True that.
Donald would not have given Paula Jones a second glance.
Or Hillary either, we suspect.

Seriously, why waste a good rape on an ugly nag, amIright CC?? Big Hi-Five there you big boy you!

Even this doesn't make sense. Natasha Stoynoff is a reasonably attractive woman. Maybe not model-pretty, but his insinuation that she's some sort of troll is way off-base.

Anyway though - everyone knows that sexual assault is not really about attraction - it's about power. And that fits Trump to a T. For Trump.

@1
Who is this 'we'? Are you at a rape joke workshop for angry little boys or something? I hope you at least have the taste to keep it rated 'G' when your mom brings down the pizza rolls.

This is why the NSW Parliament passed a resolution calling the man "a revolting slug."

Trump dismisses the allegations on the premise of "Ew, uggo. No way, amirite fellas?" and the crowd erupts with applause.

Most years, you can accept that Republicans have very different political views, and despite those views standing in full opposition of science and basic math, they're still genuine beliefs. This year, I don't see how anyone regard them with anything but contempt.

I think we should turn the question around, and ask: Are those really Donald's children? I mean, who would have sex with a narsty man like that? Even once? I doubt his story completely that he's ever sired one offspring. I mean, just look at him!
He's clearly mentally ill.

next up: consensual partners diss his skills. its likely they don't pay the bills.

@3 -- I agree. Here is a picture of her: http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/natasha-st…

In short, she is extremely attractive. My guess is Trump did this sort of thing all the time. He did as much as he could get away with. Some groping here, some kissing there, or maybe just pop in on a young woman when she is getting dressed. Most of the women hated this, but he didn't give a shit. The man is in unrepentant piece of shit*. All it takes is one out of hundred to respond in positive way, and even if not -- hey, he got his jollies.

*His response to the Central Park Five is a great example. He was wrong. He was clearly wrong. A lot of people were, and they since apologized. But not Donald. No,he just shrugs it off, keeps going and sticks to his story.

My God, the campaign is really amazing. Even after all this shit, he will still probably carry 20 states. What a stupid fucking country. Any other election and just one of the dozens of stories would have dominated the campaign. But he has said so much crap I can't even remember it all, and neither can most voters. What the fuck is wrong with so many Americans that leads them to support this dip-shit asshole.

@17, What the fuck is wrong with so many Americans that leads them to support this dip-shit asshole? Tribalism. Projection.
He's not black, or a woman, so they assume he's one of them and has their interests at heart. Once they think that, then it doesn't matter what he says or does since that's not what they're basing their support on. One of us vs them. Go team.

The argument that women should've come forward earlier bothers me. It implies that the women were fame whores like Donnie and just wanted to make the headlines. In reality they probably thought of him as a very wealthy man with powerful friends who would sue the pants off of them if they went public. Not until the election when the stakes were much higher for the American public did they feel a moral obligation to share this information.

Plus if you read the stories a lot of them came forward specifically because Donnie denied assaulting women during the debate and that rankled them.

(I'm trying to make Donnie happen as a nickname for Trump. We need a more infantile name for that man child. Apologies to Donnie Wahlberg.)

When will this end. How is this horror of a man given any oxygen?
He is truly becoming a threat to stability.

@12 -- Yeah, yeah, sadly your right. That and a lot of Americans have a major daddy complex.

Ross @15; I've seen a pro trump group who call themselves daddywillsaveus.com, or some such weird wording. Kink has crossed over to the other side.
If trump is really going to throw a hissy fit and not do the third debate, then Hillary should use that time to outline her policies.
She has to address the basic wage, the rage from some trump supporters needs to be heard.
Enough of talk about that idiot. What are Hillary's plans, that's all that matters now. That fool is done, just have to slowly and carefully close him down.
His followers are not going to be so easy to quiet. Hillary has to speak to these people.

@16
#daddywillsaveus.com is the 'work' of "outspoken gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos". (Quoting the above site)
They held an art exhibit on October 8th in New York, where Milo tried to sell copies of his latest 'work' Twinks4Trump.

It looks like satire, but it isn't. I've heard of Milo before. He even made an appearance at an RNC after party. Oddly enough, he has a following among Trump supporters. Milo has been calling Trump 'daddy' for a while now.

A little part of me is mad at you for posting the link, but it is my own fault for clicking on it.

Sorry Adam. I thought it was a bunch of conservative mummas looking for their daddy!
I didn't check it out myself. Now I won't.

My state has early voting, and I am voting today! Hillary can only win if we vote. Sitting at home is an option, but it's not a responsible one.
BTW, have you seen that some young Christians at Liberty U. are starting to put God and country BEFORE party. I wonder what Falwell will do to them.

Mr Yiannopoulos is largely the conservative version of Mr Savage. They both rose to fame on little more than encouraging straight people to use the F-word at us, and the criticism of MY from the left is remarkably similar in tone to the criticism of DS from the right twenty-ish years ago. The presidential debates would have been worth watching if the two of them had taken them over from the real candidates. And it's arguable that Mr Savage's trying to sell us out to the regressive left made a large contribution to our being landed with Mrs Clinton. Mr Yiannopoulous, who it seems would like to be the only open gay on the planet, is trying to sell out to the repressive right. I used to think that the two of them should have a debate moderated by Dave Rubin for an all-gay affair, but lately, having come to suspect Mr Rubin of trying to sell us out to the muddled middle, I'd rather see him as a third debater. Who would be left to moderate - Andrew Sullivan?

It is a shame we seem stuck in a one-party rut. People who insist that we must must MUST be Democrats forever may correctly be predicting that there won't be a viable alternative in our lifetimes, but they aren't really helping.

@11,12,15,16 -- You have to realize that the people that 'support' Trump feel like they've been seriously fucked over by ALL politicians, and their issues have been ignored by the media.

Republicans have said "Oh, Values!" and then allowed capitalists to send factories overseas, de-industrializing the heartland of America. People are seeing jobs go overseas, their communities fall to heroin and meth, and the "New Jobs" everyone touts, are fucking Amazon "Fulfillment Center" sweat-shop mail-order distro centers, or Wal-Mart (a company that @Hillary has privately lauded).

ALL POLITICIANS are suspect... all politicians are bait&switch sellouts... and Trump supporters know this. They've been sold out year after year.

And you know what? The fucking CNN/NYT media fucking ignores them, year after year. Oh, boo hoo, "heroin in the heartland" etc etc. But nothing gets done. Jobs aren't coming back, and they know it.

The reason they support Trump is because he's the ONLY ONE poking his finger in the eye of these Yale-bred, lawyer, lifestyle Politicians who suck each other's fucking cocks year after year, trading CEO for Secretary of Fuckyou jobs in a revolving door.

They are so fed up with American politics that they're willing to take the Wild Card chance to fuck shit up.

Clinton has to take him down, of course. And sex is the classic destruction button for any politician. But she will not do anything for THEM. She will continue to ignore them. That's why they hate her. Trump has just whipped up this hatred to a fever pitch.

But business as usual means that the poor get fucked again, and again. And they're pissed.

So, no, it's not exactly "tribalism", although the Trump supporters do feel a strong pride and loyalty. It's that someone, someone without the obvious veneer of political decorum is willing to point fingers at two institutions that are ignoring Americans that are suffering in the "Global Economy".

If Hillary can't get seriously nationalist-protective and actually do a real something about American jobs... bring back industrial jobs, and stop allowing Wall Street parasites to suck the financial blood of America-at-Large... then she's as good as the rest of the sleaze-o-crats that came before her and did nothing to stop NAFTA / GATT / TPP from whisking jobs away from the deserving.

I'll vote Hillary... but it's not a vote for her, it's a vote to keep the Pumpkin out of office.

Hillary will be a step backwards from the Obama Administration.

You are all arguing about deck chairs on the Empire.

Treacle @21. I agree. Those following trump are confronting issues that need to be talked about.
Labelling these people is only going to make it harder, post trump, to help America heal.
Though it is hard to feel empathy for such hate filled people. People who somehow think trump, a perfect example of all that is wrong with American style capitalism,will turn the economic tide in their favour, who hate others with such vehemence, to reach out to them is a task Hillary et al have to do.

It's not about Trump.
He is incidental.

A lot of people in America are sick to death;
sick of the politicians, the corruption, the self-serving greed, the debt,
sick of the ever coarsening soul-less social values,
sick of the gaudy show biz carnival barking that passes for journalism,
disgusted by but caught up in a culture of dependence.
sick of endless wars that make us ever more unsafe and poorer,
Sick.To.Death.

Some of them voted for Sanders.
Some are voting for Trump.

They recognize in Trump
the ultimate anti-establishment ant--status quo candidate.

They recognize in Hillary
the ultimate establishment status quo candidate.
Old, fossilized, connected, impervious, corrupt, grasping greedy.

They don't particularly think Trump is temperamentally suited to be President.
They don't care.
Trump is a brick they have grabbed out of the mud,
a brick they are going to hurl through the window.
They don't care, don't notice if it is flawed.
It will suffice for the job.

They don't particularly think Trump will be a good President.
They don't care.
He is a can of kerosine they are splashing about.
They want to Burn This Bitch Down.
He will suffice.

Do they hate you?
No more than you hate them.

The 24/7 Bimbo Eruptions CNN and MSNBC evidently plan for the next three weeks will not change their minds. It will deepen their loathing of the 'press'. It will deepen their conviction that a rigged system condemns Trump for behavior that won Bill two elections. The hypocrisy will stick in their craws and burn like acid.

The election will not end anything,
regardless of who wins.

It will just be the beginning of a new chapter.

What's disturbing about the post @24 is that, like, every other line contains a kernel of truth.

@20 vennominon, I would pay good money to make that debate happen.

@24. Yes we can see the mentality of trump followers would lead to them throwing bricks or probably shooting guns.
As if trump is anti establishment! Get real. Sanders had the true path to start to smash down the walls of capitalist greed. Didn't notice the trump groupies running to support him.
Hating and blaming is easy. Much easier than really looking at how America has evolved to get to this point.
Hillary has one chance to show she understands this is a crossroads.

@25 - Still not going to read it, though...

@28 Well, you're not missing much.

27

Of course for that to happen they would have to lower themselves to the level of the Left.

To date the riots and destruction have been the handiwork of the most reliable members of the Democrap Big Tent.
As is the gun violence in this country.

"Hating and blaming is easy. Much easier than really looking at how America has evolved to get to this point. "
So true. Hopefully the message will sink into The Left.

27

The prospects of Hillary bringing America together seem slight,
based on her performance so far.

Not only does she dismiss those who disagree with her as Deplorables but in the same breath said "those folks -- they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America."

Hillary is showing those who do not support her the door.
To where, we wonder.....