I suppose one could classify furries as a form of sexual identity and expression, but probably not because the initial hurdle anyone would have to make is having to endure going around in a hot, bulky, uncomfortable, fake fur apparel structure negotiating surrounding objects and doorways which would preclude it from being anything like that. This fad has a short half-life.

I haven't listened to the podcast yet, but I have to say I haven't heard anybody get Furry as wrong in a long time as commenter raindrop has.

For one, he seems to labor under the misconception wearing/owning a fursuit is mandatory, whereas only about 20-25% of furs actually do. (And yes, wearing one is not the most comfortable experience in the world - but it's worth it for the freedom of becoming someone other than yourself else for a while.) Also, Furry is not most furs' "sexual identity;" it is for plenty (and I say more power to them!) but for most part it's a fun hobby, on the same level as LARPing or wearing a superhero costume at a comics convention.

Worst of all is his comment "This fad has a short half-life." Raindrop my friend, Furry is growing more popular and world-widespread than its originators (long story; please read my book "Furry Nation") could have ever imagined. We've been around since the mid/late '80s and our conventions attract more people every year. (11,000+ at Chicago's most recent Midwest Furfest.) The vast majority of furs are under 30 years old - all of which means (as people continue to join) we'll probably never have to worry about a "half-life."