeed instantly) classifiable—it's a good comedy—it does not capture our amazement but only our praise.