One year later, we're still here. Thank you, Seattle, for your resilience and readership throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Contributions from our readers are a crucial lifeline for The Stranger as we write our new future. We're calling up legislators, breaking down what's going on at Seattle City Hall, and covering the region's enduring arts scenes thanks to assistance from readers like you. If The Stranger is an essential part of your life, please make a one-time or recurring contribution today to ensure we're here to serve you tomorrow.
We're so grateful for your support.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Sign up for the latest news and to win free tickets to events
Buy tickets to events around Seattle
Comprehensive calendar of Seattle events
The easiest way to find Seattle's best events
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
There are good ways to critique Malcolm Gladwell, but holy crap Rich, quoting Richard Posner is not one of them.
Gladwell did good work earlier in his career, when he was a science reporter on an underexposed beat, and before he started pulling down five and six figures for speaking to luncheons of car salesmen. He's been trash for a long, long time, though, going back to at least his first book (Blink was the second, iirc).
Gladwell's early work includes chestnuts like asian kids are good at math not because their parents put a primacy on mastery of this skill but because their ancestors were rice farmers.
Gladwell's early work like shilling for cigarette companies?
@3
That's agitprop from Yasha Levine and Mark Ames, and it's been pretty thoroughly debunked.
You don't need to argue in bad faith to show Gladwell has been completely compromised by big money.
does anyone know how that crash happened? driver swerved to avoid stopped traffic and the airbag didn't deploy?