time to dive into the real art controversy of the day- the Mary Wollstonecraft statue.
Like it, hate it, not sure?
I think I hate it but I would like to see it up close in person to make a more informed judgement.

I guess its the purpose of a portrait to idealize, but he doesn't look fat enough in that painting.

Looks like he's taking a shit.

@3,

Agree. Also, there appears to be a faint hint of a smile, which humanizes him ever so slightly. And I don't ever see him smile, even subtly, at least not in a genuine manner. I've seen that smug and detestably arrogant smirk plenty, but this is softer and undeserved.

someone needs to Picassoize
our herr Furor the stable Genius
cum reality teevee imploding-Star and
realize all the Lies behind those evil eyes

Either it is viewer looking up out of a toilet or us looking down at him in the toilet ORrrr him looking at his reflection in the toilet. The oval does not help this generic looking portrait. Copy photo sent, use normal skin tones, suggest a slimmer body with red tie, but not too red like he always wears warm it all up. Kinda "Make Merica Rock-well again"!

@5: Google 'Trump smiling' - lots of images

It's a well painted portrait.

They say the camera adds ten pounds, and the commissioned oil portrait subtracts 50.