Dear Stranger readers,
2020 is finally behind us, but our recovery is just beginning. Reader support has ensured that our dedicated and tenacious team of journalists can continue to bring you important updates as only The Stranger can. Now we're imploring you to help us survive another year. Ensure that we're here to ring in our upcoming 30th anniversary by making a one-time or recurring contribution today.
We're so grateful for your support. Thank you.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Sign up for the latest news and to win free tickets to events
Buy tickets to events around Seattle
Comprehensive calendar of Seattle events
The easiest way to find Seattle's best events
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
A thousand "meh" to you.
Tell me again how religion makes us better people?
@2/6 - What a sad, unfulfilling world you must live in.
Politics is broken. We know that Congress won't lift a finger to do anything that might help.
The police are all very well, but they can't be everywhere and can mostly only intervene after the damage has been done and then investigate after the fact.
What do we do to protect our community?
I'm a big guy. 6'4", 235#, lift 4-5 times per week. I spent five years as an active duty infantryman in the Army. I know how to look intimidating. Hell, if it comes right down to it, I know how to handle a firearm. Should I be one of the ones to step up and do something to protect ourselves? What? How?
It's not just aesthetics; you don't need a rapid fire, large cartridge weapon for hunting or home defense.
And yes, this won't stop until there's reasonable gun control.
@17: Given your knowledge of how much training it takes to fire accurately even when not under pressure, what do you think of twenty civvies pulling out their pistols and trying to drop a gunman, like the NRA thinks we should have? What's your over/under on the net change in casualties resulting from that action?
BTW, welcome back Pridge.
In fairness, aren't there leftists who practically exult when a terrorist incident is some angry white guy, or right wing extremist?
Its all quite unseemly, this business of having one's prejudices confirmed, and gloating over the corpses while clucking "told ya so." I would just hesitate about pointing fingers too much, because this ugly stuff is seen from not just one prism.
To be followed by truly horrific reasoning:
Let's go out on a limb here and say that the guy wasn't made a hating, armed radicalist created by conservative Christianity, Trump, the NRA, Koch brothers or any other convenient bogeymen that spark the senses.
This guy was filled with hate and violence because – and write this down – Hate and violence are widespread phenomena around the world. (Anyone watching Euro 2016 this week? You think the Europeans are beating the shit out of each other for the next 3 weeks because, hey, their lousy Emergency Rooms are free?)
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/rus…
Notwithstanding the rights of people – gay people – to enjoy and drink, dance together without being beaten and/or shot, there is a psychic dissonance in America between how we "feel" the world is, and how the world "actually" is.
Soft parenting has led a generation of soft-headed Millenials to "feel" like the world is a sun-shiny place where violence and hate intercedes. It's not. The real world is at a constant point of tension between people wanting to do you harm, with the odd chance that grace and love may occasionally break-out.
This constant tension is why people own private guns. Trying to address guns (and not mental and social health, which is the crisis), is a fools errand. The cities that have virtually eliminated gun possession consistently demonstrate the highest levels of violence. Chicago. Detroit. Baltimore. Washington DC. Indisputable facts.
And cultures riddled with possession of high-capacity, high-power semi-automatic rifles live quite peaceably. Switzerland has a higher household saturation of weapons (a requirement for all service-aged men to have a battle-ready weapon at home), yet its murder rate is 0.77 per 100k. In the US its 3.88 (And appallingly, 19.4 among African Americans).
We don't actually have a widespread gun problem. We have a massive don't-care-about-people problem concentrated in the poor, urban, black community.
And nobody on the Left wants to say anything. Because, appearances... as that's an inconvenient narrative to the Left.
Instead of looking at the evidence:
- That banning weapons actually makes people less safe.
- That gun murder isn't a widespread phenomena.
- That lawful societies can live peaceably...
Its somehow easier to try and project the Muslim son of a war-torn Afghan immigrant family, whose centuries-old cultural senses were offended – and say he was contemporaneously motivated by Christian evangelicals, the NRA and Donald Trump. What a fantastic fable.
The Orlando shooting is reprehensible.
In the kooky-rationalizations of the Left, sense and reason have also being massacred.
Second, before we blame Islam, religion in general, guns, Fox News, Trump, whatever, remember this shit cuts both ways: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/19/justice/dc…
The problem is simple: violence. Violence used for any means aside from defense or to secure freedoms when there is no other choice is the only time violence is justified. I don't care what your politics are, just don't resort to aggression in a free society. It achieves nothing.
Maybe if we had Swiss gun laws we'd be safer. But in America, more guns just means more death, particularly suicide.
@36: Well put.
That said, Floyd Corkins is the exception rather than the rule as far as ideology goes.
And what would have been his response, if he were President?
I was thinking more along the lines of scaring them off before the shooting starts. Give them the thought that things aren't going to go down as they hope they will. Make them think twice.
Put it another way: when I park somewhere where I know there's car thefts, I'll put a club on my steering wheel. Not because it will make my car impossible to steal, but because it will make it a relatively harder target.
Is there some good way to make our community a harder target? Because this isn't the first time we've faced this sort of thing.
@30,
You bring up some valid points. I'm at a loss as to how America is so hyper-violent. Most confounding. There is a strange disconnect. I believe America is coming apart not uniting. Whether it's race, gender, religion or sexual orientation, we seem to be more polarized than ever. And all it takes is one hater (or among a collective of) to manifest the most terrible damage. In addition to my sadness, I remain confounded. Sigh.
In Switzerland citizens can carry an unloaded gun in transit. Legally carrying a loaded weapon requires a permit (waffentragbewilligung), which is hard to acquire. (But most criminals here in the US don't bother with concealed carry permits, so...)
The Swiss only have to account for all issued ammunition as part of their militia program. All semi-automatic standard ammunition is subsidized by the government to encourage marksmanship training. Swiss gun clubs proliferate, and additional ammunition is widely available by simply showing ID (and not being a convicted criminal). As this is the only limitation, you can be sure that blackmarket ammunition is readily available to criminals.)
Your distortion of the Swiss relationship to guns is a deluded, fact-less effort to wish-away how the world ACTUALLY works, and backfill with illiberal nonsense.
The Swiss (the world's oldest democracy, with decentralized federal powers) have fostered a society with mutual respect for the individual, self-reliance and healthy distrust of the central state. (Growing up next to the Germans will do that). Relative cultural harmony has ensued. Maybe that – instead of the possession if inanimate objects, and the conjuring of feel-good-do-nothing gun legislation – should be the focus of your attentions.
We're fortunate compared to European countries like France and Belgium in that we don't have as many Muslims who are susceptible to ISIS's call to murder people at "soft targets" but we still have some (and perhaps many more than people think.) Considering how easy it is in this country to obtain weapons capable of tremendous carnage and how easy it is to carry out an attack on any "soft target", I'm surprised there haven't been more attacks like San Bernadino and now this tragedy in Orlando. But I know one thing: there will be more*. And I don't think it helps one bit to have the media trumpeting this as the "WORST MASS SHOOTING IN U.S. HiSTORY." I think that just encourages other would-be terrorists to try to top it.
*There will also, of course, be more mass killings by people who aren't motivated by ISIS (or by killing "infidels.") There are just too many angry and/or crazy people in the U.S. and, as noted above, it's just too easy to obtain weapons capable of tremendous carnage and, as a society, we appear to be incapable of dealing with either the former or the latter.
@41:
This guy had a death wish, and nothing would have prevented him from acting out on it, short of removing his ability to commit mass-carnage in the first place. I simply cannot imagine that things would have gone down much differently, even if he had known for absolute certain there were people carrying in that nightclub; it wouldn't have reduced the number of casualties, and most likely would have increased them as those carrying attempted to engage the shooter under those conditions. This guy wanted to die and his goal was to take out as many others as possible before he was taken out himself. He succeeded, and the only difference between this horrific tragedy and one in which armed citizens intervened in the moment would have been the exact number of dead and wounded, and I am in no way convinced the number would have been significantly lesser in the latter scenario.
This has to stop. We have to stop it. Responsible gun owners have to work with us towards some sort of sensible, effective legislation to ban assault rifles, register firearms, require competency training, and to weed out those who cannot be trusted to operate them responsibly. If they can't or won't, they need to step the fuck aside and let the rest of us do what's necessary to stop it to the best of our ability.
It might be in our "cultural DNA". Here's an interesting piece in The Smithsonian: The Shocking Savagery of America’s Early…
Oh, I see, the argument is a little more nuanced than that. In fact human beings have a natural relationship with hate & violence (and love & acceptance) for which religion presents a forum for resolution. And in the name of religion some go on killing sprees, and some dedicate themselves feed and care for the sick, elderly. (Faith communities are by far the largest public aid providers in the region, regardless of the recipients' fatih).
Because its not religion that is bad, its' people that hide behind it, or absolve themselves of thinking because some mighty Allah in the sky of Imam in the mosque "told" them something. Those are human problems, not religion problems.
In fact, most Abrahamic faiths abhor violence against gays. But that's inconvenient to your sense of hysteria.
Factually, reducing access to guns (see Chicago, DC) doesn't reduce violence. In fact, it may increase violence, as it diminishes deterrence.
Blaming "religion" and "guns" for everything furthers the Lefts insistence that individual people aren't responsible for their own choices and actions. There are outside forces that seek to do us harm and and only a large, centralized state government can "protect" you.
But first, they'd prefer a disarmed citizenry.
(Don't read much history, do you....?)
I understand that previous versions of Republicanism were fiscally conservative and inclined to MYOB. And it's nice to believe that we can separate that ideal from the people holding office as Republicans, and say that the ideal is what we're voting for, not the people.
But the people you are voting for -- the TX LGs, the GA Sen - have put targets on your backs, on the backs of your friends and families, on the backs of all of us who are 'other."
They do not represent the Republican ideal.
Why do you keep choosing them to represent you?
I'm truly interested in the answer(s).
Sensible people can agree that there's little reason for the AR-15 to be sold to the public for any reason other than for white dudes to show them off on Facebook, and for them to buy parts on Amazon (!) to create their own builds. It's a $1500 man toy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_…
Just like after the similar attacks in France (a gun control paradise) this shows why we need Trump so badly. Has Jimmy Ocarter made any typically impotent statements yet?
http://flvoters.com/by_number/1144/84524…
Thanks, I shall read it.
When you say "faiths" what, exactly, are you referring to? All the people in those faiths or the faiths "themselves" (i.e. the "holy" scripture that is the basis for the faiths)?
Because its not religion that is bad...
If you don't see religion as "bad", then would you say it's not "good" either?
(They ship it to where needed)
Go to
http://www.bloodworksnw.org/programs/ind…
Wow, the contortions implicit! Not only do you neglect to mention that the "transit" must have a valid purpose like taking it to the range or to a gunsmith (just carrying it around like people here like to doesn't count), how much crime do you expect unloaded guns to prevent WHEN EVERYONE KNOWS THEY'RE UNLOADED?
"additional ammunition is widely available by simply showing ID"
Except that you also have to show proof that you passed a background check, your residency information, and a valid weapon permit. If we required those here in the USA, the gunhumpers would throw a fit! And given the controls on the sale of ammunition and the oversight of those selling it, I'd love to see some evidence for your assertion that ammo is easy to acquire on the Swiss black market.
Also, you say that the Swiss have a distrust of authority inherent to their culture while entirely glossing over the mandatory military service and the whole thing about HOW THEY HAVE A STRONG FEDERALIST SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT. They've got bureaucracy at all levels! Efficient and well-designed bureaucracy, but still vastly different from the renegade-libertarian-freedumbs system you impute to them.
Are you at all familiar with the facts here?
Also, the bigotry that commenters above are objecting to concerns the singling-out of Islam as violent, when it's a bug of many other religions; so yeah, no, I will not partake of your illogical Trumpesque Islamaphobic straw man arguments, tyvm.
http://nccs.urban.org/nccs/statistics/ch…
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfarec…
Not "disarmed," just reasonably-armed. I have my hopes that this is not too much to ask. In fact, historically-speaking we have had much MUCH better gun control in this country, with little loss of freedom for responsible citizens.
I'm all ears.
On background, gun violence in the US has fallen dramatically –50% since its peak in the early 90's. And while the number of guns is up significantly, rates of gun ownership have fallen -30%. It's not that more people have more guns and and so violence is increasing. Quite the opposite.
- 39% of total white US households report living in a household with a gun.
- 18.1 percent of black US respondents reported that they lived in a household with a gun.
- 29% of Swiss households own a gun (2005)
Switzerland's gun murder rate is 0.77 per 100k. In the US its 3.88 overall, though appallingly 19.4 among African Americans. Statistically: white Americans live in "Belgium." Black Americans live in "Iraq."
Adjusting gun murder rate (per 100,000) by presence of guns in households clearly demonstrates that we don't have a gun problem. We have a culture and mental health problem.
http://www.vpc.org/studies/ownership.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co…
Having done a 2-year stint in Bern, I can assure you my comprehension of the facts.
The Swiss "presidency" is a ceremonial gig, for a one-year term, representing a 7-person council designed to keep an executive in check. Notably, he/she can't stand for a consecutive 2nd term.
Most of Swiss policy and budget is devolved to the 26 cantons. It is widely regarded as the closest thing to direct democracy in the world.
Perfect? No. But far more liberal (meaning freeing) than your "liberal" authoritarian party politics could every imagine (or see as desirable).
Venomlash @ 55
Who knows, maybe creating a political climate to close all gay clubs and once there are no gays there are no problems. Apparently Iran and Russia are our role models nowadays.
That second part is certainly true. Have there been any mass slaughters where the murderer was a woman? (If there have been any, they are definitely the exception.)
As you asked, about half of the largest aid/relief/care charities in the US are religious affiliations.
Group – Annual Revenue / Efficiency
Salvation Army – $4.1B / 90%
Catholic Charities USA – $4.4B / 89%
St Jude’s Children’s Research - $1.3B / 83%
YMCA – $6.6B / 86%
World Vision– $1.03B / 87%
Food for the Poor – $1B - 93%
Compassion International – $.7B - 89%
Habitat for Humanity – $1.53B / 86%
Catholic Relief Services – $.69B / 92%
http://www.forbes.com/top-charities/list…
From food banks, to shelters, to meal programs to meeting (AA) facilities -- "organized religion" represents the most significant aid infrastructure in Seattle. (Union Gospel Mission, Providence (largest uncompensated healthcare provider), Catholic Housing Services (shelters 4,000 per night), Catholic Community Services, runs 12 soup kitchens, countywide, each day.
I used to be a staunch 2nd Amendment advocate in my bad old libertarian days. I was raised with guns, responsible gun ownership, in a southern setting. But all of us (in my family) have turned against the type of wild west horse shit that exists now. Having children really changed everything for me.
Blessings from (whatever you choose to insert here) to all the families touched by this. Loving kindness to all.
Still waiting on your evidence of an ammunition black market, by the way. No, hand-waving is not evidence. (Protip: if you tightly regulate legitimate manufacturers, importers, and dealers and hold them accountable for stuff that goes missing on their watch, it makes it a lot harder for merchandise to be sold under the table. All guns and all ammo comes from somewhere...)
And an executive council rather than executive officer doesn't make for the sort of libertarian paradise you seem to have inferred. You're making shit up as usual.
WRT gun control, here's the problem with that: there are already about 300 million priv….
Suppose you passed whatever your ideal gun control law is. Background checks, restrictions on magazines, hell...let's just go whole hog and ban the sale of guns altogether, shut down Colt and Smith and Wesson and all the rest..
What do you do about those 300,000,000 weapons that are already out there? Do you send the police door to door to confiscate them? How's that going to play out? Do we even have the resources to do it, even if every last person is cooperative? Do we want to live in a country where the police can go door to door like that? Can search your house looking for contraband?
This is exactly the same problem that Trump's arguments about rounding up all the undocumented falls apart on. Even if we agree that that is a desirable thing to do, both the logistical problems and Constitutional issues make it impossible. This is obvious on its face to liberals. Why is it not so for weapons?
As a practical matter, even with the most favorable political climate, the guns are simply not going away. We need another solution.
And a fair amount of the victims were black, so it's not as though blaming the black community is in any way appropritate. Black people care just as much about human life as anybody else.
....so desperate for a nanny state to hold your hand through life, you can't even be objective...
As for Switzerland, ammunition is a portable, non-traceable, high-value commodity with regulation and restrictions, attractive to the criminal class. A prohibition climate. So is there any reason you would think it WOULDN'T be available in a black market?
Or in your fantasies about all Swiss obeying all guns laws, do your Swiss criminals trade in heroin and ex, but not bullets. You live in a state of denial.
Further, Switzerland's laws are much less restrictive than the crackdowns in Chicago, DC (and Russia) – yet those places with bans have runaway gun murder rates, much higher than the Swiss.
Saying gun violence can be cornered with licensing, training and registration is like saying whale hunting is a boat-licensing problem, drunk driving can be solved by driver's-ed classes, and arson is a problem due to the unregulated sale of matches.
Jesus, the news came out that the FBI did three in-person interviews with the Orlando shooter and STILL couldn't ascertain a threat. You think some background check and training is going to stop the committed criminal from attaining a weapon? (Like the AMAZING success of Brazil, with its mandatory licensing, registration, and maximum ownership quotas, and bans for new owners. Because their homicide rate 3x higher than the U.S)
Grow the fuck up.
I may vanish for a bit due to not wanting to see the attempts at point-scoring.
Ban assault machine gun type of weapons. NO ONE NEEDS THOSE...do they? NO. They don't.
You're correct. It's not. Just like being a human being is not a disease. But human beings are afflicted by diseases and violence is a disease that the male "humankind body" has. Women are not immune, of course, but their tumor is far smaller.
And so I drew the apparent contrast between the two Americas, with the incredible divergence in gun violence by race and locale. Overall gun violence in America appears high, until you isolate for variables and find-out that, statistically, gun violence in most of America is like much of gun-free Europe.
I don't doubt that many, many, many individual black people care very, very much about humanity. Unfortunately, what is commonly "black culture" (refusing to cooperate with police, unwed parenting, tribalized gangs, rejecting educational attainment) creates a crisis proliferating in Democrat-controlled cities, and for which "Progressives" won't even address for dear of being called 'racist.'
@84 Great argument. Weak finish.
Some 26 years ago there was a plot to call Neighbors and declare a bomb, then as people rushed to the alley drive by and drop a real one.
One of the plotters, needless to say all are from the state on our east, felt this is wrong at some point and decided to cal the FBI just before things got serious.
At least this is what we were told.
originalcinner @ 66 Roma @ 70
I don’t like Mondays either
Lava @ 78
I wouldn’t be surprised to find out the killer had homosexual tendencies which terrified him.
Do we really need to keep building the metaphorical mass graves for people to stand next to just because the NRA is afraid to get anything banned now?
*crickets*
http://www.fox32chicago.com/news/crime/1…
ex wife, she stated he was violent towards her. That he was very mentally unstable. When she was married to him, seven odd yrs ago, he wasn't into any radical politics. Though it seems his
father was/ is a supporter of the Taliban.
And there is that shit stain Trump tweeting thanks for congratulating him. for what? He didn't call for any haters of homosexuals to be banned from entering the country.
As early as September 2014, Mr. Adnani made clear that anyone and everyone could, and should, carry out acts of terror in the group’s name. “Do not ask for anyone’s permission,” he said, and suggested that sympathizers who could not buy weapons should instead use rocks, knives or even cars to kill infidels. . . . In this case, there was a stark resonance between Islamic State propaganda and the killer’s choice of target. The jihadist group has publicized its hatred of homosexuals, including releasing images of fighters killing people suspected of being gay by throwing them off tall buildings.
We can go back and forth all day about whether or not we think there's an active black market for ammunition in Switzerland. You say it's portable and non-traceable? I say it's more traceable than you think, and because it can't be home-manufactured all that easily the supply can be controlled by proper oversight of manufacturers. But that's all just hand-waving, which is why I'm asking you once more: do you have any EVIDENCE to back up your assertion that ammunition is easily acquired on the black market in Switzerland?
Chicago and DC suffer from the problem of open borders; any yahoo can go to a gun show one state over, buy a gun from an unlicensed dealer sans oversight, and bring it in without having to go through customs. That's the problem, and you know it. (A full 60% of guns recovered from crime scenes in Chicago came from states with looser regulations, especially Indiana. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/…) Russia, meanwhile, is plagued by pervasive corruption at all levels of power, making an analysis of its laws unreliable at best.
The bastard who shot all those people in Orlando was on the FBI's radar for a while, but they didn't have enough evidence to actually charge him. They didn't think he wasn't a threat, just that he wasn't an actionable one. Meanwhile, the NRA ensures that people on the no-fly list are allowed to buy whatever firearms they like. Your argument against background checks is the same one they always advance: that we shouldn't enforce background checks because they don't work because we don't enforce them.
And no, training isn't to stop gun homicides; it's to stop accidental deaths.
Don't be such a mermaid.
@74: I have no doubt that bigots exist, or that they would be crass enough to celebrate this. What I doubt is that such a high-profile politician's PR team would do so.
I don't think he's a saint. I just know that people in his position usually do plan their Tweets well in advance, and the Tweets are usually posted by interns. If you believe a politician's social media posts are from the guy himself, I've got this bridge...
Where are you fitting a double stack gun in your sequin short-shorts, brah? Besides, 9milley or bust.
@95 A tropical themed button down party shirt could hide pretty well if I wanted it to. Also, I got a good deal on the compact fo-taay, otherwise I agree.
So two questions: What OTHER laws (aside from those NATIONAL bans woefully failing in Russia and Brazil) would cause intent criminals in the US to obey?
What is the magical quality of the Swiss that they obey their laws on ammunition, but still have a nice little crime rate -- higher than Greece, Hungary, Portugal?
What a fantasy world you live in....
Fool.
Australia had experienced mass shootings before, but the Port Arthur massacre shook the nation to its core. . . . The Australian government subsequently introduced the National Firearms Agreement — legislation that outlawed automatic and semi-automatic rifles, as well as pump-action shotguns. A nationwide gun buyback scheme also saw more than 640,000 weapons turned in to authorities.
An article published online in July by the NRA claimed "This gun-control regime ... robbed Australians of their right to self-defense and empowered criminals, all without delivering the promised reduction in violent crime," Research, however, suggests otherwise. Gun-related homicides decreased 7.5 percent per year following the reforms, while firearm-related suicides have also fallen, according to one Australian study. Although there have been calls to revisit the laws, most Australians haven't looked back.
There is this caveat:
[Former Prime Minister John] Howard acknowledges that "major cultural and historical differences" make it difficult to draw comparisons between the gun cultures in the U.S. and Australia.
I am performing in a pit orchestra for a local musical, and we wore ribbons
on our black dress outfits at today's show upon hearing this dreadfully heart-
breaking news.
This madness has to stop now. If Congress, US House and Senate won't
stop this, then we need to overhaul Congress, the House and Senate.
http://www.minister.border.gov.au/peterd…
The Australians have simply resorted to knives and matches since Port Arthur. The law can't prevent a committed criminal.
Cairns Murders – 19 December 2014 – Stabbing attack. 8 children aged 18 months to 15 years killed. Thirty-seven-year-old woman also found injured.
Quakers Hill Nursing Home Fire - 18 November 2011 - Arson attack by Roger Kingsley Dean, a nurse, which killed 11 people
Churchill Fire - 7 February 2009 - Arson attack by Brendan Sokaluk that killed 10 people.
Childers Palace Backpackers fire – 23 June 2000 – Arson attack by Robert Paul Long, which killed 15 student backpackers.
After reading all the stuff here about Switzerland, I read that as We have both a gun problem and a Toblerone problem. Time for me to hit the sack.
The whole point is that gun control only works if it's actually consistently enforced. It's not a difficult concept, and yet you seem to be unable to wrap your head around it.
And hey, you want to know what crime doesn't happen as much thanks to it being outlawed, and the relevant laws being aggressively and consistently enforced? Murder.
@100: What's that? Gun control didn't stop ALL murders from happening in Australia?
Well, time to go home then! After all, no point in just preventing SOME murders; why, if we can't prevent them ALL we should just give up?
Imbeciles like you are the common criminal's best friend in this regard.
No you don't seem to realize – see Chicago, Brazil, Russia – that cracking-down on guns actually INCREASES murder rates, as criminals find leverage over everyday citizens.
I'll ask again – what law are you proposing that would lower gun deaths, and where else has that been proven to work?
Perhaps you haven't noticed, from Sandyhook to Orlando, that these mass murders are in "Gun Free Zones"
Florida statute (790.06):
https://leb.fbi.gov/2014/january/active-…
Also important are the actions that civilians take to protect themselves during the 3 or more minutes that it takes the police to arrive. Civilians need to be trained about what to do if one of these attacks occurs. A variety of resources are available at no cost. Federal agencies, including both the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, endorse the use of the teaching technique of Run, Hide, Fight to explain to civilians how they can protect themselves and others around them.[8] Police departments and the communities they serve should work together to implement this training.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/a…
What’s Pro-Life About an AR-15? The right to life takes second place to the Second Amendment.
I think something stronger than LMB is required for this one. I trust the assembled company will have no or little difficulty in deciphering the meaning of SMN.
Frankly, you're disgusting for even mentioning victims in this context.
The discussion others were having is about whether prescriptions for gun control are reasonable and effective. Using the deceased as human shields, to defend the weakness of an political ideology, is vile.
I've expressed my sincere condolence (@30), which you're invited to take on face value. And while you're at it – remember that ineffective gun control robs gay citizens of their rights to self defense as well.
Classless....
Good discussion between you and Venomlash. Granted it's heated but I've learned much. Thank you to you & VL. And I agree with you regarding @110. He or she is out-of-line. The victims' families deserve only sympathy & support. I believe you, me and many others on SLOG have given it. This is a most unfortunate national tragedy.
Printed button-downs are the best for that CC life, cheers mate :)
I couldn't get through this terrible article. Danny Boy was grasping at straws to incorporate any hated group he could lambaste by association: white, republican, Trump, Aurora, SC (therefore racist and homophobic by proxy.)
Danny Boy, how come you never mention www.pinkpistols.org? It's an LBGTQ group that supports the right to keep and bear arms. That's pretty cool because it would seem to me that oppressed and disadvantaged minorities should be embracing the precepts of self-defense to protect themselves and their civil rights from people that hate them for their identity. Like Islamic extremists.