Savage Love Podcast
Check out the all new Savage Lovecast site!
Got a question for Dan Savage?
Call the Savage Love Podcast at 206-201-2720
or email Dan at mail@savagelove.net.
Savage Love Archives
-
May 15
Shorties -
May 8
Reading Comprehension Fail -
May 1
Move On -
Apr 24
No Problem -
Apr 17
Dick Holes
More from Dan Savage
-
SL Letter of the Day: Seconded
-
SL Letter of the Day: Not A Prude... And Not Just Not That...
-
Great Moments In GOP Outreach to Women
-
Usually When I'm Sent a Photoshopped Image of a Gun Pointed At Me...
-
Tornado Truthers
Books by Dan Savage
American Savage
It Gets Better: Coming Out, Overcoming Bullying, and Creating a Life Worth Living
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
- Kinsey Confidential
- Carnal Nation
- Tiny Nibbles
Want a Second Opinion?
Contact Dan Savage
Savage on YouTube
The Sub's Paradox
December 28, 2011
I am a 25-year-old gay man. Although I have always accepted my homosexuality and never really felt bad about it, recently I have been going through a hard time psychologically because I'm exposing myself to very graphic homophobic online content. There are blogs, online groups, and websites that cater to gay men who like to be abused and degraded by "straight" men. Some people write extensively about how all gay rights should be rolled back.
I am very disturbed because I am actually aroused by content that shows supposedly straight men degrading gay men. I always come away feeling disturbed, insecure, and unhappy. But when I'm horny, I go right back. The worst feeling comes from knowing that a lot of those people don't seem to recognize it as just a fantasy, but instead believe in the homophobic views they express.
I was never disturbed by BDSM-type fantasies or BDSM porn, as it never seemed to be related to homophobia at all. But this type of dom/sub thing is very disturbing, as people don't seem to be "just playing" and it is playing with a real-world violent and powerful hate ideology. Is it okay for me to just view this as another harmless fantasy or is this something I need to control or get help dealing with? Secondly, are the people who contribute, participate in, and produce such gay-bashing sexualized content just indulging in a version of acceptable BDSM/kink or is it dangerous to use a prevalent hate ideology in sex play?
Not An Inferior Faggot
P.S. Examples of these websites: faggot4ever.tumblr.com, obeythestraightman.tumblr.com, and tribes.tribe.net/qssm.
You're not inferior, NAIF, and you're not alone.
In fact, you have lots of horny soul mates out there—think of strong feminist women with rape fantasies, think of faithful Jews with Nazi fetishes, think of empowered African Americans who get off on Master/slave role-play scenes. And think of all the gay men out there turned on by those vaguely threatening male archetypes. I mean, come on: All those cliché gay male sex symbols—truckers, skinheads, marines, cops, firemen, gangbangers—don't exactly represent the kinds of people or professions that have historically been associated with tolerance.
A person can safely explore degrading fantasies—even fantasies rooted in "hate ideology"—so long as he/she is capable of compartmentalizing this stuff. Basically, you have to build a firewall between your fantasies and your self-esteem. (And, just as importantly, between your fantasies and your politics.) Once you do that, NAIF, you'll be able to enjoy your "straight men abusing fags" fantasies without feeling devastated immediately after you come. In fact, successfully building that firewall and then enjoying your fantasies without shame can leave you feeling stronger and more empowered for having these fantasies in the first place. Call it the sub's paradox: A D/s sub who can enjoy his fantasies without being shredded by them is in control, not being controlled—regardless of how things might appear to a casual or misinformed observer.
But it doesn't sound like you've been able to build that firewall yet, NAIF, due to feelings of shame rooted in a perceived disconnect between the person you know yourself to be—a proud gay man—and the scenarios that make your dick hard. But there is no disconnect, NAIF. You don't really hate yourself any more than the feminist with rape fantasies really wants to be raped or the Jewish guy with Nazi fantasies really believes that Germans are the master race. (Could a people who routinely wear sandals with socks be the master race? No, they could not.) It might help if you reminded yourself of that before, during, and after you rub one out—it also might help if a sex-positive counselor reminded you of that during some regular sessions over a period of months.
You know what else might help? Finding a nice, out, proud gay man who gets off on this shit, too, NAIF, a guy who wants to explore these degradation fantasies with you in real time—safely, respectfully, and consensually. Cuddling after a hot, crazy, kinky D/s sex session with the "straight" guy who five minutes ago was "degrading" you for being a "worthless faggot"—and then getting dressed and going out to grab some fro-yo and chat about Glee—would go a long way toward helping you see your fantasies as something that brought intimacy, companionship, and connection into your life, instead of self-loathing and self-recrimination.
But don't start exploring your fantasies with a boyfriend until that firewall is well under construction, NAIF, okay?
Three months ago, I started a fuck-buddy relationship with an old friend. As we are both not seeking a serious romance, I thought it would be a good idea. My assumption was that the relationship was "open." But when I asked him how he'd feel about me dating another guy, he got defensive and said that if I fucked other guys, he would "never" sleep with me again. I asked him if he was sleeping with other girls, and he said no. I don't know whether to be happy (he likes me enough to be monogamous) or freaked (at his leotarded communication style). I do have feelings for him, and the sex is progressing from good to great. Any advice would be helpful.
Confused Canadian Chick
I would advise you to have a convo about upgrading your frequent-fucker cards from fuck-buds silver to boyfriend/girlfriend gold. The latter designation gets closer to the facts on the ground: You have feelings for him, he has feelings for you (however poorly articulated), the sex is great, the relationship is exclusive. You two may not have been seeking romance, CCC, but it looks like romance found you.
I'm a straight male in a committed live-in relationship. My girlfriend and I have sex once a week, usually on Saturday mornings. During the week, she is either too tired or too full after dinner. She often says she wants to have sex, but come 9:30 p.m., she's ready to get in bed and watch TV until she falls asleep. She asks me on a daily basis if I've masturbated in her absence. If I say no, she accuses me of lying. She has demanded to smell my hands to see if she can smell lube on them. I resent feeling interrogated and guilt-tripped over this. When I do masturbate, I always clean up after myself and I'm doing it before she gets home or after she's gone to bed. So, again, why the guilt?
Browbeating Okay, Meat Beating Another Story Totally
I don't know who's crazier, your controlling, psychotic, hand-sniffing girlfriend, BOMBAST, or you, for sticking around and putting up with this bullshit. There's nothing wrong with having a low libido; it's not a crime to want sex only once a week. But terrorizing a higher-libido partner about whether or not he is making ends meet by masturbating now and then—and demanding to smell his hands!—is borderline abusive behavior. DTMFA, BOMBAST, and be so kind as to pass this bit of advice on to your soon-to-be ex-girlfriend: If you want a companion animal you can castrate, lady, get a dog. Not a boyfriend, not a husband. A dog.
@fakedansavage on Twitter
Translation: BOMBAST, if your girlfriend objects to your masturbating, you could always have an affair.
To reduce the guilt you feel and the craziness of her smelling your hands, maybe you should go into the bedroom while she's waiting to drift off to sleep, start masturbating in front of her, and then turn over and fall asleep when you're done. You might wake up to an EX girlfriend...but you'll wake up satisfied!
I, too, had a "fuck buddy" who was an old friend of mine. He was in an "open marriage", and I believed that our relationship was all it was along with an long time friendship. However, a situation caused that to change, and my "fuck buddy" became very aggressive towards me in the end.
I say that to say this: In your case, I hope Dan is correct about "the romance finding you". But, just because your friend became "defensive" doesn't necessarily mean he has romantic feelings for you unless he comes out and tells you that he does. It could be case of control and the good ol' "I don't want you but don't want anyone else to have you." Don't ignore any red flags that may be there.
Your SO sounds very insecure, maybe you should consider a round of counseling? Sometimes an impartial translator/negotiator local on the ground is enough to set things clear; before you DTMFA, decide if it is worth spending some time and money to get beyond "Meh". Having a third party explain that she doesn't need to feel guilty, or make you feel guilty about having PIV once a week might get rid of a lot of the drama.
BTW, you do try to go out on dates, right? And you (as a couple) hang out with friends, right? Being stuck at home may be a part of the problem as well.
Peace.
11
12
That is, if you don't feel monogamous you must not like your partner enough.
True for you? Cool.
But in general? Beg to differ, CCC. Beg to differ.
Awesome answer for the confused chick. I don't think I have ever seen Dan recommend upgrading from a fuck buddy to a BF/GF which is a far cry from DTMFA.
BOMBAST needs to run like the wind. Alternatively he could tell her something like yes, bitch, I have normal needs just like a, like, normal guy. So I am beating off and I am planning to fuck the first thing that falls in front of my path. So if you want to fuck in the missionary position once a week I will always be there for you. The rest of the time I will be living a real life you pathetic cunt.
Once a week after 20 years of marriage is grounds for an affair IMHO. Once a week while just living together means once every 3-12 months after the VOWS. I guarantee this woman will make AT LEAST 4 men's lives a living hell during her pathetic so called life and she will probably make out like a gold digging bandit.......
If you laid out the ground rules from the start (not clear from your letter), and he still got his panties in a wad when you talked about seeing other people, DO NOT DATE HIM. Do not even fuck him. That sort of behavior can signal some serious jealousy issues, even beyond those of your run-of-the-mill monogamist. He'll never stop asking if you're fucking someone else.
If you didn't discuss the nature of the relationship before then, I'd still be wary. It's 2011; no one in their right mind assumes sex means exclusivity without further discussion.
If she gives you any shit, tell her a) it's not her penis, b) if she doesn't want you taking care of your own needs, she had damned well better take care of them herself any time you ask, and c) once a week is not nearly fucking often enough.
If you have feelings for him, and the sex is progressing from good to great, why are you still looking around? Are you poly? If not, is there something else about him or about your circumstances that would disqualify this relationship from progressing to the next level?
CCC: Romance found you. Congrats. All the best.
Anybody: One dumb question regarding CCC's letter to Dan: Why the word "leotarded" ? I'm not nitpicking, just curious. Does the definition possibly have anything to do with the fifth astrological sign? I'm a Leo, but I don't consider myself "leotarded". Spanxed, maybe, but not leotarded.
Dan missed the real problem here, and the real problem is you.
Your natural reaction to a situation where some other person demands something unreasonable from you is to pretend you're meeting their expectations.
This is not healthy. If someone demands something from you that you do not think is right of them to demand from you, tell them that you do not agree. After communicating that you do not agree with their expectations, you will have the opportunity to either create expectations that you can both mutually agree to, or decide that such an agreement is not possible and move on.
Those who are upset because they feel they must hide their true behavior from their significant other have only themselves to blame.
Wow, #14...why so angry? I think you revealed more about yourself in your comment than you did about the letter. And, here's hoping you're not really a "Professor," or at least one with women in your classroom.
Translation for 14: I got caught having an affair because my wife wasn't enough in bed, and I'm paying lots in alimony now.
Peace.
26
BOMBAST - are you for real? I am not sure if your letter was sincere or farce/parody. Assuming (as Dan did) that you are sincere, I highly highly highly recommend you read @20 about 20 times. It's the best synopsis of this dynamic I've ever seen (said as a fellow sufferer).
There is a way of asserting yourself without having to work up the kind of anger someone like the perfesser (clearly terrified of women, like most misogynists).
Hilarious. That's what keeps me coming back.
BOMBAST's letter reeks of power exchange. Maybe that's her kink. And perhaps it's just confirmation bias, but the formal, compliant style in which the letter is written makes it seem he's not entirely against the idea. I mean, why else would someone put up with that shit?
This is the first time I can recall being really gladdened by the reappearance of a previous letter:
We match NAIF with AGAY. NAIF is the right age and AGAY likely has the spiel down pat. If there's enough attraction between them, each is just the right type to suit - AND we can look forward to more letters from the two in future. A win all round.
The gf oughtta give herself a reality check: recognize her dour behavior, stop eating so damn much that she's roly-poly in the gunt and can't be bothered to get her bf's pennis (yes, pennis! ;-D) wet in the name of a good roll in the sack.
Or...;)
Who's to say the gf isn't messing around on BOMBAST behind his back? People who hide things tend to project their secrets onto others as accusations. Maybe she met a guy online who likes 'em big with rolls of flabber flaps, and her overeating after 9:30pm is her bid to maintain that gunt while pushing her out-of-her-league bf (BOMBAST) out the door.
She ain't all that, by what you describe, BOMBAST. I'd jerk off in front of her just to freak her the fuck out, as a goof! ;-D lol
Chicks like that are the reason why mean cheat, and why Viagra is for men stuck in horridly-boring marriages with wives who share the same brushcuts and gaucho, khaki shorts as their husbands or boyfriends. They can even change the sparkplugs on the lawn mower as good as their husbands and boyfriends.
BOMBAST's woman better wise up, and fast, before she loses him altogether. I'd say cut yer losses now, BOMBAST. You should be fucking once a day, minimum. Not once a week.
Hand her a box of frozen pizza snacks and send her on her way; presumably back to her parent's house upstairs in her bedroom where she has a webcam for chubby-chasers who like to count the flaps of flabber bouncing up and down as they tug their lil' members from the privacy of their own homes. Or something ;-D LOL.
Moral of the story? BOMBAST's girlfriend is all wrong for him. Cut her loose, BOMBAST. She sounds like too much work for too little payback. Set her free to go to her real love's house to strip and jiggle her flabber-flaps LOL.
30
I just don't get the poly/non-monogamous thing. But then, that's just me and my own particular inclinations. I sometimes wish I was more dismissive and don't-really-give-a-shit about having multiple sex partners because I could.
Love finds you: you never find it. By my own experience, love has been hotter to me than the notion of fucking a parking lot of people in an afternoon in a meth-fueled gang bang lol.
If either one of you is not on the same page about what the rules are, as far as your negotiating who else you sleep with outside of your fuck-buddy environs.
It will never work if one tends to veer toward monogamy, and the other is licking their chops about getting into three other stranger's pants by sundown, or sun-up lol.
If yer gonna keep fucking, use protection. Who wants to croak from getting some good ass? Not me, no sir-ee fucking way, man! lol ;-D
Cheers & Happy New Year Now One & All+~+
As John Lennon sings during "Beautiful Boy": Life's what happens to you while you're busy making plans.
I abide by that, actually.
;)
1.) Maybe there's some subtle kink that they're sharing; he gets extra joy while jacking while he's "not supposed to" and she is probably getting off on the discovery.
2.) If a simple DTMFA is the solution, then nothing will change. BOMBAST will find another woman who is just as manipulative, and the wench will find another manipulable guy. Some self-reflection is very much needed on his part, as well as hers but having known women like this, her ego will probably prevent it.
DTMFA by all means, but learn from it or you're wasting your time.
People put up with a lot. I know that I'd probably be OK with that situation, which is sex one time a week more than what I'm experiencing.
Having said that, it IS unreasonable what BOMBAST's girlfriend is asking for. I kind of agree with Dan's DTMFA assessment, but a real option is to quash those feelings of guilt, and carry on. Just stomp em down.
I do enjoy our life together, so I stick with her. I get tired of having to jerk of and it's a waste of time, so I save a little from each paycheck and spend time with a couple of lovely call girls I know when I really need to get laid. I don't want or need another relationship and I choose to stay with my GF, but can see a time when it will be time to leave.
So, BOMBAST, you'll know when it's time to go or stay, that decision is yours and yours alone. And don't fret about having to masturbate for the time being. Just know you have options in life.
40
I second #8 and #16 : be careful. Abusors tend to rush things along, to get to a monogamous relationship, where they can control you ; it doesn't mean they love you in any way - even when they threaten reprisal (to never fuck you again is one, if you two started out as fuck-buddies). Old friends can very well become abusors, once the relationship progresses. I'd be freaked out by his words as well - they mirror the start of my own abusive marriage. I was not much into the guy but I did believe it was love on his part. So I went along because I was willing to give his love a try.
Besides, since communication is key in a LTR, it's a pretty bad sign for enduring romance if he's already bad at communicating with you at this early stage...
Of course you could have found the odd decent guy unable to express himself, but with a heart of gold. To make up your mind, you can check red flags lists at http://drirene.com/redflag.htm and http://www.heartless-bitches.com/rants/m… (they don't pay me).
But even if he has no abusive tendencies, you should ask yourself whether you want an open relationship or a closed one - and then, stay truthful to yourself.
43
His answer : he understood my point. He was going to be monogamous, since he had no desire for any other woman than me ; he agreed that we should tell one another if we had, indeed, been non-monogamous since last meeting ; he just hoped that whenever I fucked someone else, that I would find the other to be a worse lay, and that he would laugh at me for the time lost being bored in bed with the other.
I liked his answer, and we're still monogamishly together.
+~+
If you like the girl, 1. ask her if she wants to watch you, and 2. try and have sex earlier in the day. Maybe she's a morning person! The Italians screw at midday and think we're nuts for pushing it to when everyone's tired and stuffed from dinner.
Let's not rush to crucify the girlfriend - seems to me that they may both be at fault.
It is very unclear from his letter WHY the girlfriend wants to know if he masturbates. It is not clear that he knows that she finds it abhorrent. Seems like he assumes she asks because she hates to think that he is masturbating. What if she is actually super turned on by it but afraid to admit it?
Why does everyone assume she has a lower sex drive than he does? Because of cultural messages about gender roles, women often have a hard time initiating sex. She may send out feelers and subtle signals that she feels are obvious but that he is totally missing.
She says she is turned on, but then is "too full" after dinner to have sex... maybe she is sending out signals that she would like him to initiate sex *before* dinner. When he doesn't initiate sex with her when she is interested and he then goes and masturbates, she may feel rejected. If she's a non-initiator and he's also a non-initator it just leads to a lot of passive aggressive bullshit and resentment.
Regardless of all of the other stuff, it also also sounds like she's just not into evening sex and maybe is just stressed out on weekdays. This guy needs to ask her what would help her relax to the point where she would really feel like having sex on a weekday. Maybe she wants a massage or help with housework so she can unwind.
My point is, fat or not, the gf's not visibly well-mated with her bf. Figure it out now and decide what to do from there on out.
She could boink her husband before dinner, so she's not farting, burping, passing out and getting otherwise quite unlady-like while digesting that filet mignon.
And for CCC: No matter how much you like him or how much you enjoy the sex, a dude with a 'leotarded communication style' is not a dude you want to start a relationship with.
59
In my last relationship I was considered an oversexed degenerate freak for being absolutely thrilled with sex twice a week(but being totally fine with once a week).
..hate.
60
CCC has obvious communication skills of her own. Why didn't the conversation of monogamy open into a further redefining of the relationship? Communication is a two-way street honey.
Are there pics of NAIF? Can we see? Those fantasies can be fun.
61
Ever tried introducing a vibe toy in your Sat morning romp? Ask her if she would like to watch you masturbate? Or maybe you can ask her to masturbate in front of you? Maybe dare her to read/view something sexually riske and exciting, no judgment attached?
If all that fails and she really is the controlling prude she seems, time to move on and live life a bit, with regular sex in it. RM
p.s. if it was totally not ok for me to indirectly answer your Q to the Master (DanSavage), my sincere apologies!!!
I don't get why someone with a partner telling them they want to have sex is waiting until their partner goes to sleep so they can masturbate instead of jumping them stat.
63
From what I infer, BOMBAST's girlfriend is saying she wants sex, but then turning him down when he tries to initiate because she feels too tired or sluggish from dinner. Which, hey, may be an actual legit thing for her. But the solution isn't to keep tabs on her boyfriend's wanking schedule, the solution is to find ways to work more sex into their lives by adjusting their daily schedules - maybe they start going to bed an hour earlier, so they can wake up earlier and have some morning sex. Or they find recipes which allow time for sex while dinner is cooking. Or maybe they readjust their definition of sex to include handjobs and oral.
Just too many missing details for our fervid imaginations. The lube thing gets my sniffer going. Is lube an understood thing about male beat-offs? How did she get aware of this? Did you tell her? You make a big deal of cleaning up after yourself. Why? Just don't get Dan started on his death-grip masturbation riff. Do your hands reek of your favorite lotion?
The Professor is right, once a week for a (presumably) young relationship is weak. But maybe it's your fault, not hers. Maybe you're not a good fuck. Why aren't you poking her weekday mornings?
AGAY and NAIF seemed at least potentially likely to fit right into each other's strengths.
Some type of lubrication makes things better. It's just a matter of preference of whether the rigorous cleaning up afterwards is worth it.
And man,
It's not just you, but a significant number of others as well.
Why so harsh? It seems like instead of wanting people to deal with problems and issues, the answer is to just discard them.
Granted, that's probably not the case. You want them to work out an understanding, or at least a compromise. But, it's stuff like that, that makes me blow my gasket.
It'd be easier if people with issues, (and especially people with destructive and bad issues), took themselves out of the game, but it's not a particularily easy thing.
70
Thank you. I was almost incandescent with anger(perhaps I even turned silver with rage for a second)there for a minute.
****
In regards to BOMBAST.
First, awesome acronym. Good job.
Second, and this is going to be hard. You need to call her out. If she wants to go for the hand sniff you should ask her why. If she says you masturbating is hot, then show her how you do it and let the awesome sex times roll(pro tip, have condoms handy!, or perhaps consider asking her to be all sexy while you masturbate and tell her how hot and awesome she is after you've worked it out). If she thinks it's gross, then ask her how, exactly, she recommends you get your sexual ya-yas out if she only has sex with you once a week(and be prepared for some sex negative bullshit).
Why aren't you poking her weekday mornings?
And why only Saturday mornings? What's wrong with Sunday?
73
Wow. Did your mommy let you on the internet unsupervised? You went right for the PG-13 material, didn't you? That's okay. We won't tell.
@59
Depends on who you ask. I think it's on the low side.
74
Has BOMBAST had an open, sincere conversation about what will get gf off regularly? If she doesn't come during sex, she's not going to be motivated to initiate sex very often. Granted, she should speak up if she's unsatisfied, but sometimes people need a gentle push. Opening up about how we want to be fucked can be a bit of a challenge. It makes us very vulnerable and involves a lot of trust. Have a legit convo about this (start with "what can I do differently to excite you in bed?"), follow through with her requests, and maybe more sex will ensue.
But before you do any of that, stop letting her smell your hands! I think you'll know if you should try to work on this relationship based on how she responds to you saying "no, I'm not okay with that; it makes me feel like I've done something wrong and I haven't." Unless it's some sort of "clandestine self-pleasure makes me wet" thing (which she should *really* tell you about because you're feeling super guilty for nothing!), that shit is bad bad bad for you. What happens when you say yes, btw? However, it says "she *has* demanded to smell my hands" which makes me think it was a one time thing, not that it's any less crazy... you still deserve to not feel like shit for rubbing 'em out.
That's the trouble with the columns in the Stranger. They leave it to us filthy Sloggers to fill in the blanks.
75
I wouldn't say they are completely unrelated concepts, however. It isn't that a good-faith effort on her part would give her the right to issue a prohibition. However, the conspicuous absence of good-faith effort on her part does give him reasonable ammunition to tell her to sit down and shut up because she is being a hypocrite. If she can't be bothered to pay enough attention to his needs to meet them, then she bloody well can't be bothered to pay enough attention to thwart them either.
One proposition being true does not necessarily require that its symmetric opposite be true.
It's also reasonable for him to tell her that if she does not like him masturbating, then he may (or may not) be willing to engage in a suitable substitute when offered, -- but if once a week was anywhere near an acceptable rate for him, this conversation would not have happened in the first place.
This is why I made it extremely clear when I was dating before Mister came along that I refused to be monogamous with anyone for at least one year so we could actually have a relationship and not move into mono default. Ew. Gives me willies just thinking of it.
Apparently, they must be like gremlins. Feed 'em and they go berzerk!
Apparently, they must be like gremlins. Feed 'em and they go berzerk!
Oh, and I'm a woman. My husband when we first got together 15 years ago did sort of take my need to masturbate personally but we had to just have a talk about it. Obviously, her need to control the issue is a problem that needs to be resolved.
BOMBAST and his girlfriend seem young to me. I'm tired at night and my sex drive is greater than my husbands. Sometimes you have to figure out how to work sex in at other times in the day.
Also, I am bothered by some of the misogyny of the comments.
Oh, and I'm a woman. My husband when we first got together 15 years ago did sort of take my need to masturbate personally but we had to just have a talk about it. Obviously, her need to control the issue is a problem that needs to be resolved but BOMBAST and his girlfriend seem young to me. I'm tired at night and my sex drive is greater than my husbands. Sometimes you have to figure out how to work sex in at other times in the day.
Also, I am bothered by some of the misogyny of the comments.
I've noticed, on days when he doesnt masturbate, he's less questioning about dinner and more likely to make a move earlier in the night. I understand that I should be making an effort to make the moves, but it's difficult to remember on a daily basis. So she's probably in exactly the same situation as me but just doesnt know how to vocalize that she'd like the change and she probably doesnt want to take the responsibility to initiate earlier in the evening. Maybe just a quickie before dinner instead of jerking in the afternoon once or twice a week would save thier relationship. And he can make that change.
You are too stupid to even wonder. I like how you wanna take these discussions in here as something serious, and thought-provoking, but meanwhile you're both (one and the same) idiots. Overly-analyzed, frivolous BULLSHIT MUCH LIKE YOU.
Whatever. Fuck off.
I wonder too, if it's not so much that your bf is initiating late and after dinner, but that he's expects you to work all day, come home and cook, then have sex with him. I'm sure that can be a libido killer too. I know I have a decently higher sex drive than my bf (though he's catching up!)but if I feel like he hasn't been paying me attention other than in bed, I'm not feeling super sexy and/or generous if he tries to get his.
The hand-sniffing thing really only makes sense to me that way. But I am also dismayed by the many predictable, bullshit reactions to that letter, assuming that the problem boils down to the woman not putting out enough.
Is this an abstract, non-existent, haven't met him yet other guy, or a real, attractive, he asked me out other guy? It could make a difference.
Translation: you get mad at him for not remembering to initiate SOON ENOUGH, when you can't manage to remember to initiate AT ALL.
"she'd like the change and she probably doesnt want to take the responsibility to initiate earlier in the evening.
In other words, you get mad at him for not figuring out to do what you yourself have realized but won't do.
"Maybe just a quickie before dinner instead of jerking in the afternoon once or twice a week would save thier relationship."
Great idea. Why don't you give it a try? I have seen no evidence so far that he would actually turn you down for a before-dinner quickie on a day where he had masturbated in the afternoon.
"And he can make that change.
So could you, but you choose not to, and get mad at him instead.
You aren't going to get your own needs met by demanding that the other person stop meeting theirs.
Wait, wait...you assumed that? Meaning you didn't explicitly say exactly that up front? Saying you are "not seeking a serious romance" is not synonymous with "we are strictly just fuck-buddies and I intend this to be an open relationship." Saying "not serious" can be just a way of saying "I'm not a stalker looking to slap a ring on your hand asap."
Sounds to me like the two of you have spent the last three months under different unspoken expectations of what "not seeking a serious romance" means. Just about the time that he started falling for you and getting ready for the relationship to progress, you started making noises that sound like you are ready to find a replacement for him.
Probably the reason he said he would "never sleep with you again" is that he is at that point where exclusivity has kicked in for him, (for all we know he could have felt that way the whole three months) and your sleeping with others would feel like you are cheating on him.
Before you condemn his leotarded communication style, you might want to check in with yourself to confirm whether you truly did due diligence yourself.
I dont know why, but i enjoy the thoughts of being degraded as well, i feel very shameful about it though.
I am really disappointed nobody commented on NAIF's delimma.
Its far more interesting than the uptight girlfriend's problem with masturbation.
Anyways, thanks for the maschoistic gay links.
100
For some women, initiating takes some of the fun out of it. Personally I like my gender roles old-school - that's what gets me off.
That's not so say that you can't find yourself an accommodation that is perfectly acceptable to both parties. There are plenty of men who like their gender roles old-school too. Just don't do it the way that #87 seems to be going about it.
Unless he actually is into it, and is dissembling to us about resenting it as a way to to enhance their little humiliation drama? Why keep it in the bedroom between the two of you when you can tell the whole world?
Just a suggestion: On weekends can you(all) set up the makings for the coming week's meals? I doubt I'm alone in being male and liking/being able to cook, but if your SO isn't there, why not try simple "heat at 350 at 5:00" type meals? Personally I find the cooking together experience excellent bonding time, and pre-kids we would stand a fair chance of ending up in bed while our creation(s) were cooking. To put it in different terms, having fun together makes a transition into sex very easy, and cooking has the added benefit of being useful and freeing up time down the line.
Being overwhelmed by time constraints is bad enough, job stress just makes life hellish. I hope you can negotiate the SO into understanding less stress and time constraints for you makes life better for him too.
BOMBAST should consider morning sex as the "undiscovered country", and immediately explore as far as possible.
Peace.
Totally agree. While it doesn't justify anything, I do understand where it can sometimes be hard to voice what you want. My own personal downfall is in trying to let things go the first time or two they happen and not start a fight over something that might be a one time thing. By the time I'm actually upset over it, it's got precedent and I feel ridiculous saying, "I know it seemed like I didn't mind, but I do."
Not saying I'm right to be that way, it's definitely my problem, not the other person's, but I think it's actually a fairly common reason for keeping your mouth shut (at least among people I know). It's definitely an issue that BOTH people need to work on.
108
Sigh. I don't get mad, I just don't date those types because guys too shy to initiate sex are unattractive to me. So I wouldn't be in her situation, and I'm not.
But I don't think it's "hypocritical" to want a relationship where two different people with two different genders (and/or personality types, as the case may be) have different expectations/roles/etc. It's not for everyone, and I think there are some parts of a relationship that should be equal and even, but I don't think all parts of a relatioship need to be.
Imagine the scenario: Girlfriend says, "I think you've been jerking off. I demand to smell your hands." What sane person wouldn't say, "What? You want to smell my *hands*? Go fuck yourself." Now, a very naughty boy might respond differently...
For me, the first step is to own my feelings, in my head. If I can identify what is bugging me, I'm better able to speak up for myself, regardless of whether I let it go in the past: "I'm not talking about last time; I'm talking about what I want now."
In bed and out of bed, I'm getting better at stopping to breathe & name to myself what I want, and then going for it (with words or actions). Doesn't mean I get everything I want. But when I'm more clear and specific (both in my head, and to other people) that always helps me get more of what I want. Which is nice :-)
I was ashamed of myself, worried that I was unlovable. To top it off the girl I was married to was very pretty - dream girl pretty. So I was so afraid of losing her - maybe even directly afraid of her - that I would put up with most anything. (She was pretty and very unapproachable)
Then, after some years in the marriage, I couldn't take it anymore, but too afraid to leave. So I mentally checked out and wound up in the basement every night masturbating to porn for years.
A sad sad existence, we are in the process of getting divorced now, after 25 years. I say, BOMBAST, have an honest talk with the woman. Lay all the cards out. Then, if that doesn't work, RUN.
I was ashamed of myself, worried that I was unlovable. To top it off the girl I was married to was very pretty - dream girl pretty. So I was so afraid of losing her - maybe even directly afraid of her - that I would put up with most anything. (She was pretty and very unapproachable)
Then, after some years in the marriage, I couldn't take it anymore, but too afraid to leave. So I mentally checked out and wound up in the basement every night masturbating to porn for years.
A sad sad existence, we are in the process of getting divorced now, after 25 years. I say, BOMBAST, have an honest talk with the woman. Lay all the cards out. Then, if that doesn't work, RUN.
And I agree that relationships don't have to be perfectly symmetrical in terms of needs fullfilled by each party. They don't have to match, though they should be complementary.
But #87 specifically said she was mad that he wasn't making changes that she was perfectly capable of making herself. (And if it's just so damn hard, as she says a couple of times, then she needs to cut him the same slack she cuts herself.) She apparently would rather be mad at him than see the problem solved.
Nor is she even communicating that she would like those changes to take place. She just gets mad at him for taking care of his own needs -- in the conspicuous absence of her taking care of them either -- in an information vacuum. She seems to think that the problem would solve itself if he were only kept in a state of heightened sexual hunger, whereupon he would just naturally do things the way she likes. That's not a relationship, that's passive-aggressive, manipulative, string-pulling batshittery. He's a boyfriend, not a marionette.
Like every preschool teacher in the whole country says: "Use your words." Ask for what you want. Don't try and manipulate the situation by exerting pressure on things that are at best peripherally related.
I used to run, but now I don't.
I gave everything I had to someone, and they couldn't reciprocate a fraction of what I freely and lovingly offered. It becomes all too sad that you have no choice but to go of your own volition.
One of those times it rips your heart apart to know that it will never work out, for it never really has. One person cannot pull the weight of two. That happened to me: I did everything, and received nothing back.
Finally, even loving this person wasn't enough. Nothing I did, good or bad, would appeal them into positive, healthy action. It will be something that will sadden me to think about for many, many years to come.
It would also be something that would sadden me more if I opted to remain in such a hopeless relationship.
I loved you, but you cannot love me the ways I need.. It's a sad, sad, sad day... It is.
I was ashamed of myself, worried that I was unlovable. To top it off the girl I was married to was very pretty - dream girl pretty. So I was so afraid of losing her - maybe even directly afraid of her - that I would put up with most anything. (She was pretty and very unapproachable)
Then, after some years in the marriage, I couldn't take it anymore, but too afraid to leave. So I mentally checked out and wound up in the basement every night masturbating to porn for years.
A sad sad existence, we are in the process of getting divorced now, after 25 years. I say, BOMBAST, have an honest talk with the woman. Lay all the cards out. Then, if that doesn't work, RUN.
He shouldn't have to submit to the sniff test, that goes without saying. But clearly he has chosen to do so thus far. Note that he's not asking if the olfactory interrogation is normal or acceptable. He wants to be told that it's OK to masturbate in the absence of a reasonably accomodating sex partner. The answer to that is fuck yes. And it's OK to masturbate in the presence of a reasonably accomodating sex partner as well.
125
I understand what you're saying but I didn't infer all that from her post. It's all in the eye of the beholder I guess.
I would argue, given the total context of #87, that if anyone is being treated as a marionette, it would be the LW. She has a stressful job, school, and commute, and then she gets home to make dinner and have sex. If you put yourself in her frame of reference, she has the competing demands of being told to get dinner on the table, and initiating a more comfortable sex period before dinner. Sure she could use her words, and in my opinion they should be that her partner should have dinner ready when she gets home (then the option of a light snack, sex, and the follow up of a relaxed meal?).
Peace.
I recently penned a tune about a dog-loving ex. The punch line was, "You don't need a dog, you need a crying towel."
So yeah, I'm thinking about the puppies. LOL!
Also totally agreed on what her words should be. He should be the one to have dinner on the table when she arrives -- just on general principles, since he gets home first, but especially on nights where he wants something more to happen that evening. (If not actually on the table, then in the oven so that the cooking can happen at the same time as the bedroom activities.)
Sorry I didn't address his shortcomings earlier, but I talk too much as it it.
It's pretty simple, he puts up with it because he doesn't want to provoke anything. Maybe, if he does tell her he'd like her to accomodate him a little, it'll be over. She'll leave him, or he'll have to leave her. Hopefully, they can work it out.
If THAT's the big problem, then I personally would gladly put up with that situation. And, I wouldn't like it.
Sorry, Dan, I usually agree with you, but I don't think there is enough information here. Your friend didn't say that his feelings for you are the root of his not wanting you to see other people. It could just be that he doesn't like 'sharing.' If he has feelings for you and you have feelings for him, go for it. But if he doesn't have feelings for you and just wants to keep you for himself, don't waste your time!
You say you asked him how he would feel if you dated someone else or did you ask him how he would feel if you fucked someone else. Given his reaction I would appear that you either asked the latter question or he interpreted your question that way (even if you didn't mean it that way).
Was your question part of a broader conversation on your relationship or did it essentially come out of the blue? If the latter, your friend may have felt confused, hurt, and blind sided by you, thus his defensiveness and over reaction.
All of this is speculation on my part since I don't know you or your friend and you really didn't provide a lot information. I have no clue what really happened. The classic movie Rashomon shows the subjectivity of perception of the same event. Miscommunication is not uncommon, particularly with younger people.
134
I do want to say, though, that this is the first thing in many years of reading this column with which I take issue. Keep up the great work, Dan.
135
And the boyfriend is an ass.
In fact, are you French like me ? Because your boyfriend sounds to me like the typical French male. He wants his woman to work, to cook for both ("huh, me cook ? huh, you do it so much better, love"), and then of course he wants to have sex with his little pretty doll of a girlfriend all ready for him in bed !
I guess you're doing most of the tidying up as well. And most of the chores. Be happy you don't have kids yet, because for each second of help he'll give you then, he'll brag to his family that "he does his part", and he'll demand you to be more than grateful and thankful about what little symbolic help he'll indeed give you - more than he's ever been about all what you're doing for him now.
And how grateful has he ever been to you, for you making dinner to him every night, though you work longer hours ? Yeah, my point.
He's happy to use his free time to masturbate instead of using it to do any of the chores (can he do both at the same time ? that would be hot !), and then it's only too late at night that he's horny, when you'd like to sleep it off.
DTMFA. Men exist who don't take women for granted, even in France. Men exist who'll do half of the cooking and half of the chores and won't make a big deal about it. Men exist who'll do most of the chores and most of the cooking, so that you'll be all fine and relaxed from your long work day, after a nice meal, and quite ready for steaming sex.
Lapinette, you don't have to settle for the average lazy male (yeah, I know, lazy and male often go hand in hand, in the privacy of one's home - I'm talking of my home country here, no offense meant to others). You're worth much more.
Happy New Year, Bro!
Happy New Year, Bro!
The handsniffing, yes... wacky.
But beyond that, it sounds like he is leaving out, or oblivious to, his roll in their sex life!
He even says "She often says she wants to have sex, but come 9:30 p.m., she's ready to get in bed and watch TV until she falls asleep."
He doesn't say: WHAT does he do or say to try and have sex with her?
Is he just presuming by her body language, or is he trying and getting rejected?
Maybe she's super passive. Sure sounds like he is.
Maybe she's getting in bed hoping he'll join her, shut the TV and jump her. Or maybe she's getting in bed depressed that there was no romance, yet again, and depressed thinking he'd rather jerk in the bathroom than seduce her when she gets home?
If she's truly too tired or too full, has he tried to have lighter dinners, or work her up as an appetizer?
Is he actually not doing anything to increase the mood after work, to lead up the them having sex?
BOMBAST, Maybe try unleashing your horniness on her every few days.
Then she won't think (or care) if you've been masturbating, if she's getting enough of your sexual outlet to not think it's going elsewhere.
Seems to me she'd only care if she's feeling undesired or neglected.
And sounds to me like Bombast is a passive guy, blaming girl. And she's passive too, and they have some shitty communication.
I can't help thinking what a horrible mother this woman would be like with her children, if she carries this masturbation phobia over to them.
Consider this as you're planning your future with her.
It's the attitude that needs to be retweaked. Sometimes people shrink away from confrontation. It's a part of life. It can resolve long-festering dilemmas, by taking the time to get things out in the open, no matter how difficult and uncomfortable it may or may not be..
If people don't find a way to speak up and have their true selves be heard, then what can ever be accomplished?
If people want something bad enough, no matter what it is, they'll find a way to make it happen.
Where it all begins in things like that happening is believing and having enough confidence to get the ball rolling yourself, because you want something more than you fear it.
@ 114 & 117 and for @ 119, as well:
Sometimes less isn't more: sometimes less is just less...and anything more than that is more.
Especially is someone, no matter how attractive and/or unapproachable they may seem to you..
If such a person has long been enamored of you and you're still feeling unsure or undeserving of the attention, despite glaring evidence over time that this supposedly-unattainable person is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy into you to the point of genuine passion...
It's always tough when two people's communication styles are so markedly different.
It'd be easier to contend with if that magical element of love didn't figure in so much..
It may not be easy, and it may not be always that comfortable, but if it matters enough to either person to keep trying to work it out, then please keep trying to work it out.
Sitting on what you feel and think can turn on you at some point. Let it out! Let it go: take a chance! Have a great day and Happy New Year.
That, my enthusiasm that somehow still silences you; the overall, ongoing trouble..
I am at fault, too. I am working on that myself.
{shrugs} Later.)
Thanks again. Happy New Year Peace to you too.
:-)
I can't think of anything more flattering than someone wanting to masturbate before me, to me..
That's THE Ultimate Compliment of Your Hotness!
Watching someone succumb helplessly to self-manipulated physical passion...
Whether or not BOMBAST masturbates in front of his wife or off on his own in his own bathroom in the house, she should be counting her blessings that he takes care of his additional physical needs that way. That's a good man who can see the forest for the trees and stick it out..
I think it's cool, and rather hot actually. Makes you wanna help out from carrying the burden of doing it all on your lonesome ;) ...
@87 I totally feel your pain, especially with the lack of masturbation leading to a hornier boyfriend later. I agree with other commenters that you should have a discussion with him about things he can do to help with "foreplay," as I'd like to consider anything that helps lead into sex. My guy cooking or doing dishes is so foreplay... Maybe framing it that way might help him see the disconnect in what gets you in the mood versus his libido's ties to masturbation.
I'm with you totally about what constitutes foreplay.. Any time interracting with my babe feels like (and is ;) ) foreplay to me.
When you click with someone that strongly, it tends to last a long, long, longggggggggg *wonderful* time.
Happy New Year, 1 & All!
:-)
+~+
162
Letter 2 - no such thing as a 'fuck buddy.' It's called a 'relationship' so stop fooling yourself.
Letter 3. I didn't get the 'controlling' aspect that so many people are getting to with the 3rd letter. I'd say she is most likely playing around with him but he's, surprise, surprise, another non-communicative dude who'd rather moan to an advice column instead of talking to his partner. She doesn't sound like she deserves all the abuse directed at her but the boyfriend certainly sounds whiney. In fact, the letter sounds like Dan has been the unsuspecting participant in their role playing!
It sounds like _she_ has a chastity/orgasm-denial fetish. Maybe you should ask her and see if she wants to make this a sexy game instead of just bossing you around. Then again if you're not into submissive stuff you're better off without each other. Plenty of sub guys would eat this stuff up.


RSS
Comments (166) RSS