Comments

1
Love this on the same day the Stranger features the headline "Are Democrats In Washington To Set a Good Example?" Now: Are Writers In Stranger To Set a Good Examples?
2
Unlike your other examples, there is no redundancy with "young" as an adjective paired with "teen" as 'young' conveys the joy of youth and 'teen' defines the chronological age. When similar adjectives act to individually refine the meaning, there is no redundancy.

4
Language is always changing and there will always be misfires. You are probably the kind of person who will be complaining about the proper use of "literally" on your deathbed, and that is quite sad for you. Just roll with the nonsense instead of grating your teeth and you'll be a much more pleasant person.
5
@2 "'young' conveys the joy of youth" Your dictionary is defective. Return it to the manufacturer. Or... your conception of "young" being by definition joyful is, to put it kindly, off-base.
6
I'm sure all teachers are very happy people because they don't care if the kids learn are not. Like, whatever, dude. Do whatever you want. Learn, or don't. It doesn't matter.
7
I don't think "first introduced" is so bad, if only because I'm something of a drunk who's also awful with both names and faces.

Seriously... If someone is introduced to someone multiple times (for whatever reason!) I'd think that's a legitimate qualifier.
8
(though I guess my example is relatively rare and "first" has perhaps slipped into most folks' lexicon as the standard for most introductions.)

Not sure about "young teen" though either. Would the young aspect of it not being suggesting someone in the 13-15 year old range? There are probably more efficient ways of conveying an approximate age, but I don't know if this necessarily qualifies as redundant.
9
This post is sick.
10
You, sir, have reached fogeyhood. Please accept your new title of Senior Music Reviewer For Senior Music.
11
@9,

Are you sure you don't mean it's sic?

Sorry.
12
What are your future predictions about all this?
13
I hate the "free gift with purchase" gimmick so common these days. If you have to shell out money to get it, it ain't free.
14
@12 A++
15
Banal
16
I find quibbling about grammar quite interesting; makes me remise about the fine editors I've worked with.
17
@16: "remise: to give up a claim to"

"Reminisce" is perhaps what you were going for, but you were remiss and missed.
19
@18 You started great, then quickly lost the plot, and by the end of your post, I wanted to call 9-1-1 for you. You okay? I hope so. Where can I download your poetry chapbooks?
21
@21 Why would an esteemed personage such as pansack stoop to frequent such a lowly rest stop on the information superhighway as Slog? It's a mystery for the sages.
23
I meant @20, obviously. And you grow more incoherent by the hour. "stawarts"? Troll-feeding time is over.
25
@24 You haven't annihilated anything, except maybe your tenuous grip on reality and syntax.
27
@26 I defend my points very clearly in the original post. If you disagree, fine.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.