Comments

1
I'd love to read an analysis by the Stranger of how a Monorail could accommodate this kind of ridership.
2
Next time you talk to them can you ask why the hell they don't put on extra cars for Sounders / Mariners games & other huge events that they full well know the schedule for?
3
@1: why, because you can't let go of a grudge? NOTHING HAPPENED.
4
Yet another positive step for light rail, and yet another reason to point out that The Stranger tried really hard to keep it from happening.

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/more-…
5
I love Link, and it's great to see these numbers rising, but it's also important to acknowledge that some of the increased Link ridership is happening because many north end buses now end at Husky Stadium where people transfer onto Link to go downtown (e.g., route 73). Prior to this change, these people would have simply taken the bus all the way downtown. If we eliminated those rides, I'm sure we'd still probably see an increase in Link usage, but the percentage of increase would likely be lower than 83%
6
@1: Nobody wants your plan.
7
@5: And?
8
That's like when they release political opinion polls. "Hillary is up 5%" and then chiming in, "yeah, but some of those people were neutral before. If there were no Hillary, they'd probably go Trump".

Like, obviously. People are switching to the light rail because they like it better [more reliable, faster, seating, whatever] than the bus.
9
I have been wondering if the character of the city already changed a lot and I missed it. I got onto next-door for my neighborhood, and I see people freaking out about a construction project to replace a duplex with 24 units and no parking!!

Naturally they are outraged. The street parking which the city provides free of charge is already hard to get to, and now 24 more people are coming in!! I emailed DPD to see what I could do to help the project get over any hurdles.

I thought this kind of construction was illegal in Seattle. I thought we had a law requiring parking space for every dwelling unit. Did the law change and I didn't get the memo? Or was that never the law? I looked at the DPD map and found another project like it, 30 units with no parking!! Build more like this and we will see some change I can believe in.

Here's me mocking the next-door post:
http://bodybuildingelf.blogspot.com/2016…

Here's the project
http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/shapingseattl…

And here's the other one:
http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/shapingseattl…

with these beautiful words that I never thought I would see on a Seattle.gov land use proposal: "Since the site has frequent transit access no parking for cars will be required or provided. Bicycle storage inside the building is proposed with the preferred option."

Are they sneaking this in? Am I fucking it up by talking about it? Is my desire to celebrate way too early?

Most importantly, can someone with more experience in this tell me how many hurdles these projects have to go through and what I can do to help?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.