Comments

1

Let's hope it is (state) constitutional.

3

@2 -- The B & O tax is a gross tax, not net. That means that companies that are very profitable (like Amazon) pay a smaller proportion than companies that aren't. The property tax only applies to property. Essentially it is a wealth tax, but only on a certain type of wealth (property and the stuff that sits on top of it). Thus a company (like Amazon) can become extremely profitable, and yet pay relatively little in taxes, while other companies (and individuals) could do the opposite. A grocery store, for example, might be barely scraping by (with little net income), but because they have lots of gross income and the land they own is worth a lot, pay a big proportion of their profits on tax. They may even pay more in B & O taxes than what they made!

My guess is, taxing highly profitable companies at a higher rate is what is meant by "fair share". To be clear, this really isn't a tax on the companies themselves. This is an income tax on high earning individuals who work for large companies (and a tiny income tax at that).

5

@3: "This is an income tax on high earning individuals who work for large companies (and a tiny income tax at that)."

$7M in payroll is not necessarily a "large" company, and the tax is on the job the employer provides, not upon the salary the employee receives. The employer, not the worker, pays the tax. It's a tax on jobs, not income.

(That you have to describe this tax in such deceptive terms suggests talking about it plainly won't make it look good -- and that you know this.)


Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.