Wonder who the GOP will offer up for the next governor's race. The Pro-Pedophile Sentient Thumb again? Mrs. Wife of Blind Vet Who Can't Find Coffee in Seattle? The Perpetually Unemployed Chair Thief? It's quite the Algonquin round table they've got going on.

"Oops"? Seriously, fuck Barr's fishing expedition. Durham didn't prove shit. Release the unredacted Mueller Report.

Wait till Russia ends the Black Sea grain deal, which will trigger a massive famine, and a huge influx of starving refugees into the E/U.

TFG would have abandoned Ukraine to his masters in the Kremlin, which just like Alsace-Lorraine, would have emboldened putin to invade Poland.

Vote Blue, because between Ukraine and Taiwan, without deft and intelligent leadership, the U.S. will likely find itself in a major war, and some of you reading this will likely wind up as cannon fodder.

@1 I'm guessing it's going to be either the Unrepentant Insurrectionist (Joe Kent) or the Christian Nationalist Insurrectionist (Matt Shea). I'd put my early money on Kent. They're going to see if they can pull a sub-40% performance statewide.

@5, or Loren "I'm Not Dead Yet! I'm Feeling Much Better!" Culp.

@3
‘Some of us’?
If there’s even a limited nuke-out, a minimum of 100 million in the USA. Real estate in the Southern hemisphere never looked so good!

If you are wondering what it would be like to go with TS preferred option on public drug use we need look no further than Oregon who decriminalized drugs in 2020.

https://www.wweek.com/news/state/2023/04/22/economist-magazine-a-longtime-proponent-of-drug-decriminalization-says-measure-110-is-struggling/

https://www.wweek.com/news/state/2023/05/13/survey-shows-oregonians-have-dim-outlook-on-efficacy-of-measure-110/

In case you don't want read further here are a couple good snippets:

"In the two years since the new law took effect, drug arrests are indeed down. However, overdose deaths in Oregon have risen sharply, far beyond the increase recorded nationally."

"On top of the struggle with funding, Oregon law enforcement agencies have issued roughly 4,450 citations since the implementation of Measure 110, but only 189 people have completed screening for addiction treatment"

Did anyone else notice that in the press photo of DeSantis's anti-diversity bill signing ceremony, he appears to be surrounded entirely by white people? Either the white-supremacist contingent in FL no longer feels the need to be coy about it, or else the guv committed perhaps the biggest unforced error in political optics since G.W. Bush signed the "partial birth abortion" ban surrounded entirely by men. Either way, worthy of note.

@3: where is this "Putin will invade Poland" stuff coming from? Poland is in NATO. Russian doesn't want any part of a direct engagement with NATO. Besides, the USSR already took 1/3 of Poland in 1939 - it's still the eastern thirds of Belarus & Ukraine.

Putin would take Moldova, sure. More of Georgia, sure. He may annex Belarus when Lukashenko crumps.

But Poland? I don't think he'd want it, except to have a land route to his Konigsberg exclave (which Stalin kept as a war prize).

@11, the dude who couldn't beat Culp in the primary last time? LOL

@11 What, the guy who took [checks notes] 5.4% of the vote in the 2020 gubernatorial primary, behind Loren Culp, Tim Eyman, and random dude Joshua Freed? The guy who would be campaigning on expertise and public health? Suuuuuure, that sounds like a good bet in today's Republican Party.

Let's face the reality of the Republican Party. Combined, Republicans took about 43% of the primary vote, so a successful gubernatorial candidate needs to win 15-20% in a crowded field or 20-25% in a two-person field. If a Republican candidate doesn't say that Trump won in 2020, they've instantly lost ~20% of the primary vote. It's theoretically possible that they could win, but it's pretty unlikely, especially if there's more than two people in the field. And if there are more than two Republicans running, there's a solid chance that Franz and Ferguson will both advance to the general election.

Hahahaha. Of course not included in Dipshits selective excerpt above:

"The Economist didn’t provide those figures."
and
"It’s certainly true that drug-related deaths are increasing among Oregon teenagers faster than anywhere else in the nation, as The Lund Report revealed in WW’s pages last month. But that rise began well before voters approved Measure 110."

So opioid deaths began increasing BEFORE measure 110.

And more importantly cherry picking "teenager" deaths is a cute trick. Because TOTAL opioid death rates in Oregon are lower than many Red states with STRICT criminalization. The coastal regions are younger. IE higher youth populations and coastal regions always see high migration of youth. So. Duh.

However the HIGHEST opioid TOTAL death rates are certainly NOT Oregon. They are all in criminalization states and almost all in RED states with the strictest criminalization policies.

For instance the highest rates are Kentucky, Louisiana, West Virginia, Tennessee, Florida and Alaska.

Deaths by state:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/drug_poisoning_mortality/drug_poisoning.htm

So criminalization is such a huge success, right?

The law, based on Portugals highly successful drug policy is only flawed because Oregon is not a nation and subject to the same vacuum effect as every other progressive policy suffers when surrounding states are regressive. IE: Idaho, Nevada, Montana, Utah just happily bus thier addicts and homeless to Washington and Oregon.

Because this is the rightwing solution to anything: distract with a Culture War and make it "somebody else's problem."

Nice try Dipshit. Lying again.

@14 you are so banal. Portugal is effective because they have treatment alternatives and if people don’t accept them there are consequences. Both articles note that decriminilizing without standing up alternatives FIRST is a recipe for a shit show which is why oregon voters may end up repealing Measure 110. Now who’s being dishonest?

"Sure they're cute now," he says looking at himself in a handheld mirror, "but just you wait. Men of Mediterranean ancestry never age well."

Actually, for a Disney invention they're having a pretty good run. A revival. Never really completely forgave them for that purity ring nonsense though even if it was imposed on them by corporate. Stupid. Duplicitous. Hypocritical. Up to their necks in tail, they were. Bet they're glad they are finally old enough to be out from under Mama. She was a button-punching case-and-a-half.

@18 - maybe it has to do with the fact that, with Roe dead, the Repubs are concerned that the Talibangelicals are not going to be so motivated to come out and vote for them anymore, so they have to gin up another thing that Jesus hates.

Maybe it has to do with the fact that gay marriage didn't turn out to be that issue (it's been accepted with surprisingly little bloodshed) so they needed something else.

If you are correct that the anti-trans position on the right is so motivated by the desire to protect kids from making bad medical decisions, then why would the fix be to ban discussing the issue or to pass bathroom bills?

@18, etc.: The bigots are targeting trans persons because they are fundamentally bullies, and by expanding civil rights, we have taken away all of their other victims. Hence their need to put teens with gender issues through living hell. It’s really the last group they can hate unreservedly. Add in the frustration of them being anti-choice without Roe, meaning they’re starting to lose their jobs at elections, and you have a perfect storm of hatred and bigotry, bitterly searching for a helpless target to torture.

@21 - of course they would. My point is that these were non-issues until the Republicans needed another issue to con the rural Bible-thumpers into continuing to support them post-Roe.