One year later, we're still here. Thank you, Seattle, for your resilience and readership throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Contributions from our readers are a crucial lifeline for The Stranger as we write our new future. We're calling up legislators, breaking down what's going on at Seattle City Hall, and covering the region's enduring arts scenes thanks to assistance from readers like you. If The Stranger is an essential part of your life, please make a one-time or recurring contribution today to ensure we're here to serve you tomorrow.
We're so grateful for your support.
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Sign up for the latest news and to win free tickets to events
Buy tickets to events around Seattle
Comprehensive calendar of Seattle events
The easiest way to find Seattle's best events
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Comments
Can someone explain to me how in the hell making a Decline To Sign advocacy campaign illegal isn't one of the most flagrant First Amendment violations imaginable? What genius came up with this?
I got a better idea for an initiative or legislation: make fucking around with the election process like this not a fine-based monetary penalty, but one with severe criminal penalties instead. It's the only way this stuff will be put to an end.
And...
This would be taking away the right for any private land owner to bar gatherers from working and making money on their private property, on nonsense political speech grounds. If I owned Safeway, for example, I have every right to tell any, all, none, or some signature gatherers to fuck off, for any or no reason that I wanted.
This initiative would grant special made-up rights to the people gathering signatures that even protesters with picket signs do not enjoy. If I tried to remove the signature gatherers I'd be subject to criminal prosecution according to this.
Totally insane.
IT ONLY COVERS PUBLIC PLACES NOT "ANY PROPERTY" It states that signature gathering is a legally protected activity on all sidewalks and walkways that carry pedestrian traffic, as well as outside entrances to public buildings, sports arenas and stores.
ALSO. I like the idea of having more time, I want an initiative to prevent liquor from being sold in Wal-Mart and COSTCO I might be.
Maybe we can overturn all previous initiatives that used paid signature gathering. Like the piece of fucking shit I-502 to legalize false DUI convictions, Or the Eyman one says we cant raise taxes on the rich people initiative, or how about the worst one EVER ... fucking billionaire Gates raping public schools I-1240. And don't even talk to me about Costco!
Fuck these Big business, Billionaires and Big labor cats. They are the only ones who can afford to get on the ballot. We need to eliminate voting altogether. It just gives them our permission to keep fucking us over and encourages them to continue.
Someone needs to inform Safeway of that then.
Several years ago, a woman tried to counter protest paid signature gathering outside the Safeway on Capitol Hill. The signature gatherers whined like little bitches to Safeway management about it, and management forced her to move along.
I took some personal interest in that story since it was those same signature gatherers who blocked my entrance into that Safeway, grabbed my shoulder, and tried to keep me from entering the store until after I signed their several petitions. Safeway didn't have any problem with that flagrantly illegal behavior.
Or at least go with Oregon's model and don't allow them be be paid per signature, but only hourly.
Here's hoping something actually sticks on his slime.
Pay the people that coordinate/manager/soldier for them=Those that do the work, circulate get robbed
Human Rights Activist for 20 years.