@1 wow, closet case much?

@1 -- you got a free sample?!
Condolences.

FOX could show the wonderful, inventive sculpture of derr hideous Furor,
but only from a distance, because any image of visable,
erect penises would have to be blacked out.

"It's just a buncha fake dicks, soldered together by left-wing commie "artists"!
You must HATE It , Amerikkka!"

Aheada of ya there, FOX (n' fiends).

The problem is these dildoes are far too large to be suitable. They all need to be smaller, much smaller.

(Not that there's anything wrong with that, but Small Hands In Chief thinks there is.)

@4, you may be right, but I can think of one way to do it:

For these types of pieces, you need to think of each dildo like a pixel. So here we'd be talking about a frame of 60 x 50 pixels (i.e. 3000 dildos). That's not great "resolution", but it should be sufficient to get his major characteristics.

Now I don't think you could use the whole cock as a pixel, the shape just wouldn't work. But the head of the cock would make for a nice fit. You could them poke them through a 60 x 50 board, so just the tip pokes through. Kind of like a reverse Lite Brite.*

Now, for the installation to really work, you'd have to be able to view it from the front and back (unlike a conventional painting). From the front, it would simply look like a crude pixel drawing, but behind the man there'd be nothing but warn out saggy balls.

That seems appropriate.

*You'd also have to paint, polish, or stain the tips of the cocks to get the right color tones. Based on that picture, I don't think there's enough variety or differentiation to do a pic of Trump.

I think the artist creating a fitting image of Trumpty Dumpty out of copper dildo molds would be declared a world hero. I would use stink horns instead of dildos, however, complete with their known foul stench to really capture the evil aura that is Trump.
@5 Jellob1976: All the artist would have to do would be to paint an odiferous Nuclear Holocaust Orange mushroom (See "stink horn").

Cut the nuts off all of them*, give 'em a spit-shine so they really show as bronze, then carefully lay them down in the right form, and this could be Trump's hairpiece, in a really large bust statue of him.

*The scrotums would form a nice pebbled chin and turkey neck, I think. You could even bronze the whole thing, just make sure you don't use that material around the eyes; even Trump doesn't do that.

I don’t know enough about sculpture to comment. Copper dildos; I love copper, so whoever gets to do it has a great material to work with. Would have to get lots of helpers to shine them up.

My adequacy delusion, forever shattered. Cunnilingus my old friend; I shall depend on you again.

@5 "For these types of pieces, you need to think of each dildo like a pixel. So here we'd be talking about a frame of 60 x 50 pixels (i.e. 3000 dildos). That's not great "resolution", but it should be sufficient to get his major characteristics."

Great idea, let's go one further: the artist chops up most of the dildos into pieces, of irregular sizes and shapes leaving some fragments larger / whole parts identifiable at close range. That way she/he/they could easily increase to maybe 240,000 pieces, avg. of 80 fragments a dildo = 600x400 VGA resolution image!

@7 Knat
"all of them*"

Sorry off topic here, just surprised to see "" (an asterisk) displaying here, since last time I tried to surround a *word with a pair of asterisks (as I just did with the word word)(to imply boldface type) the site deleted them.

@11
Hmm, I see the site did delete the first asterisk (the one I put in quotes), and one of the two asterisks I put around the word word. I wonder what happens when I put two adjacent asterisks between quote marks "" or around a **word

p.s. I guess the site WILL NOT STAND FOR asterisks on both sides of a word...or, er, within quote marks. Or something. The site INSISTS we not have the ability to even IMPLY formatting! I guess I'm still stuck with using /slashes/ to suggest emphasis. Or underlines or -dashes- I guess but I find those less appealing.

p.p.s. Crikey, it even deleted the underline characters!

I’d like one to place on my studio desk. A copper phallus. Rub it each day with a cleaning cloth, to keep it looking beautiful.

@11,12,13,14 -- You are allowed ONE* asterisk per post.

Yes, no i t a l i c s or BOLD or underlining here!
However, you can have as many Caps as you wish....

I did (finally!) locate the 'edit' button -- it was here all the time!
You just copy your Original comment (or, just the bad part),
edit the thing and re-submit.

It can get a little Cluttered, but isn't that Life, itself?

*just one!

If someone does not use these to weld together a wall or sign for said wall, I am going to be seriously disappointed.

@16 kristofarian
"You are allowed ONE* asterisk per post"

Explain then how there were two in yours.
Which kinda drives me crazy, I use "(1)" because when I've tried to use a pair of asterisks like you just did it doesn't work.

"no i t a l i c s or BOLD or underlining"

not even the underline character, I found @13 (I put 'em around the word "underline").

"'edit' button"

A joke, right, I assume re-submitting the text of a comment post another comment (with changes).

Let's chop up some 'shrooms!

I have to admit, I'd love to see someone actually do this just to see the inevitable media storm and Twitter storm from the White House.

Perhaps someone could at least attempt a small scale version with those gummy dicks that are sold in gag stores?

@5 Jellob1976
If instead of normal dildo molds, we had dildo molds the size and shape of (per Stormy Daniels) Trump's little toadstool, each dildo /could/ be used as a pixel, and the whole installation could easily be put in a room.

Personally, I'm all for dumping a cargo load of stinkhorns on the White Trash House and Mar-a-Lago at this point. Send the bill to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to come out of Trumpty Dumpty's own pork-fed wallet.