News

The Stranger Election Control Board Endorsements

Yes, You Can Find the CHEAT SHEET Here!

+ Enlarge this Image
Kyle T. Webster

Hate pesky reading? Click here for The Stranger Election Control Board CHEAT SHEET!

Are you a fucking idiot? No, you're not.

Are you an idiot? Yes, but we all are now and then.

Are you fucking? We hope so—frequently, safely, and responsibly.

But you are not a fucking idiot. Which is why you're voting for Barack Obama—because only a fucking idiot would vote for Grandpa Munster.

This year's election is all about Obama. But some of us at the Stranger Election Control Board (SECB) believe that if you take the time to fill out your entire ballot, you'll cast votes that are just as important as the one you cast for president.

Hell, some members of the SECB (the glue sniffers, but still) are convinced that the most important vote you'll cast this year isn't for Obama, whom you'll find near the top of your ballot, but for mass transit, which you'll find at the bottom—along with a bunch of other unglamorous, little-known, unsexy stuff that you really ought to be paying attention to. Think people should be able to get around without having to rely on their cars? This year's ballot includes 36 new miles of light rail. Want to encourage people to live in dense, compact communities? A renewed parks levy will help keep people in the city. And Pike Place Market is looking for a little love.

And put this on your calendar: Because no one should be alone on election night, The Stranger is hosting a free election-night party at Showbox at the Market (First Avenue and Pike Street). No speeches, no DJs—just booze; big-screen TVs; excited, hopeful Democrats; and tons of joyous victory and/or tearful consolation sex.

The SECB is Erica C. Barnett, Dominic Holden, Tim Keck, Eli Sanders, Dan Savage, and Jonah Spangenthal-Lee. The Stranger does not endorse in uncontested races.

Barack Obama is awesome—we mean it. We're so fired up about this election that we'd just about eat the corn out of this man's shit right now. Seriously. Sometimes we nearly forget to put out the paper because we're all sitting on the floor in a circle passing the talking stick around—it's technically a "water pipe"—and gushing about how totally superwonderful Obama is and how he's going to transform our country, rescue the middle class, provide health care for (nearly) all, end the war in Iraq, rebuild our decaying infrastructure, protect a woman's right to choose, stop bums from taking leaks on buses, cure cancer, and give us all six-pack abs.

And we know you'd lap up every word of a long, rousing Obama endorsement—because all you commie pinko fags are in the bag for Obama, right? But we didn't write that endorsement because, frankly, we're a little worried that our terrorist-fist-jabbing readers might read our Obama endorsement and then skip the rest—just like nervous local campaigns are worried that you're going to vote for Obama and then skip the rest of the races on your long, confusing ballot.

So we'll get to our Obama endorsement in a second. But first, we want you to read our Proposition 1 endorsement, which we're sticking in the middle of our Obama endorsement because we're high and it's our newspaper and we'll do what we damn well please.

So: Vote yes on Proposition 1!

Proposition 1

Last year, transit activists insisted we'd be giving up our only chance to build a real mass-transit system in Seattle if we said no to a bloated "roads and transit" package, which shackled light-rail expansion to an unpopular road-building agenda. We urged a "no" vote then and predicted that light rail would be back on the ballot this year—faster, cheaper, and smarter than before.

As much as the SECB hates saying we told you so—no, wait, the SECB loves saying we told you so. We LIVE to say we told you so. And we told you so, bitches! HA! Mass transit is BACK, and this year it includes 36 new miles of light rail to Redmond, Lynnwood, and Federal Way (they're real places, we checked); 100,000 hours of new express bus service; and a 65 percent expansion of Sounder commuter rail. It costs just $69 in sales tax per year, doesn't include a lick of new general-purpose pavement, and will be finished years before last year's proposal would have been.

But unlike Obama, mass transit IS at the bottom of your ballot—right after the parks levy and just before the big expanse of white space that indicates you're done voting and can get your ass down to The Stranger's election-night party at the Showbox. But we won't get mass transit if voters get discouraged by all those county charter amendments and obscure state officials and give up before they reach the bottoms of their ballots. So start at the bottom and work your way up: Vote "Yes" on Proposition 1 and then go back to the top of your ballot and vote for Obama.

This package, at $17.9 billion, isn't cheap. But we've got to get our region moving. If you think $69 is a lot to spend on transit in tough economic times, think about what you've been paying for gas lately. Prices are going to continue to rise—so the $69 you spend to build light rail today will be the thousands you save by not having to drive tomorrow.

If we build light rail now, you—and commuters all over King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties—will have the choice of hopping on a regional rapid-transit system that gets you where you want to go predictably and reliably, every time. And when you do need to drive, you'll be able to do it on roads that will be as much as 30 percent less congested—cutting greenhouse-gas emissions by nearly 180,000 tons a year. And you'll be able to start using the system right away, with increases in express bus service across the board—most of it on the highest-demand and most crowded routes. By 2020, you'll be able to take light rail from Bellevue to Seattle to Northgate and South Seattle—seven years sooner than in last year's roads and transit proposal.

Critics have claimed that if all the "true" costs were included, this ballot measure would cost $107 billion. They want you to believe that Sound Transit will continue taxing voters well into the 2050s. It's a lie: The plan we're voting on this November explicitly bars Sound Transit from taxing voters indefinitely by requiring a rollback of the taxes once the system is paid for.

Mass transit—specifically, fixed-rail rapid transit, the kind other North American cities have been working on since the last century—creates dense communities, raises (and protects) property values, and makes cities the kind of places people want to live. We've tried building our way out of sprawl and gridlock; it hasn't worked. It's time to give the alternative a try.

And now back to our Obama Endorsement.

Federal

Vote Obama!

7th District

McDermott totally supports Obama! Vote McDermott!

8th District

This may not be Darcy Burner's year—again. Recent polls have shown her down considerably in her rematch against Eastside Republican congressman/empty suit/great head of hair Dave Reichert. But just as in 2006, when she made her first run at the seat, Burner is the better choice. From the war, to women's rights, to the economy, to gay equality, Burner is on the right side of the issues—and right in tune with where the increasingly liberal 8th District is heading.

State of Washington

Governor Christine Gregoire endorsed Obama before endorsing Obama was cool. And if that isn't enough to make up for her less-than-stellar record on some issues important to Seattle voters—the viaduct, light rail, marriage equality—consider the alternative. Republican Dino Rossi opposes funding for women's health care so much that he once compared a requirement that pharmacies dispense emergency contraception to making stores carry "my favorite brand of sport drink." Rossi has promised to veto a gay-marriage bill. And Rossi has the backing of the powerful Building Industry Association of Washington—a sleazy PAC whose primary mission is to fight progressive legislation and push an antitax, anticonsumer, antienvironmental agenda.

Want some reasons to get fired up about Gregoire? Here are a few: She pushed through climate-change legislation, added tens of thousands of kids to the state's children's health-insurance program, increased the state housing trust fund by $50 million, and has consistently signed Democratic-agenda legislation that her opponent would have vetoed.

And you know what? No politician is perfect. Even President Obama—fingers crossed—is going to do things that disappoint you. And are you going to support President Obama—a president who's been less than perfect on your issues—when he runs for reelection in 2012? Or are you going to vote for a piece-of-shit Republican who sucks on all your issues? Of course you'll support Obama. Because, again, you are not a fucking idiot.

The same standard should apply in the race. The good-not-great-on-our-issues Democratic governor is running against a terrible-on-all-our-issues Republican. Gregoire deserves your vote, your support, and a second term—just like President Obama will in 2012.

Initiative Measure 985

Vote No

There really isn't a single good thing you can say about the latest shit sandwich from Tim Eyman. It opens up carpool lanes to all drivers 18 hours a day; diverts local funding from red-light cameras and tolls into a statewide road-building fund; eliminates local control over local transportation dollars; siphons hundreds of millions away from public safety, health care, and education; and drastically limits the use of tolls—prohibiting, for example, tolling I-90 to pay for a new SR-520 bridge across Lake Washington.

Eyman claims his initiative would "reduce congestion"; as evidence, he cites his own irritation driving (alone) from Seattle to Renton and seeing an empty carpool lane. We say it won't do much except line Eyman's pockets—while robbing Washington State citizens of funding for critical needs when we need them the most.

And a note to our elected officials: Please stop shitting your pants every time this douchebag manages to get one of his idiotic initiatives passed. Every time one of his initiatives gets struck down as unconstitutional, you grumble that "the people have spoken" and enact it anyway. Hello? The people spoke when we elected your asses. Now do your jobs and stand up to Eyman already.

Initiative Measure 1000

Vote Yes

We're all going to die. Some of us will die in our homes with a Labrador curled up by our feet while Mozart plays gently in the background—in person, if the drugs are really good. Some of us will be crushed by an express bus without warning or run over by a light-rail train full of pit bulls. But some of us will have to endure deaths that are gruesome and protracted and excruciating, deaths involving pain that cannot be managed, deaths that our caregivers and Labs can only stand helplessly by and witness.

Initiative 1000 would give people suffering unmanageable pain the right to decide—reasonably and rationally—that they would rather not spend the last few moments or hours or days of their life in pain. It gives terminally ill, mentally competent patients the ability to self-administer a lethal dose of medicine—after requesting it twice and having two doctors verify that it's what the patient wants. If I-1000 is approved, no one will be compelled to end his or her life. Anyone who wants to choose pain meds and the love of caregivers and a "natural" death can do so. But if I-1000 is rejected, those who want to end their lives won't have that choice. They'll be forced to suffer long after their pain has become too terrible to bear.

The passage of I-1000 doesn't impose anything on terminally ill people who reject physician-assisted suicide for religious or other reasons. But the rejection of I-1000 imposes the values of others on terminally ill people who would like to make that choice for themselves.

Initiative Measure 1029

Vote No

This SEIU-backed initiative would increase the state training requirement for home health-care workers—the people who wipe old people's butts and take care of the disabled—from 34 hours to 75. The measure would cost about $30 million over the next two years and about $5 million each year thereafter. It's a noble idea—of course we don't want to be stuck wiping our own parents' butts—but as the state faces a budget deficit of $3.2 billion, it's hard to justify saddling taxpayers with yet another unfunded mandate.

Lieutenant Governor

Marcia McCraw

In the primary election, we endorsed "anybody but Brad Owen," noting the incumbent lieutenant governor's ridiculous crusade against high-school potheads and his membership in a crappy-ass rock band. We described one of his challengers, Republican Marcia McCraw, as an "empty bag of chips."

In response, McCraw sent us several dozen bags of chips.

We had no choice. We convened an emergency SECB meeting, passed the talking stick around, dug into the chips, and reflected on our previous endorsement. We noted that McCraw is the kind of Republican who not only wants to legalize pot, but sends bags of chips to potheads. She's also pro-choice, and she served on the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Council. In other words, she's very nearly a Democrat—which is more than you can say for Brad Owen.

Secretary of State

Jason Osgood

Another plot twist!

We endorsed Republican incumbent Sam Reed for secretary of state in the primary and described Democrat Jason Osgood as a "paranoid, sweaty, nervous wreck." We've changed our minds. We weren't wrong about Osgood—it's just that we fucked up when we backed that partisan sack of shit Sam Reed, who proclaimed himself "delighted" when a King County Superior Court judge ruled that Republican Dino Rossi could run under the bullshit label "GOP Party"—25 percent of state voters don't know what "GOP" stands for—instead of the more accurate label "Republican."

Call us partisan, but the SECB will take an honest Democratic nut over a dishonest Republican hack any day. Vote for Osgood—he may be a kook, but he's our kook.

State Treasurer

Jim McIntire

Democratic state treasurer Mike Murphy is stepping down, and two capable candidates are seeking to take over his job, which involves managing and investing the state's tax revenues. We encourage you to vote for McIntire. And yes, this IS the dullest endorsement we've ever written. So let us make it up to you with this offensive Sarah Palin joke.

Q: What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina?

A: Only some of the stuff that comes out of her vagina is retarded.

State Auditor

Brian Sonntag

Since 1993, state auditor Brian Sonntag has pushed for performance audits and open government. Although Sonntag has won support from antitax, antigovernment activists like Tim Eyman—whose Initiative Measure 985 would endow Sonntag with all kinds of new powers (including flight!)—that's a matter to take up with Eyman, not hold against Sonntag himself.

Attorney General

John Ladenburg

Republican attorney general Rob (née "Robin") McKenna—Washington State's highest-ranking female-to-male transsexual—is an archconservative political climber whose sights are set on higher office. His opponent, Pierce County executive John Ladenburg, is a funny, smart, savvy politician with a strong environmental record. While the SECB commends current attorney general McKenna for suing the Building Industry Association of Washington, which skirted campaign finance laws in its effort to elect Republican Dino Rossi—and while we honor his trailblazing efforts on behalf of Washington State's FTM community—we will never forgive him for supporting Washington State's idiotic top-two primary. Plus, we don't want to propel a hardcore anti-abortion partisan like McKenna to higher office—a route he's certain to consider if both he and Dino Rossi win election in November.

Commissioner of Public Lands

Peter J. Goldmark

Peter Goldmark stole the SECB's heart earlier this year, and we still haven't figured out how to quit him. Heck, if the SECB could while away an afternoon snowballin' any of this year's candidates, doggone it, we'd snowball Goldmark. The charismatic cowboy—seriously, we just can't get over the fact that he's a gen-you-wine cattle rancher with a PhD in molecular biology—has promised to open up Washington's state-owned land to renewable-energy production and to closely regulate our state's timber industry. Promises like that haven't done much to win the favor of timber companies, which have put together a $600,000 fund to reelect Republican incumbent Doug Sutherland.

Vote Goldmark, because he'll protect our public lands. And unlike his opponent—who's best known for fighting sexual-harassment charges by an ex-employee—Goldmark won't touch you where your swimsuit covers.

Superintendent of Public Instruction

Randy Dorn

Incumbent schools superintendent Terry Bergeson's claim to a passing grade: pushing the Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL), a standardized test that students must pass to graduate. But when we gave Bergeson a few WASL questions in August, she couldn't answer a single one. So we think Washington should hold her back.

Challenger Randy Dorn is the executive director of the Public School Employees of Washington, which recently issued a vote of no confidence in Bergeson. He wants to revamp the WASL and push the legislature to fully fund public education. We're into that. Plus, he looks dapper in a school-bus-print tie.

Insurance Commissioner

Mike Kreidler

Like Obama, Democrat Kreidler has been an advocate for health-care reform, consumer protection, and the rights of malpractice victims. Those are good reasons to support him over his opponent, some Republican named John Adams. Stick it to one of our founding fathers. Vote for Kreidler.

Commissioner of Public Urination

Heidi Wills

Our previous candidate for this position, Kollin Min, failed to advance past the primary—leaving us no choice but to choose between his two primary-election opponents, former city council member Heidi Wills and the SECB's own Dan Savage. Obviously, we'd be accused of bias if we endorsed Savage. For the record: We are not endorsing Wills to avoid accusations of bias. We're endorsing Wills because we share an office bathroom with Savage, and he has demonstrated time and again that he is not qualified to hold this important office.

Legislative District 11

State Senator

Juan Martinez

Incumbent Margarita Prentice, head of the state senate's powerful Ways and Means Committee, has been in the legislature for 20 years. Now some of her more controversial positions are starting to catch up to her. Senate leadership is reportedly considering ousting Prentice because of her ill-fated efforts to build a $500 million stadium for the Sonics in Renton; because she wants to tap the new state "rainy day fund"; and because she has supported controversial constituencies like payday lenders and casinos. In 2004, just four of Prentice's contributions were from residents of her district—just $175 out of the total $160,000 Prentice raised. It's time for new blood in the 11th. Vote Martinez.

State Representative Position 1

Zack Hudgins

State Representative Position 2

Bob Hasegawa

Legislative District 36

State Representative Position 1

Reuven Carlyle

The race to replace 36-year veteran Helen Sommers features two qualified, energetic, liberal candidates: wireless entrepreneur Reuven Carlyle and tax-reform advocate John Burbank.

Burbank, author of the reviled "latte tax" for early-childhood education, has all but accused Carlyle of being a Republican and a shill for big corporations. Those claims have no basis in reality. Moreover, we worry that Burbank, with his party-activist background, will be locked into old ways of doing the people's business. Although both candidates would be capable leaders, we support Carlyle for his energy, his entrepreneurial background, and his enthusiasm for finding innovative solutions to entrenched government problems.

State Representative Position 2

Mary Lou Dickerson

Legislative District 37

State Representative Position 2

Eric Pettigrew

Legislative District 43

State Representative Position 2

Frank Chopp

Legislative District 46

State Representative Position 1

Scott White

Democrats Scott White and Gerry Pollet are both running for the open seat being vacated by state treasurer candidate Jim McIntire. Although Pollet has flung buckets of mud in White's direction—suing him for changing his mind after trying to exit the race; implying he has Republican ties because he, like many Democratic candidates, took dirty money from the Building Industry Association of Washington; and accusing the former head of the 46th District Democrats, paradoxically, of being too much of a Democratic party insider—none of it has stuck. We believe White has the chops, connections, and political acumen to transcend his insider origins.

State Representative Position 2

Phyllis G. Kenney

And now for a pop quiz!

The city of Seattle considers $1,153 a month for a one-bedroom apartment "workforce" housing. Next year, the state minimum wage will increase to $8.55 an hour. How many hours a month would you have to work at minimum wage to pay "workforce" rent? The first to e-mail a correct answer to iworkherebuticantaffordtolivehere@thestranger.com gets a $50 check and a large cardboard box. [Editor's note: Offer expired: We have a winner!]

King County

Judges of the Superior Court Position 1

Tim Bradshaw

Bradshaw stands out for his long list of endorsements and 20 years of experience.

Judges of the Superior Court Position 22

Holly Hill

This badass former federal civil-rights attorney is currently serving as a pro tem judge in King County District Court. She's more than qualified for a superior court position.

Judges of the Superior Court Position 37

Jean Rietschel

Rietschel, a Seattle Municipal Court judge for the last 12 years, is exceptionally well qualified for this position.

Charter Amendment 1

Elected elections director

Vote No

This measure, supported by a handful of wealthy Republicans, would make the county elections director an elected position. A politicized elections office would draw career politicians, not capable managers, to run for what's basically an administrative position. That hasn't worked out so well in Florida and Ohio. Vote no.

Charter Amendment 2

Prohibiting discrimination

Vote Yes

This no-brainer amendment expands county antidiscrimination protections to include disability, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Charter Amendment 3

Regional committees

Vote Yes

This is a mostly administrative measure that would reduce the number of county council members who serve on three regional committees from six to three, in keeping with recent cuts to the size of the council itself.

Charter Amendment 4

Additional qualifications for elected officials

Vote No

This amendment gives the county council the right to increase the qualifications for certain elected county officials, including the elections director (if Amendment 1, above, is approved.) While we don't think the elections director should be elected, it's not the council's role to second-guess the voters' decisions by adding extra qualifications to elected positions.

Charter Amendment 5

Establishing Forecast Council

Vote Yes

This gives the county council the same financial information as the county executive, giving county budget forecasts more credibility and improving communications between these two branches of county government.

Charter Amendment 6

Budget deadlines

Vote Yes

This measure gives the county council more time to review the executive's budget proposals—a must as county budgets become longer and more complex.

Charter Amendment 7

Charter amendment by citizen initiative

Vote Yes

This increases the signature threshold to change the King County Charter—a document that, like the U.S. and state constitutions, was designed to be difficult to amend. It also eliminates one of the two steps now required to amend the charter. Both are reasonable changes.

Charter Amendment 8

Nonpartisan elections

Vote No

At a time when Republicans are getting slaughtered electorally around the nation, it's no wonder Republicans are supporting a measure that allows them to run with no party affiliation. This measure is just partisanship in good- government clothing.

City of Seattle

Proposition 1

Pike Place Market levy

Vote Yes

This six-year, $73 million proposal has been in the works for years. If it's passed, the levy will pay for deferred maintenance and critical safety improvements at the market—a historic downtown landmark that brings millions of visitors to the city every year. If you support density or like buying local produce or just want to preserve one of the things that makes people visit (and spend money in) Seattle, then vote for this smart, one-time investment in our city.

Proposition 2 Parks levy

Vote Yes

The SECB wants you to know that the parks levy is totally worth voting for, if you can afford it.

That said, there are a lot of different groups asking for a handout this year. Times are tough, and when you're eating pork Top Ramen for the sixth night in a row, you probably aren't going to give a shit whether or not your neighborhood park is getting a new swing set anytime soon.

Yes, the parks levy will fund some cool projects—including a new, ginormous park in Northgate, expanded athletic fields at Jefferson Park in South Seattle, and safety improvements at a number of older Seattle parks such as Green Lake—but if you really don't think you can spare a measly $81 this year for the levy, the SECB won't hold it against you.

Share via

 

Comments (104) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
and a big FAT no on initiative 1029!

On the surface this Initiative sounds like a great idea. If passed, I-1029 would mandate more training, a new level of background checks, testing and certification for anyone being paid to care for the elderly or disabled. Who wouldn’t want that?


The truth is that Initiative 1029 would actually harm families.

The sponsors of the Initiative are the ones who will benefit financially. It is being supported by Washington State’s largest labor union that will get tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to train their own members.


Please help us defeat I-1029. It is not working in the best interest of the elderly and disabled and their families.
Posted by Evan on October 15, 2008 at 3:05 PM · Report
2
Props to The Stranger for endorsing the Seattle Parks Levy (Prop 2). But what's this about Top Ramen eaters not needing parks in down times?! Parks are free for ALL to enjoy - no entrance fee or membership or tank of gas or plane flight required. If people have to make choices, supporting improved parks throughout the entire city seems like a pretty obvious one to me...
Posted by parks for you, and you, too on October 15, 2008 at 3:27 PM · Report
3
The Parks Levy will provide a much needed investment in parks and green spaces that we will benefit from in lean times and in more flush times. For less than 23 cents per day, it ensures that we have great gathering spaces and places to run and play and to escape. It is a bargain. And, just as we need do the right thing in terms of transportation with Prop 1, we need to ensure that we have amenities like those that will be provided through Prop 2.
Posted by Renee on October 15, 2008 at 3:47 PM · Report
4
Aww c'mon, not even a swipe at Frank Build-the-Aqueduct Bigger, the-BIAW-has-incriminating-nudie-pics of me Chopp?

The guy's a tool.

I'm voting for the Republican on the near-zero chance we topple Chopp and then toss the Republican out two years down the road.

I bet Chopp even refused to meet with the SECB.
Posted by I Hate Chopp on October 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM · Report
5
Also,

Lets talk about the fact that this isn't some flat $80 tax on Seattleites.

Renters won't pay a thing for this levy--it's on the property owners.

Property owners are already paying for parks from the last levy, yet this is a decrease in the tax rate from the expiring levy...

Food for thought.
Posted by mark on October 15, 2008 at 4:44 PM · Report
6
Yeah...what he said.
NO on I-1029.

As a parent of a disabled child I can tell you that if I-1029 were to pass, the requirements to become, and remain, a caregiver for our son would be unnecessarily burdensome. For some, these new requirements might actually apply to a disabled child’s own parents or an elderly person’s own children.

Go to www.communitycarecoalitionwa.org to learn more.
Posted by ellen on October 15, 2008 at 5:09 PM · Report
7
I'm going to go be depressed now that my mother (who has long since passed the leaning part) is crutching heavily in McCain's direction, especially because she loathes Palin.
Posted by K on October 15, 2008 at 9:22 PM · Report
8
"Renters won't pay a thing for this levy--it's on the property owners. "

Of course you have to pay. Landlords just up the rent to cover it (and typically more).

Dumbass.
Posted by Capital Hill Resident on October 15, 2008 at 10:44 PM · Report
9
Food for thought...

Gregoire is rumored to be on the short list for a Cabinet position in the upcoming Obama administration. If she's tapped, the Lt. Gov will step in as Gov, which makes that race almost as important as the Christine/Dino bloodbath above it.

I don't know if that will influence your pick, but it might be a reason to take a closer look at Owen (who, admittedly, is a bit of a douche in person) and McGraw (i.e. does she have any advantages over Owen that are not pot-related?).
Posted by Nemo on October 16, 2008 at 5:14 AM · Report
10
For the last sixteen years, I have cared for seniors and the disabled, going into their homes to clean, bathe and dress them, and help them get around. I love this work, and it’s rewarding because it keeps them independent and out of nursing homes.

But a lot of people I knew who did homecare had to leave their jobs because the wages were so low and they were not provided with adequate training. This is now making it is extremely hard for seniors and people with disabilities to find qualified workers – some get stuck with people who don’t know how to care for them properly or even try to take advantage of them.

That’s why we need Initiative 1029 – Safe Quality Care for Seniors and People with Disabilities. This will make sure our seniors will have access to certified, well trained and qualified homecare workers by increasing training hours, certifying workers, and requiring federal background checks. It will help more seniors receive the care they need and deserve and allow them to stay in their homes longer. Please join with me in supporting YES on I-1029.
Posted by William on October 16, 2008 at 11:35 AM · Report
11 Comment Pulled
12
Yes, support Parks! Go tree huggers!
Posted by tree hugger on October 16, 2008 at 11:37 AM · Report
13
William...initiative 1029 does not increase pay for caregivers. If that's what is needed, then another law or initiative needs to be written or voted on.
I-1029 will not give us what we need which is better caregivers. It will only make it more difficult for the ones we want to get certified.
Posted by ellen on October 16, 2008 at 4:36 PM · Report
14
Look...here's a link to several papers with oped pieces giving lots of reasons to reject I-1029...

http://www.communitycarecoalitionwa.org/readwhy.php
Posted by ellen on October 16, 2008 at 4:49 PM · Report
15
No on I-1029 Our elderly have access to well trained, qualified caregivers. what is missing is quality supervision and better pay for the caregivers who provide low income adults with their care. This misguided initiative will not solve the problem it will make it more difficult to have a strong workforce for the growing elderly population. Vote no and if you are a member of SEIU, ask them to work for you in getting you better pay and more regularly available supervision that can provide training with each particular client.
Posted by Susan on October 16, 2008 at 5:00 PM · Report
16
I certainly want to take political advice from an asshole that uses the word "fucking" four times in the first four lines of his column.

Arthur
Posted by Artie on October 16, 2008 at 5:58 PM · Report
17
Can't go much wrong by voting the opposite of whatever the Stranger recommends.
Posted by Edward on October 16, 2008 at 6:24 PM · Report
18
Anyone know why I can't vote for State Senator on my absentee ballot? This is not an option, and I'm in dist. 37... does this have anything to do with it?!
Posted by larn on October 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM · Report
19
Caregivers are severely underpaid (so are the corporate staff at places like Merrill Gardens; it's not a high-profit industry). I-1029 is not the answer, and will really only create more problems. Big fat NO on 1029, and a big yes to unionizing caregivers.
Posted by Bingo on October 16, 2008 at 8:20 PM · Report
20
Fuck Parks. I'd like everyone to know that I have been collecting proof that giant events like that Sloan birthday party at Gas Works last August was illegal and taxpayers invested at least $50k in putting on that rich guys party...

Parks has been finally started giving me some of the 'good' documents i requested more than 400 days ago! (they are supposed to supply them in 30 days...)

These fuckwads deserve NO MONEY for anything - beacuse it will only end up paying for lawyers forced to litigate Parks because they are inept morons....
Posted by Ben"Jammin" on October 17, 2008 at 2:33 AM · Report
21
If I vote yes on Prop 2 will they still ban beach fires at Alki and Golden Gardens?

Seriously, fuck the Seattle Parks Dept. No on Prop 2.
Posted by joykiller on October 17, 2008 at 11:39 AM · Report
22
Listen you sh*theads. I loathe Sarah Palin as much as the next person, but you shouldn't be printing such offensive "jokes" about her vagina and retarded things that may or may not be coming out of it. Grow a sac.
Posted by Vote F*cker on October 17, 2008 at 3:04 PM · Report
23
Vote No on I-1000
Poorly written law that lacks safeguards and if passed will be a big win for the Insurance companies.
Posted by No I-1000 on October 17, 2008 at 3:15 PM · Report
24
what crack is SECB smokin re 'state treasurer'? you are endorsing candidates that don't even show up on my nov 4 ballot! are we supposed to write them in? pls clean this section up.. i think you copied and pasted it from the primary endorsements....no?
Posted by jack wallups on October 17, 2008 at 3:31 PM · Report
25
It is so disappointing that the Stranger stooped so low to make that Sarah Palin joke. It's a shame that it seems you're abusing your power.

If I could, just as I am allowed to with these comments, I would report this article as "off-topic, spam, false or abusive."

Come on, Stranger, you can do better.
Posted by Alexandra on October 17, 2008 at 4:27 PM · Report
26
I thought the Palin joke was in extremely poor taste and also hilarious. I do not look to the Stranger for gravitas.

Jack Wallups is either making his own hilarious joke that I don't get or has not-great reading comprehemsion.
Posted by absurd head on October 17, 2008 at 6:21 PM · Report
27
Please what is difference from "idiot" against "fucking idiot"? Every day I hard work to learn the English but it gives many word and group of word not in dictionary and I can not understand.
Posted by esl483 on October 17, 2008 at 6:37 PM · Report
28
I realize for most people, the race for the Commissioner of Public Lands is not going to be the results you turn to first, but please consider reelecting Sutherland. Goldmark has made a lot of promises that he can't keep, and reveals a startling lack of knowledge about the position he's running for. I have yet to see or read an interview where anything he says about DNR is remotely accurate. Although I'm a D when I'm not a Green, Goldmark appears to lack any integrity, while Sutherland has gotten our state forest lands green certified and balanced public use to the extent the constitution currently permits. To me, integrity in a politician is a rare trait, and much more important than voting party line.
Posted by OlyLivingMissingSeattle on October 17, 2008 at 7:12 PM · Report
29
Every other health care provider in the country has to do some kind of training, pass some kind of program, get some kind of certification. Pharmacy technicians, medical assistants, phlebotomists, EMT's, etc... and the requirements are all about 4327895X more "burdensome" than seventy-something measly hours. Suck it up and get educated, people. Health care professionals should know what they're doing, and training requirements help ensure that they do.
Posted by radio free roslin on October 17, 2008 at 10:23 PM · Report
30
It's no surprise to see The Stranger endorse Initiative 1000. But, this is the first time you have openly and honestly communicated the full depth of your prejudice and discrimination against seniors and people with disabilities.

"The people who wipe old peoples butts and take care of the disabled"

It's great to see bigots pose as progressives but make it clear that they are truly impostors when it comes to progressive causes and any adherence to civil rights.

You are fucking idiots!
Posted by yellowdogD on October 17, 2008 at 10:51 PM · Report
31
Listen,

I am a die hard liberal feminist. I cut my teeth working in social services at Planned Parenthood in their aborton clinics, I worked at a womens shelter counseling abused women and children, I spent five years at a community mental health agency working with children who have suffered from abuse and neglect and who often time had disablities.I have used the Stranger Voter Guide Umpteems times in tha past and I used it today for the November Elections. I completely agree with you and your endorsements. The thing isand I know you guys are smart asses and all that but your Sarah Palin joke was cruel and offensive. I know she's a dumb ass and she and the Republican party frustrate the hell out of me but honestly, that was the most offensive thing I've heard, read, or seen throughout this campagaign. Fuck you for lowering yourself beneath the Republican party.
Posted by amy c. on October 17, 2008 at 10:54 PM · Report
32

King County
Charter Amendment No. 1
Elected Elections Director

::READS::

Shall the King County Charter be amended to provide that the position of county director of elections be created as a nonpartisan elected office?

Wouldn't that mean we would want to vote yes? Keep the director of elections non partisan?
Posted by concerned voter on October 17, 2008 at 11:30 PM · Report
33
I'm truly shocked by the mentally retarded drivel that gets distributed (and taken seriously!) on the streets of Seattle. No wonder Kurt Cobain blew his brains out.
Posted by Georgia Loves McCain on October 18, 2008 at 7:09 AM · Report
34
I got my ballot at long last, though, oddly, no voters pamphlet.

The ballot says of the City of Seattle Prop 1 (Pike Place Market levy), "Taxes collected in 2009 would be limited to $2.60 per $1000 of assessed value."

For a $400,000 house, that would come to over $1000. That can't be right. The ad campaign says $46/year.

What does this phrase mean?
Posted by Free Lunch on October 18, 2008 at 5:19 PM · Report
35
I'm so glad you guys do this every year. I'm way too fucking lazy to do the proper research all by m'sef.
Posted by C.B. on October 18, 2008 at 6:02 PM · Report
36
Fucking iditos vote for Barack Obama.
Posted by demnomore on October 19, 2008 at 6:10 AM · Report
37
Soooo do we have any primary sources on the McKenna FTM thing? The Stranger's word is the only evidence I've seen.
Posted by lilzilla on October 19, 2008 at 11:04 AM · Report
38
@esl483: "fucking" is just an curse word, a vulgarity. It's used to make an adjective stronger, and to say that the speaker feels strongly about it. "This is delicious pie", would just mean the pie was delicious. "This is fucking delicious pie" would mean "I am really amazed by how delicious this pie is, also there are no children, old people, or very religious people nearby who could be offended by my use of a curse word". Of course the Stranger is not worried about offending people so they use it freely.


@Georgia Loves McCain: Oh, honey, nobody takes the Stranger seriously. The Stranger is that guy at the party spouting off with wit and vulgarity; you kind of love listening to him and you may sometimes think he's on to something, but you're never going to take him seriously unless you're as high as he is.
Posted by lilzilla on October 19, 2008 at 11:17 AM · Report
39
Dear Stranger - Please correct the format of your CheatSheet PDF or make a big NOTE to COMPLETELY FILL IN THE OVALS on your ballot - putting a simple Check Mark as your Cheat Sheet shows May Not Register your Vote - follow instructions in your ballot. Thank You.
Posted by KristianQ on October 19, 2008 at 4:15 PM · Report
40
everything green must be soccer field, bad parks dept.
No
Posted by gout on October 20, 2008 at 1:49 PM · Report
41
Have you seen this, about Reichart?

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=9255

$500K in illegal credit from Seattle TV stations ...
Posted by lisa g. on October 20, 2008 at 7:12 PM · Report
42
I was all for the Parks levy until yesterday when the King County Council overwhelmingly voted to approve a tax-payer funded giveaway of one of our parks to a private company with millions of dollars in the bank.

The park WAS 60 acres south in Redmond. The organization on the receiving end is Lake Washington Youth Soccer League. The county has allowed LWYSL to use the north side of the park for years in an apparent "lease" deal in which the county has received $0 in compensation while the soccer league has become richer and richer.

Anyone that tells you that this deal is "for the kids" is full of crap. After this vote, it is clear to me that the King County Council and Executive do not have the best interests of the parks or their users at heart. I will not vote to give them another dime!
Posted by no on parks on October 21, 2008 at 9:03 AM · Report
43
I think amendment no. 6 was misread by SECB. A 'no' vote would not 'impose deadlines that are twenty days earlier than exisiting deadlines'
Posted by mattbama on October 21, 2008 at 11:22 AM · Report
44 Comment Pulled
45
Right, like it isn't hard enough to find caregivers. Low pay and more restrictions will bring them running for sure. So, instead of "seniors and people with disabilities" having caregivers that may or may not be desirable, with this initiative they won't have any care at all.
Posted by Tuna Helper on October 21, 2008 at 4:30 PM · Report
46 Comment Pulled
47
Hey Mark, do you think my landlord pays one penny of the property tax on the condo I lease from him? Nope - he passes it along to me, in the form of rent. Fine by me - I don't mind paying for parks and all the other services that taxes provide. But I'm sick of people suggesting that renters don't pay taxes - we do!
Posted by libbertine on October 22, 2008 at 7:55 AM · Report
48
Snarky Sarah Palin made her own vagina an issue in this campaign, so it is fair game for any jokes.
Further, her own lack of scruples when speaking to her inbred crowds leaves her open to all scrutiny.

In fact, discerning voters would like to know what Sarah's vagina is "Palin' around with."

Could it be ...terra-rists?!?
Posted by blackhook on October 23, 2008 at 10:06 AM · Report
49
Hey no on parks - you do realize that a park in Redmond has nothing to do with SEATTLE city parks, right?
Posted by Salty Dawg on October 23, 2008 at 1:03 PM · Report
50
but how would you vote on who's hotter, republicans or democrats? :)
http://www.theonlyvote.com
Posted by GeorgiePorgie on October 24, 2008 at 9:16 AM · Report
51
Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?
By Orson Scott Card
http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081017light.html

Please spread the word. Every American needs to read this be it Dems, Reps or Independents.
Get out and VOTE!
Posted by An American on October 24, 2008 at 12:23 PM · Report
52
The world has something to say about Obama. Dig it!
http://www.iftheworldcouldvote.com/
Posted by thestoob on October 24, 2008 at 4:59 PM · Report
53
Why if on the KC Elections site (http://your.kingcounty.gov/elections/2004nov/respage6.htm) it shows Gregoire with 57.75% of the vote and Rossi with 40.09% of the 2004 results is there still discussion of a 133 vote difference in favor of Gregoire. It is listed as a final count.
Posted by Learningstill on October 25, 2008 at 10:57 AM · Report
54
"If I-1000 is approved, no one will be compelled to end his or her life."

I very much want to support this Measure, but that is the sticking point. I have heard stories, mostly in the form of worst-case scenarios, that this is a law that is more exploitable than would appear on the surface. I am wary of throwing my support behind an initiative measure that in the end will be used as a catalyst to do more harm than good. I want to see solid evidence that safeguards would be put in place to prevent its' use for ridding families of "unwanted relatives", be it for burden or financial reasons. Can anyone here supply that info? If so feel free to send a message to Saad at seattlesaad@gmail.com Your responses are much sought after.
Posted by Saad O'Rodrigowitz on October 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM · Report
55
IM 1029: I'm a health care provider and even I am voting 'No' on this one because I've gone through those trainings and extending the required hours to train, although a good idea on paper, isn't going to do much more than frustrate the states fiscal reserves (ha! ha!) and prevent those who are ready, or are urgently needed, to start work. Furthermore, we are required to complete additional training courses with each passing six month (or year) period. Don't let the wording fool you, we already have stringent background checks and training that have so far served the system well. This initiative tries to fix what ain't broke, and you know what your grandmother has to say about that.
Posted by Saad O'Rodrigowitz on October 26, 2008 at 11:53 AM · Report
56 Comment Pulled
57
If you are a fucking idiot, you'd want Obama and more false flag terrorism like 9/11 and you'll get it soon. Biden even guaranteed it when he spoke in Seattle last. Cynthia McKinney for President 2008. Or Barr or Nader or anyone but Obama/McCain. Shame on The Stranger on this one.
Posted by Eric Weber on October 26, 2008 at 12:54 PM · Report
58
A big YES for 1029!!!

Evan's comment that the state's largest labor union wanting its members to be better trained is true, but why is that a bad thing? Members AND the people they care for are screaming for the training workers need to care for our rapidly aging population. The union is helping that happen, and it is in the state's interest to make sure that it does. If we don't invest in long term care now, we will pay for it later. If we don't make sure that our homecare workers - who only make about $13/hour and contribute a portion of their pay to help pay for this training - are able to do their jobs safely, we will find ourselves paying for it in more accidents, injuries, crime and expensive nursing home care. 1029 is an investment in our grandparents, parents, and ourselves. Vote YES!
Posted by Mary on October 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM · Report
59
"'Renters won't pay a thing for this levy--it's on the property owners.'

Of course you have to pay. Landlords just up the rent to cover it (and typically more).

Dumbass."

This may be true, but it is not at all obvious. Housing is pretty supply-inelastic, at least in the short term, so it's not clear landlords would be able to raise rents.
Posted by Ian on October 26, 2008 at 11:15 PM · Report
60
Rob McKenna stated:
"I am pro-choice, and I'm on the record as being pro-choice."
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004168939_ladenburg07m.html

He may be a republican but he's the best AG Washington's had in decades. And he's totally cool with you fishing your unwanted baby out.

Now pass the talking stick.
Posted by Andy on October 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM · Report
61 Comment Pulled
62
Under info for State Treasurer, the Palin joke - "Only some of the stuff that comes out of her vagina is retarded." REALLY low and not humorous - this insults a handicapped child who holds no responsibility for its own condition, or its mother's obvious inadequacies - both to lead the country and to committ time to this child she brought into the world.
Posted by Colleen on October 28, 2008 at 10:09 AM · Report
63
I am also a caregiver. While William is well-meaning, he did not do his homework on I-1029. This initiative sounds good, but it is misleading. Caregivers already receive background clearance checks and training. Much of the extra training that is being recommended is costly, and irrelevant to the particular care being provided. This means that resources that could be serving people who need it would be wasted. This is why Washington State Hospice is against this measure, as is Aging Services of Washington, Developmental Disability Advocates, Community Care Coalition of Washington, and the Home Care Coalition. Yes, we need better services, but this is not the way to do it. This initiative is "highly politicized" (in the words of the Seattle P-I), would restrict part-time caregivers, and would in the end negatively effect the most vulnerable in this state.
Posted by Ellen on October 28, 2008 at 3:03 PM · Report
64
This is a GREAT service and GREAT reading....except for that completely bullshit joke about Palin's kid. Snarkiness is cool. A blatant jibe at an innocent child is not. Delete it.
Posted by Mom in Seattle on October 28, 2008 at 8:36 PM · Report
65
Though I had heard it once before from a completely unrelated source, when I read the Sarah Palin joke from the SECB, I laughed out loud, AGAIN! I thought it was hy-freakin'-sterical to see it as a pop quiz in the middle of all the issues! If you were offended by that, then maybe you shouldn't be reading the Stranger in the first place. Sarah Palin made her genetically engorged child a campaign issue from the moment she was struck by the lightning otherwise known as the McCain Campaign. Carabao Barbie's kid is open game. Joke you if you can't take a fuck!
Posted by John on October 29, 2008 at 6:57 PM · Report
66
Re: Initiative Measure 985

I hereby publicly challenge Tim Eyman to a no holds barred fight.

I am 40, fat, out of shape and only have one eye. But I did wrestle in high school and I have more than a bit of an Irish temper. Anywhere, anytime, any place - I won't even bring my Mom in case I tap out (which I won't – I PROMISE you).

Eyman's incessantly irritating misuse of our state's initiative system via his own perverted view that EVERY INSIGNIFICANT THING needs to be decided by our Athenian democracy option is no longer just a joke among progressives - it is an abomination that simply has to stop now.

If you do not like the way city, county or state politics are going – vote the bums out – that’s what we PAY these people to do. I.e. sweat the small stuff. I am done with this delusional hack who isn’t even qualified to be a “greeter” at Walmart.

Please, please, please for the love of GAWD, Tim, get over your microscopic penis complex and take me up on my challenge or just simply fade into the sunset and SHUT THE FUCK UP! I am dead serious about putting my rapidly aging body on the line to do it. Think I'm kidding, Tim? I triple DAWG dare YER PUSSY LIL' PINK PANTY WEARIN' ASS to contact me at info@porterharp.com

SEVERLY UNRESPRECTFULLY UP YOUR FUCKING PUNK BITCH ASS!

-Col. T. Porter Harp
Posted by Col. T. Porter Harp on October 29, 2008 at 8:48 PM · Report
67
Uh, before you spelling bee whiners go and get a bee in your spell-checker bonnet, I did mean, "SEVERELY & UN-RESPECTFULLY".

-Porter
Posted by Col. T. Porter Harp on October 29, 2008 at 10:16 PM · Report
68
thank you, thank you, thank you for the huge amount of thought and work you put into this!!
Posted by grateful on October 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM · Report
69
Your comments about Sarah Palin's child are repulsive and make me want to not read your newspaper and column. Please get a clue!
Posted by SLE on October 30, 2008 at 2:47 AM · Report
70
KC Charter Ammendment 4
What is wrong with higher qualifications? wouldn't that be beneficial? I'd like to know someone coming into a gov't job actually has the credentials needed to perform the level of service required. We don't hire people if they don't have qualifications?
...look at Sarah Palin, certainly some higher level of qualification should be necessary to run for that office. hmmmm, maybe I just answered my own question. or maybe I need your perspective? help me out here.
Posted by CharterConfusion on October 30, 2008 at 11:10 AM · Report
71
Scott White -- the mud has stuck. The King County Ombudsman discovered that White doesn't mind lying even in a formal investigation, and he'll say the dog ate his homework before he'll take blame. The Stranger seems like the last place you'd find people too delicate to look at the mud and see if it's real. Pity the 46th, if it chooses White over a progressive and honest alternative, Gerry Pollet.
Posted by Helen W on October 30, 2008 at 3:06 PM · Report
72
Hey! The Parks Levy does much more than provide swing sets. It also helps out with restoration of our parks. Did you know that many of the trees in Seattle's Parks are nearing the end of their lifespans? They only live 60 years? Then they DIE! If more trees aren't planted we will be a city without a tree canopy. Think about it...what's more important than that? NO, WE CANNOT WAIT TO SAVE OUR PARKS AND THE TREES THAT PROVIDE THE OXYGEN WE BREATHE! NONE OF US CAN AFFORD THAT!
Save the trees! Vote yes on Prop 2!
Posted by Donna on October 30, 2008 at 9:31 PM · Report
73
"Renters won't pay a thing for this levy--it's on the property owners. "

Which is why taxes like this pass much more frequently in a city like Seattle with a high proportion of renters

"Of course you have to pay. Landlords just up the rent to cover it (and typically more)."

I wouldn't got quite that far, but increasing the landlords expenses sure doesn't help your rent.
Posted by Harry on October 30, 2008 at 10:47 PM · Report
74
Thanks for your endorsements. I use your endorsements and vote exactly opposite.
Posted by crachelle on October 31, 2008 at 9:50 AM · Report
75
Not true that renters don't pay property taxes. Who hasn't had a rent increase from a sighing landlord mentioning another round of property tax increases.

But my real question: When will elected officials looks to something BESIDES property and sales taxes to fund their favorite projects? I am SO TIRED of these two options, one horribly regressive the other also regressive -- depending on the size of house the wealthy choose for themselves.

Let's repeal Eyman's flat vehicle excise tax. I drive a used car and it didn't save me a nickel, but all the SUV and luxury car drivers saved a small fortune. Now we have crappy roads. Thanks Tim!
Posted by mrconnecto on October 31, 2008 at 11:00 AM · Report
76
OMG! Everybody vote for Obama...because he's just like so oh my god awesome and McCain is such a old...guy. I mean, Bush sucks ass and like Obama is so freakin amazing...he just, like speaks about things and its going to be great, you know? I mean...McCain is like a crazy old war dude and an IDIOT! And Obama is like...there are SO MANY PEOPLE who love him and he'll fix everything and make this country FUN again! It just makes so much fucking sense when you THINK, assholes! Just do it. Go vote! Get out the vote! Vote for Obama! He's the man...or not just a man, he's like this amazing guy who just like is AWESOME! He better win, too...or we'll ALL BE PISSED! And like get all in their fucking faces you old Vietnam veteran son of a bitch old guy! GO-BAMA! (I just made that up!) See all of you guys at the party! Yes! VOTE FOR OBAMA! The Stranger ROCKS!
Posted by GO-BAMA on November 1, 2008 at 9:16 AM · Report
77
I thought that the ammendment about descrimination was a no-brainer too, until I read the text and noticed that it also seems to limit the ban on discrimination to "non-governmental organizations". This seemed like such a poison pill that I can't convince myself to vote for it, if it could conceivably open a loophole to permit the government to discriminate based on race, gender, or sexual orientation...
Posted by Anonymous on November 1, 2008 at 12:58 PM · Report
78
I wanted advice on Propositon 1, so I searched google using: Stranger Proposition 1

The first hit was for 2007's guide, titled "How to Vote - News - The Stranger, Seattle's Only Newspaper". It advised me NOT to vote for Proposition 1, saying it was deceptive and would hurt public transit. Ooops!

Fortunately I was able to cross out my choice and change it to Approved, but somebody really should edit the 2006/2007 endorsement pages to note that they're obsolete! It would be great to include a link to to the most recent page, at least until Google catches up.
Posted by Adam on November 1, 2008 at 1:42 PM · Report
79
Thanks for the info! I will make sure I vote AGAINST the candidates and issues you commie cunts prefer.
Posted by Obongo From The Congo on November 1, 2008 at 6:30 PM · Report
80
More Big Brother, SWEET, just what I needed.
Posted by totalretard on November 1, 2008 at 10:44 PM · Report
81
See you sheeple in the soup line. Maybe we'll get borscht if we're lucky.
Posted by not one of the sheeple on November 1, 2008 at 10:52 PM · Report
82
Initiative 1000: You already have the right to refuse life-extending (or any other) treatment. If I'm an insurance company and you are deemed to have 6 or less months to live, what would I cover? Your last prescription? Or seemingly futile life extending treatments? VOTE NO


Initiative 1029:
"...home health-care workers—the people who wipe old people's butts and take care of the disabled...of course we don't want to be stuck wiping our own parents' butts..."

Guess what? Butts need to be wiped. And you are SERIOUSLY being pathetically patronizing in your critique of home health workers. They serve a much bigger function that just "wiping butts." Check it out sometime.

And when you find that your parent, the same one that did so much (hopefully) to get you where you are today, is dying of cancer and needs your love, compassion and physical assistance, well...let's just say I hope you don't feel "stuck."
VOTE whatever you want on this one. BETTER PAY and RESPECT for Home Helath Workers!
Posted by Charlie on November 1, 2008 at 11:07 PM · Report
83
Great information and helpful perspective, thanks. Agreed on 80% of my voting with The Starnger.
Posted by Jake on November 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM · Report
84 Comment Pulled
85
I have always referred to the Stranger Election Guide in past elections but not this year. I actually filled out my ballot using my own brain. And I am gratified to see that I more-or-less voted in line with The Stranger, the only major exception being the parks levy. (I figure in this economic downturn I deserve to say NO to at least one would-be hand reaching into my pocket. Sorry parks.) And I voted against Polett without even knowing about his mud-slinging, etc. I voted no against him because —get this— because his signs were freaking UGLY and because I counted NINE of them within one city block near my house. I was punishing bad design and egregious sign-proliferation, but my instinct about him (being a no-class mud-slinger) was right on the money. Suck it Polett!

Now, about that Palin joke. I'd heard it before and even repeated it myself and take comfort in the fact that The Stranger still has teeth enough not to shrink from such 'blue' material. Yes, I feel sorry for the poor baby who can't defend himself, but the joke is not an attack on the child (except the use of the word "retarded" which some sanctimonious buttholes take offense at.) The joke is an attack on Palin herself, on her own severe mental retardation and her poor judgement, selfishing choosing to have a fifth god-damned child in her 40s and condemming that poor soul (the down baby) into existence. Fuck her.
Posted by Obama is CFR NWO (and I voted for him anyway!) on November 2, 2008 at 5:17 PM · Report
86
"selfishly", that is

Oh, and for you bleeding hearts... Palin endangered that poor kid even further by taking an 11 hour flight (factoring in layover in Seattle) from Texas to Alaska AFTER HER WATER BROKE, risking the health of the child just because she didn't want to deliver it at a strange Texas hospital.

The woman is selfish and... while not clinically retarded (at least she'd have an excuse) certainly STUPID.

Okay, I'm finished.
Posted by Obama is CFR NWO (and I voted for him anyway!) on November 2, 2008 at 5:23 PM · Report
87
Thank you SO much for the endorsement of Randy Dorn for Superintendent. Terry Bergeson has done a horrible job, and as an educator I've seen her speak on numerous occasions and she couldn't answer any of our questions without sounding condescending.

I did a little happy dance when I saw this--The Stranger ALWAYS comes through. Thank you again.
Posted by SaraS on November 2, 2008 at 7:33 PM · Report
88
Please vote No on I-1029. Caregivers of those with developmental disabilities and others in long term care need higher wages, not generic expensive training that will never be funded anyway.

As a caregiver and advocate for adults with developmental disabilities, I am dismayed that SEIU is using its liberal cred to impose such a damaging initiative.

THANK YOU, Stranger, for seeing the light. I got invited to the Seattle Weekly election night party, but when I noticed that SEIU was a sponsor I crossed it off my calendar.

Note: There are a lot worse things in the world than wiping asses.
Posted by DDadvocate on November 2, 2008 at 7:54 PM · Report
89
Charter Amendment No. 6 Budget Deadlines is completely mis-represented in this guide. The amendment, "impose(s) deadlines that are twenty days earlier than existing deadlines" not later as the stranger guide suggests. The only "no brainer"(to use the strangers words) in this election is this paper itself.
Posted by sampearse on November 2, 2008 at 8:43 PM · Report
90
please disregard the last post as amendment 6, by imposing earlier deadlines on budget preparation provided more time for budget consideration and ramification.
Posted by sampearse on November 2, 2008 at 8:52 PM · Report
91
In response to Mattbama's remark on 10 21: Charter Amendment No. 6 requires that county agencies submit budget information to the county executive twenty days earlier. Thus, a yes vote gives the county government twenty more days to review this information. The amendment also requires that the county executive present his (or her) proposed budget to the county council.
Posted by mmm on November 2, 2008 at 8:59 PM · Report
92
Vote NO on I-1029

I-1029 will not "make sure seniors have access" to the care they need. Care giving is an entry level position into the health care field and requiring 75 hours of training will dissuade some from entering the field thus leaving us with a greater shortage of caregivers.

I-1029 does not have any thing to do with raising care givers wages either.

I-1029 will increase costs for some of the people receiving the care. Private caregiving agencies will have to raise rates to clients in order to pay for the 75 hours of proposed mandated training.

Vote NO I-1029
Posted by paul on November 3, 2008 at 12:23 AM · Report
93
Do any of you opposing I-1029 actually have a family member in the care of a provider? these folks need all the training they can get! and higher pay as well. Of course, my bill will go up, but so will the quality of care - and that's what this is about.
Posted by wife on November 3, 2008 at 9:20 AM · Report
94
I was about to print out your endorsement cheat sheet when I read your "offensive joke" that only some of the stuff that comes out of Sarah Palin's vagina is retarded. What a horrible thing to say about her son. I'm no fan of the woman or her politics, but it's just plain wrong to make fun of a baby with Down Syndrome. Shame on you, Stranger.
Posted by Anita on November 3, 2008 at 3:48 PM · Report
95
I like how THE STRANGER says they love Obama so much but right underneath this comment box is a McCain-Palin advertisement. FUCKING SELL OUT FASCISTS
Posted by stranger sells out on November 3, 2008 at 8:58 PM · Report
96
I stopped reading the Stranger because of it's generally boring disdain for most things in this world. I figured that this cheat sheet would be the last section of this paper that would not contain sexist jokes and pointless negativity, but I guess I was wrong! I've learned once again that I was better off before I read your cheat sheet - the only useful thing about this was getting to hear reader's responses in the comments...
Posted by Bored with the Stranger on November 3, 2008 at 11:52 PM · Report
97 Comment Pulled
98
Anita, I don't think you understood the joke. You see, her baby is retarded like Corky from Life Goes On, because it's a retarded Down Syndrome baby. A retarded Down Syndrome baby fell out of Sarah Palin's vagina. It probably even has one of those weird, vacant, half-lidded drooly faces. Retarded babies freak me out. Hmm... I forgot what the hell I was posting about.
Posted by Retard Babies on November 4, 2008 at 5:38 AM · Report
99
Smart move on placing the cavalier attitude on I-1029 before the Palin joke--you made it palatable. Well, as palatable as being force-fed a heaping tablespoonful of horseradish before being made to choke down a garlic bulb can be.

Apparently, the SECB has not toured some of the "skilled" nursing facilities (while I use that term loosely, that's what they're called) or adult family homes (AFH) in the area. Both could/should be considered human boarding kennels staffed by people who range from incompetent to apathetic to just plain hateful and neglectful with AFHs being the worst offenders by far.

You'd call for reform in the way these people are trained too if you had to pick someone up from one of these places whose adult diaper is so full, the ammonia piss-smell emanating from it can be summed up as follows: Worst. Catbox. Ever. Times infinity.

Or the SNF nurse who's concerned about her normally responsive, but now non-responsive patient who fell out of bed, hit his head and had a 15 minute long seizure shortly afterwards---eight hours ago.

While ignorant and stupid people are abundant (even in health care), they shouldn't be tolerated. Educate the ignorant and put the truly stupid out of business and out of work.

www.yeson1029.org
Posted by If You See Kay on November 4, 2008 at 6:11 AM · Report
100
Hold on, Prop 1 & 2 state an additional taxes would "be limited to $2.60 per $1,000 of assessed value"; that would be $1300 on a $500,000 house. Then it states, "including approximately $0.19 of additional taxes"; that would be approximately $95 for a $500,000 house. So which is it?
Posted by Brian on November 4, 2008 at 6:50 AM · Report
101
If anyone has ever step foot in any care center for the elderly they would know that more training is absolutely necessary! The fact is that because there is such a high demand for heath care workers in these facilities proper background checks and training are often lax. Care given to these residents are not up to standard. These people are our parents, grandparent, and other family members, they deserve better care and our support.
Posted by health care worker on November 4, 2008 at 9:00 AM · Report
102
It's nice to see the election guide, but if The Stranger is dolling out "you're idiots" critiques to its readers -- what's that about?! -- then I've got one for The Stranger:

The people at The Stranger are idiots (but don't worry, you're not fucking idiots!) for including the joke about retarded things/Palin's vagina. If it's not obvious to you why that's idiotic, then that proves my point.
Posted by lullaby4nina on November 4, 2008 at 11:50 AM · Report
103
You think we'll see a spike in redstate heart-attack rates with this wonderful outcome? Biostatisticians Unite!!!!
Posted by sizzle on November 7, 2008 at 7:58 AM · Report
104 Comment Pulled

Add a comment

Most Commented in News