One year later, we're still here. Thank you, Seattle, for your resilience and readership throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Contributions from our readers are a crucial lifeline for The Stranger as we write our new future. We're calling up legislators, breaking down what's going on at Seattle City Hall, and covering the region's enduring arts scenes thanks to assistance from readers like you. If The Stranger is an essential part of your life, please make a one-time or recurring contribution today to ensure we're here to serve you tomorrow.
We're so grateful for your support.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Sign up for the latest news and to win free tickets to events
Buy tickets to events around Seattle
Comprehensive calendar of Seattle events
The easiest way to find Seattle's best events
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
It was bad enough watching the The Stranger's grip on sound reporting slip over the years, but now they've gone full Infowars, interviewing a planespotter as the sole source for a story on military technology, printing his pure speculation about a particular plane's mission and capabilities?
I'm cringing hard enough to make me wish I'd stretched first.
A respected military journalist whose only source on this is planespotters, and who is purely and simply speculating about what the plane is carrying, and what its mission might be.
Have you checked with any respected UFO journalists? Or respected DEA journalists? I bet you could at least find an alternate wild speculation to print alongside the one you ran with.
I'm no military aviation expert myself, but I have to wonder if there could possibly be something going on at Boeing Field this week that could possibly reduce the space available for military aircraft. Has anyone noticed any other unusual military aircraft at Boeing Field this week?
That there is what's called "argument to authority."
The substantive criticism of your post is that it that it's reprinting pure speculation. And absent even a shred of evidence about what the plane is doing, it's no better than pure speculation from anyone else.
You should have stopped with "I myself am easily frightened by aeroplanes."
Priceless.... I'll be sure to look it up your priceless findings in many a distinguished publication like the New England Journal of....... Reddit?
"That floor ain't going to clean itself... Get back to work"
No shit?