- Only got 37 percent.
I think what happened there is that Rumbaugh got a very late start and it was a highly ideological campaign in an electorate that was tipping the opposite direction in terms of ideology. But it was the only way he could go. He could only run a campaign on Johnson’s ideology, and that didn’t mesh with the mood of the electorate. In 2008, he wouldn’t have had a problem because that primary electorate was overwhelming progressive. This one was conservative.
Of course, money always helps. Setting aside the money in MacLean's PAC, Rumbaugh himself could gather only $115,855.46 in contributions (compared to Johnson's $134,804.49).
One question that will have to be asked about this race is why Washington's gay rights community and its allies couldn't cough up more than $115,855.46 (or, if you include the PAC money, more than a total of about $366,000) to help defeat a Washington State Supreme Court justice who had, using scurrilous logic and ancient "studies," declared, in 2006:
Direct comparison between opposite-sex homes and sames-sex homes further support the former as a better environment for children. For example, studies show an average shorter term commitment and more sexual partners for same-sex couples.
It's not like, after being asleep at the switch when Johnson was elected in 2004, the gay rights community didn't know this was coming. "Last time," Josh Friedes, executive director of the gay advocacy group Equal Rights Washington, told me earlier this month, "we learned a lesson. Washington citizens paid dearly. This time, we are doing our work."
ERW sent out e-mails about Rumbaugh, and it encouraged donations to his campaign, but clearly not enough work was done. As one local gay activist pointed out to me yesterday while grimacing at the returns in state supreme court races: If there is enough money in the local gay community to raise $200,000 at one self-praise-loaded, sycophant-packed garden party then there is enough money in the local gay community to bankroll the campaign of a guy like Rumbaugh (who, on the issue of marriage, has said: "I don't see anything in the Constitution that says two people of the same sex can't marry").
Friedes didn't respond to requests for comment on what went wrong.
Rumbaugh, for his part, stuck to the most simple explanation for why he's going down by a 25-point margin, 63-37: "I didn’t get enough votes... There just wasn’t enough interest in the election overall by the people that I needed to have come out and vote for me."
Asked to explain further, Rumbaugh said the Secretary of State's prediction of 38-percent voter turnout looks to him like it ended up being closer to a 26-percent turnout—and that in any case progressives and young voters didn't turn out in high enough numbers to help him.
Maybe it's the nature of an August primary. Or maybe it's the nature of judicial races. "When I was out talking to folks, I’d tell them this is the most important statewide office that nobody knows anything about," Rumbaugh said.
Or maybe it's the nature of not having enough money.
Would more money have helped?
"Maybe," Rumbaugh said.
Will he run again?
"Never say never."