Savage Love Podcast
Check out the all new Savage Lovecast site!
Got a question for Dan Savage?
Call the Savage Love Podcast at 206-201-2720
or email Dan at mail@savagelove.net.
Savage Love Archives
-
May 15
Shorties -
May 8
Reading Comprehension Fail -
May 1
Move On -
Apr 24
No Problem -
Apr 17
Dick Holes
More from Dan Savage
-
SL Letter of the Day: Need to Be Stoned to Share
-
SL Letter of the Day: Seconded
-
SL Letter of the Day: Not A Prude... And Not Just Not That...
-
Great Moments In GOP Outreach to Women
-
Usually When I'm Sent a Photoshopped Image of a Gun Pointed At Me...
Books by Dan Savage
American Savage
It Gets Better: Coming Out, Overcoming Bullying, and Creating a Life Worth Living
The Commitment: Love, Sex, Marriage, and My Family
Things I've Learned from Women Who've Dumped Me
Skipping Towards Gomorrah
The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant
Savage Links
- Babeland
- Fleshbot
- Good Vibrations
- Joe Newton/Savage Illustrations
- Planned Parenthood
- Spreading Santorum
- Planned Parenthood's Teen Wire
- Kinsey Confidential
- Carnal Nation
- Tiny Nibbles
Want a Second Opinion?
Contact Dan Savage
Savage on YouTube
Queer Goggles
February 27, 2013
I am writing about a friend. By all appearances, he is straight. However, on more than one occasion, he has gotten drunk and tried to hook up with a transvestite or a person who could have been one. In one instance, he went to a club and was approached by a really masculine-seeming girl who proceeded to give him head. My friend, in his drunken state, reached into her pants and felt for a pussy only after she started giving him head. On a trip to Las Vegas, he drunkenly picked up someone who I was told looked like "Kevin Garnett in a wig" and was very obviously a man. He tried to take this person back to his hotel, but friends put a stop to it. I just received a message from a friend who is with him on a trip to Europe, who said that he just tried the same thing again with yet another manly looking transvestite type. Again, my friend was stopped before he did anything he might regret. I can understand if these cases happened with transvestites who looked like real women. It's easy to fool someone when he's drunk. However, the situations I have seen personally and have heard about all seem to indicate he is seeking out transvestites. Could he be harboring some gay or bisexual tendencies? I've never seen him act this way when sober. Or could he just have the world's thickest pair of beer goggles?
Cautious Lad Observing Developments
When we speak of "beer goggles," CLOD, we refer to someone too drunk to realize that he/she has accidentally picked up—or fucked the shit out of—a type that he/she would not normally/soberly find attractive. But I don't think your friend is getting drunk again and again and going after this particular type again and again by accident. Once? Yes, that could be an accident. Twice? That could be a coincidence. But three times that you know of? Sorry, CLOD, your friend isn't going after these types because he's drunk. He's getting drunk so he can go after these types.
Before we go on, CLOD, a word about the particular term you use to describe your friend's type: transvestite. That word? I don't think it means what you think it means. A transgender woman is not a transvestite, and a transvestite is not a transgender woman. A trans woman is someone who was "coercively assigned male at birth," as they say on Tumblr, but who now identifies and lives as female. A transgender woman may or may not have had sex-reassignment surgery—which means, of course, that a transgender woman could have a dick or she could have a pussy. "Transvestite" is an archaic term for "crossdresser" that no one uses anymore.
Now, I don't know what your friend is looking for in a sex partner, CLOD, but considering his observed pickup history ("a really masculine- seeming girl," "Kevin Garnett in a wig," "another manly looking transvestite type"), it's possible that he's not interested in either trans women or crossdressers.
I did drag for nearly a decade, and there was a certain kind of guy who lurked around drag shows. By all appearances, these guys were straight. But they weren't interested in women, they weren't interested in boys who could pass, and they weren't interested in trans women. They were interested in "girls" who were obviously men in drag. They were interested in guys like me: six foot eight in heels, big tits, 26-inch waist (thank you, waist cincher!), and a latex minidress. I was pretty—I'll tweet out a few pictures to prove it—but I didn't look like a woman, cis or trans, I looked like a great big fuckin' drag queen. (My drag name? Helvetica Bold.)
The queens I ran with called the guys who wanted to fuck us "panty chasers." It was an odd choice, seeing as none of us actually wore panties. (Trans and cis women wear panties, CLOD; drag queens wear dance belts over tights.) I didn't know at the time that there was an actual $20 term for guys who were into us: gynandromorphophiles, aka "lovers of males in the shape of females." Some gynandromorphophiles are into crossdressers, some are into drag queens, and some are attracted to trans women. While some want partners who can pass, many gynandromorphophiles do not. They want the mix to be obvious. Give the kind of gynandromorphophile who chased after me and my friends in drag a choice between a "real woman"—cis or trans—and a guy who looks like "Kevin Garnett in a wig," and he'll choose Kevin Garnett every time.
So back to your panty-chasing friend, CLOD. I'm pretty sure the reason you've never seen him "act this way when sober" is because booze provides him with the courage he needs before he picks up "Kevin Garnett in a wig" and the alibi he needs after. My advice: Stop cock-in-frock-blocking your friend and let him know you accept him for who he is, and you may help him find the courage to accept himself before his liver gives out.
I'm a straight 18-year-old female, a senior in high school, and I'm still a virgin. I'm fine with this. I'm going to a university about 3,000 miles away next fall, and I am starting to wonder about going on some method of birth control. My degree is going to take me six years to complete, and I expect that within those six years I might want to have sex with someone. Would going to the doctor and having an implant or IUD inserted be dumb? (I might want a long-term method of birth control.) I trust the doctor I have here at home; the second I turned 14, he gave me tons of info on birth control and how I can get access to it. So I would be more than comfortable getting it through him. Please let me know if I'm overthinking all of this and whether or not I should cross birth control off of my pre-college to-do list.
Thinking I Might Encounter Love Yearning
"It is in no way 'dumb' to consider contraception as a virgin," says Dr. Unjali Malhotra, medical director for Options for Sexual Health British Columbia, aka the Planned Parenthood of British Columbia. "It is actually best to get on a method prior to ever having sex to ensure she is happy on her chosen option before acutely requiring it for birth control."
Dr. Malhotra also supports—acutely supports—your preference for a long-term method.
"Although oral contraceptives are popular," says Dr. Malhotra, "they have up to a 9 percent 'typical-use' failure rate." Pills can fail a woman who forgets to take them—which is all too common—but a woman can't forget to take her IUD or implant. Which is why progesterone-releasing IUDs have failure rates of 0.2 percent, copper IUDs have failure rates of 0.8 percent, and implants have failure rates of 0.05 percent. "TIMELY can choose between a nonhormonal copper IUD, a progesterone-releasing IUD, and a progesterone-releasing implant," says Dr. Malhotra. "Timing-wise, she has options of a three-year implant, five-year IUD, and 10-year IUD. There are advantages to each, which she can discuss with her physician. And, despite myths to the contrary, there are very few risks with an IUD, and she can remove it and get pregnant at any time if she wishes."
None of these options, however, will protect you from sexually transmitted infections, TIMELY, so use condoms regardless. For more info about birth control, sexual health, and STIs, go to optionsforsexualhealth.org.
@fakedansavage on Twitter
Before going on a 10-year dose of the stuff, I'd suggest a 1-month trial period. (Or a copper IUD, if you prefer.)
7
8
Want to repeat Dan's point about how TIMELY will still need condoms. Seen people act like anti-pregnancy B.C. have 'em a pass. All of my college era & immediately after homes had a candy dish w/ condoms in 'em.
When I was in college, I got the birth control shot, which I liked at the time because I only had to get it four times a year. It turns out that it causes bone loss, though, if you are on it for too long. My doctor let me get the shot for two years and then take two years off and then get on it again.
The Planned Parenthood website has a lot of good information about the various forms of birth control: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-…
Some other bits of advice about virginity, sex and college:
1. If you haven't already, spend time finding out how to give yourself an orgasm.
2. Many young men in college have misconceptions about sex, and especially about sex with an actual living, breathing young woman with a brain and feelings and sexual preferences.
3. The better you know yourself sexually, the more you can help your sexual partner to please you.
4. Don't have sex with anyone who doesn't care about your pleasure, or who makes you feel inferior. Only have sex with people who make you feel good. Trust yourself, have fun and be safe.
10
Cheap, (probably free somewhere on your campus), ubiquitous, simple-to-use, hormone-free, and protect you from STIs such as HIV.
College-aged kids are notorious for serially monogamous, unprotected (STI-wise) sex. They date for a few months, never bother to get tested, and give up condom use wayyy before it's appropriate too, since they consider themselves "in a relationship".
Which is why walk-in clinics near college campuses get antibiotics shipped to them in bulk by public health departments.
11
IUDs are painful to insert and sometimes can be felt by the male. And they do nothing to stop STDs.
Demand condoms, every time.
There's not much to be done about the cervix--yes, it'll hurt, you'll bleed like a mofo for a few days and spot for a few days after that, and your first six months of periods will be pretty ghastly as your body adapts. BUT! Hang in there, and they will normalize. I never feel mine; I never think about it except once a month when I check the string to make sure it's still in place; and it's good for 10 years. Set it and forget it!
And the problems with the Dalkon shield and its ilk have been resolved with technology--what happened was that the string attached to the old IUDs was made of cotton, which had a nasty habit of wicking vaginal bacteria up into the uterus. The new IUDs use strings made of nylon, which are not absorbent and do not do this. There are always risks to implanting anything in your body long term, but those risks are much, much smaller than they used to be.
TL;DR I wish I'd had an IUD in college and highly recommend it.
She should avoid depo provera (the shot) like the plague. Weight gain and depression are fairly common and really miserable. Also no sex drive, even relative to other hormonals.
The Nuva Ring is a good pick for not having to remember it every day.
Most women have to go through several types before they find one they can tolerate. She may as well start that process now.
I have the Mirena IUD, and have no kids - insertion was very painful even with a prescribed Vicodin beforehand. Rough sex was a favorite pre-Mirena, and now it just hurts too bad to continue (the Mirena causes cramping, at least for me, from rough sex). Even soft sex can trigger the cramping.
To top it off the strings have also fallen out, and the IUD has risen up in my cervix out of sight, so they had to do an ultrasound to find it. My gyno explained that she uses a tool in these circumstances to fish it out, I have no idea what kind of painkillers they use for this, or if they will need to do surgery, but it's something I'm not looking forward to!
The plus sides: Your period disappears, or will almost disappear, which is really nice, and for me the mood swings are gone with it. It's also great not having to worry about taking a pill everyday, but the discomfort it has caused me is NOT worth it.
It sounds like others have better experiences with the IUD, but you're new to sex! Complications like these could make life complicated, especially since you wouldn't be able to gauge from experience if the sex is uncomfortable or if its the IUD. Use condoms, and when you get into a legit committed relationship check out the Nuva Ring, it's been my favorite so far.
17
sorry you've had issues with the Mirena. Before I got mine, I asked specifically about rough sex. Well, I asked "does having an IUD place any restrictions on your sex life?" and when the midwife said no (always use a midwife, ladies) I said "are you sure? I mean like ANY restrictions?" and she repeated NO. I can't say I ever noticed any difference, and our sex gets pretty rough sometimes.
However, I also had the "lost string" experience and an ultrasound to make sure it was still in the right place. Don't freak out about the "instrument." When it was time to get mine removed (thanks again for that vasectomy, babe!), it turned out she was able to locate the string within the cervical canal and remove it the same way she would have normally.
I know all this female anatomy is probably giving Dan the vapors, but the truth is that our junk is seriously tough. It's made to be; the survival of the human race depends on it. If you have basically healthy parts, and can "man up" (ha!) and endure five minutes of pretty bad pain, your girly bits will suffer zero lasting effects. Babies come out of there, IUDs are like an inch long.
Still, I've kept it for 4 years and will probably keep it for the next 6 because it's hormone free and I won't get pregnant. And, it was so bloody painful to put it, I can't imagine taking it out until I have to. Hopefully by then I will be trying to get pregnant and won't need to worry about birth control.
It's a rough world for us ladies, the sole bearers of the birth control burden. Can't wait until VasoGel or something like it gets approved!!!
I'd love to see the pics.
Great acronym, TIMELY, and all the best in your studies!
Definitely go with spermicidal condoms, but watch the BCPs--
the Pill, especially Ortho-Novum 777, can have nasty side effects!
Thanks again for spot on advice, Dan!
Maybe ask your doctor also for resources you can consult once you've moved. I guarantee that sometime in the 6 years that you're in another state, you're going to need advice on birth control and you're original doctor won't be available. Planned Parenthood is usually amazing. Find out how the helpers at your college health center are. Make sure you know what your options are and find what you're comfortable with. Part of leaving for college is leaving your comfort zone and finding a new one somewhere else.
And as for the first letter, while I suppose it is generally wise to not hook up with strangers when you're super drunk, I got the distinct impression that had the people this guy's friend had been wanting to hook up with been bio women, there would've been significantly less cock-blocking. It's as if the friends were saying, "Omg he's drunk, he doesn't know what he's doing, get him away from the transvestite," rather than, "wow, they are really hitting it off. Let's make sure they are safe before we high five both of them." Not cool guys.
You trust your doctor. Your doctor has offered you information on birth control years ago.
Why do you write to a sex advice columnist instead of discussing this with your doctor?
Your doctor is the one who will be able to tell you if you are in any risk group regarding the suitability of hormonal BC, or if your cervix is too small/ strangely formed/ whatever for an IUD.
But why is no-one commenting on that stupid LW who sounds slightly homophobic and does everything he can to keep his friend in whatever closet that friend is?
Sure, with IUD you'll still need condoms, but last time I slept with an asshole, and turned out the condom broke, I didn't have to freak out all that much. I'm just saying: make sure you have extra precautions for the really important stuff like pregnancy-prevention!
@18&21: me too! Immediately checked my twitter and disappointed Dan didn't come through. We'd love to see those pics Dan!
26
Good point.
Probably because she wanted to write to Dan and as a virgin this was her only option for material?
Still though... good idea to go to health professionals for health advice.
I found that i had random spotting for a few months - nothing i actually needed a pad for and since then only minimal periods.
Actually, perhaps half the female population of my medical class have mirena iuds. Its the cool thing to do. And here in canada, our mirenas last 7 years (american regulations say 5 for reasons i dont fully understand).
Obvious caveats: some things dont work for everybody and you have to be responsible about protecting yourself against STIs especially with a foreign body in your uterus.
28
Okay, why am I repeatedly hearing the sentiment that pregnancy prevention is more important than STI prevention?
Also, I have a slightly unbelievable IUD story -- I had the Mirena inserted when I was in a prolonged period of single-dom (to decrease bleeding). Shortly after I started dating my fiance, 18 months later, the Mirena started coming out. My doctor said she had never seen such a thing (it had moved from being high up in the uterus to near the cervix, and the string was *long* outside the cervix), and I had to get it removed. My theory is that my orgasms were so incredible (seriously amazing, lifetime best, and I've had a few) that I was experiencing unusually strong uterine contractions, leading to expulsion. Just a theory, and one that I didn't share with my doctor ;-)
I second the caveat about hormonal BC affecting women with mood disorders, but from my experience, a 1-month trial of a BCP would have no bearing on what effects the 5-year Mirena would have on your mood -- I've had different impacts on my mood from various hormonal methods, at various times. I'm leery enough that I've stopped using hormonal BC, but TIMELY should experiment now to find out how her body interacts with these.
Also, @24, what else is there to say to CLOD beyond what Dan already said? Wouldn't any clear-thinking person have come to the interpretation that Dan offers without having to write to a sex columnist? CLOD, offer to go with your friend to a drag show -- that can be the first step to letting him know that you're done cock-blocking him.
and, it has a useful side-effect: whilst the 18 yo virgin might just want a guy for a night, she gets to pretend that she does not have them,(at first) to see if he is the type who travels prepared.
It's great that you have a doctor you're comfortable with at home, but the experience of going to a doctor you don't know as well won't harm you. You have the information you need so you assertively walk into a recommended doctor's office or the campus health clinic, say what you want, and take it from there. Any problem is more likely to be with insurance and payment. Alternately, if I'm wrong about the out-of-town doctor, use condoms until you're home for a break, then see your regular doctor. A few months is a long time to wait for sex if that's what you want. It's not too long to wait for the perfect birth control method if you have condoms in the mean time.
Listen to them when they say that things can go wrong, yes that's true. As you're going to college, great time to learn about statistics and that nothing in life is a sure bet.
While IUDs may have a 1 in 1000 complication rate + failure rate, condoms have a 150 in 1000 failure rate in typical usage (yes, 15%).
So that means many many more unwanted pregnancies across thousands of women who use condoms ONLY compared to condoms + another method.
And if some of those carry a pregnancy to term, there is *far* more than a 1 in 1000 chance of a life-threatening complication from the pregnancy itself. Even abortions, while almost always safe, can have complications. So the net IUD complication rate is far lower than any alternative.
Very sorry for those commenters who had problems with IUDs, and people should be aware anything can happen -- indeed, every day hundreds of people on the planet just drop for no apparent reason right in the middle of typing a sente
"Coercively assigned male at birth?" I call bull. We do not assign gender; we only recognize it. If a baby has a penis, it's okay to assume that that baby also has male brain anatomy or whatever else it is that makes a boy male on the inside. It's not coercion; it's not wickedness; it's just a mistake, and considering that most boys with penises and XY chromosomes actually are boys, it's not a remotely unreasonable one. A trans woman is someone who was raised male but discovered that she was really female, not someone who was coerced into being male by mean doctors.
"Coercively assigned male at birth"? I call bull. We do not assign gender; we only recognize it. If a baby has a penis, it's okay to assume that that baby also has male brain anatomy or whatever else it is that makes a boy male on the inside. It's not coercion; it's not wickedness; it's just a mistake, and considering that most boys with penises and XY chromosomes actually are boys, it's not a remotely unreasonable one. A trans woman is someone who was raised male but discovered that she was really female, not someone who was coerced into being male by mean doctors.
In the case of this letter, though, it seems like this poor guy has a lot of freaked-out and perhaps homophobic friends all trying to save him from himself. I'm wondering what kind of bars they are frequenting, and getting ready to comment that CLOD's attitude suggests that he (CLOD) has a drinking problem.
@29: thanks for posting the link. Dan, you make a hell of a foxy lady . . . or look somewhat like my aunt did as a young woman--yikes!
45
For the LW, I would incline to:
a) Talk to your own trusted doctor, since you're lucky enough to have one.
b) Use condoms for STIs and as one method of birth control.
c) Condoms plus something-different (i.e. not just spermicide applied with the condom, but a different method entirely), both used correctly, will get your risk of pregnancy very low. If you use two 90% effective methods the combined effect is about 99%. (10% of 10% for failure rate.) I would incline toward something easier to go on and off than an IUD as you see how you do with various types: as someone noted, you want to be able to tell what's the sex and what's the birth control method.
47
Why anyone would think that inserting one into a virgin is wrong or cruel is beyond me.
As for rough sex being a problem, it's not the sex, it's whether the penis is hitting the cervix that could be an issue. Frankly, that's pretty damn painful with or without an IUD and I can see it being more of an issue with one, but thankfully most men are not that big. Though if you find yourself enjoying cervix hitting sex, it is something to consider.
48
And yeah, like @16: still waiting on the pics!!!
Condoms (male and female) are great if you're not in a settled relationship, and how about not defaulting to PIV? Any kind of hormonal or inserted birth control has problems, and they need trying out to find which suits an individual. Committing to one which will last years before becoming sexually active sounds like taking on an extraordinary burden.
The morning after pill is available very easily where I am, and although it's not to be abused, on the rare occasions where condoms have come off it has been a simple and easy solution.
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and…
51
Also, my drag queen friends call those guys "clown fuckers."
I would have gotten an IUD after childbirth, but it wasn't an option due to a retroverted uterus. From what I've read, IUDs are now considered an option for most women even if they haven't given birth. Some discomfort on insertion seems like a small price to pay for 10 years of protection with a copper IUD.
And, yes, condoms, obviously. But not condoms alone if you're serious about preventing pregnancy.
But you insert it yourself, take it out for a week, then keep one in place for 2 weeks, and you dont have to go through painful installation of IUD.
"and how about not defaulting to PIV?"
PIV is great and avoiding it entirely so you don't have to bother about birth control is just sad
55
Also, Helvetica Bold is a *fantastic* drag name.
56
I am an 18 year old straight female woman who has never had PIV sex before going off to college. I have never had a long term boyfriend or even short term boyfriend at this point, and while I look forward to having sex some time in the future, I'm okay with the amount of sexual experience I've had at the moment. Should I be on some sort of long-term birth control in advance of a relationship in which I might need it, or should I wait for the relationship first and get the birth control second?
My answer is to wait. What if this young woman doesn't end up needing birth control for another few years? It's perfectly fine for her to wait. If she does find someone she wants to have sex with, they can use condoms until she gets a prescription. Given the (possible) side effects of hormonal birth control and IUDs, it doesn't make sense to me to be on them when they're not needed. Sure the benefits outweigh the risks when there's the possibility of pregnancy, but I'm not sure we can say the same thing when there's only a possible preliminary risk of pregnancy because the man involved is, at present, imaginary.
Of course, there is the 3000 miles away business, and for that, I think several packets of conventional birth control pills make a good answer. She goes off to college with them, but she doesn't take them. When she meets the right guy, they use condoms until her next period. Then she starts taking the Pill according to package instructions.
Do NOT get Mirena. IUDs carry a small risk of perforation of the uterus or the cervix. There is a pending class action lawsuit against Mirena because of this problem. If you're opting for hormone based contraception, Implanon is the safer option.
If you prefer a non-hormonal long term method, you're pretty much stuck with ParaGard. It can cause perforation, too, but there isn't an alternative long term hormone free method. (Make sure you're not allergic to copper, first, though!)
61
True. 12 years ago I got plastered in a Greenwich Village bar and ended up making out with a drag queen. My friend (who's gay) didn't try to stop me - in fact, he egged me on. I'm as straight as they come, but whatever, the whole night was just crazy and fun.
If I have any regrets, it's that I didn't get a BJ out of the deal - would have been interesting to find out whether that would have worked for me.
62
Birth control pills are fabulous if you're the sort that can remember to take them EVERY day (or have the discipline to stick with oral for the remainder of the month if you forget a day).
Otherwise, they are an unwanted pregnancy waiting to happen.
63
This phrasing pisses me off so, so much (probably only because I'm a geneticist). Fuck you, you were not "assigned" shit and there's nothing "coercive" about it, an X or Y sperm happened to be the one to fertilize the egg and thence genetic gender was formed.
Certainly that can be different from the gender you truly feel you are, which is how trans* folk end up existing. But come on people. Coercively assigned? That only makes sense if you believe in god or some equally juvenile horseshit.
Although, Tumblr.
If you want to use condoms, I would recommend getting lubricated ones without spermicide. Of course, if it's a condom with spermicide or no condom at all, it's still better to go with a spermicidal condom.
If she's an 18 year old virgin thinking about birth control, she's probably responsible and would remember to take her pills. Not everyone has side effects from hormonal oral contraceptives. I've got a 28 day mini-pill - I don't get periods ever and I experience no side effects. It's all about finding the one that works for you, and sometimes that's the pill.
I think waiting for a relationship is a really good idea for virgins, because guessing blind how sex is going to affect you emotionally isn't terribly smart--if you might be feeling wildly bonded the next day it's nice if it's with a person who likes you and wants to talk to you still.
That said, that friend has been very happy with her IUD overall, it never caused a problem during any of our other meetings over a few years, and it was nice knowing it was there in addition to the condoms we were using.
And I'm mystified as to why you aren't promoting it for those who favor abortion, too: abortion has risks and complications, even if fewer than pregnancy, and is not viewed by most women as carrying the emotional weight and physical consequences of, say, sneezing. I feel pretty confident that the vast majority of women who have had abortions would much rather have had that magical perfect birth control instead.
Dan -- love the twitter pic!!
76
Personally, I take a pill so I can skip periods. I have an alarm that goes off every single morning at the same time so I don't -forget- the pill, in fact, because otherwise it doesn't work very well. Nuvaring was lovely [though it can... come out at inopportune moments], but it's prohibitively expensive for a lot of people because of the tier drug it is and I had to switch off it.
Also, please only listen to your doctor about the objective statistics on all BC failure and risk rates. The internets are full of horror stories for every method, mainly because the many people who are quite happy with whatever they have don't feel the need to post rants about it on their blogs :)
And yes, always use condoms.
84
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_assignm…
Truth is, as long as you are fertile, nothing can completely protect you from an accidental pregnancy. You just have to evaluate your life, get to know your body, and make a decision with a doctor you trust.
86
If your sex life consists of short term hookups, condoms make sense.
However, if LW expects to find herself in a long term monogamous relationship with no clear expiration date, then it might make sense to consider other methods.
Also, relationships generally work better when both parties treat birth control and other mutual issues as shared problems rather than decisions to be made unilaterally.
Re emergency contraception, some of the pills also work to prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the wall of the uterus. Not sure about the products available in the UK, though.
And then last week I had a miscarriage, and now I'm having to re-think the very lengthy thought process that led me to the ParaGard in the first place.
Some thoughts for the writer:
--I would try BCP, possibly multiple types, for at least 6 months to see how you tolerate them
--If they work for you, stick with them or another hormonal method
--If not, consider ParaGard, but keep in mind that (a) if you do get pregnant (let's say 1 in 300) you've got a higher chance of ectopic pregnancy (very bad) and miscarriage; (b) if you contract an STD, your risk of PID/infertility/etc. is increased (so use condoms!); (c) your periods will likely be more crampy/heavy, so if they're already the least bit bad you might want to rethink ParaGard
95
Me, I'm childless and on my second Mirena, after wearing the first out with my now-husband. Some serious pain and spotty bleeding the first few months of the first one, but the second was inserted with no more pain than a pap smear. I was told by the doctor in the UK that a lot of US doctors cut the strings waaaay too short out of a feeling that American males could become distressed by palpable evidence that women have to take precautions against pregnancy and aren't instant porn fuckdolls.
Unwanted pregnancy can be dealt with, but STIs are for life. HPV, HIV, chlamydia can have life-altering consequences. Take the pill if you need it for non-contraceptive reasons, but otherwise you really do not want an excuse not to use condoms. If a condom breaks, then the morning-after pill is there for you. Ask your nice home doctor to give you a couple to keep in your bathroom cabinet.
If in the future you find yourself in a LTR in which STIs are no longer an issue, then you can reassess.
(Yada, yada, yada, on emotional issues around abortion, the sop to the anti-choice brigade. Fuck that! I’ve never been pregnant, but I'm pretty sure that while a minor medical procedure is never fun, it is much better than being told you have contracted a terminal disease/cancer/been rendered infertile..)
Dan, they may not use "transvestite" in Seattle, but it is preferred over "drag queen" in other places. Or do you prefer "cross-dresser?" Jeebus, how strange it is to hear declarative statements of that ilk from YOU!
PS why share photos only on twitter? Got something against The stranger?
I set several alarms to ensure that I always take my BCP before I go to bed since I'll get bleeding if I miss a day.
While it's not common, but I do know of a few transsexuals who engaged in similar behavior before finally coming to terms with themselves. For some it was a coping mechanism for them and for others it was a way to explore.
Don't go for chemicals or IUDs at this time. Just carry a couple rubbers around. Reasonable protection against pregnancy and STIs. Plus they're a good character check on a new guy.
Once you're in a relationship you can explore bareback BC methods.
I also say kudos to TIMELY for taking control of her sex life. Condoms are great for STD prevention, but ultimately you should also be on another method so that you have complete control of what goes in and what comes out.
My advice: Stop cock-in-frock-blocking your friend and let him know you accept him for who he is, and you may help him find the courage to accept himself before his liver gives out.
As for me, I'm a Mirena girl. No problems with side effects, hasn't affected my ability to enjoy occasional rough sex. I adore not having a period.
1. IUD. Do it! getting one inserted feels a bit like going to the dentist (open wide and a bit of soreness) but the confidence of almost-zero risk of pregancy is worth it
2. Birthcontrol pills persciption, filled. IUDs often cause heavy/longer periods for the first few months. get some birthcontrol pills and practice using them to shorten/lighten or change the date of your period (ie not during that long weekend road trip)
3. Condoms. Every decent univeristy should be giving away LOTS and LOTS of condoms on welcome week. grab a handful, and put them in every bag you own (purse, laptop bag, gym bag, etc...) as well as besides the bed. Encourgae your school to prepare those little travel packs of 2 condoms and a ketchup-packet worth of lube, like my school did.
4. Vibrator/dildo or other sex toy. all you need is a pre-paid credit card for $20 and a mailing address. all stores ship in plain packaging. consider this a gift to yourself.
1. IUD. Do it! getting one inserted feels a bit like going to the dentist (open wide and a bit of soreness) but the confidence of almost-zero risk of pregancy is worth it
2. Birthcontrol pills persciption, filled. IUDs often cause heavy/longer periods for the first few months. get some birthcontrol pills and practice using them to shorten/lighten or change the date of your period (ie not during that long weekend road trip)
3. Condoms. Every decent univeristy should be giving away LOTS and LOTS of condoms on welcome week. grab a handful, and put them in every bag you own (purse, laptop bag, gym bag, etc...) as well as besides the bed. Encourgae your school to prepare those little travel packs of 2 condoms and a ketchup-packet worth of lube, like my school did.
4. Vibrator/dildo or other sex toy. all you need is a pre-paid credit card for $20 and a mailing address. all stores ship in plain packaging. consider this a gift to yourself.
TIMELY, ignore 110. You definitely do not need to go on both the IUD and birth control pills at the same time without a medical professional telling you that it is advised in your case. Talk to your trusted family physician, and I think those suggesting that there are enough side effects of all the non-condom methods to be cautious about using them unnecessarily for years are onto something, if you don't have a medical condition (acne, bad periods) that might be helped with bcp.
The first year or so on Mirena's rough. I'm at year five and basically forget that it's there. Cervical stimulation is no issue. Hubby is quite well-endowed, which is also no issue. Mirena + condoms = win
LW1 is a terrible friend on a group of terrible friends. Why would you follow your friend around, chasing away people he's picked up? Who does that?!?
I was very proud of a drag name in thought up for a Puerto Rican friend of mine -- "Bessie Mae Koolo".
@15. Oh you poor thing. I wish you luck, so much luck, and a skilled GYN. My first insertion the strings were cut too short (Kaiser, obvs) and it took my new doc 15 minutes to dig that fucking thing out of me. It hurt so bad I nearly passed out and it took me a month to recover from constant cramping afterward. It fucking sucked. Take anything legal or non legal you can before going in there, and explain your situation first so they know what to expect. And DON'T LET THEM CUT THE STRINGS.
118
Much less intrusive to feel for an Adam's apple. Can also check for against-the-grain stubble on the cheeks.
I know there is more at stake for the woman but I agree with seandr @86:
"Also, relationships generally work better when both parties treat birth control and other mutual issues as shared problems rather than decisions to be made unilaterally."
and with Hunter @103:
"Don't go for chemicals or IUDs at this time. Just carry a couple rubbers around. Reasonable protection against pregnancy and STIs. Plus they're a good character check on a new guy."
It's sensible to get information now, and to know what kind of birth control you could imagine for yourself.
Once you are in a relationship, or if you realise you like to have ONS and random hook-ups, it is time to re-evaluate with your partner or alone in the latter case to see which BC is the best for your.
What you descibe is not BC as such.
It is a hormonal treatment of serious health issues with the (welcome) side-effect of reduced fertility.
123
In Europe condoms have a failure rate of 2% tops - same as the pill.
124
I hated the pill so much, damn. It was like having a low-grade clinical depression where you also had no sex drive. But that's just me.
I feel strangely old-fashioned for recommending The Sponge. It's not difficult to get online, and not terribly expensive. When I first discovered the sponge I was pretty much delighted; it worked well and wasn't that intrusive. Female condoms are pretty good too. These are all non-hormonal BC alternatives in addition to conventional condoms. Try a lot of things; it can be very fun to experiment, really.
Also, @52, I'm not sure why you were told you could not get one due to a retroverted uterus, since I also have a retroverted uterus and it was not an issue at all.
And for anyone wondering, I do still use condoms every single time (no exceptions), even though my only 2 partners have both been monogamous relationships.
Also, despite always using condoms and getting Gardasil before ever having sex, I did still wind up with HPV and precancerous cells on my cervix, so no matter what you should still always go in for a yearly gynecological exam.
Also, @52, I'm not sure why you were told you could not get one due to a retroverted uterus, since I also have a retroverted uterus and it was not an issue at all.
And for anyone wondering, I do still use condoms every single time (no exceptions), even though my only 2 partners have both been monogamous relationships.
Also, despite always using condoms and getting Gardasil before ever having sex, I did still wind up with HPV and precancerous cells on my cervix, so no matter what you should still always go in for a yearly gynecological exam.
127
In other words, if you use a condom correctly the error rate is statistically insignificant.
PS, I hate that the religious right has manipulated those statistics to carelessly assert that condoms are scarily ineffective.
128
The statistics that are taught to European junior highschoolers are : condoms are "98% effective when used properly", just like the pill.
We are not told statistics on how effective they are when used on the ear.
I'm not trying to mock you, but to mock the US "religious right", which would be called the "fascist right", if they were Europeans.
Mussolini was very big on religiosity too : not on really practicing himself, but on telling others what was religiously and patriotically moral to do. Having citizens make tons of kids, and putting women back in the home, in order to be available to make more kids, were one of his pet projects. He would have fought condoms like a Catholic Pope, if he had not been killed and hanged like a pig by Italians.
130
The split second a couple is "official" the man starts whining about condoms and insisting that they don't "need" them anymore since they're monogamous. I mean sure they've only been together for two weeks, and sure he has chlamydia which he never got tested for, but condoms are for hookups! Not for real relationships.
Not only do I see this personally all the time, but it's also a well-studied phenomenon. Short-term, serial monogamy combined with those attitudes is a documented risk-factor for STIs. And before you say "oh well I was talking about long term relationships", well sure, but you weren't talking about the middle ground, and most people in short term relationships don't know their relationship will be short-term and they identify more with LTRs than with single people, obviously. The LW is approaching college-age so I think it's important to address the extremely likely outcomes, one of which is short term relationships.
Ladies. It's your right to protect your sexual health for as long as you have to. Don't let anyone guilt you for doing so. One doctor I work with recommends at least a year or two into a relationship before taking condoms out of the equation. (I think he says it knowing that people are going to divide whatever number he gives). In other words, he advises female patients to "unilaterally demand" condoms.
131
That is some rough luck - do you know if it was a different strain from the ones you were vaccinated? I'm assuming they'd never test for that but on the off chance.
(As I recall for the 20ish a year of unprotected sex has about a 66% failure rate in terms of there being a pregnancy. If you want a kid, that can be rather daunting: What do you mean I won't get pregnant the instant the condom comes off? If you don't want a kid, it's way too high. But the "fifteen of you will get pregnant" (85% effective) and "two of you will get pregnant" (98% effective) can also sound way too high if you're in a group of 100 women who DON'T want to get pregnant. It's one reason a lot of girls decide to wait until after high school: they don't have faith that of course they would be in the 98 and not 2, and they aren't ready to handle even a small risk of pregnancy when only 15 or 16.)
As a science person, the rate in practice is very important to me. Muttering "well this would be a GREAT medical treatment if people used it correctly, it's just that most people aren't able to follow the regimen" is kind of a big problem with a regimen. It's a good idea to talk to your health professional about what contributes to the difference between the theoretical and actual rates of a method and how likely you are to be in the Perfect User category.
For example, I suspect drunken teenagers are iffy at using condoms correctly. If you are going to be having sex sober, with someone you knew you were having sex with (no swept away fantasy), it's a lot more likely you will correctly get the condom on and not too late. (Withdrawal is actually a moderately reliable method with perfect use, the problem is achieving that perfect use. Teenage boys are bad candidates.)
(You should also not be one of those annoying people who declare that only truckstop hookers have STIs, and that because their sex acts all took place in relationships--they even talked about a fond childhood memory first!!!--there's no way they could have an STI.)
I've got friends who have loved their IUDs, who have had no issues with Depo, or the implants have been fine.
Like many other people here, condoms no matter what, and I suggest starting with something you can easily switch if you react badly. Everybody and every body is different so be patient and enjoy!
With the pill, there are fewer failure modes, but depending on the dosage and her body mass, they can be SUPER sensitive to being taken at the same time every day. Most pills are tested in clinical trials for women up to about 180lbs, so for women heavier than that, you may also not get the blood concentrations you need and not all doctors are very good at discussing this (2 friends had this issue: one had an abortion, one had a baby).
Not really. Most of the women here (I haven't done a count in this thread) are insisting on condoms. We're also sharing our experiences, good and bad, with IUDs and hormonal birth control. There really isn't a method that involves both men and women equally, but condoms come closest. Other possibilities involve talking about birth control, going together to a clinic, talking about pros and cons of each method, talking about side effects, sharing the cost. All those take for granted an ongoing relationship with good communication.
I'm the consummate romantic. My initial impulse was to advise TIMELY to wait until she had a good deal of friendship, love and attraction with a guy before thinking about having sex with him. That's the way I did it, and my experience was good.
After a moment's reflection, however, I realized that I'd take a lot of flack for that. There are women who want hook-ups just as there are men who want hook-ups. Debating the pros and cons of that is a subject for another column. TIMELY didn't make it clear what she was after. It's likely that she doesn't know herself. (For that reason, the advice givers have to look for clues in the letter. I zeroed in on the "love yearning" in her sig.) Bottom line is that the advice had to encompass any number of possible scenarios, and condoms were the best fit.
In a perfect world, the man in question would be just as insistent on condoms. They'd both have them in their wallets just as a matter of course. His reasoning would be that he doesn't want to take the chance of getting her pregnant, and he doesn't want to take the chance of getting or giving a STD. Given that that perfect world isn't always the case, and given that he didn't write the letter, telling TIMELY to insist on condoms is the next best thing.
138
139
"easy to imagine a school with 100 women using birth control form X" : not for me. Unless by school you mean college.
Thanks for the info nonetheless.
Oh, and I use condoms, everytime. I've never had any break, but slip I've had 3 times. I took the morning after pill and no pregnancy happened (I was not mid-cycle, anyway), nor did STIs.
Do condoms really break, or is that a coded way to say they can slip ?
It only takes a couple of weeks between starting the pill and full protection -- use that time to get to know your potential partner and have lots of fun, non-pregnancy causing sex before the pill kicks in. Then you can experiment with IUDs/shots/etc. and see what works best for you.
And yes, they break. They are very thin pieces of silicone or lambskin or what not and occasionally they rip. It happens. I knew someone who had it happen on, literally, the night before her husband was going to have a vasectomy. (She got the morning after pill.) I know someone who had it happen the third time she had sex in a new relationship, so they got to go to the clinic together for morning after pill and deal with that worry when they were just starting out together. Condoms are not made of some incredible nano-armor.
Via a fast google: chartsbin.com/view/xxj
Average age of first intercourse in the US is 18. In France 18.5. I am very, very doubtful that the French high school kids all wait until graduation, then hit the sheets like mad so they can squeeze everyone in over those summer months and hit the 18.5 average: kinda looks like many of them have sex in high school. (Sources vary: another I found put the US at about 17 and France at about 17.2.)
Those female friends of mine who were on other kinds of birth control (IUD, BC pills) were more likely NOT to use condoms for random hook-ups and in short- and long-term relationships than those who weren't on any kind of birth control.
Also, the male friends of mine who started their sex life with female partners who were on the pill from the get-go were more likely not to use condoms.
So, getting on long-lasting birth control before being sexually active is good against pregnancies but problematic in respect to STI prevention- at least in my non-randomised, small, not representative sample.
The only use of the word "average" in my post was to describe sex education, not age of sexual debut. If you reread my post you will note that I wrote "age of sexual debut" rather than "average age of sexual debut." In demography "age of sexual debut" almost always means the median age. In the future I will specify.
I am actually starting to wonder whether French sex ed is really superior to American sex ed given that Sissoucat was not aware of the difference betweeen typical use and perfect use failure rates for contraceptives, and was apparently not aware that condoms can break. Condoms are a great tool for preventing pregnancy and many (but not all) STIs, but we should not oversell their effectiveness. Typical use is just that....what happens typically. Perfect use is pretty rare.
@144: It's really hard to come up with an age distribution in which the mean and median would be so far off for this, though. You could have a big chunk of 12 year olds and everyone else waited until college, so "most" waited til 18 or 19 but the average was 17, but that seems unlikely. Roughly half of people 17.2/17.6 and under is probably a good estimate of the distribution.
My take is that every woman is different and needs to decide for herself what her priority is. For women who would have no problem getting an abortion (or having a kid) STI prevention might be a higher priority than pregnancy prevention and they might be comfortable using condoms alone. For some women however abortion (or carrying to term) might seem completely out of the question--these women may feel more comfortable using a highly effective method of contraception as a backup to condoms.
Even though no method is perfect, and we still lack highly effective reversable male birth control, we are pretty lucky to have as many options to prevent pregnancy as we do.
My take was that Dan tried to ease the homophobe into first accepting that his friend was into cross dressers. When that has settled the homophobe might be ready for accepting his friend being gay.
152
What I've gathered from reading American sources though, is that American sex ed has recently been mainly "abstinence ed", which I wouldn't call proper sex ed, and that it failed to meet its goal of making the teenage pregnancy rate drop significally.
I'm not a statistics nerd, but my impression is that the teenage pregnancy rate in France is much lower than in the US (I'm a high school teacher and I've never seen a student get pregnant, ever, although I heard of some cases back in my youth, of overweight girls suddenly giving birth at school). From that, I just assumed that the age of first intercourse was much lower in the States - after all, you do need to have had sex in order to become pregnant. I stand corrected about that asumption.
As for highschool kids having sex - I maintain that the majority of them doesn't... but French highschool is not American highschool, only 1/3 of all kids go to highschool (= general highschool, the kind that leads to college). The other 2/3 of kids are in technical highschool and professional highschool. They must be more sexually precocious, if numbers are to be trusted... Only I don't have access to those kids, by my teaching in general highschool. My mistake, then.
153
Come on, I am not that dumb.
Why did I mentioned that I heard of condom breaking (but never experienced it) then ? Don't be patronizing, it poorly reflects on you, not on me.
As for typical failure rate - when I was young I didn't bother much for typical stuff since I was not typical myself. So 2% is the number that got stucked in my little head in the 80s.
I've checked on an official French site for you - it's actually 5% for proper use and 21% for typical use. Actually French people have less mastery of condoms that American people.
Happy now ?
As for your version of "high school" only meaning 1/3 of the students... that's kind of a big difference when comparing groups. Kids in the US who see a solid future away from home if they don't screw up their life (i.e. college bound) are also more likely to delay sex until after high school. So group to group it's about the future you see and probably pretty comparable, since the age of losing virginity is comparable. Nothing about the sex ed.
But I strongly suspect that your observation that none of the high school students you know are having that sex stuff is both inaccurate and one that could be echoed by adults all across America. As for no one getting pregnant that you know of? That's very different than no one getting pregnant. There hasn't been a visible pregnancy at my daughter's high school that I know of, it's one that is very heavily college bound, my impression of her group of friends is that they all see the benefit of waiting until college... and yet I am quite confident that that does not mean that no one in the school is having sex.
155
Personal rant: I don't know what it is about people (not just 18 year old virgins) who can't sit down and logically think through/discuss the consequences, ground rules and boundaries surrounding an upcoming hookup. Yeah, sure. Spontaneous is fun, but it can be traumatic if things go awry. Good for TIMELY for thinking ahead.
I also use condoms to prevent against STDs. Having the IUD inside me gives me more confidence than using just condoms alone. I've had one break on me (well, not "on" me; heh). The IUD gives me more peace of mind than just using condoms alone.
As for the pill: I had heard that birth control hormones in the water were doing weird things to wildlife. (It's one reason I went with a copper Paragard, which is not enhanced with hormones.) But now I see that the issue of birth control hormones in the water has been vastly overstated. Good to know!
http://www.arhp.org/publications-and-res…
Also, for the first couple of months, having sex with a woman with an IUD means getting poked in the end of your cock by what feels like fishing line. Ouch. Even when the strings eventually softened up, I could still notice them. I imagine TIMELY going to a party, flirting with a guy, going back to her place, starting to have sex, and he freaks out because it feels like he's sticking his dick in a twiggy bird's nest. How's that for a first sexual encounter? Anyway, I hope TIMELY chooses another option. My girlfriend and I have been using good ol' condoms, and they've been working great.
BTW, the sex with an IUD-wearing woman was with my girlfriend, not my sister. I did grow up in Kentucky, but I do draw the line somewhere. ;-)
I've tried every method there is, and used condoms with each type until I was in a long term relationship. Everyone has to find what works for them, though.
1. Make sure you take something for the pain before insertion because it won't "just slide right in". It fucking hurt worse than any pain I've ever had down there, resulting in me passing out in the clinic.
2. Make sure you have a few days of rest after insertion. Doing anything that involves extended periods of movement will be uncomfortable.
3. Be prepared for heavier periods with lots of cramping. Increase intake of calcium to help uterine muscle contraction and drink raspberry leaf tea for the two weeks before your period.
4. Tell your partner before you have sex that you might experience soreness or sharp pains during intercourse. Open the channels of communication so they understand when it's time to ease off.
I'm not trying to knock IUDs. I think they are a great method of hormone free birth control, however, they aren't perfect and it's better to know what could happen before it happens.
High-five to you for being proactive about your own health and sex life, seriously. That's awesome, responsible foresight. Encourage your friends to do the same!
All of my lady friends have had different experiences with different kinds of contraceptives, and it's sadly true that there's no way to know what will work for you until you've tried it. Personally, I did great on the Pill (tri-cyclin, and later, the seasonique brand that gives you 4 periods a year) ...I LOVED the Pill, but my doc said I couldn't take it anymore because my migraines put me at higher risk for stroke when taking oral contraceptives. I am now a few months into my first IUD, the Mirena, and I have to say... getting it inserted was pretty horrible. (I haven't ever had children, and I had to have a cervical polyp removed in order to do it, and it was the 2 most painful doctor's visits of my life.) I also had some cramping for the first month which was no joke. HOWEVER, after getting through that, things are actually pretty great - light/practically non-existent periods (looking forward to them getting more predictable as I adjust!), hardly any PMS at all, and no more stress about pregnancies. For at least 5 years. Without me having to do anything else. My doc even told me that for pregnancy prevention, the Mirena is statistically as effective (or more) than getting my tubes tied. And sex is still awesome. WIN. SO WORTH IT.
If you can get the pill, and you don't have any risk factors that make it a bad idea (classic migraines, smoking, etc, TALK HONESTLY TO A GOOD DOCTOR ABOUT THIS) it's really worth a try, and well worth trying out before you are sleeping with anyone. The basic low-dose stuff (like the Tri-Cyclen Lo) is pretty affordable and has the benefit of you being able to quit it at any time if it doesn't work for your body. Given that you've got the clarity and foresight to be thinking about this now, you're probably responsible enough to set a daily alert on your cell phone (or whatever) to remind you to take it on time every day. Try it out for a few months, see if you like it, switch your prescription if you want to, give it a shot. This also goes for the NuvaRing, which I've heard some people really like.
If the Pill doesn't work for you (and I have a few friends who it sucked for, it's not for everyone), an IUD is a totally legit option and is great for really long-term reliability. If you're going to get one and you haven't ever given birth, GET RECOMMENDATIONS/REFERRALS FOR A REALLY GOOD GYNO WHO HAS DONE A TON OF IUD INSERTIONS. Seriously. You want a seasoned pro for this. Take a max dose of ibuprofen ahead of time and plan to take that day and the next day off to chill on the couch with a heating pad and some bad tv. And give it a chance to get better. For most people it does get better, and winds up being worth it. :)
In any/all cases, USE CONDOMS if you and your partner haven't been tested!!! You can still use condoms with ANY of these other forms of birth control - pill, IUD, implant... Have them for a backup against pregnancy AND as much protection as you can reasonably get against STIs. It will give you confidence and peace of mind. Buy them for yourself and tell your partners to buy them too. Make condoms mandatory, because they shouldn't be a big deal - they should be the standard. Train those college boys well!
And have fun!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbO999Jr-…
That saying my girlfriend/boyfriend is hotter (and even taller and more muscular), and thank goodness likes the ladies.
It didn't turn out as badly as I was predicting. She did go home with a man she barely knew after only a few weeks there, and it did turn into a relationship of sorts. When that man ditched her and she was heartbroken, she embarked on a string of relationships in which she expected each man to meet her, fall for her, sweep her off her feet, make mad passionate love to her, save her from the wrong guy she'd had sex with previously, and carry her off into the sunset on a big horse or whatever.
No communication about birth control required. To my surprise, none of that turned out as badly as I would have predicted either. She didn't get what she wanted, but she didn't die from the experiences. She kept running with the unrealistic expectations until she learned and got different expectations.
My idea was to make sure the guy was willing to talk to me about birth control first. I wanted him to be willing to help put my diaphragm in. I insisted on communication and friendship first. I never ran into a man who put up much resistance to my very reasonable demands. Here's the surprising life lesson. I thought then and still think now that my "method" was the superior one, but there are no guarantees. My early sexual experiences were no more perfect than hers were.
That's what I'm trying to keep in mind when advising TIMELY to have her own condoms and to wait with the long term birth control until she knows the man in question a little better. I'm trying to walk between the extremes.
Incorrect usage does not mean people putting condoms on their ears, it includes "in typical use". In the real world people are drunk / high, it's too dark, a condom might be old and someone forgot to check carefully. Oral contraceptives: lots of people are usually careful but life gets REALLY busy and they forget a day.
Nuva ring, diaphraghm, FC: same problem. Human error.
The reason IUDs and implants in actual usage are so close to their ideal rate (very low rates of pregnancy) is that they just work for 99.9% for an extended period of time. A professional sets it and forget it for years. They're not perfect but anything else is gonna have a much higher failure rate in practice no matter how careful a person is, people make errors. Of course, the failure rate of condoms is sufficiently low that, used carefully, they are quite good against the most serious STIs, so it's definitely worth using TWO methods for female bodied people of reproductive years.
The first insertion was moderately painful (I'd say a 6 out of 10) and the second was way less, probably only about a 3 or a 4. No painkillers for either of these insertions and it was really no big deal. Yeah, it hurts a bit and things get a bit crampy. But you know what else hurts and feels crampy? Pushing a squalling infant out of your vagina. I visualized being a total badass for the next five years during each of the insertions and it was NBD.
I recommend the Mirena to everyone ever. Of course there's side effects and downsides-- everything in life has risks and benefits. For me the potential risks of the Mirena are FAR outweighed by the benefits and I couldn't be happier about it.
Thanks for talking up IUDs Dan!
False, women who haven't had kids can easily get IUDs (sometimes with a little perseverance).
There are two models of IUDs available in the US, the Paragard (nonhormonal) and the Mirena (hormonal). The Paragard is FDA approved for use in women who have never been pregnant while the Mirena is prescribed off-label for this purpose all the time. I should know, I've never been pregnant and I've had two Mirenas.
It's also a myth that male partners will always feel the strings on an IUD. None of my male partners have ever felt my strings, and we're talking about 5 years worth of sexual partners. The trick is to have the doctor keep the strings longer so that they can be tucked up and away. Sometimes women are misinformed and ask that the strings be cut very short, which means they're short and pokey and there's not a lot that can be done about that.
Not all women experience excruciating insertions or horrible side effects. In fact, 91% of women who get an IUD report being very satisfied with this chosen method of BC a year after starting to use it, which is a higher number than women who use oral BC, barrier methods, the ring, the patch, or the shot. I'm sorry your girlfriend had a bad experience but please don't turn other women away from one of the most effective and user-friendly forms of birth control available just because you didn't like it.
Ladies: Do some reading (check out the LiveJournal community "iud_divas" for great info), educate yourself, and find a knowledgeable practitioner to do your insertion. There's a 90% chance you'll love your IUD.
175
Ok, we get it - your STD prevention strategy begins and ends with condoms. Good for you, and best luck with it! If you have a lot of different sexual partners, you'll certainly need luck, even if you use condoms.
Personally, I've used a more sophisticated strategy that has, statistically speaking, probably exposed me to less risk over the course of my life than you've exposed yourself to. Part of the strategy involves a strong preference for sex with women whom I know and like, as opposed to random hookups. The other part involves factoring in the specific sexual history of my partners, which is important information for determining the risk of any given encounter.
As an example, my risk of getting an STD from all the wonderful sex in my first two long term relationships was, statistically speaking, probably less than the risk you took with your last short term hookup. How so? Well, in the first relationship, we were both virgins. In the second, our prior sexual histories included one virgin each. In both cases, we agreed that condoms were an unnecessary nuisance, and we enjoyed hot, spontaneous, fully natural, condom-free sex, with the pill as our protection against pregnancy. If risk is foolishness (which I don't believe, btw), any one of your random hookups was far more foolish than these entire sex lives combined.
My 3rd long term relationship was with a woman with a longer sexual history and a standard (i.e., mild, rare outbreaks) case of herpes. After initially bumming out when she told me, I educated myself about the disease because I really liked her, we ended up getting together, we simply avoided sex during the outbreaks (exactly one during our time together), and I never caught it from her (confirmed with a test). There is plenty of research demonstrating the effectiveness of this strategy, BTW.
If/when I start a new relationship, and that relationship is working, there will come a point, likely within a month or two despite your doctor's recommendation, where we really open ourselves up to each other, emotionally and sexually. At that point, neither of us will be inclined to pretend that we might have diseases we don't in fact have.
178
My doctor checked the placement of the IUD using ultrasound (it was fine), she also tested me for diseases and other problems (there was nothing). I am 32 years old, no kids, daily exercise, normal weight, healthy lifestyle. All of the above problems were a direct result of the IUD. Within a week of removal, all of these problems disappeared, and I was back to normal. I just wish I had had it removed sooner!
tl;dr - Age 32, no kids, healthy, my IUD made my periods 10 days long, very painful, caused many other problems. Waited two years and it never got better. After removal, all problems disappeared. IUD users, if you still have problems after 6 months, get it taken out!
180
Okay that is some willfull ignorance. None of what I said was specific to me, in fact what I said was based on observations of how other people work and operate. So how about you go ahead and retire from assuming about other people's sex lives. In the meantime I'll humour you:
1. The majority of all sex I've had in my life has been within the context of a small number of long term relationships.
2. My STD prevention does not "begin and end with condoms", it begins with condoms. I'm on Seasonale, actually, and love it quite a bit.
3. I've never had an STI of any kind, either, so guess what, I get to be 100% as smug as you!
I see people every day who decide after such a short period to "open up" to partners who assure them they don't have diseases. Heck, I've even seen patients who were virgins, and caught STIs from their first, long-term, monogamous partner (who then insist that they don't have the disease in question despite the obvious evidence). If you want to do that, fine.
But I would never advise that method to someone young and impressionable. It fails constantly.
TIMELY: You're going to have to use condoms anyway, but it is nice to have a back-up contraceptive that you control. Birth control pills have their failings, but they can also lighten your periods and make them less painful, clear up your skin if you'd got mild to moderate acne, and give you a predictable cycle. And if you'd like to not menstruate but don't want the drawbacks of Depo, ask your doctor to give you a BC pill that you can take continuously (most women will experience breakthrough bleeding after three or four months at which time you can take your week break and have a period, then start right back up again).
The first is with definitions. My experience has been rather like yours. As I've mentioned upthread, my sexual relationships have (mostly) been with men I've known for a long time, men I've shared friendship and trust with, men I've carefully vetted.
Let me use the first for an example. We'd known each other since junior high, hung out with the same group of friends, shared innermost secrets, and done quite a bit of necking and petting before deciding, together, to go with PIV sex. We knew that pregnancy was a possibility so precautions would have to be taken. We didn't consider STDs given that it was a first time for both of us. Turns out my experience was a good one. I've said I'd recommend that to an 18 year old based on my own good outcome.
But let's say for the sake of argument that my experience wasn't good. Let's say that despite my vetting, the guy in question turned out to be a rat. Let's say I thought he was a virgin but he was really have sex with, and getting STDs from, a dozen skanky whores. That would mean that the vet-the-virgin system had a dismally low actual success rate compared to the theoretical success rate which is quite high. Detractors would point out that that example didn't count because I didn't do a good enough job at vetting. It becomes a self-fulfilling illogical mess. We know that he wasn't vetted well enough because the outcome was that I got an STD, but if I didn't get an STD, my vetting would have been sufficient.
The 2nd reason it doesn't work is that the heart wants what the heart wants. By analogy, let's say it's 1985, and a gay young man comes out to his parents. Shocked, but not totally evil, they blurt out that there's an AIDS epidemic and they're worried about him. They tell their son that he'd be a lot safer if he were attracted to women. That's actually true. His chances of getting AIDS would be lower if he weren't gay. But that's also beside the point.
Your strong preference for sex with women you know and like as opposed to random hook-ups is not a strategy; it's a preference. Preferences are not strategies (no matter how preferable onlookers might think the preference).
184
185
"your observation that none of the high school students you know are having that sex stuff"
Now, where did I state that stupidity ? Oh, right, I didn't...
It might not be romantic, but a joint trip to the doctor for across-the-board testing is never a bad idea before getting rid of condoms in your relationship.
(As for the other letter-writer, the homophobic piece of shit cockblocking his friend...well, dude, knock it off.)
So---are we okay, then? You're not going to come after me with an AK-47
just because I like Brad Pitt at his current age?
I think he's got a nice smile, and seandr--you nailed it---ooooooohhhh, those baby blues!!
Okay. Late back in this week's game. Of the relationships I've had, a couple of things:
Unwanted side effects from birth control pills sucked!
I agree: condoms should be readily available in hospitals, in junior and senior high schools, everywhere---along with helpful information about their uses.
George Carlin is so right on when he stated that those arguing so violently against abortion aren't people we'd want to fuck anyway.
Which was one of many reasons why I got divorced.
188
I have nothing against dropping the condom after a while in monogamous LTRs, if there's another contraceptive method in use - but a prerequisite would be to get both partners tested for all known STIs, regardless of claimed sexual histories, and to show each other the results.
I wouldn't give a pass out of testing to someone who'd say he's a virgin.
Would you agree on that ?
an IUD. I'm glad things are better for you now.
I can certainly empathize with having horribly excruciating, prolonged periods! My problems were strictly poor diet-related, however (way too much junk food and sugar!).
Now that my health has changed for the better, so far I thankfully don't have any more bad periods, either.
190
I am honestly SO confused.
One second I was showing you a video of attractive men, you were making a joke about liking men your own age, commenting about Mrs. Robinson.
I made a joke that was intended to express solidarity while making a cheeky cultural reference like... "yeah, I also prefer to be with people my own age, we're alike in that way!"
And then suddenly I'm trolling you... or slapping you in the face... or shooting you?
For real, I have zero idea where you read hostility. Because I find current Brad Pitt 100% unappealing? I honestly can't figure it out.
Anyway, sorry for whatever I said that bothered you. :/
191
I've done both.
It is possible, you know. After all, when your searching for a heart of gold, you should consider what kind of girl is most famed for having one. :p
By the way, even in a relationship that's been going on for years, where both partners have been tested and condoms aren't mandatory, they still have their place. Sometimes having semen coming out of you for the rest of the day isn't something you want to deal with. It can be distracting in the middle of a presentation on novel cancer treatments that capitalize on drug-induced mutations.... for example.
I'm not sure where Dan is pulling the conclusion Clod's "friend" is attracted to transwomen, not cross-dressers. There's no textual evidence, but cross-dressers are much commoner than trannies.
And I don't get why Cocky is denying the "friend" is into cross-dressers. "Yet another manly looking transvestite type" is pretty clear.
194
Time dilation as per special relativity?
That thing where the guy wakes up at the end of the movie and finds out the whole plot was a dream?
Ooh, ooh, ummm, fanciful definitions of "long" or "term" or "relationship" on the part of dirty old men on the internet?
Tell us the secret, oh archaic one!
Just kidding, don't talk. Ever.
196
"At the opposite end of the spectrum are well-documented cases of persons who have been HIV-infected for greater than 20 years without any clinical symptoms or evidence of clinical progression."
http://books.google.ca/books?id=xmFBtyPG…
1) making it easy to figure out which way the condom rolls? I can't count the number of times I or a partner has had to throw away a condom we started putting on the wrong way. I suspect I am in the minority and most guys just turn it around and use it anyway, defeating the purpose if it is avoiding STDs.
2) sealing condoms in a way that you can open the packaging with lube on your fingers?
Please!
198
The smart answer is to test which way it rolls before placing it on. I have seen a guy try to flip it around after putting it on the wrong way and I was mortified.
"Are you even serious?" Was my response.
As for the opening part, I don't use lube but I think a smart thing would be one of those pull tabs like that have on gum wrappers, you know? I don't know if that's possible while maintaining a seal but it'd be pretty rad.
201
Nothing unreasonable about that.
Personally, it's hard for me to imagine being one month into a serious relationship with a woman and not feeling like I could trust her, so I'd be inclined to give out free passes depending on circumstances. I'd probably feel differently if I was dating men, given that at least half of us are total shits.
I may very likely have misinterpreted (I seem to be doing that a lot, lately)
one of your later posts from last week's Savage Love "Wedding Day" column.
No harm, no foul, no blood, and above all, no assault rifles, I swear.
I did enjoy Martina's song, and, however young for me, her guys were cute.
Thanks again for sharing, and god bless. -:)
griz
I'm going to have one hell of a surprise for my gynecologist at the Seattle VA!! HA! I'm packing my own lunch and snacks for the trip down, though. The Canteen needs to be offering healthier food! VA officials can't keep calling us fat when there's a McDonald's on every U.S. Navy base and Exchange complex, and the VAMC cafeteria only offers deep fried junk or foods high in carbohydrates, gluten and sugar!
Bless you, Dan, everybody posting, and all fellow veterans!!
She wrote in saying she intended to go to college. Not that she absolutely positively never wanted to have children, which is a totally different thing. I don't think the problem is that she got the two confused.
213
Anyway, I'm sure your turtle is very nice.
216
Wait... do you actually think that Dan invented the application of "cis" and "trans" to sexuality? He didn't.
Besides, cis vs. trans molecules are classically diastereomers, not enantiomers, I mean, sure, a cis or trans molecule COULD be chiral as well (assuming there's at least one sp3 hybridized carbon as well as the two sp2 hybridized carbons that made up the cis or trans double bond), but cis or trans isn't referring to that property, dex/levo/R/S is.
Happy?
218
I minored in chemistry (and physiology) and majored in neuroscience. I'm taking some time out of school to work before going back again. :)
If you're serious about pregnancy prevention, using two methods is highly promoted.
If TIMELY is reading this, please just go talk to your doc.
That was one academic science I avoided--because I was afraid of possibly blowing up the classroom.
As a humbling result, I continue to suck at other forms of...chemistry.
223
As I mentioned earlier, there's a great deal of evidence suggesting that college aged people are less likely to consider condoms important if they're on the pill. Yeah, in a perfect world people would use both, but in the real world, people (at least in that demographic) typically don't. So that's why it makes sense to treat it as an either or situation, though it certainly doesn't have to me.
@griz
Thanks :)
The second one I took gave me three months of slightly less bad side effects, then settled down. But...
Years later, I stopped taking it, suspicious that it was dampening some of my emotional responses, including libido. I immediately felt much better, and, well, much better. My moods are mine, and I'm glad to have them back. There was no change to my cycle.
I would go with condoms. Only a barrier method is going to prevent against STDs, and there are plenty of people out there passing those around.
And if I didn't already know that emergency contraception was easily available (and that I already had the next day off work to get it sorted) I wouldn't have had the sex. But the LW is in the US where I keep hearing that BC is sometimes harder to get hold of?
If we are playing the "should have" game then perhaps what I "should have" done was gone on BC two years ago when I started doing sexual but non-pregnancy-causing stuff.
Regarding getting it inserted (installed, ha-ha): It was a little uncomfortable, but not bad at all. Several people are writing about painful insertion, but my insertion was really nothing notable. And my cramps haven't gotten worse since i had the IUD. I think it's the best form of birth control ever.




RSS
Comments (233) RSS