Last night the Seattle Times and regional funders coalition We Are In wrapped up its second evening of debates between Seattle and King County candidates. The conversations focused on the defining issue of the local elections, the homelessness crisis.
The first night, mayoral candidates Bruce Harrell and Lorena GonzĂĄlez squared up in that day's second forum on homelessness. The next night put candidates for King County Position 3, City Attorney, and City Council Position 9 in the hot seat.
Since the onset of the pandemic, homelessness has become more visible. A survey by researchers and students from Seattle Pacific University and the University of Washington found a 50% increase in the number of tents in the highest populated areas in the winter of 2019 to the summer of 2020. This summer, Seattlites could not go to a public park or a grocery store without being hassled by handsomely paid signature gatherers with magenta rainbows on their lanyards. Charter Amendment 29âwhich died, tried to revive itself, and died againâdivided the city on how we should approach homelessness, and the local candidates reflect that division.
At their debate, the candidates for mayor didnât have much new to say. Harrell and GonzĂĄlez had faced off earlier that day at a debate hosted by Resolution to End Homelessness, and they have both publicly outlined their plans for combating homelessness.
Harrellâs plan borrows from the approach of the now-defunct Charter Amendment 29. He wants to identify 2,000 units of emergency shelter in his first year, bring nonprofit partners to scale to provide individualized services that are accessible and culturally competent, and restore parks.
GonzĂĄlez, who sat on the other side of the Charter Amendment 29 fence, wants to create more housing by legalizing apartments in single-family zones, tax corporations to build more affordable housing, and create âindividual service plansâ for people sleeping outside so we can figure out whoâs ready to come inside and then get them in quickly, according to her 100-day plan.
Both of these candidates have served as president of the council, and, as a quick walk downtown will reveal, neither solved homelessness during their tenure. With that less-than-ideal track record in mind, the moderator asked both candidates why Seattle should trust them to solve homelessness as mayor.
After often claiming to possess a direct, straight-talking campaign style, Harrell dodged the question by saying he didnât want to play the blame game, as it doesnât bring the unhoused inside. He does not blame any mayors for the current crisis. GonzĂĄlez had less of a problem assigning blame: she doesnât think Seattle has had a mayor who is serious about homelessness, and she described a gridlock between the legislative and executive branches on the issue.
Perhaps the most telling moment arrived when the moderator asked the candidates who they planned to vote for in the City Attorney race: police and jail abolitionist Nicole Thomas-Kennedy, or the Obama-voter turned Trump-era Republican, Ann Davison? Recently, some Democrats have crossed party lines to rally around Davison.
GonzĂĄlez said she would vote for Thomas-Kennedy, despite some disagreement with her policies and sentiment. âI want to support another democratic woman,â she said.
Harrell said heâs in the undecided camp. âBoth present opportunities and both present challenges,â but he is willing to work with either.
The more conservative candidates expressed the same caution when answering the reverse question.
There are many differences between the candidates running for City Attorney. Thomas-Kennedy has four years of experience in the courtroom as a public defender, and Davison hasnât seen the inside of a courtroom since the Obama administration. Davison wants to lock up low-level offenders and use diversion where âappropriate,â and Thomas-Kennedy thinks routinely locking up people for committing crimes driven by poverty perpetuates the problem.
Last night the City Attorney candidates even had difficulty agreeing on what exactly the office does â Davison is focused on carrying out the law as legislated, and Thomas-Kennedy says âdiscretion is the duty.â
During the debate, Davison said Seattle was âworse than a Cambodian refugee camp,â called crime âa form of communication,â and refused to weigh in on city policy even in the abstract. Thomas-Kennedy said she wants to address homelessness by upholding the renterâs rights laws the city has passed and by not putting people in jail for crimes committed to sustain life.
When it came to sex work, Davison spoke only of protections from people who leave sex work after being trafficked. Thomas-Kennedy wants to decriminalize sex work altogether.
The moderator asked about their picks for mayor and for the open city council seat. Thomas-Kennedy reaffirmed her support for GonzĂĄlez and Nikkita Oliver without missing a beat. Davison took a more cautious approach.
âI donât think itâs appropriate for me to say,â Davison said. âI would need to provide impartial legal advice to whoever is elected.â
Similarly, Oliver, an abolitionist themselves, sang Thomas-Kennedyâs praises when asked about their vote for City Attorney. Nelson kept her lips sealed.
âIâm not going there,â Nelson said. âThe last thing I need to do is make more enemies."
Like the other pairs, Oliver and craft beer lobbyist Sara Nelson shared little common ground.
âThe contrast is pretty clear between our two candidates,â Nelson said. âMy opponent wants to abolish the police and I donât. I am focused on pragmatic solutions that will help real people living real lives, struggling with real problemsâŚâ
As Oliver told the Stranger in an interview this summer, âabolishing the police,â for them, means: âOver the next few years, we need to continue to decrease the Seattle Police Department by 10 to 20%, continue to grow our in-community structures for responding to mental health crises, domestic violence, having access to safe houses and affordable housing, providing people with rental and food support."
Nelson doesnât think the solution to homelessness is as âsimpleâ as taxing business and the wealthy. She offered little about funding, as she does not believe the city should âgrandstandâ when a majority of the resources would be turned over to the King County regional authority anyway. Sheâs ready to âfall in stepâ as she said. Oliver is not.
âI value ensuring people have safety,â Oliver spoke directly to Nelson. âYou value ensuring that the park is a place that you can comfortably go without seeing the crisis that Seattle has failed to respond to.â
Itâs been clear for a while now, but two slates of candidates have formed in the city races. GonzĂĄlez and Oliver are backing Thomas-Kennedy, who is backing them right back. The three of them were on the same page about Charter Amendment 29. The othersâall fans of sweeping people out of parksâkept quiet on whether they support one another.