Dear Stranger readers,
2020 is finally behind us, but our recovery is just beginning. Reader support has ensured that our dedicated and tenacious team of journalists can continue to bring you important updates as only The Stranger can. Now we're imploring you to help us survive another year. Ensure that we're here to ring in our upcoming 30th anniversary by making a one-time or recurring contribution today.
We're so grateful for your support. Thank you.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Sign up for the latest news and to win free tickets to events
Buy tickets to events around Seattle
Comprehensive calendar of Seattle events
The easiest way to find Seattle's best events
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
"Ok, well personally I disagree that..."
"RACIST! OUT! OUT! OUT! FIRE HIM!"
Does that basically sum it up?
Yup
I've read about 6-7 articles including student newspaper and you have summed it up perfectly.
The only proviso is that it is POSSIBLE that there may be true racist incidents on campus but students will not provide facts and details but just make claims.
You are lying.
Simple as that.
You are lying.
Thx.
Yep. Pretty much.
As a Person of Color myself, I see the intention in the Day of Absence but its not an executable premise and they way that they went about it seemed only a set-up to being divisive even if there were not actual intentions of creating a large problem. I guess I take this is as a high minded but weak on execution collective idea that in retrospect now, seems like it could only have backfired as presented.
@3 - Do you have a link for this? I'm not doubting it. I'd just like to see what he said on Fox though I don't think its a smart move to ever appear on Fox news. The WSJ has a paywall, so reading the article there is a no go.
https://youtu.be/-fEAPcgxnyY
The Left is one giant, dead, joke.
But these people don't seem to want a discussion, as can be seen at the tantrum they threw because some white devil who only agrees with them 98% instead of 100% had a mild disagreement.
If you just want a pat on the head and to have your own ideas parroted back at you for reassurance, that's fine, but don't lie and say you wanted a discussion when you do not have the maturity to handle a discussion.
It's likely the Crtl-left has finally jumped the shark. There has been of recent a kind of shark-jumping olympics around the country (primarily in the academy, much of it rotten to the core with regressive leftists), but this one seems to have struck a nerve. Those of us on the left have been tired of these fucksticks for a long time now - they are one reason Trump is in power. I hope this is the beginning of the end for this kind of stupidity.
Stalin and Hitler would be very proud of those students at Evergreen..very proud.
Hitler and Stalin were taking careful notes.
Reap what you sow, progressives. Reap what you sow.
Good observation. I saw the video a few days ago on the WSJ site (before the paywall) via Realclearpolitics.com. The students were quite intimidating to Professor Weinstein. "Fail" comes to mind in the execution of this Day of Absence protest. It was absurd to think the act wouldn't sow discord among the student body and dissent from reasonable professors like Weinstein.
The Academy in America is in trouble. It's painfully obvious from the past 3-4 months or so. Most unfortunate.
Additionally, too, I think the context of this being a liberal university is not lost but... a little muddled, I guess? I was an academic for a while before I transitioned into the better paying tech sector. These sorts of highly idealistic, flash bang attempts at activism are same shit, different day on almost all campuses. The faculty and students sympathetic to the activist side praise and headpat them and the faculty and students who don't give a fuck continue not giving a fuck. Unless otherwise provoked into action, administrators just sorta ignore the whole thing. Everyone "wins". Rinse, repeat because nothing much ever comes of it other than momentary symbolic action or outrage.
I'm not sure this actually deserves a whole lot of national attention because its not really any better or worse than any other liberal activist call for action on most campuses. It just happened to get national attention. But when these things do, the activist groups tend not to be favorably viewed - usually because their message is incoherent or too Ivory Tower.
Changing the weight, direction and onus of The Day of Absence to those most privileged was a brilliant move. Weinstein's whine about the request is the epitome of racism. Why should he be asked to do anything to help fix the problem? The audacity!
What this really highlights is the racism of the American Left. We see this all the time, as people wave the flag of "ally" or "turncoat", rather than admitting they are at best "deprogrammed". Weinstein is a shining example of the white moderate MLK spoke about in The Letter from Birmingham Jail.
Have we really learned so little in the past 50+ years?
https://youtu.be/nh1wGFFsIts
https://youtu.be/bO1agIlLlhg
https://youtu.be/qCZNCmMFwcI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9f4Td7h…
Watch this and then tell me that we're dealing with mature, rational adults in this situation.
These people harass and intimidate a Jewish professor for opposing what is in effect racial segregation and then have absolute AUDACITY to call other people Nazis...
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bonu…
And HR folks? Look at those videos closer and keep an eye out for those brats to apply for jobs.
https://youtu.be/xq4Y87idawk
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news…
The rest is just rationalization
The left needs unity, not reasons to cannibalize their "allies" because they don't agree 100% on tactics or messages. If you can't handle disagreement you are intolerant. If you are defending stupidity and failed strategies, then you are GermanSausage and have no idea how political consensus are built.
You know it's well-known that people who accuse others of racism are very often the true vicious racist and only make accusations to try and divert attention to others.
Just something to think about.
Evergreen Faculty calling for Weinstein to be on campus trial.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zwPL…
"Demonstrate accountability by pursuing a disciplinary investigation against Bret Weinstein according to guidelines in the Social Contract and Faculty Handbook. Weinstein has endangered faculty, staff, and students, making them targets of white supremacist backlash by promulgating misinformation in public emails, on national television, in news outlets, and on social media."
There you go. Thank you. Out of all the comments, starting with the first one, the 45th one is what you are Kathy Griffining on.
too bad the internet went to shit. Had such high expectations for it..what can we expect when the sperm of satan get together for a party in their dark and rotten caves to spew their vomit across the walls..
enjoy it ya'll. enjoy your privileged pity party. I'll toss you a few kkk party hats..stamped with the presidential logo
From Miriam-Webster
race-baiting: the making of verbal attacks against members of a racial group
I watched the interview twice and there's nothing in it which can reasonably be said to fit this definition. The students in the video clips, on the other hand, were explicitly attacking a racial group and thus were clearly race baiting. It just happened to be in a different direction than what one normally expects.
Or do you also have a definition of race baiting which means it can only apply to light skinned individuals?
>> On Day of Absence, you can choose how and where to participate. [...] off-campus, at [location redacted] we will host a full-day program focusing on allyship and anti-racism work from a majority culture or white perspective. Due to the capacity limits of the space (200 participants), we are asking those members of the Evergreen community who wish to attend the off-campus Day of Absence program to commit in advance by completing the registration form. [...] And because many of us are mixed, and may not wholly identify ourselves with one community or the other, we invite each person to attend the program of their choice, wherever they feel most comfortable. <<
Obviously this was an invitation to an event that a small portion of the campus community could choose to participate in if they wished.
The protestors are upset partly because a white person took the event, claimed victimhood, and derailed the entire discussion to make it about him. His words have been quoted often and at length; he has been interviewed and had op-eds published.
This misrepresentation has motivated numerous editorials and countless online comments trashing Evergreen, and its students and faculty, as well obscenity-laced emails including threats of violence and death to specific individuals and to the entire campus. This must stop.
I'm white.
I was on the Evergreen campus late in the afternoon on the Day of Absence(which was, as has been mentioned, totally voluntary)
I was in a class with several of the most outspoken African-American students on campus.
Nothing happened to me or any of the other white students in that class.
Nothing happened to any white students or instructors who did appear on campus that day.
Bret(at the TESC Oly campus, we're on a first-name basis with all instructors and administrators)is largely responsible for inflaming the situation on campus and for putting TESC students in danger.
He made it sound like the protests were all about him and his class(ONE was-there are issues with his evolutionary argument about racism-it appears that he is claiming that racism is a natural product of evolution, rather than a learned behavior) but most were not.
There have been real issues with the physical safety of students of color.
There have been real issues with the treatment of students of color(two black trans lesbian students have been the subject of continual harassment and repression on the campus-you can find information on that at the Cooper Point Journal website), and there are real issues with how the campus police have treated students of color.
The protests were centered on that, NOT on Bret.
And it was inherently reckless of Bret to go on Fox and give a distorted account of the situation, refusing to challenge Tucker Carlson's demagogic version of events, and put everyone on campus in the literal rifle sights of a viewing audience that would like to see most people color, most LGBTQ people, and most people on the Left dead.
Whether or not Bret can fairly be called racist, he CAN fairly be called rhetorically irresponsible.