Dear Stranger readers,
2020 is finally behind us, but our recovery is just beginning. Reader support has ensured that our dedicated and tenacious team of journalists can continue to bring you important updates as only The Stranger can. Now we're imploring you to help us survive another year. Ensure that we're here to ring in our upcoming 30th anniversary by making a one-time or recurring contribution today.
We're so grateful for your support. Thank you.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Sign up for the latest news and to win free tickets to events
Buy tickets to events around Seattle
Comprehensive calendar of Seattle events
The easiest way to find Seattle's best events
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
"To use the words of Tanya Stephens: "It's a pity.""
No disrespect to Ms Stephens, but William Shakes said it first and said it better;
"...'tis true. Tis true, 'tis pity, and pity 'tis 'tis true.
Damn, you really - I mean REALLY - need to get laid...
It's like all rules of society instantaneously cease to exist.
So unless you not getting any, nobody should either?
Pls no violence
This type of stuff drives me nuts on the transit here. Seattle is turning in to a big city and no one knows how to act like they live in a city. Not moving to the back of the bus, crowding the doors so people can't get off on the light rail, and taking your back pack off on crowded buses are all things the folks here need to learn.
And yet, significantly, Charles makes absolutely no mention of whether they are walking up - or down - the escalator or not, so one can only conclude (confirmed @5) that it's not their side-by-side presence on the escalator to which he objects, but rather their very mild PDA. So, why do you automatically assume a behavior which is neither mentioned nor apparently germane to his "criticism"?
If you want to walk, take the stairs.
Here's what a real urban-type person expects from the people in a city: lots of oblivious tourists, starry-eyed lovers in slow motion, unpredictable ill-behaved children, strutting youths, and on and on, all getting in everyone's way, from one end of town to the other. The realer the city, the more distracted, unpredictable, imaginary-code-violating people it will contain.
And the real city person does not even notice them.
Any real urban-type person long ago mastered the fine arts of sidestepping, sudden hopping, spin-dodging, moment-to-moment rerouting, all while maintaining an aloof, far-off gaze, serenely filtering out even the loudest unexpected sounds and gaudiest sideshow spectacles.
The person who can not do this, the person who instead is constantly bothered by it all, who must complain over and over again about the very things that the city is, does not want to live in a real city. This person wants to live in a pretend city found in some book of useless philosophical pronouncements. This person wants nothing to do with what real cities are made of.
What this person wants to live in, really, is a boarding school, not a city.
Here's the NYT article that highlights the study to which @17 refers. Of particular note is the statement from the representative from Otis that they advise against walking on their escalators, for reasons of safety.
@19:
"Cheap and plebeian", how very unproletarian of you. Why, hand holding is probably one of the most common means of displaying affection throughout human civilization; one could say it's almost ubiquitous, and crosses over ethnic, cultural, social, linguistic, class, gender, even political boundaries. It's an indicator of rapport, respect, concern, and trust, above and beyond even romantic feelings.
You should try it sometime - it would probably do you a world of good.
That silent, private love is the love of the bourgeois, the love of the rich and the comfortable.
But the love of people who have nothing, nothing for themselves, nothing to give but their love, nothing to show the world except their moments of love... well, the bourgeois loathes and resents this very different kind of lover, naturally.
Because this sort of lover is so showily showing the bourgeois that social standing and wealth and ever-so-proper comportment are utterly useless things to a person who has love, love which costs nothing, love which even the lowest plebian proletarian peasant can find, love which can never be packaged up and warehoused and hoarded and kept away from the awful little people who do all these awful little things in the awful, horrible city.
If you can't appreciate that we have always done things our own special way here in Seattle, than perhaps you haven't lived here long???
We are the people that invented the wave for fucks sake!!!
Deal with it!
what is charles mudede, who wrote that sentence, yearning to tell, having seperated 'person' from 'lover' as categories?
1. he's into -and i mean realllllly înto (catch my "winky" wink drift) - dolls. 2. he elevates (denegrates?) "the lover" as a being set apart from personhood, as for instance one might with a saint through devotional actions and whatnot. 3. #1 & #2 combo.
He is basically just a middle schooler trying to be edgy. His writing makes a lot more sense when you look at it this way.
I mean, ever wonder why other writers use The Stranger as a farm team before going of somewhere better, yet Mudede just sits still for years writing the same four posts over and over?
good job Charles. good job.
9m boardings this year in Seattle? How about a city with 5.7m average boardings each DAY (weekdays), and even with that 100x busier network, mid-day PDAs underground and on the stairs are in my humble opinion cute.
Buddhists talk about vicarious joy. Try it!
Rejoice being in a place where couples of any gender identity can and do express simple affection in public.
And the escalator "stand to one side" myth: London transit proved it, when busy, more people flow per minute if everyone stands and no one keeps to one side. (Ahh, for escalators in the subway. How lucky some are. Why is it NYC subway looks like it's stuck in the 1920s? Oh, right, other cities had escalators in the 1920s too.)
Now, studies aside, if anyone is blocking my way and I'm in a rush -- gettaouttahere!