Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
It's no secret that numerous unsanctioned encampments in Ballard have been out-of-control heroin dens (even when trash bins and toilets are provided) and that property crime is sky high. Why shouldn't businesses (most of which are small, local companies, doing their part to be good community members) report issues in a coordinated way?
@4: "the puget sound area" is what, king, pierce thurston, snohomish, kitsap counties? and jefferson, clallam, skagit? i wasn't aware that seattle city council controlled all that spending.
I don't think the city needs to be in control of regional spending, nor the spending confined solely to the city, nor the source of funds to be taxes only, before we're allowed to notice that there's quite a lot of money being spent on a social problem that's getting worse every year.
The current direction of city policy (more centralization and coordination between organizations, "results-based" funding) might not be effective, either, but it seems perfectly reasonable to look for new ways to use the resources available when the results of the approaches tried to date have come up short for everyone involved, not least the unsheltered themselves.
rents are climbing, property taxes are climbing. working class pay is not. social housing is not. federal spending is contracting.
Er, no, I'm not suggesting that city policy is causing homelessness. I'm not sure how you managed to get that out of what I wrote, but no, I do not think that is the case.
That means 1/3 of homeless in those encampments actively choose to stay on the streets, refusing homeless services.
They do not represent all homeless people; many of whom are simply poor folks down on their luck.
But they're there, gathered in numbers.
also, even though the city was kind enough to treat Ballard residents to the Urban Rest Stop, the "campers" still go into the library to use the bathroom for cowboy showers and worse - that's why the doors to the bathrooms are propped open now.
hopefully the citizens of seattle are finally starting to realize the con game being played with the homeless - a small % accept shelter space, a small % are in their position because of lost jobs, etc.
a post on the west seattle blog re: "camp 2nd chance" states that nobody really knows the monthly cost for running the camp. that is ridiculous. the "nonprofits" are keeping themselves busy and employed with our tax money and need the homeless inventory.
WAIT A MINUTE!???? I thought seattle had a ten year plan to END HOMELESSNESS???? what, you mean throwing millions and millions of dollars at lifestyle homeless and junkies DIDN'T WORK? and you want to do more of the same, but of course with more money? lol
This is the second time in a week I've agreed with Heidi Groover on something. Should I check myself in at the mental health clinic?
Seriously, though, while I understand Mike Stewart's frustration with the situation in Ballard, flooding Find It Fix It with duplicate complaints on homeless camps is not going to make city to clean them up any faster. First of all, Find It Fix It is already overwhelmed and has a months-long backlog of work to do on camp clean-up. And let's remember what Find It Fix It is really for. Do you think it ever intended as a way to put pressure on city officials as Steward imagines? No. Just the opposite. It was intended to RELIEVE pressure on them. And it's been doing a great job of that. Every time someone files a homeless camp report with Find It Fix It, they're sending a message to themselves that the City is really concerned about the problem and is really DOING something about it. When the peasants perceive that the government really cares about them, they are much less likely to revolt. If King George III had implemented a Find It Fix It app for tax complaints in the Colonies, there would have been no Revolution, and today we'd all be speaking.... um.... English.
No, if we want to get serious about cleaning up homeless camps and getting people indoors, we've got to go right to the source of the problem, and in this case the source is Ballard councilmember Mike O'Brien. We've got to remove this guy from office and get somebody good in there for a change. And we can't wait another two years on this. We've got to do it now.
Visualize Whirled Peas
The EHT may or may not pass but in the mean time thanks to CM O'Brien we will still get LEAD coming to our neighborhood in 2018.
*LEAD = Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion
but it's not because city council are fuck ups or lazy. it's because they don't control the forces that are causing the crisis. "the market" (for real estate and opiates) does.
Instead of getting snarky on a group of small business owners and residents who have not only had to live with the crime, environmental degradation (ever had an RV empty its septic tank in your front yard or sidewalk?), needles, wino fights at 3 AM, and on and on, all while being pecked at by unhelpfully divisive voices like Heidi for DARING to send the wrong virtue signal, maybe you should be getting all shitty on your buddy Mike O'Brien and his friend with the megaphone. They've made a lot of noise these past few years but no progress in getting a significant number of people off the streets and into housing and care. They've also spent a lot of your money. BUILD THE HOUSING NOW. Camps suck for everyone. Spending all day debating where tents can go is one less day spent on buying the land (eminent domain is fine, too) and building the housing. Shame.
The city could build similar structures all over the city on single family lots. Put in nice landscaping so it looks like a private home, and assign a resident social worker to each one. Make people who are staying there check in each day and take their medicine (if applicable), have someone come into each room each day and empty the trash, so no hoarding happens, and stock the kitchens with donations from food banks.
Once you build up that inventory, have zero tolerance for encampments - and provide the necessary social programs for addiction, mental health, etc. You either have to go into the program or leave town.
They could do the same thing with apartments - build fourplexes all over town that are designed to fit in with the neighborhoods, and some larger apartment buildings. Keep it simple, though - don't make it a bonanza for the Architectural and public art industrial complexes. Use the same floorpans whenever possible.
Those folks yelling "Stop the Sweeps!" at our City Council should be yelling, "Yay! Hep' A!"
From now on, every illegal homeless encampment I see gets a cell-phone snapshot for a FIFI submission.
It is time for tough love. It will be tough for us, who actually do care and, it will be tough for the ones who don't really want to live in the norms of society, but, so be it.
I didn't say anything about affordability. All I said was I don't feel bad about not giving money to the mean spirited pricks that claim to speak for Ballard. Most of these businesses just got here yesterday and they ought to be more grateful for the privilege of doing business in our city, instead of their endless complaining and rejection of the people who were here before them. Homeless Seattleites were here before them.
Local small businesses are self-pitying, narcissistic and guilt tripping. They never give you a good reason to want to deal with them. They only try to bully us into feeling like we owe it to them. At least Amazon delivers what you were promised at a good price, without driving around for an hour spewing carbon trying to figure out which store carries what you need.
Look at package theft. Is Amazon trying to harass people in crisis? Siccing the cops on them, making their lives worse? No, Amazon isn't blaming package theft on the most vulnerable people in our society. They're working on solutions. They are spitballing ideas, and experimenting. Some of their experiments are kind of goofy, but that's better than looking of scapegoats.
If they Ballard Alliance wants their business to thrive, they should focus on giving back to the community instead of putting community members in their crosshairs. I hope they go out of business. I don't feel bad about not giving them my money.
They pay annually to renew their business licenses with the city. Maybe that's why they want the laws against vagrancy and public dumping to be, you know, actually enforced.
Homeless Seattleites were here before them.
I can't wait to see your census data from Ballard to support that point.
...instead of putting community members in their crosshairs.
That's assuming our local businesses' communal values include living in filth, trading in stolen bicycle parts, sharing needles, and being a vector for Hepatitis A.
Local small businesses are self-pitying, narcissistic and guilt tripping. They never give you a good reason to want to deal with them.
May we safely say you've been heartily disinvited from any considering any future patronage at a number of our fine local businesses?