Comments

1

Delicious.

3

I don't trust traitors. As much as I want to believe his testimony, something is missing here.

4

"I don't trust traitors. As much as I want to believe his testimony, something is missing here."

^ Yeah. That checks out.

So by that moronic logic we'd have to overturn every single organized crime and cartel conviction as well as every single spy and war crime prosecution in history because informants are how you convict organized conspiracies.

But Trump is ALSO a traitor. So was Epstein. SO was Manafort. So was Cohen.

So it's traitors all the way down. And since we can't convict anyone based on traitors/informants testimony or evidence... I guess it's criminal anarchy from here on out.

5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxd06uD3kiY

No, I do believe what he is saying regarding the confirmed testimony and the breadcrumb trail, and there is overwhelming evidence for impeachment wrongdoing and impeachment.

What I'm saying is that just like, it's strange that it would take him multiple times to finally make a clear statement. And it took Michael Cohen many times after lying to congress. So he just laughs in everyone's face and acts like he's untouchable and really seems way too calm about all of this, in spite of the threats he has been facing. Who knows? Maybe that's why he's ambassador.

I don't assert anything about my conjecture. All I know is that this guy makes my spider sense tingle.

6

@4

John Dean:

"Modified Limited Hangout"

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2019/11/20/john-dean-sondland-trump-impeachment-hearings-acfc-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/anderson-cooper-full-circle/

7

Your spider sense directs you towards John F. Dean?

8

Don't see a mystery here, he took multiple times to improve his recollection because he didn't think he'd have to. He testified early on, as did Volker, and both ended up on legal thin ice when multiple later witnesses contradicted them.

He iterated once, and then last Friday he learned multiple people had heard his phone call with Trump in a crowded restaurant. The walls were closing in, he could take the Fifth or give more up. And it's not as if the content of what he's saying is surprising.

9

@7 John Dean states that Sonland was covering his own ass and gave very wishy washy testimony in certain areas that potentially implicate him as well. I sensed he was hiding something, but what that is of course I can't say. I was just qualifying my hunch with the man who he has been compared to who spent four eight hour days during Watergate essentially spilling the beans on everyone and himself.

10

Before you line up to suck Sondland's dick, keep in mind that he was happy to be a Trump toady and follow his directives until the heat was on, and he himself might have gotten in trouble, and then everyone was in on it EXCEPT him. Well, after talking to many people in order to finally sort out his own memories, of course.

Everything he is saying may be true, but people who do shitty, self-serving things until they get caught are not heroes.


Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.