Comments

1

So is Beto going to give back all that out of state money that's flooded his campaign down in Texas?

3

Isn't the largest contributor in support of I-1631 the Nature Conservancy, which is incorporated in the District of Columbia?

4

but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about but what about

5

4

Sucks when facts fuck up your side and you get called out.

You seem to have repeated trouble dealing with that in your posts.

6

@3, tsk tsk tsk..let's not ask about the money going into those things we like. That's called "freedom"

8

@5
And you seem to have repeated trouble with logical fallacies

9

@7:

And how, pray tell, did you come to that conclusion? If the companies are from out-of-state and paying for advertising, mailers, phone-banking, and what-not, how precisely does their completely voluntary donation to the campaign constitute, in any way, shape, or form a "tax"? Did the state force them to pay this money to a non-profit political organization? If so, how was this accomplished? I'm sure other PAC's would LOVE to know the secret you've apparently discovered single-handedly. Do share, please.

11

@8 spunkbutter: He's got a used puck bag for a brain.

12

Should be illegal: just like all other lobbying/bribery . . . . --- littlesis.org & theyrule.net & whereisthemoney.org .


Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.