Theater Jul 15, 2010 at 4:00 am

Life During Wartime in Ruined, Small-Town Murder in The Laramie Project

The best little whorehouse in Africa. Chris Bennion

Comments

1
I saw "Ruined" last night. Strong performances by all, even with an understudy in the lead. Seattle is very fortunate to have this production here.
2
Regarding 'Laramie', I'd go farther- the actors laughing as they recreated interviews among themselves actually seemed rather condescending, like 'weren't some those hicks hyesterical?" (Shawn Law's Sgt Hing was especially an example of this, as when Garrison put on a clip on tie and said "Wait for it" Ha Ha Ha Ha. Laramie's just like Mayberry RFD, ain't it?). Staging it so that the group was often performing these little recreations for themselves accented that occasional smugness. (The portrayal of the drama professor Rebeccal Hilleker came off like something from sketch comedy). I don't think this is what the Tectonic group intended at all in their depiction of the townspeople. It often felt like actors playing caricature rather than trying to portray real people responding to real events. Some moments were breezed through robotically (Matthew Shepard's funeral)- some were overly wrought (Aaron's discovery of Matthew's body was as though Nick Garrison had found the baby Jesus in a rubbish bin). A little more heart and a little less winking seemed in order.
3
And p.s.- while one of the townspeople was supposed to be from Texas, people in Wyoming actually don't have discernable accents. I heard alot of Southern drawls being thrown around, which only added to the impression of caricaturing.
4
This is an interesting discussion and one we talked about a lot in rehearsal for 'Laramie'. During the first week, we spent most of our time telling personal stories to one another. One of our discoveries was that amateur story-tellers do caricature people we are talking about--especially people that we love and admire, because we are just trying to capture the essence of that person's physical presence instead of an imitation. The things that each of us are best known for are our idiosyncrasies. And we found that the common reaction by others who know and admire the people we're embodying is, in fact, laughter--warm, appreciative laughter, not mocking. But I admit it's a fine line, and we probably blew past it a couple of times in our ultimate performance.

That said, I would hesitate to presume what the Tectonics were intending in their script. Though it's obvious that they were genuinely affected by the people they met in Laramie and surprised by the interconnectedness of the community, they didn't give every character equal reverence. There are people whose mispronunciations, bad historical references, and bad facts are allowed in the script, while others are not. These interviews were carefully edited by the Tectonics to tell their version of this story (read Dennis Shepard's entire 16-page court testimony if you want to talk about bias). I don't think it's unfair to say that they were making fun of some of what they heard.

I think the interesting question for "The Laramie Project" is whether it will survive as a memorial or as a play. The previous productions that I have seen were both very affecting--but less as drama, than in the way that a candlelight vigil is affecting. We took the approach at Strawshop that if we could recreate the conflict between the New York actors and the Wyoming subjects, we could find dramatic tension--the kind of tension that would be mandated if this was a work of fiction.

I agree with Brendan that there are places where that conceit runs against the structure of the play. On the other hand, it gave me a much greater appreciation for the mystery novel way that much of the script is constructed (in previous productions, I actually lost track of the sequence of events). And it allowed us to put heart where we thought it was called for, without setting up every line these poor people uttered on tape to be heard as timelessly profound.
5
This is an interesting discussion and one we talked about a lot in rehearsal for 'Laramie'. During the first week, we spent most of our time telling personal stories to one another. One of our discoveries was that amateur story-tellers do caricature people we are talking about--especially people that we love and admire, because we are just trying to capture the essence of that person's physical presence instead of an imitation. The things that each of us are best known for are our idiosyncrasies. And we found that the common reaction by others who know and admire the people we're embodying is, in fact, laughter--warm, appreciative laughter, not mocking. But I admit it's a fine line, and we probably blew past it a couple of times in our ultimate performance.

That said, I would hesitate to presume what the Tectonics were intending in their script. Though it's obvious that they were genuinely affected by the people they met in Laramie and surprised by the interconnectedness of the community, they didn't give every character equal reverence. There are people whose mispronunciations, bad historical references, and bad facts are allowed in the script, while others are not. These interviews were carefully edited by the Tectonics to tell their version of this story (read Dennis Shepard's entire 16-page court testimony if you want to talk about bias). I don't think it's unfair to say that they were making fun of some of what they heard.

I think the interesting question for "The Laramie Project" is whether it will survive as a memorial or as a play. The previous productions that I have seen were both very affecting--but less as drama, than in the way that a candlelight vigil is affecting. We took the approach at Strawshop that if we could recreate the conflict between the New York actors and the Wyoming subjects, we could find dramatic tension--the kind of tension that would be mandated if this was a work of fiction.

I agree with Brendan that there are places where that conceit runs against the structure of the play. On the other hand, it gave me a much greater appreciation for the mystery novel way that much of the script is constructed (in previous productions, I actually lost track of the sequence of events). And it allowed us to put heart where we thought it was called for, without setting up every line these poor people uttered on tape to be heard as timelessly profound.
6
I agree that amateur story-tellers do tend to exaggerate- but these weren't supposed to be amateurs- they're supposed to be the (professional) Tectonic company. I know that the script reflects that there were moments when Tectonic chuckled at what some of the people said to them (at the end, one character says Matt Galloway said he'd like to know if open auditions would be held)- and I don't think the townspeople are Christ-like either- but they are real human beings, not 'types'. Had you performed it as though the actors were talking to the audiance, instead of each other, it would probably have diffused this somewhat. I also would expect that Nick Garrison's ad-libbed asides "Wait for it" (before putting on a clip-on tie) and "Oh look, (Doc) spelt H-O-P-E out.." wouldn't have been in there. I should've mentioned in my first posting that I think there are alot of commendable things about your production, I just felt you were off the mark in some of those areas I mentioned.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.